GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hot or Not Should we ban the USA from doing research? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1174731)

dyna mo 09-30-2015 09:05 AM

dumbfuck op, heads-up:::::::;

Of almost 3,000 articles published in biomedical research in 2009, 1,169, or 40%, came from the United States. As the line graph below demonstrates (that’s the number of publications on the Y axis, and the year of publication on the X axis), the output of every other single country in the world is dwarfed by what America produces. The closest contender is Great Britain, which comes in at about 300 articles. (Per the comments below, I’m waiting for more explanation of these numbers.)

http://blogs-images.forbes.com/matth...omedicine1.jpg

It’s certainly possible that the U.S. is publishing entirely low quality data, but another data point, the citation score, seems to indicate that isn’t true. The citation score is the number of times an average paper was referenced by other scientific papers. In the graph below, the Y axis is the citation score and the X axis is the number of publications in total.

http://blogs-images.forbes.com/matth...on-impact2.jpg

The Most Innovative Countries In Biology And Medicine

pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20592697)
why don't you get your mom some health insurance? it's also not accurate to make sweeping generalizations that "it's not cost-effective to do anything in the USA" based on your mom not having insurance.

one should not have to insure against robbery LOL
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-SLtpkm2QVC...-obamacare.jpg
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/wp-co...07/robbery.jpg

pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20592705)
dumbfuck op, heads-up:::::::;

Of almost 3,000 articles published in biomedical research in 2009, 1,169, or 40%, came from the United States. As the line graph below demonstrates (that?s the number of publications on the Y axis, and the year of publication on the X axis), the output of every other single country in the world is dwarfed by what America produces. The closest contender is Great Britain, which comes in at about 300 articles. (Per the comments below, I?m waiting for more explanation of these numbers.)


It?s certainly possible that the U.S. is publishing entirely low quality data, but another data point, the citation score, seems to indicate that isn?t true. The citation score is the number of times an average paper was referenced by other scientific papers. In the graph below, the Y axis is the citation score and the X axis is the number of publications in total.

The Most Innovative Countries In Biology And Medicine[/url]

ok so you make a lot of publications, good for you, its decent of you to admit that lots of publications do not mean high quality data, this is a huge step for you :thumbsup

Now you should have no trouble at all listing what diseases the USA has cured in the last 50 years?

Paul Markham 09-30-2015 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20592699)
This is not true. Cuba has a working vaccine against cancer, it is not almighty but it works in most cases. Keep in mind that cuba is a 3rd world shit hole under mafia sanctions from the USA for almost half a century. They have cured vitiligo as well, this is not bad for a 3rd world shit hole.

As for "do not buy if you do not like" well...if you are dying you pretty much have no choice but to buy...its medicine...not some worthless I crap...

<sarcasm>Also look at the long list of stuff the USA has invented in medicine in the last 50 years </sarcasm>

I will wait and see what Cube discovers. As for not having a choice, yes you do. Which is better than not discovering a cure and having no choice.

Unlike you, I have faced this choice. Still being in a country that doesn't rip off it's citizens for healthcare, my costs were far lower.

Paul Markham 09-30-2015 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20592711)
one should not have to insure against robbery LOL
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-SLtpkm2QVC...-obamacare.jpg

It depends who runs the insurance schemes. Private enterprise or the Government. Americans don't have the choice. They are lumbered with it being the the guy in the picture below.

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/wp-co...07/robbery.jpg

If a President put it to the people, they would vote overwhelmingly to Nationalise Healthcare. Unless too stupid to realise they would be far better off. As they will never be given the choice, never vote for politicians who will give them the choice, it's hypothetical.

A country gets the government it deserves.

pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 20592736)
If a President put it to the people, they would vote overwhelmingly to Nationalise Healthcare. Unless too stupid to realise they would be far better off. As they will never be given the choice, never vote for politicians who will give them the choice, it's hypothetical.

A country gets the government it deserves.

its fascinating to see so many americans trying to defend the 1000$/pill model, you have to give it to the US gov. they are masters in brain wash....I bet the 1000$ pill gets produced in china LOL

north america and north korea are just living in a fantasy world of their own and will defend their masters to the very end :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dyna mo 09-30-2015 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20592716)
ok so you make a lot of publications, good for you, its decent of you to admit that lots of publications do not mean high quality data, this is a huge step for you :thumbsup

Now you should have no trouble at all listing what diseases the USA has cured in the last 50 years?

dumbfuck, where the fuck do you think research gets communicated? in fucking medical research journals, dumbfuck.

and yes, according to the study, it is high quality data and that's why i also included that fucking statistic in my post. but you're too much of a dumbfuckwad to figure that out.

pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20592748)
dumbfuck, where the fuck do you think research gets communicated? in fucking medical research journals, dumbfuck.

and yes, according to the study, it is high quality data and that's why i also included that fucking statistic in my post. but you're too much of a dumbfuckwad to figure that out.

ok so you will not have a problem listing some cures for diseases that the USA has found in the last 50 years...I mean all them papers and billions of $$$ you must have something to show for it other than "we get cited in papers"

other than the 1000$/pill hep cure what do you have to show for all them billions? its a fair question :2 cents:

TheMoneyMan 09-30-2015 11:00 AM

While the costs are crazy and many are driven for profit, a lot of good still comes from US research.

dyna mo 09-30-2015 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20592763)
ok so you will not have a problem listing some cures for diseases that the USA has found in the last 50 years...I mean all them papers and billions of $$$ you must have something to show for it other than "we get cited in papers"

other than the 1000$/pill hep cure what do you have to show for all them billions? its a fair question :2 cents:

dumbfuckwad, i'm speaking to the topic- "banning USA from research". i'm not defending USA. the facts i posted clearly show the USA leads the world in high quality medical research, by far. Cuba isn't even on the list.

gofuckyouself. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

candyflip 09-30-2015 11:10 AM

Your shithole country hasn't and won't contribute anything anyhow, so why do you care?

pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMoneyMan (Post 20592800)
While the costs are crazy and many are driven for profit, a lot of good still comes from US research.

I do not dispute this. You guys are a big country with lots of printed money to invest. I am just arguing that the huge bulk of the funds do not go to research but line the pockets of various corporations. Many people still remember the $436 hammer, the $600 toilet seat and $7,622 coffee brewer the US army billed the US people. I would say its a safe bet to say that the billions the USA invests in research end up the same way.

If we were talking about anything else than medicine I would not care, if you guys want to make a 10.0000$ iphone this is your right. But a 1000$ pill to cure a disease is literally robbery. "pay or die" is robbery in any book.

The world should violently oppose any US healthcare bullshit spilling outside the USA. We must not allow this cancer to spread to other countries nor this mindset where people defend a 1000$ pill to become the norm.

One should not have to take out robbery insurance or health care insurance. There is something very wrong with the world where you have to insure yourself against the greed of big corporations. :2 cents:

pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 20592808)
Your shithole country hasn't and won't contribute anything anyhow, so why do you care?

ok name a major cure the US has contributed in the last 50 years :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

so neither will your country contribute shit what do YOU care? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20592803)
dumbfuckwad, i'm speaking to the topic- "banning USA from research". i'm not defending USA. the facts i posted clearly show the USA leads the world in high quality medical research, by far. Cuba isn't even on the list.

gofuckyouself. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

again:

ok so you will not have a problem listing some cures for diseases that the USA has found in the last 50 years...I mean all them papers and billions of $$$ you must have something to show for it other than "we get cited in papers"

other than the 1000$/pill hep cure what do you have to show for all them billions? its a fair question


concentrate...try to answer the actual question, I did not ask you about papers LOL

dyna mo 09-30-2015 11:18 AM

hey dumbfuckwad op- name 3 major cures for diseases made in the last 50 years by any country.

candyflip 09-30-2015 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20592812)
ok name a major cure the US has contributed in the last 50 years :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

so neither will your country contribute shit what do YOU care? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I live in an area in which medical research is a HUGE employer. If you don't think that the US has made major advancements in medical research in the past 50 years, you're likely retarded or just don't want to see or here the truth.

Oh and...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dyna mo 09-30-2015 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20592815)
again:

ok so you will not have a problem listing some cures for diseases that the USA has found in the last 50 years...I mean all them papers and billions of $$$ you must have something to show for it other than "we get cited in papers"

other than the 1000$/pill hep cure what do you have to show for all them billions? its a fair question


concentrate...try to answer the actual question, I did not ask you about papers LOL

you're so fucking shell-shocked you can't even remember your own thread topic. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Sly 09-30-2015 11:21 AM

Let's kick it up a notch and ban the US from providing any technologies (this includes medical and scientific,) aid (financial, supplies, and labor,) or military support (direct involvement, supplies, training, and funding) to any other country in the world.

Now we're on to something!

dyna mo 09-30-2015 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20592822)
Let's kick it up a notch and ban the US from providing any technologies (this includes medical and scientific,) aid (financial, supplies, and labor,) or military support (direct involvement, supplies, training, and funding) to any other country in the world.

Now we're on to something!

serb logic dictates all medical breakthroughs happen in a vacuum in Cuba.

dyna mo 09-30-2015 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20592815)
again:

ok so you will not have a problem listing some cures for diseases that the USA has found in the last 50 years...


hey dumbfuckwad op, i'm still waiting for that list of 3 cures for diseases made in the last 50 years.........


pimpmaster9000 09-30-2015 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 20592818)
I live in an area in which medical research is a HUGE employer. If you don't think that the US has made major advancements in medical research in the past 50 years, you're likely retarded or just don't want to see or here the truth.

Oh and...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

then you will not have a problem in naming some will you? :thumbsup

Mr Pheer 09-30-2015 02:49 PM

You guys are arguing with a Serb.

I'm sure you have more productive things to do, like watch some paint dry or something.

j3rkules 09-30-2015 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer (Post 20593022)
You guys are arguing with a Serb.

I'm sure you have more productive things to do, like watch some paint dry or something.

http://www.watching-paint-dry.com/wa...-paint-dry.gif

Horatio Caine 09-30-2015 04:09 PM


pimpmaster9000 10-01-2015 04:13 AM

What is interesting about this poll is that 9 chubbies actually voted for corporate dick up their asshole. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

They would rather pay 1000$/pill and go in to debt slavery than see the CEO of some US medical mafia corp not buy his 34-th yacht :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Oh the chubbies are good little north koreans/americans :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh well trained to bend over and not ask questions, defending their corporate pimps until their assholes start to bleed and then some more.

Can any chubby that voted "yes I want it up the ass" explain his fetish to me? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Chubbies are so well trained that they would probably form a human carpet for their corporate masters to walk all over them :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh a chubby chubby carpet but still :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Seriously now, do you find this guy attractive and would you pay to suck his corporate dick?

Does it turn you on to imagine being fucked by your masters is it a sado-maso thing?

http://i2.wp.com/problamb.com/wp-con...ize=1228%2C730


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123