re read my whole post but here is part of it if you can't read more than 2 lines of text

Interestingly....Redlands is a town that has been identified as a site for Syrian Refugee Settlement

Big drama back in October

Op-Ed: The risks and costs of bringing ?Syrian? ?refugees? to America and Redlands

yeah! they only do 0.1% of world terrorism, the other 99.9% is completely legit because the USA inspected itself and found nothing wrong :thumbsup

christianity can not be linked to terrorism in any way, regardless of the massive disproportion in violence between the two religions...if you repeat it 100x you will come to believe it :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

teflon christianity: no responsibility shalt stick to us, immune to guilt, oblivious to liability, we shall pretend we dindu nuffin' :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

christianity...religion of peace pffffffffffffft*(you can practically taste the smell)

oh what could you possibly do to stop that?

http://cdn.meme.am/instances2/500x/3184580.jpg

Aaaaaand my theory now has a little more evidence behind it:

San Bernardino Gunwoman Pledged Allegiance to ISIS, Officials Say

"As investigators search for signs of a political or religious motivation for the massacre, the discovery of Ms. Malik?s Facebook posting has forced them to consider whether any radical impetus for it came from her more than from the husband"

Workplace violence. What a cop out.

It's obvious this whole thing was caused by climate change, poverty and lack of opportunity for muslims in America. Ya, he made $70,000 a year but that is below the cutoff line for becoming radicalized. If he made $74,500 he would not have been forced to commit these acts because he would have been able to afford a Prius to stop climate change.



.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

gofuckyourself:::::

well crockett. after 2 days, looks like i called it right. unlike you, i can see limited information & draw the correct conclusion early on. so you should recognize. trump will win.

:)

It looks like they're mostly talking about the male shooter -- but I think the chick is the mastermind.

Yep.

San Bernardino Wife Believed to Be Driving Force to Radicalism

It makes me happy to be right, Röb. Of course, Röb, you may consider the wall street journal a faulty news source. And you may say, Röb, that I had only preliminary evidence and an incorrect picture to inspire that line of thought. Probably, Röb, you'll say either nothing, or some bullshit. Another prediction.

Next time you want to jump in on some theorizing, or even some informed speculation, with a post about how great you are, ask yourself if you convinced anyone.

I can't wait to see how they spin that into a workplace disagreement.

All of you need to keep in mind that as this was unfolding, it looked like a "violence in the workplace" kind of incident. As we learn more, it's becoming apparent this was some kind of terrorist related incident. However it's still strange being as terrorist attacks usually don't take place against someone's work place, but instead against a highly visible target where they can inflict large amounts of casualties - airports, convention centers, embassies, and similar targets.

Here is what I think happen... I think this man was mentally unstable to some degree, and his wife surely had a large amount of influence over him. His wife was most likely radicalized in the Middle East, and to a large extent so was he. I think they were planning some kind of a larger attack, but something at this party set him off - perhaps it was just the fact that he had to take part in a Christmas gathering. The had a target in mind, but quickly changed over to the party and were most likely on their way to the primary or original target when police caught up to them.

Nothing about two people with body armor, rifles, handguns, thousands of shells of ammunition, and over a dozen pipebombs says "work place argument."

Anyone that thinks otherwise needs to remove their head from their ass.

+ the fact there was no argument at the party.

But again, terrorists have never attacked their co-workers.

I think this couple was moving in a bad direction and was planning something, but set off their plan pre-maturely and decided to take out his co-workers first.

Either way these people are mentally ill. No one should want to take out dozens of innocent people who went to work that morning.

I think Obama said it was terrorism. I don't see the response though. I don't agree you can watch every adherent of of the various flavors of Islam. I mean where does that end up? Killing atheists, that's where.

Someone on here said Islam is in its 12th century phase. That seems pretty apt. How to defend against it without giving away all our freedom? I wish to fuck I knew.

Jtfc. Even BO has admitted it was an act of terrorism. Rochrads doubling down on being wrong because terrorists have never killed coworkers.

Jtfc.