GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Trump wants to "close up the Internet" (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1180413)

crockett 12-08-2015 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20661541)
New poll of likely voters: 68% of trump supporters would abandon the gop and vote for trump if he ran as an independent.

So much for that ridiculous notion Trump plays to the GOP base.


Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha.

oh noes you got us.. trump supporters are really liberal.. You honestly can't be this dumb can you? You know that the far right has gone so far o the right that the Republican Party no longer fills their wants...

ITraffic 12-08-2015 03:41 PM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVvMBJFWoAAjdR5.png

dyna mo 12-08-2015 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20661576)
oh noes you got us.. trump supporters are really liberal.. You honestly can't be this dumb can you? You know that the far right has gone so far o the right that the Republican Party no longer fills their wants...


Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha. Yeah,sure you and rochard keep high 5ing each other thinking you've got it figured out: trump and his supporters are far right and stupid. Meanwhile, those of us that can examine this without bias can see it for what it is.

Robbie 12-08-2015 03:59 PM

I'm just shocked that the media has their entire focus on how "dangerous" it is for Trump to call for temporarily stopping Muslims from immigrating or coming to the U.S. until the govt. gets this under control.

The way they are carrying on about something that should be common sense is as if he is more "dangerous" than the terrorists themselves.

I saw CNN's Jake Tapper today interviewing the Democrat House member who is one of two Muslims in Congress.
The Congressman went on and on about how "dangerous" Trump's "rhetoric" is.
Tapper asked him if he had heard any confirmation from intelligence sources about any ISIS people infiltrating Syrian refugees to gain access to the U.S.

The Congressman replied that with any large number of people you are going to have some "bad" ones.

So Tapper asked again if he had gotten any concrete intel on that...
The Congressman replied "No, but I'm not worried about that. I'm more worried about the dangerous rhetoric that Trump is spreading".

WTF?????

He's not worried about ISIS sympathizers killing people. He expects that to happen.
The only thing he's worried about is Trump.

And that is considered by the media to be the "sane" and "normal" viewpoint.
And Trump calling for a temporary ban on Muslims traveling to the U.S. or migrating here during this time that ISIS has declared war on us...the media says THAT is "dangerous" and "extreme".

crockett 12-08-2015 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 20661544)
Ha

Trump is playing to the non politically correct people who are sick and tired of the shithead in office and the two party system

It's quite funny how brainwashed you right weenies are.. It's sad we no longer have John Stweart to point out the Fox News "words of the day".

It's actually hilarious to see how these dumb right wing "buzz words" trickle down to the mass of ignorance..

Some Fox News anchor likely started saying "politically incorrect" as their buzz word for a few weeks and now suddenly every Right weenie on the net is using the term..


Previously it's been buzz words like "shill" or the logest lasting "liberals" or their biggest blunder "Obamacare" where they attempted to make fun of ACA but instead Obama took it an ran with it..

It's honestly funny watching you retards, it's why I start these topics, because I'm always amazed how long you guys will whine and complain or make excuses about stupid shit your talking heads do..

Watching you right weenies make excesses is like being a kid again, kicking over an ant hill and watching them scramble all over..

MetaMan 12-08-2015 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20661602)
I'm just shocked that the media has their entire focus on how "dangerous" it is for Trump to call for temporarily stopping Muslims from immigrating or coming to the U.S. until the govt. gets this under control.

The way they are carrying on about something that should be common sense is as if he is more "dangerous" than the terrorists themselves.

I saw CNN's Jake Tapper today interviewing the Democrat House member who is one of two Muslims in Congress.
The Congressman went on and on about how "dangerous" Trump's "rhetoric" is.
Tapper asked him if he had heard any confirmation from intelligence sources about any ISIS people infiltrating Syrian refugees to gain access to the U.S.

The Congressman replied that with any large number of people you are going to have some "bad" ones.

So Tapper asked again if he had gotten any concrete intel on that...
The Congressman replied "No, but I'm not worried about that. I'm more worried about the dangerous rhetoric that Trump is spreading".

WTF?????

He's not worried about ISIS sympathizers killing people. He expects that to happen.
The only thing he's worried about is Trump.

And that is considered by the media to be the "sane" and "normal" viewpoint.
And Trump calling for a temporary ban on Muslims traveling to the U.S. or migrating here during this time that ISIS has declared war on us...the media says THAT is "dangerous" and "extreme".

Yep sick sick pepple.

Trump explains muslims should be banned entry until the vetting process is better.

The government has 0 fucking clue who is a terrorist and who's not... but hey who cares about details!

TheSquealer 12-08-2015 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBJ (Post 20660852)
They already have that right and I'm cool with that. What I'm not cool with is this guy to pass new laws that allows him to police anything he wants.

I mean read what he says and he says HE wants to close up the internet. Why would he say that when the gov already has rights to seize and take down sites.

seems you have no idea how laws are passed.

crockett 12-08-2015 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 20661582)
Bernie sanders and Hillary are on the far, far left :2 cents:

Yeah, because wanting free health care for every one and free college educations is just as bad as tracking groups of people if not banning them from the country all together because of their Relgion.. I mean it's almost like they are on the same level, but yet world's apart...

MetaMan 12-08-2015 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20661846)
Yeah, because wanting free health care for every one and free college educations.

why not free vacations to hawaii? free homes? free cars? free booze?

if i want to become fat, get diabetes, smoke and take a 10 years to complete an art degree in university instead of working, someone should pay for it! FREE HEALTHCARE AND FREE COLLEGE FOR ALL!!! WOOOOOOOOO

*round of applause from the drabble*

Paul Markham 12-09-2015 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 20661504)
WTF are you talking about? Closing the internet? WTF :1orglaugh he is talking about going after ISIS related sites. They even have fucking facebook and twitter accounts

Ban guns? Unconstitutional you dumb fuck.

Close the goddam borders, quit letting these 3rd world rascals in

I thought Freedom of Speech was part of the Constitution. Good luck closing ISIS related sites and yes I mean that. Getting rid of a lot of the trash that's online would be an improvement. Be careful someone doesn't think the same about porn.

As for guns. Relate this as a terrorist event and it's the worse since 9/11. As a mass shooting worse since 2012. If they hadn't been able to buy guns the casualties would have been lower. Even people on a No Fly List can buy guns. Can people on a terrorist watch list buy guns? As for changing Constitution, no biggy it's been done by making amendments.

Quote:

They were U.S.-born Syed Rizwan Farook and Pakistan national Tashfeen Malik, and had an arsenal of ammunition and pipe bombs in their Redlands home.
So a ban on migrants wouldn't work. A far stricter control of guns would have worked. And worked to save the lives of 100s more, even the high number of police killing has to be related to their fear of people carrying guns.

I can see why Trump appeals to many, he's promising quick fixes to people who think he can deliver them.

Paul Markham 12-09-2015 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 20661544)
Ha

Trump is playing to the non-politically correct people who are sick and tired of the shithead in office and the two party system

Trump is playing to the people who believe he can solve problems way out of his understanding, or maybe he knows that and playing to people who don't understand the problems.

Banning all Muslims won't stop terrorist attacks. There are the US born and those already in the US Muslims.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 20661737)
Trump explains muslims should be banned entry until the vetting process is better.

The government has 0 fucking clue who is a terrorist and who's not... but hey who cares about details!

How would you suggest banning Muslims who are born in Europe, Australia, or anywhere outside the ME? Assuming those bent on terrorism don't tell the migration officials they're Muslims!!!!

So the same people with 0 fucking clue will be getting a whole lot smarter because one man is in the Oval Office. Dream on.

Banning the sale of many kinds of guns, limiting sales to only those who can pass the same vetting process suggested for migrants. Would reduce the numbers of innocent people killed by huge numbers. Even police killing would be reduced after time. Police now assume suspects are armed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 20661860)
FREE health care and FREE education?

You can't be serious...

Seeing as that's how most of the Modern World does it, I would say it's a very serious method. Of course, if you would rather pay twice the price for health care and education. Then that's how brainwashed you've become. It's not free, it's paid via taxes and works our cheaper and fairer. Tagging on free trips to Hawaii? free homes? free cars? free booze. Shows the weakness of your argument.

I can see why Washington is against both of these. It keeps a lot of people in fear and uneducated. Reserving it for the 1% and above.

theking 12-09-2015 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 20662196)
Trump is playing to the people who believe he can solve problems way out of his understanding, or maybe he knows that and playing to people who don't understand the problems.

Banning all Muslims won't stop terrorist attacks. There are the US born and those already in the US Muslims.

How would you suggest banning Muslims who are born in Europe, Australia, or anywhere outside the ME? Assuming those bent on terrorism don't tell the migration officials they're Muslims!!!!

So the same people with 0 fucking clue will be getting a whole lot smarter because one man is in the Oval Office. Dream on.

Banning the sale of many kinds of guns, limiting sales to only those who can pass the same vetting process suggested for migrants. Would reduce the numbers of innocent people killed by huge numbers. Even police killing would be reduced after time. Police now assume suspects are armed.

Seeing as that's how most of the Modern World does it, I would say it's a very serious method. Of course, if you would rather pay twice the price for health care and education. Then that's how brainwashed you've become. It's not free, it's paid via taxes and works our cheaper and fairer. Tagging on free trips to Hawaii? free homes? free cars? free booze. Shows the weakness of your argument.

I can see why Washington is against both of these. It keeps a lot of people in fear and uneducated. Reserving it for the 1% and above.

The same uneducated...clueless...person you always have been.

Paul Markham 12-09-2015 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 20662208)
The same uneducated...clueless...person you always have been.

Can you help me then?

If it's good to ban Muslims from entering the US. Should they be banned from buying guns, even US-born Muslims and white converts. Is this allowed under the Constitution?

Should there be no further gun controls. Because it's OK if people get shot by anyone except Muslims?

Just claiming someone is uneducated and clueless, opens you to the consequence of explaining your reasons. Can you, or will you hide?

The problem with Trump's proposals is it won't solve the problem. Entering the US as a Hindu, Christian or Athiest is still open. It's easy to get past to anyone determined. It does nothing to protect people from terrorists.

Whereas banning the sale of guns to all but those who can pass vigorous tests, which includes limiting the amount people can own. Protects everyone from getting shot by accident, in a mass shooting, or random shooting. It's not 100% and will take the time to see the results. It seems to outsiders that some Americans feel their rights to own firearms is more important than the 1,000s of innocent lives lost.

So long as the shooter isn't a Muslim.

But, a dead person is dead no matter the crazed reasoning of the shooter.

CarlosTheGaucho 12-09-2015 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20661602)
I'm just shocked that the media has their entire focus on how "dangerous" it is for Trump to call for temporarily stopping Muslims from immigrating or coming to the U.S. until the govt. gets this under control.

The way they are carrying on about something that should be common sense is as if he is more "dangerous" than the terrorists themselves.

---

So Tapper asked again if he had gotten any concrete intel on that...
The Congressman replied "No, but I'm not worried about that. I'm more worried about the dangerous rhetoric that Trump is spreading".

WTF?????

He's not worried about ISIS sympathizers killing people. He expects that to happen.
The only thing he's worried about is Trump.

And that is considered by the media to be the "sane" and "normal" viewpoint.
And Trump calling for a temporary ban on Muslims traveling to the U.S. or migrating here during this time that ISIS has declared war on us...the media says THAT is "dangerous" and "extreme".

I still quite can't grasp what is going on, there were people killed by Islamic fundamentalists on US soil.

Every aspect of it (equipment, guns, exolosives, Saudi Arabia connection) implies a well organised act of terrorism, the probability of this being a work of an already established terrorist network operating in US is very high.

Yet the media try hard to make it seem as if nothing happened, politicians try hard to make it seem as if nothing happened.

I only hope this will make more people realize how incredibly fake, stupid, absurd and utterly dangerous this whole PC charade is. This mentality will only get more people killed.

Btw as always - the misinterpretation and one sided, biased commentaries are again going strong, somewhat ignoring the actual subject they're supposed to report about.

crockett 12-09-2015 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 20661861)
why not free vacations to hawaii? free homes? free cars? free booze?

if i want to become fat, get diabetes, smoke and take a 10 years to complete an art degree in university instead of working, someone should pay for it! FREE HEALTHCARE AND FREE COLLEGE FOR ALL!!! WOOOOOOOOO

*round of applause from the drabble*

Except you miss the most obvious point.. The so called free healthcare obviously costs us money, but as every country in the world with free healthcare shows us.. It costs us less money in the long term. The cost per person drops dramatically once insurance co panties are removed from the mix.

The leading cause of bankruptcy in the US is because of medical bills and it's not because the people had no insurance.. The current system is broken and can not be fixed as long as drug companies can charge hundreds and even thousands for medications which cost dollars to produce.

A stay at a hospital doesn't cost tens of thousands of dollars in any other country in the world except the US. It's a fucking crime that people in this country who work their entire lives go bankrupt because of medical bills when they paid for insurance all their lives..

The system is broken and needsto be rebuilt from the ground up as a single payer healthcare system. The insurance companies who put profit ahead of healthcare need to be removed from the equation..

It saves the tax payers billions in the long run.. It's not socialism, it's common fucking sense and it's the fiscally responible thing to do..

Barry-xlovecam 12-09-2015 08:55 AM

For all of you "doorknobs";

ISIS (or any form of terrorism in general) has no free speech rights under the US Constitution. Speech that incites or conspires towards criminal acts is not constitutionally protected legal speech.

Billions of dollars in the US are transacted daily via the internet -- the internet will not be closed in the USA. Law enforcement can monitor internet communication for illegal activity and they do.

Demogogery PDF
Here is the manual for this sort of demagoguery -- Trump could of wrote the book ... Mein Kamf is also a good example of demagoguery's effectiveness.

shake 12-09-2015 08:58 AM

Starting to think trump is the best troll of all time.

Paul Markham 12-09-2015 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20662421)
Except you miss the most obvious point.. The so called free healthcare obviously costs us money, but as every country in the world with free healthcare shows us.. It costs us less money in the long term. The cost per person drops dramatically once insurance co panties are removed from the mix.

The leading cause of bankruptcy in the US is because of medical bills and it's not because the people had no insurance.. The current system is broken and can not be fixed as long as drug companies can charge hundreds and even thousands for medications which cost dollars to produce.

A stay at a hospital doesn't cost tens of thousands of dollars in any other country in the world except the US. It's a fucking crime that people in this country who work their entire lives go bankrupt because of medical bills when they paid for insurance all their lives..

The system is broken and needsto be rebuilt from the ground up as a single payer healthcare system. The insurance companies who put profit ahead of healthcare need to be removed from the equation..

It saves the tax payers billions in the long run.. It's not socialism, it's common fucking sense and it's the fiscally responible thing to do..

:thumbsup :thumbsup

http://www.iahc.com/wp-content/uploa...ost-Trends.jpg

Nothing else illustrates as much, who owns the US Government. And they don't plan to change. The saddest part is so many are anti-Government Healthcare because they think it will cost more.

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003..._1_xlarge.jpeg

King Mark 01-29-2017 05:49 PM

Good thing us gfyers don't need the internet... Or porn... To make a living...

Barry-xlovecam 01-29-2017 06:20 PM

The Economy would collapse.
The Government would collapse.
The Military would collapse.

And Trump would collapse with no Twitter ...

Brian8377 01-29-2017 06:21 PM

100 Trumpsters

Bladewire 01-29-2017 06:50 PM

Donald Trump Vows To Crack Down On Pornography (Yes, Really!)

notinmybackyard 01-29-2017 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20660842)
So let me get this right, people have a problem with the government taking down sites recruiting isis? Sites glamorizing terrorists .....

Many people often compare the Internet to the "Wild West"

Well... in the 19th the "West" was a place of lawlessness and it was "won" using this

http://img1.imagilive.com/0117/serveimage7c7.jpg

It's time to bring the law to the Internet.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123