i don't have faith in anyone, but the fact that the media and establishment is trying anything to keep Trump out of the White House should say enough to even you. Trump disrupts them, something I haven't seen in US politics in my lifetime. So he is at least a little bit different, dont you think?

The last time we in Holland had someone who disrupted the establishment, ended up being assassinated days before the elections. The parallels between him and Trump are huge.
It was an orchestrated demonizing campaign by established politicians and the media which resulted in him being shot to death. The same way politicians and media are working together to demonize Trump. For me that's one sure way to see that they don't want him, which means they are truly scared he won't play ball with them, which in turn is positive and never seen before for the people.

The average Trump supporter feels they have been shortchanged their entire life due to their low IQ and they see Trump as a way to 'get even'. They hope Trump starts a nuclear war and fucks up the entire world because it gives them a feeling of empowerment in a world they feel powerless in. The Germans felt the same way after getting their asses beat in WW1 and it's why they supported Hitler so strongly.

based on everything i've read and heard, hitlery is more hawkish than Trump, Trump is to the left of hitlery on defense. if people want more war, they'll want to cast their vote for her.

Don't think he has anything to hide. Just a personal matter as he's written off a lot of hair treatments. :2 cents:

Trump Nation :thumbsup

So full of shit he is turning orange

The media isn't against him; The news is all about Trump at this point.

The American public - and the rest of the world - is stunned Trump has gotten this far.

I wouldn't reloose my taxes either.... it's private...

the media is thoroughly against Trump. they cover him (entirely in a NEGATIVE light) because it serves 2 purposes, 1) it advances their liberal bias and 2) it sells ads. people click on Trump articles. i'd even suggest that more anti-Trumpers click on Trump articles than Trumpsters.

If "The Media" is again Trump, why did Megyn Kelly completely destroy any ounce of true journalistic integrity she might have had, and lick trump's Asshole for an hour last week during that useless, pointless, fluff-piece of an interview?

Yes, but you aren't running for the highest office in one of the most powerful countries in the world. It's been standard for candidates to do this since the 1970s.

well megyn kelly is a shill for the right, who sometimes throws fastballs at trump just to appear credible, or balanced or something.

the media has a lot of people who despise trump & mix fact journalism with advocacy journalism. dumb people, & young people who dont yet know better, are prone to being brainwashed by leftism that simply sounds like the truth to them. i suspect you are one of the dupes. I would offer you a red pill to see the full truth. but you will take the blue one.

:)

it's FOX news so i don't pay attention to it, and i don't believe she's ever had any journalistic credibity. i have paid attention to studies that confirm the media bias against Trump.

you don't recall the major news outlet refusing to even cover Trump?

the criticism of him by the press has been very heavy. not saying that's a bad thing, i am saying it's simply inaccurate to claim the press is on his side. the press isn't on hillary's side either. she steers clear of the press and calls the shots on her interactions with the press. Trump is the exact opposite, he'll talk to any and all press, he doesn't give a shit if they spin it like rochard does, it's free press for him, $2 billion worth at last count a month or so ago. obviously, the heavy criticism attack of him isn't working. that's what i've been trying to tell liberals all along, he's not a joke candidate, in spite of all the negative press, he's winning.

this also:

the next 5+ months are going to get very ugly for the clintons and hillary, as some serious shit is starting to leak out about billy that's going to be very ugly for them. if Trump not showing his tax report is all they have on him, yawn.

this new shit is bad news bear for hillary, and the final nail in the coffin for her will be her husband, the alleged pedophile rapist.

rochard, you haven't been following the brouhaha on the nyt hit piece on Trump? the one where they spun the interviews to cast a disparaging light on Trump only to have the star interviewee go public stating the NYT spun her story negatively about Trump?

:::::::::::::
It was the most predictable thing, and for me, a very familiar thing as well. The New York Times, which might as well be the official newsletter of the Democrat Party and the Hillary campaign, goes around and interviews every woman it can find who?s ever had contact with Donald Trump ? then writes a story that drips with implication he treats them boorishly and in a sexist manner.

But there?s one problem: Their star witness immediately came forward and said the Times completely misrepresented what she told them. Case in point: She showed up at a pool party Trump hosted without a swimsuit, so he offered her one and suggested she changed into it. How does the Times present that? They tell us Trump ?suggested she change out of her clothes.?

New York Times hit piece on Trump feels awfully familiar | Canada Free Press

whoops

The Arkansas woman who says Bill Clinton raped her in a Little Rock hotel room in 1978 is calling on The New York Times to devote the same amount of time to investigating sexual assault claims against the former president as it has allegations of Donald Trump’s mistreatment of women.

Juanita Broaddrick, a former nursing executive, issued the suggestion in a Twitter post on Wednesday and also told The Daily Caller that The Times has not contacted her about her story.



Read more: Bill Clinton’s Rape Accuser Calls Out New York Times For Failing To Cover Allegations Against Ex-POTUS

whoops

An investigation into official flight records of financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express” are once again dragging former President Bill Clinton into the national spotlight.

Flight logs obtained by Gawker in January 2015 put Mr. Clinton on the billionaire’s infamous jet more than a dozen times — sometimes with a woman whom federal prosecutors suspect of procuring underage sex victims for Mr. Epstein. Fox News reported Friday that records show Mr. Clinton declined Secret Service protection on at least five flights.

The network’s investigation reveals Mr. Clinton flew on the Boeing 727 “Lolita Express” 26 times, more than doubling the previously reported 11 trips.

“Bill Clinton … associated with a man like Jeffrey Epstein, who everyone in New York, certainly within his inner circles, knew was a pedophile. "

Bill Clinton ditched Secret Service on multiple Lolita Express flights: Report - Washington Times

Doesn't Trump know that you cannot hide anything. Eventually it will all come out.

The State Department released some fifty thousand emails and yet not one thing is embarrassing. (Pretty obvious they didn't look hard enough.) Yet Trump is hiding his tax returns? LOL.

What is he hiding?

The last 3 years Trump has been receiving a tax credit for households earning less than $500k a year and his spokesmen Lewandowski confirmed it's true.

http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2016-03-09/trump-received-tax-credit-for-middle-class-taxpayers

So a billionaire is claiming he made less than $500k a year?

I've been telling you all for years - rich people don't pay taxes. I don't consider myself rich by any stretch of the imagination, but I write everything I can.

This is what Trump doesn't understand.... No cared about what he did behind closed doors as a business man. But now as a candidate it's all going to come out in public. What he did wasn't wrong, but when the average citizen discovers Trump is making tens of millions or hundreds of millions a year and only claiming less than $500k on his taxes.... People are gonna be pissed.

The IRS should be abolished it's an absolute scam. We pay taxes on EVERYTHING no reason to have all the headache of a game that changes every year for a final government gotcha money grab once a year.

someone has to pay for liberal income redistribution schemes. if you dont like it take it up with hilary.

I agree with you.

Minte built a $250k fountain for his business and then wrote that off of his taxes. It's insane what we can write off.

Any new structure that's erected in downtown Los Angeles is required BY LAW to spend >5% of the building cost on beautifying the area with fountains,art work, sculpture, and plants, all of which is also a tax write off.

Not everywhere needs to look like shithole central California

no, halfwit. The media didn't print the truth. Romney's taxes showed that he made a lot of money and gave a lot of money away.

After that hatchet job, no one of any intelligence would release their taxes.

"Concise and correct.

You have problems. The "fill in the blank" people are a big cause of those problems. Things can be great again like your nostalgic memories in which most of the bad stuff has become less bad over time. To be great again you need to X the "fill in the blank" people.

Time tested formula.

So how could they do a hatchet job?

Unless he gave the money away to dodge paying taxes to charities that weren't legit.

Maybe in America the media can take something legit and lie about it. Here in Europe we look deeper.

Oh, I disagree with that. The Freedom of the Press here is stunning, and they can abuse to find things that don't exist.

The story went something like this:
Romney made 50 million last year but only paid an effective tax rate of 12% by using a loophole for giving money to charity.

Meanwhile, he gave away 15 million to charity.

And no, in europe they do the same nonsense. The public is just less aware of being lied to over there.

Horseshit.
Actually he was praised for taking less deduction that he was entitled to. No-one scrutinized him.

Romney paid 14% effective tax rate in 2011 - Sep. 21, 2012

You think Trump will actually get away with never proving his returns? Or you think his tax people are working overtime ammending them so when they release them the doctored ones make him look like a saint? :D

But... There is a catch with this. What charities did he give to?

My kid's sports league is a non profit, which means donations are tax deductible. So any fees I pay to the league are in fact tax deductible. $600 for a new uniform? Sure, "no problem". (Damn kids are expensive.)

My point isn't that Romney did wrong; I am just not caring. Our tax system is so freaking stupid.

And in the case of Trump, you know damn well he was overly aggressive with his taxes and when it comes out it will look bad. And it will come out, a little at a time.

I think he will continue to bs his way through. Once Hillary unleashes commercials about his mistresses, bankruptcies etc his taxes will be the least of his problems.

If you look at this from a liability standpoint....

Hillary has the email scandal (which still amounts to nothing) and ten investigations into Benghazi which has resulted in, well, nothing.

Trump.... every business deal he has ever made, every woman he has ever dated, every time he went on Howard Stern and said something dumb.... his taxes.... All of that is going to come out.

If Hillary was smart..... I won't go so far as to say she is smart, but clearly she understands politics - not to mention her husband was President.... All she has to do is dig up the dirt and bring it up one thing at a time, keeping Trump running from one scandal to another, with Hillary controlling the news cycle....

no worries never-trumpsters, the felon will beat him. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You mean the felon who has never been charged with anything?

I don't really like Hillary, but man... The Republicans got nothing on her.

The key is, what charities he contributed to.

There are more ways to dodge taxes than charities. The biggest one is tax havens. France is taking Google to task over their funneling of profits to Bermuda.

While he doesn't release them, which he has said he would, the voters are left to make their mind up. Those who think it doesn't matter if he paid a lower % than they pay. Fine, they would vote for him if the Government gave him back all the money. The undecided, who are the key to winning, believe he's hiding something.

We are constantly told about tax dodgers. Read the British News.

https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...ax-authorities

again, idiot, Romney didn't dodge taxes and neither did Trump.

he stated he never received inheritance from his parents, but he did, and donated the money to a school that had his fathers name.. and either clarified about not using money from his parents etc

Romney is a strange part of american politics.. for example, obamacare is basically the same thing that Romney suggested.. what was called 'Romney Care' at the time