GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Beware of MrSkin: they will screw you over and keep your money (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1210393)

Bladewire 08-06-2016 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21085996)
I did steal your content

Without provocation you bring up you stealing my content at least 3 times a week since you got out of the loony bin, multiple times today, for no reason, it's like you're bragging. Shady :disgust

Is the banned member asking for proof or ban? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

EddyTheDog 08-06-2016 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21086032)
Without provocation you bring up you stealing my content at least 3 times a week since you got out of the loony bin, multiple times today, for no reason, it's like you're bragging. Shady :disgust

Is the banned member asking for proof or ban? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

OK - Yes, you accused me - Proof or ban - It feels like being back at school but this is gfy...

Theo is around - Shall we do this now?....

Bladewire 08-06-2016 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21086062)
OK - Yes, you accused me - Proof or ban - It feels like being back at school but this is gfy...

Theo is around - Shall we do this now?....

You have been banned twice and are posting on your third fake nic!

If you didn't violate your ban you wouldn't be here wasting my time, or Theo's time :2 cents:

Tip: you should adjust your meds

EddyTheDog 08-06-2016 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21086074)
You have been banned twice and are posting on your third fake nic!

If you didn't violate your ban you wouldn't be here wasting my time, or Theo's time :2 cents:

Tip: you should adjust your meds

You attacked me not the other way - I'm not going to bother Theo - You have multiple fake nics and I am too old to get into crap with some troll like you...

My meds are fine - Thanks for your concern.....

xXXtesy10 08-06-2016 02:18 PM


Bladewire 08-06-2016 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21086104)
You attacked me not the other way - I'm not going to bother Theo - You have multiple fake nics and I am too old to get into crap with some troll like you...

My meds are fine - Thanks for your concern.....

You we're viciously attacked & you're only trying to defend your good name and spotless reputation of your 2 banned nics & current fake nic. :1orglaugh Suck it :love2suck

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10 (Post 21086125)



:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

EddyTheDog 08-06-2016 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21086134)
You we're viciously attacked & you're only trying to defend your good name and spotless reputation of your 2 banned nics & current fake nic. :1orglaugh Suck it :love2suck



:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I can't be bothered and my tablet is nearly out of batteries, sleep well...

/end

AmeliaG 08-06-2016 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21085684)
That's the problem, they never gave me any info. I didn't even know which gallery URL was infringing. I asked for a copy of the DMCA report many times but never received one.


Yes, i did get owned. By fucking thieves.

I hope other people don't make same mistake. Because by their logic (and terms) even using a MrSkin banner to promote their site is grounds for account termination for "trademark infringement". (when it suits them)

And if by site you mean the gallery, i guess it does suck, it been made 10 years ago or so.


They gave you the name of the complainant, the original copyright holder. Why don't you contact the photographer whose work you used without permission and, unlike Mr. Skin, without promoting him?

kane 08-06-2016 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21085672)
More lies from Mrshitskin scumbags.

You told me it was a DMCA report. Here's a screenshot. (and after numerous requests you never showed me a copy of it.

http://c2n.me/3AXcYfd.png



I didn't insinuate anything. Any webmaster promoting celebrity niche is using celebrity photos from various sources from the internet. Everyone knows this. You didn't have problems with it for years while i was sending traffic your way. And you don't have problems with obviously dubious content on high traffic websites and tubes when you spam them to promote you. I already posted a photo of you soliciting it.



So you are "borrowing" someone else's work/content to promote your website. How is it any different from what i did? Double standard hypocrites.


Of course i was using your "trademarks" to promote YOUR program EXCLUSIVELY. That's the whole point, to make a gallery look similar to the paysite that you promote. What planet are you from?



Again, this only became a problem when i stopped sending you traffic. You didn't give a shit about this for years. And the domains had exclusively MrSkn galleries, which promote only your website. Terminating an account because of that is stupid. You could have just asked to transfer the domain (which we did same day after your requested it).

You aslo gave false hope (hinted) that transferring the domains to you would solve account lock problem. And after i promtly pushed the domains same day you just left me standing with my dick in my hand:

http://c2n.me/3AXdXbT.png



How could I remove all content? I have hundreds of galleries built over the years. I removed the one with the name mentioned. I couldn't remove the other one because i didn't know what it was. I asked you numerous times to send me the copy of DMCA report so that i would know the URL and which content exactly was in violation. Every request got conveniently ignored by you. You weren;t interested in fixing anything, just wanted a reason to can the account and keep the rebills.




I used your promo tools to exclusively promote YOUR FUCKING SITE, FOR YOUR PROFIT.

I removed the only instance of the mentioned celeb name i was able to find the moment i received your first email. You never even mentioned an infringing URL until in this thread. I asked for a copy of DMCA to know better what to look for, so that i could remove it. I cooperated fully and pushed the domains to you the same day. I promty did EVERYTHING to rectify the problem. You just werent interested in rectifying it.


Hopefully people make a good note on your "policies" and how you are able to terminate an account and keep all the money with any made up reason. Nice Terms & Conditions you have to fully protect yourself in any situation and fuck over any affiliate at a drop of a hat.

God damn scumbags :321GFY

Two quick thoughts

1. You should be able to remove content on all URLs. You should know what is on every URL of your sites. It is called doing business and being responsible. If you don't know what is on every URL on your sites you should take a little time to go through your server and document this stuff so you do know. Ignorance is not an excuse.

2. You rail against them being dishonest, yet you are knowingly using content you don't own and admitting to doing so. That makes you a thief. Maybe take a minute to look in the mirror before you start talking shit about other people.

wehateporn 08-06-2016 05:33 PM

Looks like an honest guy, but fair play for knowing how to make $600+ per month from them


Bladewire 08-06-2016 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21086296)
Looks like an honest guy, but fair play for knowing how to make $600+ per month from them


He's cute! Who is that?

charlie g 08-06-2016 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina (Post 21079243)
We shoot the content, run the site where it is sold from and the ONLY people who peddle our shit are thieves, pirates and those like you who think that they are entitled to make money of others people creativity ......and that DOES include Mr.Skin.

fuck off you punk piece of shit. i dont steal nothing from nobody... i am not a webmaster.

plaster 08-06-2016 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21086134)
You we're viciously attacked & you're only trying to defend your good name and spotless reputation of your 2 banned nics & current fake nic. :1orglaugh Suck it :love2suck



:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Shut the mother fuck up you turdless fucking cum collecting waste bin of loud, obnoxious hissy fit fuck you bullshit that constantly comes out of your stinky fucking pie hole.

Just go drown yourself in the ocean you failure.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

Bladewire 08-06-2016 06:57 PM

Banned user Beaner drunk again posting as Plaster following me through every thread daily *yawn*

I've had him blocked forever but you know he's drunk because like clockwork 9-10pm Eastern time he starts up. Sad

He's obsessed with me.

plaster 08-06-2016 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21086401)
Banned user Beaner drunk again posting as Plaster following me through every thread daily *yawn*

I've had him blocked forever but you know he's drunk because like clockwork 9-10pm Eastern time he starts up. Sad

He's obsessed with me.

Ummm... if you had me on ignore how'd you see my post?

You're such a failure of epic proportions and your antics on this board of humiliating people far more successful then yourself are numbered. :2 cents:

Why don't you go find some men at your local hot spot and do a little of...

:sleep:sleep:sleep:sleep:bigears

... which is your forte

vano 08-07-2016 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21086260)
Two quick thoughts

1. You should be able to remove content on all URLs. You should know what is on every URL of your sites. It is called doing business and being responsible. If you don't know what is on every URL on your sites you should take a little time to go through your server and document this stuff so you do know. Ignorance is not an excuse.

2. You are knowingly using content you don't own and admitting to doing so. That makes you a thief.

1. I have THOUSANDS of galleries from the TGP days. If they don't even tell me the URL, I can't know where the problem is. When someone sends you a DMCA report, one of the requirements is to describe which work is in violation and where it is located. Skin never showed me the complaint (i wonder if it even exists).

2. Skin uses content they dont own. What does that make them?

At least I have contact info for dmca reports on my websites to quickly remove content if someone complains, and i don't pocket other people's money because i'm a greedy asshole.

vano 08-07-2016 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 21086143)
They gave you the name of the complainant, the original copyright holder. Why don't you contact the photographer whose work you used without permission

Why should I contact anyone? I'm not violating any copyrights as far as i know. I never received any notifications. Just because Skin says so doesn't make it true. Why wouldn't skin show me that notification?


Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 21086143)
and, unlike Mr. Skin, without promoting him?

Oh, this is comedy gold. Now Skin is promoting him? The copyright holder? In what way?

Do you just make shit up on the go, no matter how dumb it sounds, just to support Skin? Did they buy you a drink at one of the conventions? :1orglaugh

kane 08-07-2016 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21086659)
1. I have THOUSANDS of galleries from the TGP days. If they don't even tell me the URL, I can't know where the problem is. When someone sends you a DMCA report, one of the requirements is to describe which work is in violation and where it is located. Skin never showed me the complaint (i wonder if it even exists).

2. Skin uses content they dont own. What does that make them?

At least I have contact info for dmca reports on my websites to quickly remove content if someone complains, and i don't pocket other people's money because i'm a greedy asshole.

I won't comment on what they have or have not given you and just take your word that you didn't know what content they were speaking of. That said, They did provide a URL in their reply and, well, you still have illegal content on there as of my typing this.

The difference between what you are doing and what they are doing is simple. It is called Fair Use. You see you are taking content you do not own in order to make money. You haven't changed it in any way or done anything that would alter it from it original format (other than maybe size and compression ratio etc.). Mr. Skin provide commentary and reviews about the movies, the scenes, and the people in them. When they do this it creates a fair use situation. Imagine it like this: If you have TV show like At the Movies where you review movies and play clips from them. You are allowed to show those clips because you are also providing a review of the movie, hence, fair use. If you just took those clips and uploaded them to YouTube or some site you likely would be hit with a complaint.

If Mr. Skin were really breaking the law do you not think a big, powerful movie studio would have hammered them into the ground by now? It s a big site, that has even been mentioned in some movies and the owner goes on major radio shows like Howard Stern to promote it. If they were breaking the law they would have had their asses handed to them a long time ago.

The odds are they hadn't really paid much attention to you as an affiliate until you had lawyers contacting them about your sites. Had that not happened I have a feeling your account would still be open and everything would be fine.

This is the game you play when you decide to make money using stolen content. At some point that money might go away.

kane 08-07-2016 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21086662)
Why should I contact anyone? I'm not violating any copyrights as far as i know. I never received any notifications. Just because Skin says so doesn't make it true. Why wouldn't skin show me that notification?

Did you shoot the pictures?

Did you pay someone a licensing fee for the pictures?

Did you get permission to use the pictures?

Unless you answered yes to one of those you are violating the copyright on every one of those pictures.

vano 08-07-2016 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21086668)
I won't comment on what they have or have not given you and just take your word that you didn't know what content they were speaking of. That said, They did provide a URL in their reply

Yeah they did. In this thread. 3 weeks after terminating my account. And only because I created this thread. The conveniently ignore all my request to point out the content in question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21086668)
and, well, you still have illegal content on there as of my typing this

According to who? You? Or Skin, who also dont own the copyright? You can't pass that judgment. What if I had a deal with the photog and he let me use his content?


Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21086668)
The difference between what you are doing and what they are doing is simple. It is called Fair Use. You see you are taking content you do not own in order to make money. You haven't changed it in any way or done anything that would alter it from it original format (other than maybe size and compression ratio etc.). Mr. Skin provide commentary and reviews about the movies, the scenes, and the people in them.

So they found a loophole in the law and are exploiting it. By same token I could write a line of text next to my gallery and claim it as fair use. But that still would be profiting from someone else's work. How is it any different from tubes who are also using stolen content and are hiding behind legal loopholes?


Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21086668)
Did you shoot the pictures?

Did you pay someone a licensing fee for the pictures?

Unless you answered yes to one of those you are violating the copyright on every one of those pictures.

Can you answer yes to all these question regarding a photo in your sig?

http://www.freakydink.com/boobs.gif

Anyway, the legality of content or fair use is not the point of the thread. The point is that MrSkin will gladly take all your traffic, not matter how clean or dirty it is. But they will fuck you over when they are not profiting from it anymore (i.e., when you stop sending them traffic and just collecting rebills money). It's a question of affiliate program's integrity. MrSkin has none - they will throw you under the bus at a drop of a hat.

wehateporn 08-07-2016 08:24 AM

Did you still make new sales?

xXXtesy10 08-07-2016 08:30 AM


RandazzoXXX 08-07-2016 09:18 AM

The "celeb" niche in porn is and always has been shady. MrSkin is no exception. The affiliates promoting celeb content AND the sponsors are using content they don't own. That's the nature of the game.

It's pretty obvious what happened here. They were taking heat, decided to look through your account and realized that you were making money from rebills while sending very little new sales so they said fuck that... cancelled your account and will keep all the money to themselves. Pretty common practice in the industry.

vano 08-07-2016 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandazzoXXX (Post 21087121)
The "celeb" niche in porn is and always has been shady. MrSkin is no exception. The affiliates promoting celeb content AND the sponsors are using content they don't own. That's the nature of the game.

It's pretty obvious what happened here. They were taking heat, decided to look through your account and realized that you were making money from rebills while sending very little new sales so they said fuck that... cancelled your account and will keep all the money to themselves. Pretty common practice in the industry.

Exactly. The content is not the main problem here.

The problem is how they handled things. Instead of supporting a old time webmaster who had been faithful for years, they decided it was a good time to screw him over and keep the profits. It's simply a shit move on their part.

xXXtesy10 08-07-2016 11:58 AM


poncabare 08-07-2016 02:35 PM

Another pissing match on gfy. Shocking...

Lichen 08-07-2016 02:39 PM

Stopped promoting MrSkin long time ago and never looked back. Fuck them (smug assholes) and their non converting sites.

There are much better options out there for your celebs traffic.

kane 08-07-2016 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21086698)
Yeah they did. In this thread. 3 weeks after terminating my account. And only because I created this thread. The conveniently ignore all my request to point out the content in question.

According to who? You? Or Skin, who also dont own the copyright? You can't pass that judgment. What if I had a deal with the photog and he let me use his content?



So they found a loophole in the law and are exploiting it. By same token I could write a line of text next to my gallery and claim it as fair use. But that still would be profiting from someone else's work. How is it any different from tubes who are also using stolen content and are hiding behind legal loopholes?



Can you answer yes to all these question regarding a photo in your sig?

http://www.freakydink.com/boobs.gif

Anyway, the legality of content or fair use is not the point of the thread. The point is that MrSkin will gladly take all your traffic, not matter how clean or dirty it is. But they will fuck you over when they are not profiting from it anymore (i.e., when you stop sending them traffic and just collecting rebills money). It's a question of affiliate program's integrity. MrSkin has none - they will throw you under the bus at a drop of a hat.

I'm done in this thread as there really isn't anything more to say. Just to answer your question, this GIF was part of a content package I purchased a while back so I do have a license to use it.

AmeliaG 08-07-2016 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21086662)
Why should I contact anyone? I'm not violating any copyrights as far as i know. I never received any notifications. Just because Skin says so doesn't make it true. Why wouldn't skin show me that notification?



Oh, this is comedy gold. Now Skin is promoting him? The copyright holder? In what way?

Do you just make shit up on the go, no matter how dumb it sounds, just to support Skin? Did they buy you a drink at one of the conventions? :1orglaugh

If you are posting modern photographs, without even knowing the source, you do know you are violating copyright.

Mr. Skin is presumably not promoting this photographer because his work does not appear on their site. I believe they do promote the work of people whose copyrighted material does appear on their site. Are you disagreeing with that?

You, on the other hand, are using that person's work and not promoting him. Mr. Skin has told you who the owner is, so why would you ask GFY where the images you took are, before you would ask the person with a lawyer where he thinks you are using his property? Do you disagree that your screenshots show Mr. Skin told you whose photos this is about?

What is confusing you here? Mr. Skin can't legally make money off of your illegal activity, which the complainant's attorney has notified them of. So you need to make good with the copyright holder, not complain to strangers on the internet about Mr. Skin.

vano 08-08-2016 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 21088138)
Mr. Skin is presumably not promoting this photographer because his work does not appear on their site. I believe they do promote the work of people whose copyrighted material does appear on their site. Are you disagreeing with that?

Yes, I am.

Here is just one of MrSkin's websites full of stolen, i mean "borrowed" content: Dakota Johnson Topless During Filming 'Fifty Shades Darker'

- they didn't pay for this content
- they didn't get permission to use that content
- they don't have a license to use this content

And they sure as hell aren't promoting anyone else but themselves.

Look, celebrity niche is tricky and hi-risk. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind here or set anyone straight. All i'm saying is that you can't trust MrSkin. Instead of working with together with you to solve things, they will jump at first opportunity to fuck you over and steal money from you.

I've learned the lesson and moved on elsewhere from their shitty, non-converting revshare program.

CaptainHowdy 08-08-2016 05:29 AM

OP got paid or what??

Google Expert 08-08-2016 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 21088519)
OP got paid or what??

as far as i can tell, OP got robbed out of $600/month in rebills money

tough times being an affiliate nowadays

AmeliaG 08-08-2016 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21088513)
Yes, I am.

Here is just one of MrSkin's websites full of stolen, i mean "borrowed" content: Dakota Johnson Topless During Filming 'Fifty Shades Darker'

- they didn't pay for this content
- they didn't get permission to use that content
- they don't have a license to use this content

And they sure as hell aren't promoting anyone else but themselves.

Look, celebrity niche is tricky and hi-risk. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind here or set anyone straight. All i'm saying is that you can't trust MrSkin. Instead of working with together with you to solve things, they will jump at first opportunity to fuck you over and steal money from you.

I've learned the lesson and moved on elsewhere from their shitty, non-converting revshare program.


That is not disagreeing with me at all. I made no assertion about Mr. Skin, other than that they told you where the complaint came from and they do give credit to their sources.

Mr. Skin can't work with you to solve you pissing off a copyright holder Mr. Skin has nothing to do with. You used content unrelated to Mr. Skin. They told you who the owner you have to satisfy is. Why would you give up domains and complain to GFY before contacting the owner of the photos to see what you could do to make it right?

If you can describe that the content is from Fifty Shades Darker, there is promotional credit.

Why are you scared to contact the actual owner of the work you posted and made money off of?

JFK 08-08-2016 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10 (Post 21077575)
proof of what? the site is pack full of stolen movie stills scenes clips. are you fucking drunk or high?

Stolen ?:2 cents:

vano 08-08-2016 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 21089341)
You used content unrelated to Mr. Skin.

MrSkin DOES NOT own any content. They steal everything and profit from it under the pretense of "of fair use" loophole. Just like tubes use the "user submitted content" loophole.

Seriously, stick to something you have a clue about or STFU.

AmeliaG 08-09-2016 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21089860)
MrSkin DOES NOT own any content. They steal everything and profit from it under the pretense of "of fair use" loophole. Just like tubes use the "user submitted content" loophole.

Seriously, stick to something you have a clue about or STFU.

You lost your domains. You lost your rebills. And you won't do a thing to help yourself.

I'd ask you where you think I said anything about what Mr. Skin owns and I'd ask you again why you ask strangers on GFY and give away your domains before you contact the owner of the work to make things right ... but I'm putting you on ignore, so there would be no point, as I will not see you failing to answer.

xXXtesy10 08-09-2016 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 21089386)
Stolen ?:2 cents:

fuck off old man. they not make those films asshole

Bladewire 08-09-2016 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21089860)
MrSkin DOES NOT own any content. They steal everything and profit from it under the pretense of "of fair use" loophole. Just like tubes use the "user submitted content" loophole.

Seriously, stick to something you have a clue about or STFU.

Mr. Skin owns the trademark you violated.

You violating their trademark caused them problems with a copyright owner.

Violating trademarks can be costly. You're lucky to get off so easy.

Either you're clueless about affiliate marketing or you purposely violated Mr. Skins trademark in your domain to gain SEO rankings for people searching for their site/brand.

vano 08-09-2016 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 21090367)
You lost your domains. You lost your rebills. And you won't do a thing to help yourself.

I'd ask you where you think I said anything about what Mr. Skin owns and I'd ask you again why you ask strangers on GFY and give away your domains before you contact the owner of the work to make things right ... but I'm putting you on ignore, so there would be no point, as I will not see you failing to answer.

- I was forced to give up my domains
- My Rebills were stolen from me
- I couldn't do anything because Skin were set from the get go to screw me over.

I asked them for the DMCA report but they never gave me one.

vano 08-09-2016 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21091264)
Mr. Skin owns the trademark you violated.

You violating their trademark caused them problems with a copyright owner.

Violating trademarks can be costly. You're lucky to get off so easy.

Either you're clueless about affiliate marketing or you purposely violated Mr. Skins trademark in your domain to gain SEO rankings for people searching for their site/brand.

ANY webmaster would be violating Skin's trademark just by running their banner on his website.

I was using the domains to exclusively promote them. There were zero seo rankings, the domains had Skin galleries on them.

That's what's called affiliate marketing.

They just decided to be greedy cunts about it.

JFK 08-09-2016 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxtesy10 (Post 21091198)
fuck off old man. They not make those films asshole

Look in the mirror, if you want to see an asshole ! I am sure you are privi to all their agreements with various studios ?

xXXtesy10 08-09-2016 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 21091900)
Look in the mirror, if you want to see an asshole ! I am sure you are privi to all their agreements with various studios ?

you forget geritol again? how owner's cum taste? there many indie film there, bet ass no permission.

JFK 08-09-2016 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10 (Post 21091987)
you forget geritol again? how owner's cum taste? there many indie film there, bet ass no permission.

That's all you got ? :321GFY

Matyko 02-10-2017 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 21089860)
MrSkin DOES NOT own any content. They steal everything and profit from it under the pretense of "of fair use" loophole. Just like tubes use the "user submitted content" loophole.

Until the point you made $$$ from it, you did not care that it's "all stolen content" .

Speigelau 02-10-2017 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10 (Post 21086125)

Is this Eddythedog?

Fat Panda 02-10-2017 02:34 PM

whats going on here?

Bladewire 02-10-2017 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21533860)
Is this Eddythedog?

Nope, this is Eddy, he's from Croydon in S. London



And by the way, I think the guy above is HOT because he has a beautiful fat rock hard cock :thumbsup

babeterminal 02-10-2017 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21533860)
Is this Eddythedog?


yes thats one of the croydon massive, but you have to understand there are a few like her on that id eddythebullshiter

Bladewire 02-10-2017 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babeterminal (Post 21534019)
yes thats one of the croydon massive, but you have to understand there are a few like her on that id eddythebullshiter

^^^ DVTimes is obsessed with EddyTheDog :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Speigelau 02-10-2017 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babeterminal (Post 21534019)
yes thats one of the croydon massive, but you have to understand there are a few like her on that id eddythebullshiter

Pretty sure it's just one poster with multiple personalities, mostly fueled by alcohol consumption.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123