GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Looks like trump is done. Clinton delivered her final blow. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1222720)

Coup 10-21-2016 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21236857)
You really live in a bubble.. Trump has never been ahead of Hillary at anytime. You guys live in your conservative bubble where everyone "you" know likes Trump, but out side your bubble it's very different.

He's currently ahead of her in three general election polls

Quote:

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Rasmussen Reports Clinton 41, Trump 43, Johnson 5, Stein 3 Trump +2

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton LA Times/USC Tracking Clinton 44, Trump 45 Trump +1

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Tracking Clinton 40, Trump 41, Johnson 8, Stein 4 Trump +1
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

which supports his assertion that trump will win the popular vote

Rochard 10-21-2016 10:51 AM

00
Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21238201)
You really have no fucking idea. Obama has done great things? His major accomplishment is a disaster and will be gone next year. My insurance is increasing roughly 50% year over year. This year coming up there are only 2 companies I can choose from period and a estimated 62% increase. All major carriers have left the program. The two left will bail out of it as well as everyone has to jump over to them and they take on all of the losses. It's literally going to end up like the banking crisis and whoever is left holding the bag of shit at the end will crash it all down. Women have lost their freedoms? wtf? Sorry but you must have us confused with some Muslim country. I know it's hard to distinguish when we have one running ours but..

I keep hearing people complaining about Obambacare and I am just not getting it.... My healthcare went from $900 to nothing. That is a little misleading - The reality is I was paying $900 a month and then with Obamacare it dropped to $250 a month, and at that point my wife's employer kicked in to pay the rest (although by law she is not required to).

For me it's working perfectly.

femdomdestiny 10-21-2016 11:59 AM

https://s16.postimg.org/kn7tf8ifp/hillaryislam_vi.jpg

https://s13.postimg.org/82fh1opdz/zb...3o1krdtfve.png

onwebcam 10-21-2016 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21238222)
00

I keep hearing people complaining about Obambacare and I am just not getting it.... My healthcare went from $900 to nothing. That is a little misleading - The reality is I was paying $900 a month and then with Obamacare it dropped to $250 a month, and at that point my wife's employer kicked in to pay the rest (although by law she is not required to).

For me it's working perfectly.

How much "credit" are you getting? You see what's really going on is the insurance companies are raising the rates to where they would normally be without the "credit" because truth be told the government isn't paying these companies anything. Nothing compared to the expenses they are incurring anyway. In addition the deductibles are being raised to the level that most insurance has become catastrophic insurance. Unless you understand how insurance actually works you can't understand what's really happening. Let me give you an example.

My son had a motorcycle accident early this year. His mom told him he was covered under her policy. He in turn told the hospital this. He wasn't. The hospital thinking he was insured charged him the insured rate. His bills in total were in excess of $30k. Fast forward a month or so and them figuring out he wasn't insured they came back with a uninsured rate that was around $5-6k. Now many people have this belief that the people who are insured are filling in this gap of being uninsured. But what's really happening is the hospitals mark up the cost of an insured persons bill 4-5+x what it would be an uninsured/cash payer.

So in my sons case. If he had insurance he would have most likely had a policy with around a $5k deductible. So he pretty much would have ended up paying out the same amount of money with or without insurance. Now if he were insured the insurance would (if they already didn't have an agreement in place which they usually do) call up the hospital and negotiate down the cost of the bill. So if I'm said insurance I call up the hospital and say "you've sent me this bill for $30k but I know that you only charge uninsured people $6k. My client has to pay $5k of this so that leaves a $1k difference. What do you say we send you a $500 check and call it even." So having insurance my son would have saved $500 but not really because he had monthly premiums. So ideally said insurance company would have still profited of his premium for the year. Which is their goal.. They aren't a non-profit charity.

Grant it not all cases end up like this but you have to remember the insurance company is a for profit business not a government who can print money. This is not a case for not having insurance. Hell I've been telling him since he turned 18 he needs to get it but like many young adults they don't feel the need for one and two would rather spend the money on gadgets. Simply put the system will never work for everyone as a whole. Those who can't afford to pay for it will obviously benefit but those who can will increasingly get gouged to fill the gap so the insurance company can make a profit. This is what's already happening and it's what everyone was warned abut when it all started.

altmman 10-21-2016 12:27 PM

According to the NY times today

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...4a&oe=58AB056B

onwebcam 10-21-2016 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altmman (Post 21238507)

According to the over-sampled polls and "create your own map?"

altmman 10-21-2016 12:50 PM

i guess
789

onwebcam 10-21-2016 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altmman (Post 21238612)

Grant it you can't really gauge latimes polls because of their method but they seem to be showing Hillary in decline http://graphics.latimes.com/usc-pres...oll-dashboard/

My guess is decline will continue as more emails come out. Hell the day before the election the FBI discovered deleted emails get released.

Even politico is giving in to them WikiLeaks poisons Hillary’s relationship with left - POLITICO

kane 10-21-2016 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21238534)
According to the over-sampled polls and "create your own map?"

ElectoralVote

Has it about the same.

Here's the bad news for Trump. According to the polls Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, and Arizona are all potentially in play. Those should be easy states for the Republicans to win.

crockett 10-21-2016 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21238534)
According to the over-sampled polls and "create your own map?"

it's called the electoral college and it's not run by user polls. It's called fucking reality.. Something you choose to ignore. :1orglaugh

It's not even going to be a semi close election..

onwebcam 10-21-2016 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21238666)
it's called the electoral college and it's not run by user polls. It's called fucking reality.. Something you choose to ignore. :1orglaugh

It's not even going to be a semi close election..

Which is why Trump is leaving his conceding options open. Everyone knows Hillary is a compromised establishment puppet and most of the establishment would vote for her if they can. But the problem is the electorates are suppose to vote the way their constituents voted. They do have the option to not go that route but they could face political backlash by doing so. Winning without popular vote has only happened 4 times in history. 1 where neither got electoral and oddly Congress decided against Jackson's popular vote winnings. He actually got more popular and electoral and still lost. Presidents Winning Without Popular Vote It's a very risky time for this type of political game.

kane 10-21-2016 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21238723)
Which is why Trump is leaving his conceding options open. Everyone knows Hillary is a compromised establishment puppet and most of the establishment would vote for her if they can. But the problem is the electorates are suppose to vote the way their constituents voted. They do have the option to not go that route but they could face political backlash by doing so. Winning without popular vote has only happened 4 times in history. 1 where neither got electoral and oddly Congress decided against Jackson's popular vote winnings. He actually got more popular and electoral and still lost. Presidents Winning Without Popular Vote It's a very risky time for this type of political game.

I can see if electorates go against how their constituents vote and that costs Trump the election how he would fight. I would too.

But if it is a matter of him getting more total votes, but losing the electoral college, there really isn't anything he can do but stir up trouble.

JSWENSON 10-21-2016 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21238123)
i respect your take on things, even though we disagree on the candidate. your one of the few that understands the race is not a done deal. hilary should be 20 points ahead, but nope.

there are a couple polls with trump in a small lead. but since they show trump winning, they are automatically tossed out by lefty leftists.

:)

They are tossed out as outliers, because they are. This is expected thanks to the magical world of statistics. Early voting has already started, Trump is done.

onwebcam 10-21-2016 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWENSON (Post 21238921)
They are tossed out as outliers, because they are. This is expected thanks to the magical world of statistics. Early voting has already started, Trump is done.

You should consult with your statisticians on you're level of ignorance as well as over-sampling.

Rochard 10-21-2016 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seth Manson (Post 21236200)
Ok, so you were listening... but then you make up shit and say the he said he wouldnt accept the results. Got it.

He was asked a direct question. He was asked if he would accept the results of the election. The ONLY possible answer her is "yes". It's not open to discussion. It's not open to debate.

When he loses the election, he will scream and kick like a little baby. He will complain that it was rigged.

LOL.

onwebcam 10-21-2016 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21239104)
He was asked a direct question. He was asked if he would accept the results of the election. The ONLY possible answer her is "yes". It's not open to discussion. It's not open to debate.

When he loses the election, he will scream and kick like a little baby. He will complain that it was rigged.

LOL.

About that


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123