GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Brilliant Trump tweet (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1229305)

BlackCrayon 11-17-2016 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21309484)
you bring up a good point about the fact that many people end up not voting in states that are way blue or way red... deciding winner by popular vote would solve that problem, but at the same time it would concentrate all the political power in a few major cities, leaving rural areas and smaller states practically powerless...

so it's debatable which way is better, but if it worked fine for few hundred years, why change it now? Isn't a good rule of thumb "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"? Isn't the main reason why there is drama is because Hillary won popular vote? what if election results were reversed, would you still think it's a good idea, or would you lean towards keeping what worked for few hundred years as is?



yea, you are right, I looked at it wrong, Ohio did indeed in a way decide the election... :thumbsup

worked fine according to who? how can you tell? since there are no parallel universes where the opposite outcome happened that you can spy on, you'll never know if the country would be better for it or not without trying it.

kane 11-17-2016 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21309484)
you bring up a good point about the fact that many people end up not voting in states that are way blue or way red... deciding winner by popular vote would solve that problem, but at the same time it would concentrate all the political power in a few major cities, leaving rural areas and smaller states practically powerless...

so it's debatable which way is better, but if it worked fine for few hundred years, why change it now? Isn't a good rule of thumb "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"? Isn't the main reason why there is drama is because Hillary won popular vote? what if election results were reversed, would you still think it's a good idea, or would you lean towards keeping what worked for few hundred years as is?



yea, you are right, I looked at it wrong, Ohio did indeed in a way decide the election... :thumbsup

If the election results were reversed I would still be for removing the electoral college. I have felt this way for a long time. I just think it encourages corruption and it disenfranchises voters. Most of the time the system we have ends up working fine, but I just think we should do everything we can to get more people to vote and not alienate them.

As for candidates focusing their efforts on the population centers, I don't think that would happen as much as people think. When you look at the popular vote numbers from this election they are very close. They are reasonably close in the previous handful of elections as well. Candidates go where their voters are. Hillary won 61% of the vote in California. Trump got 34% and he didn't even campaign there. In Tennessee, Clinton got 35% of the vote and she never campaigned there. I think our society has become diverse enough politically that candidates will still be forced to carry out a national campaign in order to win and going to states that traditionally wouldn't could end up being a major strategy. If you told Hillary campaigning in Tennessee could net her another 250,000 votes, or you told Trump going to Oregon could get him that extra 250,000 I think they would jump at the chance of doing it.

woj 11-17-2016 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 21309505)
worked fine according to who? how can you tell? since there are no parallel universes where the opposite outcome happened that you can spy on, you'll never know if the country would be better for it or not without trying it.

US started with nothing and became, and still is, a dominant world power in just about every sense: economic, military, overall influence, one of the highest standards of living in the world, etc, so I think it's pretty fair to describe the political system in the US as "worked fine"...

it perhaps stagnated a bit last few decades, reasons for that are complex, but that has nothing to do at all with the way presidential elections are held... so I don't see any good reason why the way president is elected should be changed...

Bladewire 11-17-2016 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21309544)
US started with nothing and became, and still is, a dominant world power in just about every sense: economic, military, overall influence, one of the highest standards of living in the world, etc, so I think it's pretty fair to describe the political system in the US as "worked fine"...

it perhaps stagnated a bit last few decades, reasons for that are complex, but that has nothing to do at all with the way presidential elections are held... so I don't see any good reason why the way president is elected should be changed...

I hate to inform you but the standard of life / quality of living is better in every other western country but America.

I.E. when I lived in Australia 7 years ago the national minimum wage was about $10 an hour, now it's $17.70 an hour minimum. Minimum weekly pay is $672.70 or $2,691 a month.

When I lived there every average older person I knew owned a home and a rental property, this was on the Gold Coast.

The public school my son went to had on site dentist building and nurses building. Flat tax for citizens no IRS bulshit. Puvluc healthcare for everyone and unemployment, etc.

So America being a "dominant world power" has got us what? AND we're squeezing our citizens to death financially and giving a crappier than crap quality of life for most full of stress and anxiety for things as simple as healthcare & childcare.

mlove 11-17-2016 05:50 PM

The only thing this would result in is more trump campaigners having rocks thrown at them.

bronco67 11-17-2016 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JesseQuinn (Post 21309007)
^^gracias for this

I honestly feel like I'm living in some weird parallel universe these days, one where grown adults find it acceptable to rant/debase/insult/threaten peeps who have the temerity to be and think, gasp, different from themselves

I really don't spend that much time online except to work. I check in here and a couple other forums, perform the bare minimum of social media to keep my name/biz out there but fuck me the internet is a really cruel space I try to avoid. I prefer the real world where at least the people I interact with have to look into my eyes and see a human being there, and vice versa.

It's much more difficult to tear a person apart (note, not impossible, just more difficult) when they are right in front of you; the 'social isolation' inherent to the net absolutely brings out our worst human tendencies because this. the same principle is at play in road rage.

social media exacerbates and reproduces these divisions of position and perspective. the content each of us see is filtered by these private/for profit corporations to pertain to our underlying values/views, as determined by computer algorithyms.

the end result is people who share a community, share a nation, share a fucking planet we all rely upon, aren't encouraged to recognize this. being bellicose and selfish and cruel is seen as strength.

social media and the internet also perform useful, constructive roles (providing a voice to peeps who have not historically had a global platform, as a tool for sharing knowledge and ideas) so I'm not dismissing it out of hand. my point is that the internet is a tool, nothing more. it's not actual life.

this tool is currently being used by private interests to divide us, both to ensure the stability of the current system and equally importantly, to sell us shit

there's no god out there that cares about it. humanity and our planet are mere specks in a universe that really has no interest in our wellbeing. the only beings that care about us are us. and this is how we treat each other.

it's fucking insane and nobody wins

How about the weird parallel universe where an internet troll is our new president? That's right. He qualifies as an internet troll.

slapass 11-17-2016 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21309046)
Well said! :thumbsup

Ever notice how when you're in public these tensions don't exist face to face with everyday people you don't know personally?

It's important to remember that while grunts beat their chest, they don't have the intelect, tools, or will, to be divided, they just want to be acknowledged incessantly.

They elected a president. Trolls won this round. no way around that.

slapass 11-17-2016 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21309583)
I hate to inform you but the standard of life / quality of living is better in every other western country but America.

I.E. when I lived in Australia 7 years ago the national minimum wage was about $10 an hour, now it's $17.70 an hour minimum. Minimum weekly pay is $672.70 or $2,691 a month.

When I lived there every average older person I knew owned a home and a rental property, this was on the Gold Coast.

The public school my son went to had on site dentist building and nurses building. Flat tax for citizens no IRS bulshit. Puvluc healthcare for everyone and unemployment, etc.

So America being a "dominant world power" has got us what? AND we're squeezing our citizens to death financially and giving a crappier than crap quality of life for most full of stress and anxiety for things as simple as healthcare & childcare.

And they have very little govt debt on the national level.

slapass 11-17-2016 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21309607)
How about the weird parallel universe where an internet troll is our new president? That's right. He qualifies as an internet troll.

Wow read what I just wrote. I didn't label him as one but I see your point.

crockett 11-17-2016 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21306805)
http://c2n.me/3Eut9hw.png

Trump's right, you know.

"won even bigger and more easily" = brilliant to you? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh No wonder you are a Trump supporter..

Rochard 11-17-2016 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 21308848)

you're either a democrat or republican....

Not really. I am not a Democrat and I've voted Republican before in the past. I vote for the person, not what one party or the other tells me to vote.

BlackCrayon 11-18-2016 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21309991)
Not really. I am not a Democrat and I've voted Republican before in the past. I vote for the person, not what one party or the other tells me to vote.

political views are becoming more polarized in general, as evident by this board although its probably not a good representation most people will align their 'beliefs' to fit the mold of "their" party. obviously not everyone is but just because you voted republican a couple times doesn't mean much...

Bladewire 11-18-2016 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21309991)
Not really. I am not a Democrat and I've voted Republican before in the past. I vote for the person, not what one party or the other tells me to vote.

Same here :thumbsup

But extreme Trump fanboys are so narrow minded they can only call us "libs" its all they can comprehend and vote party line only, this is how corrupt people like Trump get elected while losing the majority of the American vote :2 cents:

romeo22 11-18-2016 01:44 PM

Is this over yet

Google Expert 11-18-2016 02:32 PM

Trump's a good sport



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123