I don't think so...

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4pX-zZrB17...oque%2B(3).jpg

She's pretty regardless. I think the beauty cues like smooth skin, chiseled cheekbones, big eyes, shiny hair are mostly universal. There may have been a ton of beautiful people "back then" who simply never saw a camera or had access to nice clothes even. Now everyone has a phone and can share every pretty face they see.

Women with less clothes looks better

I give you exhibit A and exhibit B: Anlella Sagra and Lauren Drain.

https://s23.postimg.org/wk5tpqjnv/anllela_sagra_13.jpg

https://s23.postimg.org/8uge11laj/anllela16.jpg

https://s23.postimg.org/82dq1uh3f/Anllela_Sagra.jpg

https://s23.postimg.org/6ytlpvwgb/anllela_sagra_19.jpg

https://s23.postimg.org/wgc09he6j/anllela11.jpg

https://s23.postimg.org/z6lc6oavf/lauren_drain_44.jpg

https://s23.postimg.org/3pf6jf8cr/Lauren_Drain_32.jpg

https://s23.postimg.org/oxsv0umtn/lauren_drain_33.jpg

you never know, they say that ppl are getting better if you get closer to them and after few drinks :winkwink::winkwink:
so these photos may be actually far from stiffy cock's sultan's reality

so fucking hot :thumbsup

There wasnt as many gay guys posing as straight banging girls with flat ass and twink bodies. Must be. :thumbsup

Vintage muffs...

http://assets2.vice.com/images/galle...1424787779.jpg

Wow these women look like dudes! Masculine faces and hairy legs no thanks!

Never wished to be a Sultan? :winkwink:

Fuck my eyes! Time makes people more humanoid-beautiful!

http://i.imgur.com/bGr4ZOZ.jpg
Rita Hayworth

http://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/be...ome-hither.jpg
Veronica Lake

http://img2-1.timeinc.net/people/i/2...acall-1024.jpg
Lauren Becall

http://img1.imagilive.com/0117/78615...35754d2caa.jpg
The everyday style of woman in the 1940s

http://img1.imagilive.com/0117/s.jpg
A lot of the crap that goes on with today's women

wonder who has more fun though. if I was a betting woman would put cash on the latter =)

btw I fucking love your signature

For me today woman looks more pervert...

Nuthin' held a candle to Caroline Munro in her early days.


http://38.media.tumblr.com/2b280f7b9...asv1o1_400.gif

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TEJ3F9R2J5...s1600/cm29.jpg

http://cdn.icelebz.com/celebs/caroli...es/photo19.jpg

Simple odds : Millions more cameras + millions more models

Nothing else.

Thanks

We had more fun in the past.

As an old man that remembers the past without the rose colored glasses I'll be the first to say that women were more sexual than they are today.

The women of the past sucked, fucked, took it in the ass, dyked out, participated in orgies, etc. They were whores in the bedroom and saints in the kitchen. The difference was that they were far more discreet and had a hell of a lot more class. (((( And a hell of a lot cleaner too if you know what I mean)))


In the 1960s I did business with a lot of the old guys that were born around the turn of the century. One of them had been throwing swinger retreats in the blue ridge mountains since the mid 1930s. When I knew him he was still organizing the events but was bitching about the increase usage of drugs.

I like your style recent months. When you do not post illogical "dass waciss" posts (like you used to year or two ago) you seem smart.

There were plenty of insanely beautiful women back in the day, style and requirements were different though.

Also don't forget that pictures and what you see on the street are two different things.

I would even believe there were way less overweight females than today, despite the much fueled "beauty" cult.

Grandma NO!

I'd give to the second one. They are all beautiful in their own way.

Damn I forgot about her. What a freakin' babe...


http://i.imgur.com/714kUb3.jpg
Brigit Bardot