GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Rachel Maddow claims to have President Drumpf's tax returns (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1251889)

JFK 03-15-2017 11:28 AM

Fitty Late Filings :Graucho

Speigelau 03-15-2017 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 21627304)
Yeah, I agree. I like Rachel Maddow and watch her show often. To her credit it was a good report, but it was overhyped. She has a solid record otherwise.

??? Her record is horrible, she's full of bluster and misinformation and I hold her personally responsible for brainwashing you. Any other network would have fired her after her pre-election debacle.


Joshua G 03-15-2017 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21628102)
??? Her record is horrible, she's full of bluster and misinformation

thats why mark prince loves her. She tells him fairy tales that affirm the liberal narrative that russia runs the country, trump is hitler, climate change will destroy the earth...

no facts. just shit that makes mark tingly inside. feels good.

:1orglaugh

MrBottomTooth 03-15-2017 12:06 PM

Breaking news: "Business owner pays the legally required amount of income taxes. More at 11. Back to you Wolf."

flashfire 03-15-2017 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21628051)
Sure it is.
He's worth 10 billion total. Making 150 million in just one year is pretty damn good.

916M loss on his 1995 return.....so if he did 150M every year in the from 95-2005 he should have broke even. Its pretty obvious he is the one who leaked the return so you gotta think this is one of if not his best years.

Putting 112M in your pocket in one year isn't too shabby, but its not near the levels he boasts about. Go look up what the really wealthy people in this world earn.

Then you look at what he inherited, guy has done nothing special...Paris Hilton has had a better rate of return on her inherited income


Warren Buffet made 37M A DAY last year fyi


For christ sakes Lebron James earned nearly 80M last year for putting a ball in a hoop

Robbie 03-15-2017 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire (Post 21628219)
916M loss on his 1995 return.....so if he did 150M every year in the from 95-2005 he should have broke even.

Remember, that having a loss doesn't mean that you lost everything you have.

I could be worth a million dollars...then have one of my businesses that would have it's own bank account and money have a bad year and have a loss.

Didn't affect my original million. Didn't affect my other business. But it was a loss. I can now use that loss for taxes (according to how my overall corporation is structured, etc.)

I have no idea how Trump is set up...but I would assume it's done in an efficient way that is best for tax purposes (taxes are one of the biggest expenses for every business).

What I'm trying to say is...you can show a major loss one year when something goes bad. Doesn't mean you are broke, and it doesn't mean you can't make a killing the following year...but it DOES give you all of that loss to write off of your taxes.

It's a simple deduction. And you can break it up into chunks over the years.
My own accountant did the same thing when he got divorced over a decade ago and lost everything.
He was able to write that big loss off over the next several years.

It's more common in the business world than you would think. And of course if you listened to the anchors over at CNN during the campaign you would come away thinking this was something that had never been done before and was borderline criminal activity. :(

flashfire 03-15-2017 12:27 PM

I am not saying that...I am saying one 2 page return from 2005 proves absolutely nothing either way...if they all looked like that they would have been released IMO

150M isn't much for a guy who acts like one of the richest men in the world...he boasts more than anyone. Buffet makes that every 4 days lol

Steve Rupe 03-15-2017 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21628159)
thats why mark prince loves her. She tells him fairy tales that affirm the liberal narrative that russia runs the country, trump is hitler, climate change will destroy the earth...

no facts. just shit that makes mark tingly inside. feels good.

:1orglaugh

I very seldom watch her show but when I have she has not told fairy tales and was very fact based with multiple sources and presented her reports in a very professional and yet entertaining way. One of the very best media commentators in the field. I am satisfied that her employment status is assured, if not for MSNBC, for someone else. My opinion of course.

Joshua G 03-15-2017 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21628306)
I very seldom watch her show but when I have she has not told fairy tales and was very fact based with multiple sources and presented her reports in a very professional and yet entertaining way. One of the very best media commentators in the field. I am satisfied that her employment status is assured, if not for MSNBC, for someone else. My opinion of course.

i agree with you...before trump.

but since trump...she's as fake as the rest of the channel...& last nights broadcast is all the proof i need.

total liberal speculations regarding russia, with nothing. obama has trump wiretapped & they still have nothing.

unless you think last nights show was full of facts...maybe you can find this proof of russian collusion since obamas NSA & rachel can't.

:)

flashfire 03-15-2017 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21628327)
i agree with you...before trump.

but since trump...she's as fake as the rest of the channel...& last nights broadcast is all the proof i need.

total liberal speculations regarding russia, with nothing. obama has trump wiretapped & they still have nothing.

unless you think last nights show was full of facts...maybe you can find this proof of russian collusion since obamas NSA & rachel can't.

:)

lol speaking of fake...where are the facts on this

total speculation of wire tapping with NO PROOF as usual

Trump should get back to building his fence paid for by US tax payers like he promised

Bladewire 03-15-2017 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire (Post 21628342)
lol speaking of fake...where are the facts on this

total speculation of wire tapping with NO PROOF as usual

Trump should get back to building his fence paid for by US tax payers like he promised

Sad how he directly, and clearly, accuses the last POTUS of committing a felony by having him wiretapped, then immediately cowers away and only lets his 2 spokespeople & GOP congressmen speak on his behalf.

Trump is a cowardly liar

Joshua G 03-15-2017 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire (Post 21628342)
lol speaking of fake...where are the facts on this

total speculation of wire tapping with NO PROOF as usual

Trump should get back to building his fence paid for by US tax payers like he promised

LOL. its only on the cover of NYTimes january 20...

http://cdn.newsbusters.org/styles/bl...?itok=J8I0Qe7o

sorry i guess im posting fake news, right? & the dirt found on flynn, when the recorded conversation was provided to washington post....no wiretap, right?

keep your head in the sand where it belongs, bro.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Robbie 03-15-2017 01:12 PM

That's the funny thing.

The media reports this stuff. THEN, they conveniently "forget" it just a month later...and the people who are so intent on hating Trump go right along with it.

Maybe if some of the anti-Trump people would stand up and say "HEY! You guys reported all of this yourselves! And now you say the opposite. Please explain this to us."

Maybe then the media would start acting like real journalists instead of an extension of the Democrat National Committee

Edward R. Murrow is rolling in his grave as is Walter Cronkite. Both of those guys were extremely liberal in their personal lives. But they took their duty as journalists and leaders of the free press very seriously.

They would have NEVER engaged in the partisan b.s. that has become so accepted in the media today.

This is reminiscent of the "Yellow Journalism" fad of the 1890's.
It's disgusting. :(


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123