@ paul the west is soooooo fucking peaceful tho look at the terror map of the west:

http://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-con...ghope.org_.png


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh nigga plz

Today in Paris a terrorist tried to hit a cop with a hammer

International news..

Notre Dame hammer attack suspect yelled 'This is for Syria'; terror investigation launched | Fox News

Also today 47 clucks in the USA shot each other but that's not in international news

you can bet hundreds of Christians around the world today killed each other and dozens of Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, Atheists, and Pagans also killed today.

But there's that one guy with the hammer crying "This is for Syria" that's the issue.

no, each party has their flaws. At this point its down to choosing which option is the least retarded... shutting the borders down might help to an extent but it won't solve the problem completely, However opening the borders is just gonna bring in more of these terrorists.

let more in and more will die or let less in and less will die.

I've simplified it for you dumb libs. Your call.

I'm out :321GFY

If 10% are pro-radical Islam, the more the whole number is the more pro-radical Islamists there. This means more terrorist attacks.

But that's not the real problem.

The real problem is when they decide to have their own political party representing just Muslim values.

At the moment the SNP represent 5.295 million Scots. There are 2,786,635 Muslims in the UK mostly in England. In 2001 there was 1.3 million. If in 15 years it has doubled, it's obvious in 33 years it could treble to 10 million. Especially when the birth rate of Muslims is so much higher than any other sector.

The SNP have 56 Members of the UK Parliament. What could 10 million Muslims achieve?

When Americans start blowing people up on the streets of London, I will care what you think.

Just do what Poland has done, don't allow any migrants from Muslim countries.

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/pr...e365bb1f0f7aa5

you posted a map of worldwide armed conflicts and I posted one...I did not mention the country you sold out at all...

Sorry, I grew up in the Middle East, Jerusalem in fact, and I find most of the arguments here as non convincing. I experienced terrorist attacks first hand, beneath my bedroom window, and their origin was not Islam, nor their trigger.
I've lost too many Jewish, Muslim, and Christian friends in these attacks, and I'm still not swiped by arguments that are based on wikipedia.

So what is the origin of all the wars in the ME?

Please don't come ack with the Western influence because that's bullshit. Except when it comes to the creation of Israel.

Your map includes CIA influence. Start by showing the proof of that, unless you include the CIA giving people already at war the arms to carry on that war, you're fucked.

Islam starts wars or tries to and bombs people where there is no conflict.

Well, there are no angels in the Middle East, myself included Paul.
Deflating any conflict with wikipedia truths is nice, it makes everyone pseudo intellectuals for about 15 seconds of glory.
The real tough and brave question to be asked in my humble opinion is not "what is the origin of wars in the Middle East?", but "what will be the origin of peace in the Middle East?", and wiping out Islam does not seem to be a good start. My 2 cents about it, but what do I know.