GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier shows its ability by making a fast turn at sea. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1285130)

pimpmaster9000 11-23-2017 07:08 PM

Did anybody see "American wiper" with Bradly pooper and Siena bowl filler? It's about this guy who turns radical...goes on killing sprees in other countries...then is killed by another radical...crazy shit...

EddyTheDog 11-23-2017 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22082766)
LOL you invaded over lies and pretend it was "legal"...Saddams invisible wmd...oh what a joke...

Saddam had and has used WMD's - That's not deniable - He was a valid target - Should he have been the number 1 after 9/11? - Not so sure...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 22082864)
No, you got it wrong.

I'm right - OK there are women in the navy - But they are not available.....

Steve Rupe 11-23-2017 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 22082894)
Saddam had and has used WMD's - That's not deniable - He was a valid target - Should he have been the number 1 after 9/11? - Not so sure...



I'm right - OK there are women in the navy - But they are not available.....

There is also more than 5,000 aboard the ship and there are women in the ships crew as well as the aircrew and women, in reality, are always available.

EddyTheDog 11-24-2017 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 22082965)
There is also more than 5,000 aboard the ship and there are women in the ships crew as well as the aircrew and women, in reality, are always available.

I know a few women in the UK forces and they are definatly not available to men - It wasn't a serious comment anyway - It was a light hearted comment about all those men with not much to do in a confined space...

aztecboi2003 11-24-2017 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22082363)
That is just bad ass. If you've even been on an air craft carrier before you know how freaking huge it is....

The past 2 years I worked on the Nimitz, and the Stennis when they were in Bremerton. They are huge.

PornDiscounts-V 11-25-2017 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22082345)
Waste of money...

You broke or something?

just a punk 11-25-2017 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 22082657)
Of course if a Carry Group were to be destroyed by any kind of a nuke the country that delivered the nuke, with in minutes, would be totally destroyed

Of course not. If the States will dare to use nukes against Russia, China or even India, they will be burned out in about 30 minutes. No one will survive. Even in bunkers. So I don't think that a tactical nuke attack on the US aircraft carrier group will trigger a mutual ICBM strike, because it will mean a total annihilation of the United States and all NATO countries.

Also even non-nuke cruise missiles are able to sink a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier just easily. This is how old good non-nuclear SS-N-22 Sunburns made in 1982 work:



The modern Russian missiles like SS-N-26 Strobile, SS-N-27 Sizzler and SSC-6 Sennight let zero chances to survive to any type of the US aircraft carriers. Just compare a price of a cruise missile and a price of a whole aircraft carrier with 3000 men aboard. Now tell me you didn't know that :)

Once again: your aircraft carriers are cool, but they are dinosaurs in 21st century. Course they could work fine against stone-age countries like Somalia or Yemen, but not against Russia, China or India. They will be sunk in minutes with a minimum effort. All the mentioned countries have a lot of cheap-ass shipwreck cruise missiles that are undetectable and uninterceptable, because they fly on almost a zero attitude with an ultrasonic speed. Boom and there is no "Abraham Lincoln" with all its crew. These missiles are very cheap and extremely reliable nowadays. Sad but true.

Bladewire 11-25-2017 05:39 PM

^^^ Insecure Ruski afraid of America's big dick

just a punk 11-25-2017 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22083877)
^^^ Insecure Ruski afraid if America's big dick

A world's biggest dick does look like this:



It's absolutely uninterceptable and such a single dick is able to destroy whole Texas or the Great Britain + Paris at once.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...2890277728.jpg

I like your comparison with a big dick :thumbsup

The USA have no dick to be compared with old good SS-18 Satan while Russia is currently upgrading to SS-X-30 Satan-2 - the new generation of the largest and most deadly nuclear missile in the World's history. No other country on the planet has a technology to make something similar.

The most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated was "King of bombs". But it was just a bomb. Now the same 50 megaton nuke can be delivered with a single Satan-2 ICBM to any place on Earth. A big dick you say? LOL )))

pimpmaster9000 11-25-2017 06:00 PM

Just a reminder that US aircraft are not stealth...you can detect them with a potato...

Steve Rupe 11-25-2017 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22083874)
Of course not. If the States will dare to use nukes against Russia, China or even India, they will be burned out in about 30 minutes. No one will survive. Even in bunkers. So I don't think that a tactical nuke attack on the US aircraft carrier group will trigger a mutual ICBM strike, because it will mean a total annihilation of the United States and all NATO countries.

Also even non-nuke cruise missiles are able to sink a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier just easily. This is how old good non-nuclear SS-N-22 Sunburns made in 1982 work:



The modern Russian missiles like SS-N-26 Strobile, SS-N-27 Sizzler and SSC-6 Sennight let zero chances to survive to any type of the US aircraft carriers. Just compare a price of a cruise missile and a price of a whole aircraft carrier with 3000 men aboard. Now tell me you didn't know that :)

Once again: your aircraft carriers are cool, but they are dinosaurs in 21st century. Course they could work fine against stone-age countries like Somalia or Yemen, but not against Russia, China or India. They will be sunk in minutes with a minimum effort. All the mentioned countries have a lot of cheap-ass shipwreck cruise missiles that are undetectable and uninterceptable, because they fly on almost a zero attitude with an ultrasonic speed. Boom and there is no "Abraham Lincoln" with all its crew. These missiles are very cheap and extremely reliable nowadays. Sad but true.

if a nuke of any type is used against the U.S. forces that nation will be destroyed, period. We have a zero tolerance policy. If Russia destroys a Carrier Battle Group with nukes the entire nation of Russia will be destroyed. The U.S. has this policy to deter any nation from first use, period.

just a punk 11-26-2017 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 22083931)
if a nuke of any type is used against the U.S. forces that nation will be destroyed, period.

Hmm... So you want the US nation to be eliminated? The moto Russian ICBM forces is "nobody after us" and they really have means to burn out a whole planet a few times. I bet the US president is not stupid like you to exchange a whole American nation (including himself and his family members) and nations of all NATO countries for some aircraft carrier battle group.

FYI: according to the Russian military doctrine, the ultrasonic cruise missiles with tactical nukes are the only weapon that should be used against the US aircraft carriers (this is written here). There will be no "if", because military people don't ask questions. Period :)

Sarn 11-26-2017 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22083877)
^^^ Insecure Ruski afraid of America's big dick


just a punk 11-26-2017 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 22084137)

That made me to recall this:


Sarn 11-26-2017 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22084266)
That made me to recall this:


Shiiit (c) obama

just a punk 11-26-2017 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 22084137)

That made me to recall this:


Steve Rupe 11-26-2017 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22084065)
Hmm... So you want the US nation to be eliminated? The moto Russian ICBM forces is "nobody after us" and they really have means to burn out a whole planet a few times. I bet the US president is not stupid like you to exchange a whole American nation (including himself and his family members) and nations of all NATO countries for some aircraft carrier battle group.

FYI: according to the Russian military doctrine, the ultrasonic cruise missiles with tactical nukes are the only weapon that should be used against the US aircraft carriers (this is written here). There will be no "if", because military people don't ask questions. Period :)

The President does not really have a say in this matter. The U.S. has a military policy, much like Russia has a military policy. According to you Russian military policy is to use nukes against a carrier group even thought they know to do so will initiate the end of Russia. The Russians know well what our military policies are just as we know theirs. Our military policy is zero tolerance of first use. The Russian military are fully aware what will happen to Russia if they ever initiate first use. So does every military with nukes. As you said there will be no "if" as the military will respond as they are trained to do.

pimpmaster9000 11-26-2017 04:55 PM

Can't wait for everybody to have nukes...

just a punk 11-26-2017 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 22084485)
The President does not really have a say in this matter.

Who cares that some piece of shit says? The military guys have a strict algorithm. They will follow it in any case. They are not trained to think, they are trained to execute.

Steve Rupe 11-26-2017 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22084947)
Who cares that some piece of shit says? The military guys have a strict algorithm. They will follow it in any case. They are not trained to think, they are trained to execute.

On this point your are correct.

Steve Rupe 11-26-2017 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22084923)
Can't wait for everybody to have nukes...

A dream of yours that will never come true and the dream of a traumatized, twisted, ignorant mind.

pimpmaster9000 11-27-2017 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 22085055)
A dream of yours that will never come true and the dream of a traumatized, twisted, ignorant mind.

Sure it will...technology advances everywhere...it does not even have to be nukes...the moment small countries start having the "off" switch to life on Earth is the moment humanity will be free from your Mickey mouse politics...

Keep comforting yourself daquan lol

Sarn 11-27-2017 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22084923)
Can't wait for everybody to have nukes...

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22085217)
Sure it will...technology advances everywhere...it does not even have to be nukes...the moment small countries start having the "off" switch to life on Earth is the moment humanity will be free from your Mickey mouse politics...
Keep comforting yourself daquan lol

:1orglaugh

Bladewire 11-27-2017 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22085217)
Sure it will...technology advances everywhere...it does not even have to be nukes...the moment small countries start having the "off" switch to life on Earth is the moment humanity will be free from your Mickey mouse politics...

Keep comforting yourself daquan lol

What is "daquan" and why do you call Steve Rupe "daquan" I'm so confused

pimpmaster9000 11-27-2017 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22085544)
What is "daquan" and why do you call Steve Rupe "daquan" I'm so confused

steve believes in gang logic/values and the right of the stronger party to bully the weak for financial interest...for example if country x does not want to sell resource y to the USA he believes it is his right as a gang member to invade...

example of steve logic:

little girl has a bicycle...daquan is big and strong but does not have a bicycle...daquan beats up little girl and takes her bicycle...little girl gets gun to protect herself from daquan...daquan get super pissed because he is the only one who should own a gun

steve is white daquan :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123