Do you work for FOX News Lazycash?

Off camera Leslie Stahl asked trump why do you say fake news? He said he called anything negative about him fake news. The sad thing is the sponge heads believe it.

I don't know...I'm assuming that the rest would be their selection of series ("The '60's" and other decades, "This Is Life", "Anthony Bourdain, Parts Unknown", "Shades Of America", etc.)

Uh...I know that people these days are DELIBERATELY having short memories.
But it was CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC who originally coined the term "Fake News".

Trump merely turned it around on them and then the entire internet started posting them doing "fake news" in videos that then showed how they lied.

So the "sponge heads" were originally people like...YOU. But now that (once again) Trump has turned it around on them and pointed out that they were projecting their own shit...you and the media have conveniently "forgotten" where the term and the ACTUAL "fake news" came from.

got it. I had wondered about all this the last time I was in an airport. we cut the cable years and years ago and rarely even get a glimpse of cnn cable. I do check cnn.com daily. of course the news requires active reading, but i don't really see any glaring issues with cnn online. seems like the cable channel is pretty shitty though.

No, it was Hitler calling the media 'Lügenpresse'. Toadstool Trump and his cultists fall in line with the same rhetoric.

Good riddance..a lot of people become puppets because of them, I'm glad I don't waste time watching the news..

Well...the online version is pretty outrageous with it's "opinion" pieces.
If you notice a lot of the time they have their stories on cnn.com marked as "Analysis". And that sounds very official. But it's just Opinion pieces that you would have read in the Editorial section on the last page of the newspaper back in the day.

Plus they tend to run big headlines politically that are anti-Trump and some of the biggest news of the day is "buried" on the site.

Hell, for a while there they were putting up a pop-up with a link to "all the news you may have missed today".
And I thought to myself..."Why would I have missed all this news when I am looking at your FRONT PAGE???"

The answer is clear. They are doing something similar to their television show: Making the "news" all about themselves with opinion pieces covering the front page.

It is easier on the mind to read their opinion pieces as opposed to watching their "talk show" style format on television over and over and over again.

Today they don't have ANY mention at all on CNN.Com's front page of THE biggest story: The de-classification of the Russia probe related documents and FISA warrants.

They simply choose to ignore it because it is something that will tear down the "Russia" narrative.

They VERY briefly spoke about it this morning on John King's show on television (about a 10 second mention of it by King, but no "discussion" follow up at all)...but show a very, very strong LACK of any journalistic curiosity about potential abuse of power by the Obama administration using intelligence resources to spy on an opposing party's campaign.

I mean damn...Nixon didn't even have the balls to do that. Watergate hit the fan from G. Gordon Liddy and his crew breaking into a room and taking some files.
The Democrat administration used the full "crushing" resources of the Dept. Of Justice and FBI to actually SPY on the other campaign and kept it secret.

Remember when Trump accused them of doing exactly that in 2016? And the Obama Admin DENIED it, the FBI DENIED it, and the media (CNN, MSNBC, WAPO, NY TIMES) all LAUGHED at Trump and said he was paranoid.

That was when they THOUGHT Trump was going to lose of course.

If CNN had any journalistic integrity left in them at all...they would be doing investigative reporting on this.
Instead they ignore it and deny it.

I watched the video and sorry to say it doesn't remove the fact MSM is losing ground and neither does it help their cause.

Now what?

I understand most all that. That's why I mentioned I use active reading. I don't think anyone in these threads can claim I'm uninformed. Sure, I have an opinion, but I don't make uninformed opinions or I wouldn't waste time yapping an opinion not based on anything close to reality. I use cnn and many other news outlets to do that.

Sure, cnn isn't perfect, media in it's entirety has real problems right now, I get that. I check out drudge too, heck, I read the gateway pundit and outlets like that. I tend to stay away from Infowars type outfits. Trying to understand both sides by reading both sides versions of reality helps me sort out mine.

For me it's more about seeing a story on the news, and then trying to find out what really happened from the source.

If CNN or Fox News says that a person said something and paint it in an unflattering light...you can usually go to YouTube and watch the person saying it unedited and find the truth.

And for events that happen...then you have to really dig. Many times the best way to find out what really happened in an incident in the United States is to find the local news channels websites. They usually don't have any obvious political bias in their reporting.

As for world news...all bets are off. :(
We literally have no idea if what we are being told is true or some kind of propaganda.

The term "fake news" started trending right when Wikileaks dropped the Podesta emails. The media was desperate to distract from these emails which led to the Pizzagate/ Pedogate scandal.

Google Graphic Proves How the MSM ‘Fake News’ Strategy Was Implemented To Short-Circuit PIZZAGATE Scandal

https://www.sott.net/image/s18/36323...04_at_5_39.png

The media tried to distract us by claiming that people believed there were kidnapped kids in the basement of a pizza shop. Only a gullible dipshit, like RedFred for example, would let the media distract from the leaked emails

:1orglaugh

Listen to the cries for help :2 cents:

I think the biggest question is why CNN is continuing to run failed programming. They just double down over and over again. There has to be some agreement in place with DNC/Obama/Soros/whoever.

Yeah, this place is mentioned in the emails dozens of times. The owner is for sure involved in some criminal shit, but this place is just a small part of a much larger network. When the media focused on this place it was obvious that it was a distraction

:pimp

Seeing the "art" in the Podesta brothers homes leaves no question at all to the fact that they not only strangely obsessed with children (mostly nude and disturbing sculptures and paintings) and are totally insane.

When you couple all those weird cryptic emails obsessing over pasta and noodles, and the artwork of kids in bondage...its very odd. Actually beyond odd. :helpme

go find the huge reddit discussion on it all. it's insane.

it's easy to sit back and say "more conspiracy bullshit" if you don't look into it. but when you go through everything you'll be left with your jaw on the floor. the craziest shit was all his coded language in his emails which "coincidentally" is all on the FBI.gov site explaining the code and its pedophila meanings. Podesta didn't even deny they were his emails. Then there's all the pics and descriptions and the "spirit cooking" shit which in itself is incredibly disturbing.