GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Michael Cohen is pleading guilty to lying to Congress about Trump/Russia (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1306331)

onwebcam 11-30-2018 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22374715)
http://our-russia.com/sites/default/...?itok=qC5M2435

How many other comrades do you live with?


0 :thumbsup My building was actually built by Dupont for traveling executives to stay at in the early 1900s.

Bladewire 11-30-2018 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22374667)
Why do you keep lying about why they were indicted? They lied to the FBI about their dealings on the Trump campaign. It is with out a doubt about Trump...

You can keep lying to yourself but it's not gonna stop the truth.. just give it up already, you look like a fucking idiot trying to deny stuff that can easily be proven..it's court records..

He's a lonely alt-right hate troll

It builds his fragile self esteem to get people to do research for him, then deny the facts of the research.

He thinks anyone who gives links to prove him wrong is an idiot.

He thinks anyone who takes him seriously is an idiot.

It's his job to post lies and deny the truth that's what he gets paid his little rubles for.

What is the sense of trying to get someone to see the truth when they deny the truth over and over and over again for 3 years? No sense to it he's a lost case. End of story

3 years!

No integrity

No common sense

No sense of right & wrong

Rochard 11-30-2018 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22374708)
She told that to the FBI while being questioned... Grant it she did get special treatment by answering any questions while not being under oath so you're somewhat correct.. I guess that makes it ok for you? Who was doing the questioning? Peter Strzok... Who was in attendance while she was being questioned? Her co-conspirators....

What exactly did Hillary Clinton say during this interview?

Did she lie during the interview? If so, she should have been charged. Did she say "she forget"? I don't recall that.

It was the Republicans leading the investigation, yet... They couldn't find a valid reason to press any charges against anyone.

Bladewire 11-30-2018 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22374720)
What exactly did Hillary Clinton say during this interview?

Did she lie during the interview? If so, she should have been charged. Did she say "she forget"? I don't recall that.

It was the Republicans leading the investigation, yet... They couldn't find a valid reason to press any charges against anyone.

Trump supporters know the investigations are fake, they just want to see someone from the other team being harassed that's all they care about is people suffering and hurting people that aren't on their team. If it's a minority or woman, they get extra excitement from it.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22374720)
What exactly did Hillary Clinton say during this interview?

Did she lie during the interview? If so, she should have been charged. Did she say "she forget"? I don't recall that.

It was the Republicans leading the investigation, yet... They couldn't find a valid reason to press any charges against anyone.

She claimed she didn't know what the "C" meant.

https://www.theverge.com/2016/9/2/12...assified-label

Spent nearly her entire adult life in government and supposedly doesn't know classification designations..

She bold faced lied.. You suckers eat it up..

bronco67 11-30-2018 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22374607)
Not at all. Mueller did not lie to Congress at all.

He said.... "Secretary Powell presented evidence this week that Baghdad has failed to disarm it's weapons of mass destruction, and is willingly attempting to evade and deceive the international community".

Everything he said was in fact true - very true. Secretary Powell did in fact present such evidence, and his report said they believed Baghdad failed to disarm, and his report also said they believe Baghdad was intentionally trying to deceive the International community by dismissing the inspectors.

Everything he said was in fact true.

We have had dozens of investigations into Hillary Clinton and everyone else, and all of them have come back with "no charges". Yet we have one investigation into Trump and dozens have been indicted, some have plead guilty, and others found guilty in court.

You can spin it any way you want but the truth is the truth.

I love their argument. Everyone should just overlook the gang of criminals running the country because..."Iraq war 17 years ago".

onwebcam 11-30-2018 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 22374728)
I love their argument. Everyone should just overlook the gang of criminals running the country because..."Iraq war 17 years ago".

What's the crime? Because "collusion" isn't one. You can't have an investigation without an actual crime. Name it, because Mueller hasn't. Prosecutors can't be allowed to dig through people's lives to "discover" a crime especially while blatantly overlooking the crimes of others.. If that's the future you wish for we might as well get down to business.. Winner decides..

onwebcam 11-30-2018 06:05 PM

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...?itok=hlHZxGuQ

Provoking New Crimes Rather than Uncovering Past Crimes: Mueller's Modus Operandi

"Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don't believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.

In the end, Mueller should be judged by how successful he has been in satisfying his central mission. Judged by that standard and based on what we now know, he seems to be an abysmal failure."

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...modus-operandi

Bladewire 11-30-2018 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 22374728)
I love their argument. Everyone should just overlook the gang of criminals running the country because..."Iraq war 17 years ago".

He tries so hard to divert the conversation of topic.

Trump's in the slow cooker. I love watching him squirm. Trump is no match for Mueller.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22374744)
He tries so hard to divert the conversation of topic.

Trump's in the slow cooker. I love watching him squirm. Trump is no match for Mueller.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtQjZgSVAAA8yGX.jpg:large

Rochard 11-30-2018 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22374723)
She claimed she didn't know what the "C" meant.

https://www.theverge.com/2016/9/2/12...assified-label

Spent nearly her entire adult life in government and supposedly doesn't know classification designations..

She bold faced lied.. You suckers eat it up..

So?

She wasn't sure what a single letter mean on an email? She lie about it? Was she under oath? Did she commit a crime?

No. This was a bullshit witch hunt investigation in which they were "hoping" to find some law broken, but found none. Do you know how you know it was a witch hunt? Simple. They had a dozen investigations and NOT ONE returned with any charges or even any wrong doing.

Meanwhile, Trump there is calling Mueller's investigation a witch hunt while everyone is going to jail.

http://rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/emails.jpg

onwebcam 11-30-2018 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22374746)
So?

She wasn't sure what a single letter mean on an email? She lie about it? Was she under oath? Did she commit a crime?

No. This was a bullshit witch hunt investigation in which they were "hoping" to find some law broken, but found none. Do you know how you know it was a witch hunt? Simple. They had a dozen investigations and NOT ONE returned with any charges or even any wrong doing.

Meanwhile, Trump there is calling Mueller's investigation a witch hunt while everyone is going to jail.

http://rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/emails.jpg

lol

I knew you'd give her a pass in her bold-face lying...

Like I said, we may as well get down to business. No sense in dragging it out any longer.. The only people that helps is those in Washington.

It may kick off here in Fort Nashborough if the mayor keeps it up. The natives are restless.

Bladewire 11-30-2018 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22374746)
So?

She wasn't sure what a single letter mean on an email? She lie about it? Was she under oath? Did she commit a crime?

He wants to change the thread topic to ANYTHING but Trump & Russia.

Hillary, Obama, Pelosi have nothing to do with Trump lying and Trump licking Putin's ass clean for a few rubles.

Trump admitted to lying today.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22374750)
He wants to change the thread topic to ANYTHING but Trump & Russia.

Hillary, Obama, Pelosi have nothing to do with Trump lying and Trump licking Putin's ass clean for a few rubles.

Trump admitted to lying today.

Do you mean the same Hillary who's foundation received over $100 million from those involved in Uranium One?

If her Foundation was so legit and such a beacon of light to humanity then why did donations drop by 80% last year?

King Mark 11-30-2018 07:20 PM

Hillary lost. She's a non-factor.

Trump is the liar in chief. The only thing that matters right now.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22374762)
Hillary lost. She's a non-factor.

Trump is the liar in chief. The only thing that matters right now.

Not when everyone involved in the witch hunt is doing so to keep Trump from going after her/them.. And the only people getting harmed are innocent bystanders.

This isn't about Trump or Hillary.. This is the deep state telling EVERYONE "it's our pick or no one" If you are involved with a campaign outside of the establishment choices then you will be ruined so do not even go there again....

King Mark 11-30-2018 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22374764)
Not when everyone involved in the witch hunt is doing so to keep Trump from going after her/them..

That has nothing to do with it. You're deflecting.

King Mark 11-30-2018 07:25 PM

You should update your sig. Might help you stay focused.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22374765)
That has nothing to do with it. You're deflecting.

EVERYTHING to do with it. "Insurance Policy"

bronco67 11-30-2018 08:11 PM

We're going to see more shit drop in the next few days. It's very possible that next week will be a week just like this one. We're all finding out the things intelligent people with common sense have known to be true in some form or another. You don't have to be a master dot connector to get a general sense of what happened, especially when you can read Trump like a book and know that he is 110% motivated by money. He's been compromised by the Russians and is a traitor to his country. And he's the fucking president. It should be scary to anyone.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 22374770)
We're going to see more shit drop in the next few days. It's very possible that next week will be a week just like this one. We're all finding out the things intelligent people with common sense have known to be true in some form or another. You don't have to be a master dot connector to get a general sense of what happened, especially when you can read Trump like a book and know that he is 110% motivated by money. He's been compromised by the Russians and is a traitor to his country. And he's the fucking president. It should be scary to anyone.

What have you found out? That someone forgot about reading an email? That's genius. Pat yourself on the back one more time for me

bronco67 11-30-2018 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22374773)
What have you found out? That someone forgot about reading an email? That's genius. Pat yourself on the back one more time for me

That's a straw man argument. I didn't say anything about an email.


There's more than enough smoke around this fire and you know it. Why am I even engaging with you? You're a fucking idiot.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 22374775)
That's a straw man argument. I didn't say anything about an email.


There's more than enough smoke around this fire and you know it. Why am I even engaging with you? You're a fucking idiot.

I'm an idiot and you don't even know what the charge is about?

Pat yourself on the back twice for me you fucking genius you

VRPdommy 11-30-2018 08:55 PM

You can always tell when there is no true counterpoint to be made...
2 words always pop-up...
Hillery and Obama...

But to the point of the Clinton's (who I never really like by their legislative actions)
I don't think there have been any 2 people in government that have been so investigated and what did they turn-up ?
emails on a private server and sex with a intern.

Does anybody actually care about national security enough to let this one investigation come to a full public end. If not, you must have a vested interest in the cover-up.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRPdommy (Post 22374777)
You can always tell when there is no true counterpoint to be made...
2 words always pop-up...
Hillery and Obama...

But to the point of the Clinton's (who I never really like by their legislative actions)
I don't think there have been any 2 people in government that have been so investigated and what did they turn-up ?
emails on a private server and sex with a intern.

Does anybody actually care about national security enough to let this one investigation come to a full public end. If not, you must have a vested interest in the cover-up.

Full public end? How about explaining the start first? Because the current explanation is debunked and/or based on fabrication and lies BY those running the "investigation."

Obviously no one cares about National Security considering Hillary is still walking free.

King Mark 11-30-2018 10:29 PM

But Hillary!!! But Obama!!!

This is going to be the new angle during investigations.

Last resort type shit. Must suck for y'all.

VRPdommy 11-30-2018 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22374778)
Full public end? How about explaining the start first? Because the current explanation is debunked and/or based on fabrication and lies BY those running the "investigation."

Obviously no one cares about National Security considering Hillary is still walking free.

Full public end
- Come to a natural conclusion with a public release of all information investigated so we know if there were any actual 'witch hunts'.

Debunk what ?

How is Hillery a threat to you now ? LOL you crack me up. My turn to be funny !
There is a reason none of the other republicans continue to attack her... she is no longer a threat to them. Trump does it because it makes folks forget about what he has done... or not. It keeps you excited in a way that makes you blind.
I just can't figure out why 2 republican FBI directors, and 2.5 republican AG's can't find a reason to appoint a special prosecutor to go after Hillery...LOL...
Can we see Ivanka's emails while we are at it ? LOL
Everyone is corrupt but Trump right ?...LOL...
You have a POTUS that borders on treason. - That is not funny !

Drugs, something in the water or are you inbred ?

I pretty much know what is about to happen. You may be the last to figure it out. You go ahead and keep on fight'n Hillery, it will be alright !

'no more than' 781 days left no matter who you want to blame. I'm OK with that, if we can make it that far as a nation.

Assuming Mueller concludes, the AG will never release the report. Circular file it goes.
So you should be worried about the House investigative commttee's.
I can't wait to hear the BS generated by that 'WITCH HUNT" LOL !
All it's going to take is his tax returns. And those now have 4 ways to surface in the public eye.

But the sad reality is if Trump 'is able' to run for re-election, he will not make it past his own primary. Unless he can use Putin's money. He has quietly pissed off most of the large republican ATM machines. They will be betting against him even if satin is running.

Perhaps after pardoning himself, he can seek asylum in Russia....LOL...
Shack-up with Snowden....LOL...

It's a shame that nobody remembers that the investigation is about foreign influence in a election. Especially from the folks that don't want to count the votes of American's with hyphens in their name. Sorry, that's not even funny.

Bladewire 11-30-2018 10:40 PM

I've seen some alt-right trolls in comment sections going back to JFK trying to deflect.

They are lost and so fucking pathetic :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

onwebcam 11-30-2018 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRPdommy (Post 22374797)
Full public end
- Come to a natural conclusion with a public release of all information investigated so we know if there were any actual 'witch hunts'.

Debunk what ?

How is Hillery a threat to you now ? LOL you crack me up. My turn to be funny !
There is a reason none of the other republicans continue to attack her... she is no longer a threat to them. Trump does it because it makes folks forget about what he has done... or not. It keeps you excited in a way that makes you blind.
I just can't figure out why 2 republican FBI directors, and 2.5 republican AG's can't find a reason to appoint a special prosecutor to go after Hillery...LOL...
Can we see Ivanka's emails while we are at it ? LOL
Everyone is corrupt but Trump right ?...LOL...
You have a POTUS that borders on treason. - That is not funny !

Drugs, something in the water or are you inbred ?

I pretty much know what is about to happen. You may be the last to figure it out. You go ahead and keep on fight'n Hillery, it will be alright !

'no more than' 781 days left no matter who you want to blame. I'm OK with that, if we can make it that far as a nation.

Assuming Mueller concludes, the AG will never release the report. Circular file it goes.
So you should be worried about the House investigative commttee's.
I can't wait to hear the BS generated by that 'WITCH HUNT" LOL !
All it's going to take is his tax returns. And those now have 4 ways to surface in the public eye.

But the sad reality is if Trump 'is able' to run for re-election, he will not make it past his own primary. Unless he can use Putin's money. He has quietly pissed off most of the large republican ATM machines. They will be betting against him even if satin is running.

Perhaps after pardoning himself, he can seek asylum in Russia....LOL...
Shack-up with Snowden....LOL...

It's a shame that nobody remembers that the investigation is about foreign influence in a election. Especially from the folks that don't want to count the votes of American's with hyphens in their name. Sorry, that's not even funny.

The investigation is based on a dossier bought and paid for by Hillary... Based on PROVEN lies.... That's it...

The Russia connection? Deripaska, the man who Mueller asked to put up millions of his own money to free an FBI agent a decade ago..
Deripaska, the man who says that he was colluding, with the FBI, and has done so for at least the past decade...
What do you think Deripaska was getting in return? Why did Trump sanction him if he was "in collusion" with him?

The other connection? Halper.. Who was on US government payroll and who's lawyer states "He was US Intel"

Who else was on US Gov/FBI payroll? Carter Page...

Who received $10k cash from Israeli Intelligence which Mueller requested as his fine? Papadopolous...
Who "worked" for the Intelligence front in London? Papadopolous
Who's wife also worked at this Intelligence front? Papadopolous

Beginning to see a trend here? Let me know when you find "Trump collusion" in those FACTS

VRPdommy 11-30-2018 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22374800)
The investigation is based on a dossier bought and paid for by Hillary... Based on PROVEN lies.... That's it...

The Russia connection? Deripaska, the man who Mueller asked to put up millions of his own money to free an FBI agent a decade ago..
Deripaska, the man who says that he was colluding, with the FBI, and has done so for at least the past decade...
What do you think Deripaska was getting in return? Why did Trump sanction him if he was "in collusion" with him?

The other connection? Halper.. Who was on US government payroll and who's lawyer states "He was US Intel"

Who else was on US Gov/FBI payroll? Carter Page...

Who received $10k cash from Israeli Intelligence which Mueller requested as his fine? Papadopolous...
Who "worked" for the Intelligence front in London? Papadopolous
Who's wife also worked at this Intelligence front? Papadopolous

Beginning to see a trend here? Let me know when you find "Trump collusion" in those FACTS

The investigation is based on Russia trying to influence American elections...
Just Ask Facebook !
Or did they just lie to a republican senate committee for the hell of it just for public impressions.
You guys wanta fly that dossier up at half staff and it really does not matter in the scope of things except, if true, it really looks bad. i could care less about it.

I am more concerned about stopping foreign influence in our politics and that has been a lot easier to do since money is somehow equates to free speech and the only way to get to the bottom of it is a investigation, of which, I want to hear the results of !
And I don't care if it implicates Hillery and Obama !

onwebcam 11-30-2018 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRPdommy (Post 22374809)
The investigation is based on Russia trying to influence American elections...
Just Ask Facebook !
Or did they just lie to a republican senate committee for the hell of it just for public impressions.
You guys wanta fly that dossier up at half staff and it really does not matter in the scope of things except, if true, it really looks bad. i could care less about it.

I am more concerned about stopping foreign influence in our politics and that has been a lot easier to do since money is somehow equates to free speech and the only way to get to the bottom of it is a investigation, of which, I want to hear the results of !
And I don't care if it implicates Hillery and Obama !

You're asking if DARPA/Facebook "just lied" to Congress about some silly FB Ads? LOL

You REALLY took that shit seriously?

VRPdommy 11-30-2018 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22374811)
You're asking if DARPA/Facebook "just lied" to Congress about some silly FB Ads?

I'm not asking anything.
Your talking points have worn themselves out a long time ago.
Better go order some new ones.

BTW... I seems you were not paying attention to those hearings...
It's not about facebook adds, it's about the private data of users that was used in profile perspectives to excite particular users (like you) and that data was used outside of facebook as well as inside.
It's quite effective and that is what is in those reports. If you can read and understand them.

onwebcam 11-30-2018 11:43 PM

Oh look, we get to add another to the "FBI asset" list

"former FBI informer Felix Sater"

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...teer-collusion

Sure seemed to be a lot of FBI assets up in this ordeal.. I wonder how that happened?

onwebcam 11-30-2018 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRPdommy (Post 22374812)
I'm not asking anything.
Your talking points have worn themselves out a long time ago.
Better go order some new ones.

BTW... I seems you were not paying attention to those hearings...
It's not about facebook adds, it's about the private data of users that was used in profile perspectives to excite particular users (like you) and that data was used outside of facebook as well as inside.
It's quite effective and that is what is in those reports. If you can read and understand them.

Ah yes, the facebook data that Zuckerberg personally gave/taught the Obama campaign how to gain/use..

King Mark 11-30-2018 11:51 PM

Lmao....

onwebcam 11-30-2018 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22374817)
Lmao....

I suppose you're laughing at this?

Funny, When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions Of Users To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered
https://www.investors.com/politics/e...on-obama-2012/

Obama's Campaign IT head says they have/had ALL of FB data.. As in the entire sire of data..

BaldBastard 11-30-2018 11:54 PM

Snowden said project 'rainfall' could target and listen in to any phone or wireless communication, if your device goes through a satellite.. They have you

Staff from NSA testified the monitoring of political candidates in the USA was not a mistake but a primary core function.

Military surveillance can't be used in a civil case.

Australia and the UK do the monitoring of Americans... Out of you jurisdiction.

-----

If this investigation becomes a treason one... That military surveillance can be used.

Alexander Downer is one of the very few Australian Politicians with access. Papadopolous was too low in the political food chain to be monitored remotely.

The extent and capabilities of the military's ability can't and won't be made public

Mueller's been provided with all the info he needs, but it's upto him to connect the dots and bring it to a civilian court.

Trump and those around him are as guilty as fuck..

onwebcam 11-30-2018 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 22374819)
Snowden said project 'rainfall' could target and listen in to any phone or wireless communication, if your device goes through a satellite.. They have you

Staff from NSA testified the monitoring of political candidates in the USA was not a mistake but a primary core function.

Military surveillance can't be used in a civil case.

Australia and the UK do the monitoring of Americans... Out of you jurisdiction.

-----

If this investigation becomes a treason one... That military surveillance can be used.

Alexander Downer is one of the very few Australian Politicians with access. Papadopolous was too low in the political food chain to be monitored remotely.

The extent and capabilities of the military's ability can't and won't be made public

Mueller's been provided with all the info he needs, but it's upto him to connect the dots and bring it to a civilian court.

Trump and those around him are as guilty as fuck..

Good thing you mention your boy Downer (AU Intelligence) and your country spying on US citizens..

Might be why your leaders along with the UK's are begging Trump not to release the FISA's?

Because they were involved in setting up this big FRAUD? Trying to interfere with US elections?

Hmmm.. No shit? And you blame Russia?

King Mark 12-01-2018 12:01 AM

Bro, it's about to be 2019 and Obama been out of there for 2 years. I didn't cheer. Lets talk about our current situation. Our current president being a traitor is way more important than the facebook Obama app from 7 years ago that fully disclosed to the downloaders what they were doing.

onwebcam 12-01-2018 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22374823)
Bro, it's about to be 2019 and Obama been out of there for 2 years. I didn't cheer. Lets talk about our current situation. Our current president being a traitor is way more important than the facebook Obama app from 7 years ago that fully disclosed to the downloaders what they were doing.

It's the same App.. Cambridge was an intelligence front/Op..

Halper was a Professor where? Cambridge University.. Where the app was originally created...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123