We wuz kangs!

Funny... They look Aztec to me !

An explanation for the flood stories that circulated the ancient world is easy. Tsunamis and the melting of the Ice caps after the last Ice Age. Add these stories to religions that are meant to scare people into believing that a god is there to punish us for not doing as the priests tell us. And you have an explanation.

Using theory as facts is dangerous.

We wuz vi-kangz!

The 'GREAT FLOOD' story told in the bible was a borrowed story from Sumerian text while the Hebrew were in exile in Babylon. That is not a theory.

It has a geologic record of truth placing it sometime around 8000-6000 BC.
To the Sumerian text, it was caused by a celestial body passing by to close.

But many major floods have occurred not as large as this and is proven in geologic fact.
Enough to raise all sea level. Some just huge tsunami .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doggerland

The current theories 'not in that wiki' are that it suffered twice from 2 different events.
One from a more local ocean shelf slide and one much larger flooding from water held back by ice in North America.

Such huge events rarely leave many left to 'tell the tale' of it.

More on global trade before Christ....
https://newsmaven.io/indiancountryto...keYmvcooUO6kA/

There are so many overlooked answers just laying out there that have been dismissed, sometimes because of the lack of understanding at the time and others because of political and religious purpose.

The more you dig back for a second look, you gain answers and generate more questions.
These things do not make headlines but there are plenty of them if you pay attention.

The less you know of them, the more far fetched any one might seem.

Something to change some thinking on how peoples migrated around the world 1000's of years before you thought possible and has been the point of my search for answers.

While that video presented a lot of facts that have been on the table and mostly rejected by the powers that be because they have no explanation and you can't deny fact based on no or poor explanation, Mr Bauval made a leap of judgment at the end.

While one of more pharaoh may have visited that site to visit their ancestors, we also already know the race of the pharaoh changed over time. With many of the first more resembling Olmec's/Maya.
And we also already know the the earliest pharaoh do not date back before 4000bc.
So it hardly puts a good time stamp on this. Especially when you can not date the pictures photographed in the dwellings which I do view as authentic, just misplaced in time. Do not assume.
He is making the same leap in judgement that he was talking against in the miss-thinking on the builders of ancient Egypt.

We may never know what race the original people were but at this point I will trust in the Sumerian text but that does not tell us what they looked like, if it matters.
At least until something better unveils itself.

So, go read-up on the original creation story written perhaps 4000bc of stories that were told orally 1000's of years earlier.

There's a theory that the flood in the bible was due to the melting of the ice cap after the last ice age.

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ev...ry?id=17884533

https://io9.gizmodo.com/5940112/anci...ogical-history

What we now have science to explain to us, primitive Man explained as acts of god. The sad part is all the people who still believe this BS.