![]() |
50 fake trump moves
|
Quote:
|
Dead eye sees things through a cloudy hateful racist homophobic lens :2 cents:
Just do a Google search of GFY for 2040 and see how many times a day the hateful asshole talks about "his people" taking over the white majority in America and giving payback to the American white population. |
^sit down when adults are talking
|
Quote:
Penalising Mexico with a tariff if they don't stop illegal immigrants from crossing their country to get to America is a good idea. Telling China to buy more from America, stop the unfair trade actions or get massive tariffs is another way to sell more American goods, create more jobs, help with the debt America faces, etc. Talking to NK is better than doing fuck all, which was the action of previous Presidents. We all know he's not the greatest at the job and some of his measures are pure insanity. But others have done little but looked good. |
Quote:
Obamacare was good and scrapping it was bad. Complaining about the costs is stupid because under any system American health care is over priced. |
Quote:
Why should Mexico care? Because if they do nothing America will hit them with tariffs. Yes go solve problems S. America has. Are you serious? The basic problem they have is they are poor so unless you pump $trillions into S. America and make sure it doesn't get skimmed off. They will always have problems. |
Quote:
I would much prefer a cleverer President carry out trade reform, slowing down illegal immigration and talking to NK. But none of his predecessors have done anything. Clinton started the Prime Mortgage scheme that nearly bankrupted the world, Bush went to pointless wars you will end up losing, Obama bombed Libya, but some Americans ignore those things while Trump gets vilified at every turn. |
Quote:
Trade policy has always been to promote 'fair' trading. Not tell others 'they have to buy more from us' We have always talked to NK, trump is just doing it alone without our partners of common interest who are the ones they have originally threatened ....OK... where has that landed him... the same place and because he actually believes/says progress was made, it is much worse now because there is no motivation to do anything now until they escalate it to the next level. This is how it turned so messy in all of the history behind it. Everyone keeps accepting the next escalation after grumbling about it and putting up some words and doing nothing. Everyone has known that the only thing you can do is keep it contained a bit. Trump just learned that lesson we already knew. Only now they have high end nukes and long range missiles. If he was tough as he likes to portray himself, he would have put a navel blockade on the country right from the start. And i'm not arguing for that but it would be effective. They are getting the tech from the outside. Our policy has been one of containment. The only difference is portrayed as a matter of perception. It is worse, not better. You can't polish a turd. |
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartanntp
It seems like every day, there's a new headline which starts with "Trump threatens". And that's because that's all he has in his extremely limited mental toolset. When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. His way of killing bin Laden would have been to nuke the entire middle east. |
Success.... Victory.... We Won... Yippy... Ye-Haw...
Trump threatens more tariffs on Mexico over part of immigration deal https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1TB182 The legislation was agreed to in December. Waiting for their legislature to sign it. Why add insult to the matter. Sounds tough anyway. If they were headed to Canada... what would we do ? Should Canada tell us they will impose tariffs if we let them though ? |
There are principles involved here that should be talked about.
It is part of the resentment of the US around the globe. We are in effect forcing MX to enforce our rules/will in their country. Every country is responsible for their own borders. Because we fail to legislate what we want/need here in the US, we take the side-step to try to keep them from landing on US soil where US laws apply. Pretty simple as I see it. Government failure ! What did Reagan do after the 'boat people' ? try to remember. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/161438 https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...20-1980-528819 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The question was, if they were headed to CAD, instead of the US, what would we do ? I suspect, nothing. We might even help them get there. Just a little reflection on what we expect from MX. They simply do not want them to land on US soil where US laws apply to them. It's a political fix, not a legal or moral fix. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Their approaches were not so soft and no different that trump imposed. And they achieved something until trump came in... they put the new POTUS to the test and he failed to deliver anything new and things have got worse. And those that were imposed by others were not claimed as victories ! Made no major headlines... probably why you are unaware. you seem only to read headlines and trump sure makes those everyday. You only want to remember part of the history you either know or wish to know. The whole history of action for NK is one of containment. Just like Iran. If you don't believe that then why not bomb today ! That is not soft ! Place a navel blockade today, that is not soft. Try something new outside of rhetoric. That is all he brought to the table. I think SK and Japan would have a say in our bombing, they would likely loose half their population and they are not at the table with trump. he is gong it alone. Real Tough... what is he asking for that has not been asked before. What has he done that has not been done before, except go it alone, without the folks it will effect most. The only reason they agreed to close production units was because they were closing them anyway and building new ones. Its a old political play the US and Soviets would use to eliminate warheads they were replacing for age as it was and both leaders could claim Victory! Winning ! I'm ready to accept the fact they have them and might use them and we should continue to keep them contained. Because that is all we can do without wiping out major populations. |
|
Quote:
If any did I will praise them too. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123