50, :thumbsup

Thanks for the find Lens.:thumbsup

:thumbsup

very very true:thumbsup

:thumbsup

You are an IDIOT.

Sure no party will HELP the insustry, but I know at least ONE PARTY with a RELIGIOUS MORAL AGENDA and a zealot AG whose aim it is to take down our industry.

I wish I could just punch all you Bush supporters in the face one good time -- you deserve it.

you people think this little war that John Asshat has or is going 2 have going on with the porn Ind. is going away if Kerry gets elected???

Think again all of'em are a bunch of scum bags. So don't get you hopes up.

What are you all going 2 do if Kerry comes out, anti porn in one of his speach's. :Graucho

Myself I like my odds with Bush, no ideal what Kerry might try, none at all, the man is all over the place on every other issue.

We have added it to our front page. :)

or Antonin Scalia

:helpme

Yes, because in the eyes of most surfers FREE PORN is the only thing that matters.. Let's not worry about terrorist, economies, jobs, healthcare, social security.. etc

All that matters is FREE PORN...

hey when is the election date exactly?

I don't think Kerry is going to have an atty general that covers up the "Spirit of Justice" statue.

http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/AshcroftDrape/1.asp

Spreadin' the word.

I have added it to my paysite and I also plan on adding it to various yahoo groups i have.

:)

What the fuck ever dude..

I am only pointing out that speculating a more liberal party will make it better for porn is weak.

There is zero evidence that the way any political party works will help porn.

It never has and I am assuming it never will

I am not supporting any political party based on this cause because there is no stance

I really want to beat you up. Beside the obvious porn thing...

Happy he lowered taxes? Give him 4 more years and he will lower your taxes a shitload because he will shut this industry down...you can't tax any % of zero.

Has he made the world safer?

No. In fact we are less safe. He has polarized the hatred of all who oppose us to an all time high. Al Queda is a complex system of underworld cells that had NO basis in Iraq. Look at all the time and resources that have been wasted in Iraq when we could have been dismantling the real threat ? Al Queda! Not to mention that because we have occupied Iraq tens of thousand of civilians over there have died in our air strikes, hundreds of Americans soldiers are dead, and 24 people have been executed because of our occupation. Yet Bin Laden and his organization continue to live on and all this crap in Iraq didn?t amount to shit ? they didn?t even find the WOMD that Bush claimed they had.

Iraq was all about settling a debt for daddy and oil.

The war in Iraq is the equivalent of having some guy punch you in the face at a bar, but instead of punching him back, you walk over to a bar across the street, smack around a bunch of guys over there, but that guy who punched you is still there.

Did he stop 9/11? No. Bill Clinton told Bush that Bin Laden was threat #1 and he was ignored.

Is the economy great? No.

Jobs? Nope.

Deficit? Through the roof.

Dependence on foreign oil? At an all time high.

What about our civil liberty? Getting stripped away by the second.

It?s obvious the threat he is to this industry.

But, hey, our taxes are A LITTLE BIT LOWER?

WOO-HA ? That lower taxes thing appeals the lowest common denominator and lowest intelligence. If you think we should sacrifice all of that for a measly tax cut?

YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKING MORON!

George Bush is dangerous, incompetent, stupid, and NEEDS TO BE REMOVED!

Excuse me..

I simply made a statement that no political party is going to help online porn.

For some reason you want to post a bunch of negative things about Bush..

Who is the moron now? You fucking idiot.

Bush or Kerry vote for whoever you want..

I am only saying that the person who gets elected will have little impact on 2257 and issues with online porn in general.

One can speculate otherwise but in the end it's still mere speculation.

Thats all I have to say about this matter.

Thank you :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

Kenny - who do you think has a bigger hard-on to take this biz down -- an right wing zealot AG who spends 8k of taxpayer money to put a drape on the bare breast lady justice or the AG of an admitted liberal?

God, I would like to break your nose.

Indeed. The question has never been "which party will help our industry?". It's more along the lines of which do we know will hurt our industry?

To put it another way, would you rather have a constant negative quantity, or an unknown quantity with a history of essentially looking the other way?

I'll go for unknown because even a worst case scenario equals what we have now. And a non-worse case scenario equals something not as bad as we have now.

Those are great odds.

I say it's irrelevant provided the track record of all political stances regarding online porn.

Thats where I stand believe that you will..

And please stop with the childish remarks of "punching" me and what not

I wouldn't mind if you said it to my face.. but please not on a message board

Thats a good perspective.. well better then most


Still the fact remands that there really isn't no political party thats going to do anything but cause harm to online porn.

Online porn is associated with to many bad things. To many people are agaisnt it when it comes to a political stance.. It's a safe bet to be anti-porn in politics.

It's really unfortunate as most online porn is legit buisness providing a honest service.

You can thank people like spammers and child porn peddlers for the general bad reputation of online porn

Hopefully I will see you at a show sometime - asshole.

Voting for Bush, despite what the haters say, will have nothing to do with our business. In fact, many hate to admit it, but most of us who are well off, are even banking more since Bush has been in office? Name 1 thing he or his administration has done that has effected your business negatively? You can't can you? Didn't think so...

Stop trying to brainwash people in here, if you hate Bush, you hate Bush, just say it. Don't go around spitting lies just to scare people to vote democratic... Below is proof that Bush's own evil Supreme Court rejects any type of laws that would hurt us..

Proof

Yes, but see.. it really does come down to a known stance versus an unknown stance. We may not know who is best for us, but we know who has demonstrated they are bad for us.

It's like so many things.. It's like fishing. You can throw a lure for 10 hours and get nothing but bad results. Thats when you throw *anything* else because you sure know what doesnt work, lol.

There was a time when anything related to pot was an automatic knock-out blow. But now people dont much care. In fact, you'll probably get more votes if you got stoned once when you were a kid. Shows you're real.

Porn is like that too. So many more people go and rent movies, or buy online memberships than even a few years ago.. It's not exactly taboo. If anything, it's certainly moving more towards being "normal" than "abnormal". So I would not presume that everyone will carry on with the current ultra-strict morality that comes off this bunch..
Dressing the statue was the most unreal, amazing thing I've ever seen... I keep asking, whats next? All women must wear skirts down to the ankles? I mean honestly.. It's just backwards, not "conservative" it's "preservative" Preserving a time long long gone from reality.. it's so contrary to the way our society is moving.. it really shouldnt be allowed to continue..

Communists!

Too bad I live in Canada and can't vote. I urge all webmasters to vote...every single one counts.

exactly

well, that is a given . . . seems like several are out there just trying to drum up business without having a clear understanding, or a very twisted interpretation

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I had a response, but since you don't live here I decided to let it slide

I will give you this..

You might be able to slow down the process and I am using the word "might" because after all this is a unknown factor.

But ultimately no good will come from the goverment regarding online porn.

Porn in general has and will continue to become more acceptable.

The bad reputation of online porn is different because of the things associated with it.

I am at a loss for words :helpme

You are wrong. The supreme court has no say in 2257.

so if we vote in November..they will leave online porn alone?

Apparently you are unfamiliar with the Meese Commission. Under Reagan, obscenity was prosecuted regularly, two of the people that I do alot of business with were prosecuted and one did 18 months in jail.

The Clinton administration chose not to prosecute obscenity.

I keep seeing this . . . is it because you guys are kids that just turned 18 or something?

If not, why are you waiting until the last minute to get involved? It starts at the local level.

I doubt that 20% of you that "never voted before, but will now" will take the effort to get off the couch to go vote, then will whine when the results don't go as you think you wanted them to.

Nothing against you or any moron ( i.e. bitch with nothing to say )who pipes up , but your best chance of changing the future is not to sit idly by while you do what your lawyers tell you to do.

Are you a fucking sheep ? well neither am i. And i don't expect to be treated like one , so stand up for your rights instead of laying down like the political whore you are.

I agree you have to bring the cause mainstream - so it affects more "everyday people".

no shit. register and vote you fuckers

and try to ignore the poster above me. he's a little off.

No, you're not a sheep, you're a dumbfuck with your head up your ass and the reading comprehension of a third grader, as evidenced by your inability to string together two sentences that are neither deragatory towards someone else or contributory to this discussion.

As far as whores go, that's something your wallet probably has plenty of experience with, since given your simple minded comments I can't imagine there's a woman out there with a GED, much less a diploma, that would find you even mildly interesting, and that would only be if your dick was at least 9" long.

OMG! That's the funniest shit I've read all week! Thanks for starting the weekend off on a FANTASTIC note, Kimmy!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I don't know how to break it to you, but every Supreme Court Justice has been appointed by Nixon, Reagan, or Bush, except Breyer and Ginsburg (Clinton-Dem) and Stevens (Ford - Rep)

So much for that idea, huh?

Good looking out

:thumbsup

face it, the Democrats fucked up by nominating Kerry

stop being logical here . . .it won't work

Good point. They went after Frank Zappa.

Frankly, conservative judges on the Court aren't a bad thing. A conservative court has the tendency to support the law as its written, not try to interpret it into a new spin on the law.

Until someone gets popped and there's a case before some court, it's very much a wait and see game, especially when you take into account that these new regs will be signed into law in some sort of form prior to the election and the compliance date should fall ten days or so before the election. Leaving enough time for there to be a public "lynching" in the media of someone or other.

COPA happened during the Clinton Administration.

The Meese Commission didn't that provide that 1988 Obscenity Enforcement Act? That was the first version of 2257

The courts ruled that unconstitutional. I will have to read more about it.

The internet changed all that to my understaing. The laws were not equipped to combat internet based porn.