GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   People, "The Village" was marketed poorly. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=424070)

pornguy 01-30-2005 06:30 PM

It only took me about 20 minutes to figure it out, but I enjoyed the movie.

Varius 01-30-2005 06:35 PM

I have to disagree with you. I didn't even have a clue what the movie was or was about (not much film marketing down here in costa rica), but decided to just see it one day at the theatre.

The first half was GREAT, looked like the movie was very promising....and then they blew it.

The whole second half was (to me) very very predictable and boring. Nothing came as any surprise...it lacked any impact the first half was building up.

I'm also a huge fan of independant films and not so much into big hollywood ones. This movie just didn't do it for me :2 cents:

andrej_NDC 01-30-2005 06:38 PM

its a little bit scary, but in the intelligent way. Some people think that horrors with ugly looking monsters who kill people are scary, but those movies are funny. The most scarying is when you wait for a monster to come all the time, but you dont see it.

Platinumpimp 01-30-2005 06:39 PM

I watched it last night. It was ok, nothing more...

andrej_NDC 01-30-2005 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK
Fact: "Signs" is a crap movie

I love it. :)

imafuckingaussie 01-30-2005 09:48 PM

Yep, spose it was marketed to a young audience as being a thriller. It was I guess for a little while. I was a bit annoyed that it wasnt the scary movie I thought it was going to be, but it was a great see never the less.

Really worth watching the dvd features, as it shows you how they made the whole freaking village from a vacant parcel of land, amazing work. Also, the stars had to live the lives of those people they portrayed, interesting stuff.

Now. a scary movie that doesnt let you down? Try "The Gurdge", that is a nice shocker that one imho!. Some scenes in there that should make u jump out of your pants!

Elli 01-30-2005 10:17 PM

One of the biggest detractors for me was the the Ivy girl kept LOOKING at things that shouldn't have "colours". She just wasn't that great at playing blind.

Rick Latona 01-30-2005 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
It was a commentary on society. It was in some ways a farce, but mostly a deep and insightful look into the ways of small town america.

It was marketed poorly. The type of people that went to see the movie are not the type of people that would have went had they known it was "a commentary" on culture.

The movie is good. Actually, the movie is real good.

I didn't see it in the theaters because I thought it was a horror flick. However, I watched it in my hotel room a few nights ago and loved it.

reynold 01-30-2005 11:36 PM

I hated the movie. It sucked. :disgust

Centurion 01-30-2005 11:40 PM

It was average..started above par & finished below par, which leaves it at average.

P.S. WHY did the "park ranger" sneak the medical supplies to the girl? Maybe I missed something there..but I thought he would take her in and say something to the effect of "We've got a nutcase here!"

Der Schleicher 01-30-2005 11:42 PM

A good movie.

Der Schleicher 01-30-2005 11:43 PM

I think it is a good movie but it's not scary. :upsidedow

Cory W 01-31-2005 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Centurion
It was average..started above par & finished below par, which leaves it at average.

P.S. WHY did the "park ranger" sneak the medical supplies to the girl? Maybe I missed something there..but I thought he would take her in and say something to the effect of "We've got a nutcase here!"

I am assuming that he effectively trusted that her "madness" was actually driven by something more tangible and some sort of strange scenario.

He seemed to believe she needed to independently take care of her dilemna.

DEA - banned for life 01-31-2005 10:38 AM

all the previously mentioned moved suck ass in my book ..but who reads my book :thumbsup

Nylz 01-31-2005 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
I had to change my expectations. I was in the mood for a scarey movie.

And that was probably the problem with 99% of the people that went to watch that movie..

A lot of people I know told me the movie sucked, but I really liked it because I rate the movie on the storyline and entertainment value, and not on my expectations beforehand..

born4porn 01-31-2005 11:50 AM

I am looking forward to seeeing it! :D

Peaches 01-31-2005 12:19 PM

I watched it last night and it was OK. 3.5 out of 5 stars, but certainly not a thriller.

I suspect the guard knew exactly who she was and what she was from. The property both inside and outside the wall was owned by her father and from what I could tell, the people who decided to live in the village told others that they were leaving and where they were going.

There were some contrived parts and it could have been better because it was a good concept, but all it all, a solid 3.5

Centurion 01-31-2005 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches
I watched it last night and it was OK. 3.5 out of 5 stars, but certainly not a thriller.

I suspect the guard knew exactly who she was and what she was from. The property both inside and outside the wall was owned by her father and from what I could tell, the people who decided to live in the village told others that they were leaving and where they were going.

There were some contrived parts and it could have been better because it was a good concept, but all it all, a solid 3.5

The father owned the property inside and outside the wall? Hmm..was wondering how they were never discovered in there if the rangers were comming in and treating sick animals.

I thought it strange that the guy reading the newspaper (who's face we never saw) talked about "government guys comming here and setting it up so planes would not fly over the reserve." Now that was just a TAD unbelieveable.
:1orglaugh

Loryn 01-31-2005 01:34 PM

It was a good movie, not the best but good. I enjoyed it!!! :thumbsup

Peaches 01-31-2005 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Centurion
The father owned the property inside and outside the wall? Hmm..was wondering how they were never discovered in there if the rangers were comming in and treating sick animals.

I thought it strange that the guy reading the newspaper (who's face we never saw) talked about "government guys comming here and setting it up so planes would not fly over the reserve." Now that was just a TAD unbelieveable.
:1orglaugh

M. Night Shyamalan, the writer and director was the man behind the paper. He's in all his movies, ala Hitchcock :)

Irrum 01-31-2005 01:55 PM

Most of M. Night Shyamalan movies, you either hate them or love them. I can see why some people don't like his movies though, too slow and quiet.

For me I like them, I like movies that make you think about life and whatever message he conveys in his film. Besides the obvious of the sixth sense being good, I thought unbreakable and signs were really good. I like unbreakable the best out of all of them (thats cause I like comic books).

But I'm not a big fan of the Village, it is okay. Out of all his movies I liked it the least.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123