Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 12472863)

these republican supporters live in a fucking fog ,all the times pressure has been put on adult its during republican admins:
Nixon
Reagan/meese cost adam and eve 1 million dollars fighting them
W 2257 made a bitch to follow and for the first time inspections start and dont think for a moment everyone got off scott clean, the feds work very very slow.
Atty's fired because they wouldnt go after adult porn, Ashcroft was going to hit porn very hard if 911 didnt happen.
Now under clinton porn grew more than ever before, they didnt support it but felt there were more important things to do with government resources then go after consenting adults.

Originally Posted by PornMogul (Post 12468356)

Which candidate supports the porn industry, I would assume a democrat, Who are you voting for in 2008 and why?

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12472874)

Tip Tip Tipper Gore Tipper Gore lol. Coppa? Ring any bells?

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 12472886)

Rudy


because I'm smart. :winkwink:

Originally Posted by JP513 (Post 12472202)

No candidate from either party will support porn. You all aren't looking at it the right way.

The question is . . . which candidate will appoint the judges that are the most liberal with their interpretations of privacy and civil liberties statutes. Not just at the Supreme Court but the Federal Appellate level too.

That would be a liberal democrat, most likely. I'd say Obama or Biden or Richardson. The fact that Bush won in 04 and appointed 2 conservatives to the Supreme Court does not bode well for our industry. It's 4-4 now (liberals/conservatives) with one Justice (Kennedy) on the fence. He was a Reagan appointee, and conservative in some areas, but not in all areas. But it's not all about the highest court.

The views of judges who preside in all the courtrooms throughout the Federal judicial system are the largest determining factor in the long term health of the adult industry.

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 12472902)

too many skeletons in his closet wont happen. Both sides they all suck ,the more I read the more they all make me want to throw up.

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 12472900)

Copa was pushed by the republican congress, .

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 12472916)

I think we're ready to forgive skeletons now more than ever.

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 12472906)

I weould remind you that consevatives protect freedom of speach far better than liberals.
look at who is the driving force behind kicking Imus off the air etc.

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 12472938)

The extreme right has a problem with him, I like Rudy I lived in the city when he became mayor he did great things.

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 12472953)

Yes that's why Bush appointed Ashcroft to AG because he's going to defend our freedom of speech. You'll sell your soul to Satan because you think he'll save you a nickle on taxes which is also BS.

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 12472930)

yes idiots that failed civics class forget it's CONGRESS that passes legislation not the President.

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 12472938)

The extreme right has a problem with him, I like Rudy I lived in the city when he became mayor he did great things.

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 12473007)

nah, its a perfect storm for rudy. He's running against someone the extreme right thinks is a turncoat and the other choice is a mormon.
The end.

In the general election, Rudy wins NY and all else is irrelevant.

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12473013)

He wont get the nomination. Im calling this one for Fred Thompson. Watch and see.

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 12473025)

its ok to tell the teacher he's wrong. Just do it politely so when he says,"I told you so" it doesn't hurt as much.:winkwink:

Originally Posted by Wizzo (Post 12468858)

Whoever the Dems put up as you have to switch the power back and forth or one party gets too strong...:pimp

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12473001)

COPPA went into effect April 21, 2000, but was actually signed into law by President Clinton in 1998-- a significant year that also saw the passage of COPA by Congress.

Didnt veto it did he?

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 12473237)

yes of course Clinton just coming off a sex scandal and trying to help the dems win the White House that same year is going to veto a piece of legislation called the "CHILD Online PROCTECTION Act". Are you that retarded?

Fact is under Clinton the US Justice Dept went after porn far less than Bush or Reagan. That's is FACT. Go look it up.

As I stated before your Alex P Keaton schtick is about 20 years too late. Try something new.

You and 12clicks make about as much sense as

Jews for Hitler
Blacks for the KKK
Mexicans for tougher borders
Christians for Satan
Muslims for equal rights for women

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12472695)

And then you have to weigh in the other factors

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 12472906)

I weould remind you that consevatives protect freedom of speach far better than liberals.
look at who is the driving force behind kicking Imus off the air etc.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12472751)

you must be very young or very naive . . . . or both