|
Always so much Jew hating on GFY. Common, all you haters just wanna be a member of the Tribe don'tchya? :winkwink:
|
[QUOTE=IllTestYourGirls;13705629]More non-jew Russians and more non- jew Chinese where killed in WW2 than jews. More non-jews were killed in the camps. People just spun it as a holy war against the jews. It was very sad what happened to the jewish people during ww2 but they were not the only ones to suffer and they were at the bottom of "peoples" that were killed by the nazis.
Ok firstly shut the fuck up your a moron ! Secondly if your gonna come up with crazy figures then please provide proof, now a little education for you because you've obviously not had any (oh by the way not everything on the internet is true) Now the difference between the Jews and all the other people who were killed in ww2 is as follows, the Jews had no country, no army but were singled out by the Nazis for Extermination all pre planned. This did not happen to the Russians or the Chinese. No one has ever said that ww2 was a holy war you douche :321GFY Quote:
Since when did the nazi's hate everyone ? They didn't hate the Japanese did they ? They actually tried almost everything in there power not to attack England as Hitler actually quite like the British. Oh and why you bringing the bible up ? Did you actually think it is a historical reference ? LMAO Now for some work ahh :Oh crap |
|
Quote:
From all the major film studios to all the major actors at the start of Hollywood were all Jews. |
Quote:
Some of my colleagues recommended that I write a letter about how Jews makes so many laughably militant statements, it boggles the mind to think about them. This is that letter. Here's the story: If we contradict Jews, we are labelled infernal, exploitative maniacs. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. Antagonism advances his long-term goal of plutocratic global dictatorship. Added to this is something else: He and his cronies are peevish proponents of feudalism. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we lived in a world without avaricious oligarchs? Take this example: Let's say that Jews displays the paranoid malice that is the hallmark of true negativism. Now let's say that he justifies his plans to supplant one form of injustice with another as "preemptive self-defense". Does that mean that you and I are morally inferior to quarrelsome, dangerous varmints? No, because even if his revenge fantasies were completely successful in making a few people feel better, they would still be demeaning to everyone else. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if he finds a way to perpetrate acts of the most uncompanionable character. Jews fervently believes that it is vengeful to question his excuses. This shows that he is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that instead of taking the easy path in life, the downward path, we must choose the upward path regardless of the pain, suffering, and sacrifice that this choice entails. Only then can we finally comment on Jews's smears. Yes, Jews will try to stop us by forcing me to throw in the towel, but his encomiasts all look like him, think like him, act like him, and pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a conceited coterie of Lysenkoism, just like Jews does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha! Above all, Jews recognizes the potency of fear and its ability to paralyze and enslave humankind. If we bring him to justice then the sea of scapegoatism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that Jews commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. He is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. Ask yourself: Why does Jews think that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole? I bet you'll answer the same way that I did because we both know that if we look beyond Jews's delusions of grandeur, we see that for the nonce, he is content to leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries. But by the end of the decade, he will offer stones instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world. As stated earlier, we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that he will scrap the notion of national sovereignty. And to overcome these fears, we must establish democracy and equality. You may not be aware of this, but Jews makes it a point to judge people based solely on hearsay. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: Jews respects nothing, honors nothing, and values nothing beyond himself, and everyone with half a brain understands that. People who are attacked by raucous, stolid dingbats basically have three options. They can ignore the attacks, engage the attackers in a debate, or apply some sanction that will put an end to the attack. In a nutshell, the idea that people want counter-productive cowards to subjugate persons of culture, refinement, and learning to bitter Luddites is a fundamental misunderstanding of the human condition. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your missing the real force behind hollywood too and the US if you actually recognise them as a real religion ! http://worldofwonder.net/image1/southparkjews.jpg |
Quote:
Please forgive me, but I told you so. I predicted long ago that Israel would impede the free flow of information. Now that he has, I'd like to express my thoughts on the matter. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I issue a call to conscience and reason. From the perspective of those inside Israel's cabal, university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to Israel's maladroit, vulgar prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. The reality, however, is that what we're involved in with him is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person -- every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility -- must concern himself with it. I apologize if what I'm saying sounds painfully obvious, painfully self-evident. However, it is so extremely important that I must definitely say it. Israel's pestiferous rejoinders are in full flower and their poisonous petals of sesquipedalianism are blooming all around us. As soon as Israel found the resources to do so he lost no time in turning sectarians loose against us good citizens. The inevitable followed: Testy thieves started to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains. The scariest part of all of this is that I have to wonder where Israel got the idea that it is my view that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is. If, today, the urge of Israel's war-soul can prompt him to generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest, then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-cranky Israel of tomorrow. We are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which stupid nitwits like Israel are entirely absent. The other road leads into the darkness of communism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? Unfortunately, I can't give a complete answer to that question in this limited space. But I can tell you that whenever there's an argument about Israel's devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that I'm not actually demanding revenge. That should settle the argument pretty quickly. Israel's screeds are surrounded by a halo of ethnocentrism and if you don't believe me then you should carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against Israel's disquisitions. I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Israel's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. I acknowledge freely and make no apology for the fact that I once considered it reasonable for intransigent nonentities to equip besotted, self-indulgent wantwits with flame throwers, hand grenades, and heat-seeking missiles. But now I know that we must give you some background information about Israel. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that Israel's idolators warrant that "Israel has the trappings of deity." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written instead that Israel's torchbearers don't see the chaos that will be unleashed if they get their way and make nearby communities victims of environmental degradation and toxic waste dumping then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, Israel has spent untold hours trying to regulate mandarinism. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that a vivid realization of the caducity of life is what motivates me to tell him where he can stick it? The answer is almost utterly obvious -- this isn't rocket science, you know. The key is that Israel's causeries are muzzy-headed. They're unnecessary. They're counterproductive. Whenever I encounter them I think that Israel wants to oppose the visceral views of 98 percent of the nation's citizens. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background. Israel's goal is to doctor evidence and classification systems and make arrogant generalizations to support lethargic, preconceived views. How insensitive is that? How meretricious? How detestable? Israel always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to him; nothing else matters -- except maybe to show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in but also for you, the readers of this letter. I tell you this because Israel's confreres aver that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because if Israel gets his way, none of us will be able to navigate a safe path between the Scylla of Israel's clueless hatchet jobs and the Charybdis of factionalism. Therefore, we must not let him confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian government in our minds. Lastly, I can't end this letter without mentioning that Israel uses the word "literally" when he means "metaphorically". |
Quote:
Guns? Absence of religion? Lack of self-esteem? Poor parenting? The entertainment industry? Who's to blame for Israel Holywood's ridiculous stances? Numerous professionals (and not-so-professionals) have speculated and mulled, publicly and privately, over what has caused Holywood to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. So, without further ado, I present you with this all-important piece of information: He is planning to criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. This does not bode well for the future because I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that Holywood uses highfalutin terms like "theologicohistorical" and "protobasidiomycetous" to conceal his plans to take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most appalling imbeciles will never be in a position to condescend to. In this scheme of his, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that mingy spoiled brats are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that my current plan is to challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but he says that laws are meant to be broken. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that his fibs won't be used for political retribution. More often than not, Holywood is completely versipellous. When he's among plebeians, Holywood warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against vigilantism. But when Holywood's safely surrounded by his habitués, he instructs them to till the wild side of the Lysenkoism garden. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that if I were to compile a list of Holywood's forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that someone has been giving Holywood's brain a very thorough washing and now Holywood is trying to do the same to us. According to Holywood, he is a man of peace. He might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then Holywood would realize that if one believes statements like, "All minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash," one is, in effect, supporting supercilious wiseacres. Holywood is frightened that we might turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action. That's why he's trying so hard to prevent whistleblowers from reporting that unlike him, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- Holywood were not actually responsible for trying to impair the practice of democracy, then I'd stop saying that Holywood keeps telling everyone within earshot that sneaky philosophasters are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. I'm guessing that Holywood read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that some people are responsible and others are not. Holywood falls into the category of "not". The tone of Holywood's screeds is eerily reminiscent of that of jaundiced, stinking pantywaists of the late 1940s in the sense that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how there is a format Holywood should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. Holywood speaks like a true defender of the status quo -- a status quo, we should not forget, that enables him to introduce changes without testing them first. Am I the only one who makes that observation? Of course not. But perhaps I express it more directly, more candidly, and far less euphemistically than most. According to Holywood, most people believe that the sky is falling. Really? Does Holywood have some sort of mind-reading ability or did he get his information from a less reliable source? I once asked Holywood that question -- I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that Holywood's older conjectures were deranged enough. His latest ones are clearly beyond the pale. The purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how psychotic and unregenerate he has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how I wonder what would happen if he really did write off whole sections of society. There's a spooky thought. In summary, people who agree with Israel Holywood's conclusions are either stupid, drunk, on drugs, paid off by Holywood, or are vapid schizophrenics. Is anyone listening? Does anyone care? |
49 chars
|
50 AIPAC members
|
Quote:
|
crazy figures? this is just from a quick google search.
27 million russians killed http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2005/0...day050509.html Chinese between 15 and 22 million Russians 25 million http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_s...in_World_War_2 jews 5 to 6 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties The jews had home lands... they were living in them. [QUOTE=Stephen McTowelie;13706755] Quote:
|
[QUOTE=IllTestYourGirls;13707226]crazy figures? this is just from a quick google search.
27 million russians killed http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2005/0...day050509.html Chinese between 15 and 22 million Russians 25 million http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_s...in_World_War_2 jews 5 to 6 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties The jews had home lands... they were living in them. Err ........... Ok i was just not gonna post again as i really have stuff to be getting on with however, first i ll just clarify what i ve already said, Firstly I never said that the Jews lost more people than any other nation ! You on the other hand do not seem to understand the most important thing here all the other people lost were from China ( a country) or Russia ( also a country) Where as there was no Jewish state therefore no declaration of war ! The figures given for allied and Russian losses also do not include any Jews that fought and died even. Also the Nazis didn't even attack china you dumb ass so why you bringing the chinese into things ? Also you have missed another key point is its not just about numbers of people killed, its also about the proportion of the population killed which is much higher than that of the Chinese or Russian who were at war with both Japan and Nazi Germany. But hey keeping bringing up your nazi revisionist bull shit and i can take it down every time ! Do you know why ? Because the one i am saying is get this , in real history boos not just on wiki or some douches website ! :321GFY Oh and your still a http://www.film-tech.com/ubb/image_uploads/retard.jpg |
IllTestYourGirls , don't let Stephen berate you. Surely you are a retard, but still, you have the rights!
|
Quote:
The reason i called him a retard is cause he didn't bother to read the post or couldn't understand it. |
how is it so hard to understand that the Jews had a homeland in fact they had more than one? They were living in them.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
People who have a lot of money run countries
|
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=IllTestYourGirls;13707226]crazy figures? this is just from a quick google search.
27 million russians killed http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2005/0...day050509.html Chinese between 15 and 22 million Russians 25 million http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_s...in_World_War_2 jews 5 to 6 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties The jews had home lands... they were living in them. I will say this, the 5-6 million jews represented HALF of all jews alive on the planet at that time. 22 million Chinese? Please there was already 700-800 million at that time. They could have used a little de-population. 25 million russians? At least 170 million russians then. So maybe 1/7. We Americans like to bring up our scrifice and we maybe lost 1/10 as many people as the jews did and we had 150 million. about 1 in 250 American died durring WWII |
ofcourse they control it
|
This is Racist!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't understand all of the irrational Jew fear that I hear spouted across the web.
|
Quote:
|
This thread should be re-titled: RECESSION IS COMINGGGGGGGGGGGG
|
Quote:
Not "Throw the Jew down the well..."? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The way I look at it...if Google and social media could usurp porn, then porn had to be complicit in it somehow. The changing of the web landscape has been beneficial to Jewish interests, but as always we can't talk about who benefits :) |
I am still waiting for wehateporn to jump in...
|
|
Almost 200k views and only two pages?
Weird thread. |
Your post
GFY you anti semitic bastard.
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123