GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   You know what is really sad about the passage of Prop 8? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=867828)

JFK 11-09-2008 03:25 PM

100 sad things..............:(

d-null 11-09-2008 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 15027972)
Way to miss the point . . . and I was not talking about to circumsize or not to circumsize.

My point is that humans have not always looked like we do now (a lot less hair for example). Do you know why we used to have more hair than we do now? Evolution. The point being that just because we have it today doesn't mean we will have it tomorrow.

so you are saying that we evolved from animals that you are also arguing are just robots? :error

PurrrsianPussyKat 11-09-2008 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 15028296)
Tonsils . . .

What about them? They serve a purpose. They are removed from some people because they get infected.

'So Fucking Money 11-09-2008 05:49 PM

eh...... hrm..

'So Fucking Money 11-09-2008 05:51 PM

Sad about prop 8.

As far as prop2 I voted yes. I think it's more of the younger crowd that is voting this way. I try to eat organic when I can. I'll pay the whole foods prices & I recycle. Even if they are gonna be food they shouldnt need to suffer before the time comes.
I guess I am sorta a tree hugger though. Ive got trashcans for each: plastic, glass and aluminum, paper. At this rate we should all be doing this. That's good 'nuff for me.


http://raspberet.files.wordpress.com.../protester.jpg

chodadog 11-09-2008 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 15021774)
If you want to rely on farms that have enough room to let chickens scratch around looking for corn the price of chicken is going to go thru the roof. You can already count on a price hike as a result of this stupid measure.

Oh, I don't eat chicken beaks, so I could not really care if they chop them off or not.

Through the roof? I buy free range eggs and chicken. For the eggs, a cage-egg carton is usually about AU$3.50-$4.00. The free-range eggs are between $5.00 and $6.00. Really not that big of a deal. Plus the ones I get are free of growth hormones and anti-biotics. The yolk is generally darker and has more flavour. No idea why that is. I can only assume it's 'cause of the lack of anti-bioitics and growth hormones in the hens. As for chicken, typical supermarket prices for chicken breast are between $12 and $14 per kilo. I just picked up some free range chicken breast for $16/kilo.

My point is the difference in price is not that significant. And if that sort of thing were mandatory, the economies of scale would suggest the price would come down. Not as low as it is currently, but probably not too far off.

baddog 11-09-2008 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog (Post 15029421)
Through the roof? I buy free range eggs and chicken. For the eggs, a cage-egg carton is usually about AU$3.50-$4.00. The free-range eggs are between $5.00 and $6.00. Really not that big of a deal. Plus the ones I get are free of growth hormones and anti-biotics. The yolk is generally darker and has more flavour. No idea why that is. I can only assume it's 'cause of the lack of anti-bioitics and growth hormones in the hens. As for chicken, typical supermarket prices for chicken breast are between $12 and $14 per kilo. I just picked up some free range chicken breast for $16/kilo.

My point is the difference in price is not that significant. And if that sort of thing were mandatory, the economies of scale would suggest the price would come down. Not as low as it is currently, but probably not too far off.

You have any idea how many Congressional hearings they would have if eggs went up $2.00 a dozen here? :1orglaugh

chodadog 11-09-2008 10:00 PM

Yeah but if the whole market was free range, straight away the prices would come down as they'd need to be more competitive. Right now, they can charge more because concerned people are prepared to pay more. When everything on offer is free range, it's a level playing field and competition will do what it does.

Couple that with the economies of scale and I really don't think there'd be that big of a difference in the price in the long run.

brassmonkey 11-09-2008 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 15022538)

i guess they should be drunk when they knock their heads off :1orglaugh

baddog 11-09-2008 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog (Post 15029558)
Yeah but if the whole market was free range, straight away the prices would come down as they'd need to be more competitive. Right now, they can charge more because concerned people are prepared to pay more. When everything on offer is free range, it's a level playing field and competition will do what it does.

Couple that with the economies of scale and I really don't think there'd be that big of a difference in the price in the long run.

That was a joke right? How much space do you think we have just to let chickens roam around?

CosmicTang 11-09-2008 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 15021646)
I think State measures should only be voted on by natives. If you moved here fine, not much we can do to keep you out, but please leave our politics alone.

Well then only California natives should have to pay state taxes. As long as the state takes a piece of my paycheck I have a say in what goes on, I'm paying for it.


Humans are not masters of the planet, we're stewards. We can certainly eat animals and use their hides for clothing, but we have a responsibility to take care of them as well.



Animals, whether you believe they have emotions or not, are living beings. As such they deserve the respect that all living things deserve. They should not be mistreated or tortured. We can have eggs and meat without being cruel and driven solely by profit.

CosmicTang 11-10-2008 12:01 AM

that said, this prop is a difficult one because we have to weigh out the need to treat animals humanely with allowing farmers to earn a living.

baddog 11-10-2008 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicTang (Post 15029731)
Well then only California natives should have to pay state taxes. As long as the state takes a piece of my paycheck I have a say in what goes on, I'm paying for it.


Humans are not masters of the planet, we're stewards. We can certainly eat animals and use their hides for clothing, but we have a responsibility to take care of them as well.



Animals, whether you believe they have emotions or not, are living beings. As such they deserve the respect that all living things deserve. They should not be mistreated or tortured. We can have eggs and meat without being cruel and driven solely by profit.

Just because you would not like to be stuck in a cage does not mean the chicken gives a damn. :2 cents:

kesha1 11-10-2008 12:43 AM

We are still killing them, and... eating.
I don't know, all this has deeper roots!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123