yeah just see 90% of pedos like boys, they are all the same sick fucks who need a cure, not rights

BUt most pedos are closeted, Christian, white dudes? usually republicans?

Openly out and gay, proud men aren't pedos...

Is that the reason we were "put on this Earth"?

Now you tell me. Make money from porn? Yes? Then you're a hypocrite. :2 cents:

Lol at you, fudge packer

Do you like them circumsized or uncircumsized?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Do you enjoy getting to be a dick from behind the scenes of a fake nick?

Is it like therapeutic for you or something? Fun game?

go do some blow off a trannies ass and get a life.

For me , marriage is just normal step in life. But if all gay men get married then who will pay to look at gay porn for sexual satisfaction? :)

Uh..
straight, married dudes still pay to look at chicks.

you have scientific proof? cause this discussion is quite old - is homosexuality something you "learn"? in that case homosexuality can also be "cured" - can't it? ask any homosexual what he thinks about that.

or is homosexuality something genetic? then it should not matter if the kid lives with homo- or heterosexual parents.

but i am sure what kids learn in that case is being more open minded - something a few people are quite obviously missing here. right, spicy? :winkwink:

you know - i once learned that people who fight homosexuality are doing this mostly because they are afraid of their own feelings. so how about you, spicy? got a boner when you saw 2 guys kissing and now you are frightend cause you liked and daddy would beat you when he finds out? :winkwink:

People should be able to do as they please in there own homes, this includes marriage. Why should only straight people get a tax break?? What is it anyones business who a person loves? But then again these are the same people who would rather spend billions on a drug war that is unwinnable, when all they would have to do is sale pot and tax the shit out of it...no more debt for america...

Nope I don't.

And surprised at the results being as close as they are. This is a hugely liberal and left wing board and I thought it would have been more like Yes 90% no 10%.

You have a lot of scared, big huffy, puffy, manly, man types... who think agreeing to anything gay.. makes them less of a man.


You also have a lot of hypocrites.. who are closet Bible beaters.. but are a-okay with with selling porn for their not so christian like addictions.

Yeah this is the second most used phrase by man asshole protectors like you.. LOL.. like what other argument would I expect from an ugly fat bald homo that kisses male shitholes. :1orglaugh

I bet you were attending a gay ass protection course, as every faggot out there and their ass lickers use these same arguments everytime they defend their sick brains :2 cents:

no, I just fucked your fat mommy cause your homo dad couldnt, retard

who gives a fuck, live your own life, if gays decide to get married it should not be anyone elses business :2 cents:

well still over 60%... now with all those funny gay pics people keep posting here you would even think they actually are serious about them :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

please don't get a stroke, i don't want to be responsible when your mum gets a heart attack when she finds you in your basement :thumbsup

LoL.. fat ass dick head tells me about heart attack funny as hell, you better do your exercises fat pig cause your heart attack might be on its way :1orglaugh

true love

Impressive arguments I'm seeing here: "We were put on earth to reproduce." "Being gay is sick, you're gay, and I insult your personal appearance based on your avatar photo." I loved the one about gay people's "sexual thinking" affecting their kids. Clearly, being involved in the porn industry we've seen that straight people never experience "sexual thinking".
Really though, there have been enough gay parents out there so far that someone would have noticed if all of their kids turned out to be gay or, oh the horror, DOUBLE GAY! Kids do learn how people in relationships operate together from their parents. However, physical affection at the level that parent's let their kids see isn't gay or straight. Someone with functional parents is probably going to have a good relationship model whether they have two dads, two moms, or one of each.
Being as open minded as I am I can at least be comfortable in my sexuality. If I were gonna be gay I would have been. I pity the fools out there who fear and condemn the gayness. If they did happen to be gay they'd be self hating and closeted, desperately trying to knock chicks up in the hope that it will somehow prove that they're straight.
Seriously, who actually believes that our purpose on earth is to reproduce? If that's all we were meant to do we wouldn't have needed to evolve past the sophistication of fruit flies.

eh no thanks! just no...

I love you.

This is your best response? Yup, you win the debate. The 4 smilies clinched it.

One thing though, I am married. To a woman. I have 2 kids.

D'oh. Sorry about that. :upsidedow

why do we have to have "a purpose"? that's a bit of a simplistic, even primitive view of life. what one believes to be his/her "purpose" has nothing to do with the fact that reproduction is essential both to the survival of the species as a whole and to smaller social groups. from an evolutionary standpoint, homosexuality offers no positive benefit to a social group or species.

Clearly we share two different opinions, that is fine. I get into political debates & gay marriage debates atleast once a month with somebody at a bar or club, we'll seriously be throwing punches at each other , then afterwards we will shake hands and make up. Thats whats great about this country, we have the freedom of speach to do so, and are allowed to express our opinions, and have the choice to to pick to be gay or straight, so maybe I am wrong. Maybe homosexuals should be able to marry?

Anyway, I am in no interest to create an "online adversary" who could be a potential business partners. :thumbsup

Yes, I do support it. And I am a registered Republican.

If religious institutions don't want to define marriage to include gay people, there should and will be a constitutional amendment one day as each state keeps losing the battle.......that will define marriage to include two people regardless of gender. It may be a civil ceremony; but, it will be marriage recognised by the IRS and the legislative bodies. And, this is as it should be.

I have never met a gay man who 'chose' to be gay. Knowing you are and choosing it are different. With everything I've learned, I believe that gender identification is biology with possibly an environmental trigger.....we are born straight or gay. sure, we can sublimate whatever we are born as because societal demands and religious expectations might force us to lean that way. All things considered, we are born to be attracted to whom we are attracted.

Whether or not we approve or disapprove, truly it is none of our business. And, there is no reason to believe that gay men and women will do a better or worse job of raising a child than straight people. I say give them a chance to fuck up kids, just like straight people have been doing it for thousands of years. now, THAT'S equal opportunity.

in all reality, studies have shown that kids raised by those who are physically, mentally handicapped or different as in gay, grow up far more empathetic, compassionate, and aware than those who are raised in narrow minded, angry, fearful homes.

Joy to the world, as far as I'm concerned. Besides, it is good for the economy. Let gays marry. Have ceremonies. It's a whole cottage industry worth billions.

Gay couples are great for the porn industry, just as straight couples are, just as gay singles and straight singles are.

If we would mind our own business and just let everyone be, within reason, we could all have great lives.

so... if i watch a porn scene of two women going down on each other and making out... are they "born gay"? or are they just two people of the same sex having sex with each other?

if you are attracted to both sexes are you "born gay"

if you are a female that has been raped or abused by a male and has major issues with bonding or trusting males and gravitates towards female relationships are you "born gay"

i don't think there is any agreement at all or scientific consensus as to why people are gay. i certainly don't think there is consensus to the fact that its black and white and can't be both combination's of both genetic and psychological factors or one or the other.

The concept of marriage for love is a relatively recent idea. In most of those other places you mentioned, marriage is more of a business transaction. The "groom" gives the "bride"'s family a cow, goat or tract of land. Arranged marriages are still very real throughout the world even to where a young prepubescent girl is promised away for a future date in exchange for something. There is no concept in many of these places of marriage for love. The kids are commodities to help till the fields or to be promised out for an exchange.

A lot of places plural marriages still fly where monogamy isn't even a thought. That "understanding of marriage" you speak of has many many incarnations throughout the world and a lot of them are not in the vein of traditional nuclear families.

Gay couples can have the nuclear family structure you seem romantic about with 2 loving parents caring for their children; often as good, if not better than a dysfunctional male/female marriage.

If a couple looking to adopt can pass the tests and qualifications for a stable, loving environment, why not allow them to adopt.

It's not like allowing gay marriage will open up the floodgates to allow people to marry animals, enter into polygamous marriages, or some other extremely odd derivation to where the proponents from groups such as NOM bring to hyperbole can, should or would come to pass. Allowing more equal rights WILL happen.

As for your earlier example of morbidly obese people at movie theaters, they can sit in a damn wheelchair and take up one of the many handicapped spots already available in theaters. To your colorblindness example... um? They are already colorblind and can't see the extra colors regardless so I fail to see how anything would change for them or how any extra concessions could be made.

I don't want to put words in his mouth, but i'm pretty sure that's not what he meant. I believe he means women who have random sex with some random guys out of wedlock and pops out 3-8 kids.

That was added to show we are more godly than those godless communists.

In the US in most states being together for a few years is considered a common law marriage.

Personally no. I fully respect gay people, they've had no choice in the matter, however I think to a degree they have to accept society and respect others. Environment does play a role in sexuality I think (perhaps not the complete role), when you look at Ancient Greece (and the proliferation of homosexual behavior) or prison, or even heterosexually what we find attractive in a partner is in large part determined from where and how you grew up.

So if I establish that (at least to myself) the question is whether or not I believe we should have a society that essentially encourages homosexuality - and I don't. I think confusing children with homosexual behavior on tv, in public and normalized in marriage, etc is really not ideal.

How about this...

Marriage = Legal License between a man and a woman

Civil Union = Legal License between a same sex couple.

To me the debate is over the use of the word "Marriage".

If the U.S. were to enact a law that grants all U.S. citizens the same and equal rights whether it be a "Marraige" or a "Civil Union" would this not solve the problem???

Why must the gay community be so adamant about the semantics of the word marriage and not embrace the term "Civil Union" as their own? To me this would create the unity needed at the national level to take the issue to Washington via a united front rather than fighting the battle in 50 separate arenas.
_
_

Are you against marriage for the elderly since they can't reproduce?

As for the evolutionary standpoint, it does offer some positive effect. The fact they have evolved to this stage in countless species shows that it has some benefits to our overall survival as a species (lots of theories on this).

I personally support it because I don't really care. If two gay people want to get married, it has zero effect on me or my life. It's a natural occurence amongst our species and we shouldn't treat it any different than race, ethnicity, or hair color. The same arguments used against it were used against interracial marriage.

Ultimately marriage is just a legal document that gives you some tax benefits and rights in hospitals and such. If a Church refuses to marry, that's fine, but our government shouldn't be deciding who we choose to spend our lives with.

actually many hetero people turned out to be gay after having children and being married to a woman.. fucking retards

i've never said i was personally against it for any reason related to reproduction. i laid out my reasons very clearly ;)

i think you are making the "positive effect" up. the only positive benefit is population control. i can't imagine any other accepted scientific theories as to what positive role homosexuality plays in any animal species as it pertains to their evolution and survival.

I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion on this topic however my thoughts on it are that if it don't effect me personally why should I care? What you do in your personal life is your business and as long as it does not impact my life to drastically I have no problem with it. I have several gay and lesbian friends and I support their lifestyle 100%. Only down fall about approving gay marriage is meaning that more of my friends are likely to get hitched and I am gonna have to fork out $$$ for gifts. LOL

Homosexuality is extremely common throughout the animal kingdom. It isn't a human specific trait. The sheer size of the population in not only our species but others shows that it has had some evolutionary benefit. We don't know for sure what that is and may never know. But the fact it has survived to this point in such large numbers shows that it did play a beneficial role.

Some believe that the demeanor of homosexuals are beneficial to society. That being less aggressive, there was a better chance that they would survive. That their demeanor was more attractive to women and even beneficial to males in the group. Sexuality isn't black or white and is a lot more complex than we realize. Homosexuals reproduce.

Nonetheless, marriage isn't about reproduction. It's about some tax benefits, patient rights, and heir rights. We often look at legal marriage as something more but it isn't. It's simply a legal classification. A Church has every right to discriminate in my opinion whether I think it's right or wrong. But I don't believe our government has that same right.

Here's a nice piece on the topic. Ton of other scientific studies out there about evolution and homosexuality.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...sexuality.html
http://evolution-101.blogspot.com/20...ty-evolve.html

I honestly get surprised each time someone from our industry doesn't support equal rights for all. I mean we fight so hard for our rights as an industry.

Why shouldnt we care about the word marriage you straights have married on tv for entertainment purposes married in vegas and now you wanna say the word is some how to be protected.. I dont want a damn civil union what the fuck is that.. I pay my taxes i want equal rights not special... If i want to get married I want a marriage!

You arent serious right? If so the company in your sig should be ashamed!

Something must be traditional !!! I dont think that is good idea !!!!

because having no reaction would mean you really don't care..

All you straight fuckers talk about us gays so much! You are a jackass

I say let em marry. if two people love each other that much and want to marry then who am I to prevent them from doing so.

In my experience those who bash gays and the supporters of gay rights, are usually insecure about their sexuality(secretly love the cock) and feel they have to resort to bashing

no
 

Because they will probably stop buying gay site memberships .

LOL never in fact it is proven gay men share porn with their partners! Only not buy from people who dont support them!

I don`t have anything against gay marriage