![]() |
Don't be afraid to post ways to shave... A program that shaves today is a dead program tomorrow.
Gota remember, the Program doesn't know what "I expect the ratio to be" so even if they take 1 sale away, that could be the end of that Webmaster or the bulk of the traffic. The longer a program doesn't perform to the Webmasters expectations, the bigger chance the program has of failing. For sure with todays adult 'net.. One sale could be all sales... hehe.. |
Quote:
how would you define shaving? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Replace your biller postback script with a wrapper that just drops the postback x% of the time instead of passing it back to the affiliate software. Won't show up in a house account in your software but it will result in a nice surplus on the biller side. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Shaving is the manipulation of statistics shown/given to the Affiliate, normally done through code. Here is the thing... with NATS, you aren't taking something before/after it has the data, and changing it, and the re-giving it back to nats. Think of it like this.. If you tried to shave random people, you could shave yourself, your own traffic, your best webmaster. How crazy would it be to shave your own traffic buys? Thus you need something to help calculate who should be shaved, when, how much they have been, the levels of shave, where it should happen, countries, etc. Doing that in NATS means data is different, time stamps, member poll won't come in correctly, webmaster stats aren't going to post in time, clicks/sales, rebills, something is going to be behind. If it's a going program, it's going to change when all other nats programs don't.. Anyway.. it's software based :) |
Quote:
And correct, you wouldn't have admin stats for the shaved joins. Does it matter at that point? It was one scenario, I'm not sure if you're trying to play devils advocate or just feel like being obtuse today. |
Quote:
Lots of work for a sale and no stats.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Personally I don't see the point of shaving, in this day and age of shitty conversions, the more sales your affiliate sees the more likely he is to keep on sending and potentially send more. I would think "reverse shaving" would be more popular, but then you still have tons of idiot gfy members who won't get off the "omg shave!~" thing. |
Quote:
So now we are talking about a serious fucking programmer, 1% of 1% of the people that can modify a complex, split up, amount of data, that must match from the join submit down through the process, and pick it back up (ie: protection from webmasters getting sales stolen) - without data being changed... Ok.. So in the extreme of super extremes... I guess nats can be shaved.. But at that point, you could code your own software 10 times over. Quote:
|
Quote:
The fact is, I can do anything, and work around anything. It's just a byproduct of being a genius programmer. If you want me to keep replying in this thread you're going to have to start paying by the hour :winkwink: Too bad I retired. Quote:
|
I guess it is possible, but if conversion rates get too low webmasters usually test new sponsors to see if there is an improvement. Shaving one or two sales from a whale may not be noticeable but small webmasters will think the conversion rate is bad and move on.
I dont think it is in the sponsors interest to do shaving, in the long term. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
can you fuck affiliates out of their payments with nats? fuck ya, just like you can with any other software, is the correct answer i dont know if that was a clever move that was able to fool people or an overly obvious attempt. |
Quote:
Don't try mix your morals with what shaving actually is, your morals are for sale just like the affiliate programs, same reason you are in porn. Could the processor screw you out of sales, could the bank, the cc company, could the host rip off traffic without you knowing, could you be hacked, was it your mom that stole your cc? So many people to not trust for so many made up reasons. So many people to blame shit on.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The topic starter asks if programs on nats can shave. Yes they can. Maybe not (easily) through the nats software itself, but a program that uses Nats can still implement scripts that will take a way traffic (=sales) from affiliates (which is shaving im my opinion). |
way to ruin a thread Doc.
|
Quote:
Then we get magic tour links, that nobody is going to magically notice, mixed with missing posts... all while nobody gives a shit about frauding webmasters. This slandering crap hurts good honest programs and people, the several 100 NATS programs that 100% never screw with the affiliates, that have been honest from day one, before they moved to NATS. My fav day's are when Affiliates open up a Program just to find out... they suck at converting traffic - it was never a shave. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I am a little bit confused with the whole "trust no one" hysteria.
It's a nice thing to say, it sounds nice, but let's get a little bit real. For example if you go to a shop, buy bread and you don't like it, will you say that all bakers are bastards and stop eating bread? Maybe, but maybe not. Maybe you'll just move to another shop and find something that's good for you. You're a part of one process, one is producing, other one is consuming, both are all right with it. Now in online, one makes the pay sites, others send traffic to it, they're all free to do whatever they want, if one doesn't make money for you, try another one. But should one side shout on the other side that they're in principle scammers, while still comfortably cashing checks and making money in online? I just don't understand the collective hysteria, yes scamming happens, it happens in ANY industry, that's how world is, people suck, but being hysterical won't change it. |
Place:
<? $_REQUEST['nats']=(rand(0,9)==1)?'OMGSHAVING':$_REQUEST['nats']; include('signup.php.orig'); ?> In your signup.php, and rename the original to signup.php.orig Congratulations, you've got a 10% shave. (btw, you'll get fucked by TMM pretty quickly for this, but hey) |
Quote:
But that's a cool idea either way, may have pulled out a way to show off different join pages based on the webmaster id, without the webmaster having to do anything... neat. |
|
Quote:
You save the original as signup.php.orig, then make your own signup.php - that does whatever, then includes signup.php.orig. You're almost right, but slightly off track w/ your theories about the tour tracking. |
Quote:
It's not a theory about the ?nats var. The tour to the gallery, the ?nats=whatever never has to be passed in, it's not a factor. You changing it, doesn't change the "real" webmaster id, passing in a the wrong id from the tour to the join page, does not change the id. You can't reset it on the tour (the tour isn't part of anything), because the tour doesn't own the cookie, you can't reset it on the join form because nats doesn't allow it. |
Quote:
|
From what I've learned so far in my short life it appears that everything is possible :2 cents:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123