LMAO! Good post

Daizzzy you are a loser, you?ve got sprung on 2 boards about your free password forum and shown with screen caps but you still deny it. I wonder how many sponsors are about to ban you from the list provided. :321GFY

hahaaa daizzy you fail at everything you do bro... you failed on how many boards now? you suck at the interwebs.. open a hot dog stand or something...

interesting drama lama

so basically your teaching surfers how to get free passwords if they "review"

absolutely right. it's just our approach to manage review team.

we wanted only surfers reviews, so to get a pass surfer should review a tour first, if it's qualify mpd demands than he gets a pass to complete his review and access to password database to review any site he likes. it was always such scheme since the beginning


that's an example of such review: http://www.myporndiary.net/classic/p...assione_piedi/

it's synchronized with the board, so you'll find it into review section on the board too. feel free to contact MO, the owner, which provided us with access and was satisfied with the way it worked

it's the most stupid drama i ever seen. and it amazes me who's attacking sbd. just lol

that section was and still is available for reviewers only (it's protected by password), which in our case are usual surfers, not professional copyrighters (mpd is 100% surfers oriented site, nothing fake won't be there). and all those promotexts were and still are only to push people to review sites.

Ok so now you are also admitting to giving away free passwords to SURFERS to do a review for you when the sponsors gave them to you for the review NOT for a surfer to do a review in fact those same surfers could have joined the program and the program owner would have made some money from it along with another affiliate. Can?t you simply do the reviews yourself or at least pay someone to do them.

How many of the program owners did you inform you will be giving away free passwords to SURFERS to do reviews I'm sure the sponsors would like to know that as well as all of us webmasters.

You are digging your own grave deeper and deeper.

hello, mr. stupid troll
that's our only ccbill ref stats. almost 800 webmasters already and it's growing evey day
http://i330.photobucket.com/albums/l...8/refstats.jpg

so you've made $5,000 total?

is that right? LOL

Someone should contact the sponsors and have him blacklisted for doing this

that's a good suggestion

I agree that's why I wrote these but he never answered but don't worry the sponsors will see this thread I'm sure a lot of pissed off affiliates will be contacting them :thumbsup

Actually a few have already seen this thread :thumbsup

Fucking lame.

It's funny your on here trying to play the fucking sheriff "calling out" sponsors that have "hidden" cross sales which weren't even hidden.

Now we find out your giving surfers free access to members areas in exchange for some reviews.

I think you should be blacklisted aswell.

Someone got busted.

I looked at some of the sites he was bitching at.

Hidden in the sense that you can never find them? NO

Hidden in the sense that unless you are being extra cautious and read every fucking word you are going to get popped for $80 more than you expected? YES

I looked at a single page and it had two false endings before 2 prechecked cross sales. Lame.

daizzy sends good traffic in large amounts and i've never had any problems with him.

I thought i'd come in here and say that.

Never did like the setup of that site, to cramped.

Come on so sending good traffic makes it ok for him to be giving out passes from sponsors who trusted him to SURFERS to do reviews man come on if he can?t do a review himself or afford to pay someone in cash he is simply shitting on program owners as well as webmasters by giving out FREE PASSES from the sponsors.

bump for dizzy fizzle

Shit man. do you ever sleep?

Oh man.

Seen it all now.

write me pretty story on site i give you access to tranny! verry nice, yes, yes!

NO STORY, NO PASSY!

I see what your saying, what I said in that thread was they were not hidden but pre-checked like many others and I also stated the positioning of them was questionable.

But anyway, what I'm saying here is he has been calling out sponsors with questionable tactics and making out to be the angel of webmasters slamming other peoples businesses with threads calling them out essentially saying they are using poor tactics and scamming surfers. then a few weeks later we find out he's giving porn away for free?

Total fucking hypocrit!

shit canned express

Pretty sure this thread was on the first page when I hit reply..

lol fucking classic. this guy is still an idiot, nothing has changed.

Will you hit your friend up for me? Tell him I'll give him passwords to his favorite paysites, just do a review for me.. He will be stoked he doesn't have to pay for porn anymore.

I'm gonna bump this.

Where did the screen caps go?

loldaizzy . a twat if i ever saw one..

saturday drama, yay...

On another board he is say he doesn't give out passwords and there is no proof of him ever giving them out to anyone, because nobody here can provide a password he has given out. lolol

I LOL'd :1orglaugh

Look at your site. Do you think people are really that stupid to believe anyone would sign up for anything there?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Whether his site sucks or not is irrelevant. If every site that sucks had its own drama thread at GFY... lol.

The questions is, whether his scheme of "password in exchange for reviews" was approved by his sponsors or not. I personally believe that such scheme is doomed to fail, but if he's gotten all necessary approvals from his sponsors to try it, it's none of anybody's business to bash him. We're all free to try different approaches to biz as long as they're legit, however lame they may seem from other people's point of view.

So far, none of the sponsors listed above came into this thread with both guns blazing. To mean that means that all necessary approvals were recieved.

When I was a cable splicer for GTE there was a co-worker that would eat his lunch in the porta-potty on job sites.

I know a couple that terminated his accounts with them. Sometimes not saying anything is worse than coming in guns-a-blazin'.

But not in the case of public discussion, where webmaster was publicly accused of violating the terms of service.

To me, that his sponsors are silent could also mean that they're embarrased to admit they really did apporove such a lame scheme - but cannot openly deny it because they know he has either ICQ history files or e-mails where they said OK etc.

Not saying I don't trust you, but to confirm the guy's really in violation we need to hear from his sponsors directly, not from a third parties that may have misinterpreted the peices of information available to them (even if his account was really terminated by those sponsors you know, it could be for some other reasons, such as low trials to rebills ratio etc which are irrelevant to what he's been accused of in this thread).