"The people" also said that blacks should not be integrated into the armed forces. Didnt Fox report that news last week like everyone else? ~85% of soldiers said at the time that integrating blacks would destroy the US army. Truman did it anyway because he possessed enough simple common sense to see the handwriting on the wall. Will it be the GOP agenda to repeal that too?

The "people" also said blacks can't marry whites, and at one point blacks couldn't even marry other blacks.

The "people" aren't necessarily the wisest owls.

Why should we give "religists" that word? It doesn't belong to them. It belongs to humanity as it always has been throughout the ages. They've tried to take words make them there own.

I fed up with it.

:2 cents:

So when has it been other than a husband and wife?

Not about more regulations, just don't want to change the meaning of Marriage
I could live with that, call it a civil union, then when they get a divorce, we can call that a UNcivil union
But it did go to a vote and that was thrown out by a judge that should have removed himself from the decision because of being openly gay

Now you're calling GOP racist, do you have one fucking brain cell that's your own? Or are you just going to spout what the liberal press needs you to?

It's not true?

What in the hell is wrong with you dude? I stated a historical fact, and wondered out loud if it will also be part of the GOP political agenda to repeal another instance of the government acting CONTRARY to the will of the people.

Save your race baiting for someone else, I dont appreciate it.

Apparently he thinks that all GOP are Racist
http://image3.examiner.com/images/bl...istTeaSign.jpg

I'm interested to see how the judge handles the stay application.

Wasnt it a progressive that segregated the army and a Republican that desegregated?

The problem today is most republicans are progressives.

He forgot that Abe Lincoln was the first GOP president

Then Teddy came and fucked all that up :disgust

http://www.jewishideas.org/articles/...x-jewish-famil

http://matzav.com/ou-survey-finds-th...ety-as-a-whole

http://www.koltorah.org/ravj/Interma...lancing_1.html

Blah blah you're an idiot as usual.

Good god, you're not only a moron, but a moron that doesn't understand how amendments work with federal statutes. Too easy.

Why don't you enlighten us with your vast knowledge then slick.

Really? It's been between a man and a man or a woman and a woman? Who taught you ancient history?

You do understand the difference between theory and practice right? You also understand that homosexuals aren't considered a legal minority too right? So you're telling me the Supreme Court must uphold is retarded, considering if they held your simplistic and literal views of the constitution, same sex rights would have been established long ago. But please, keep humoring us. There's been a shortage of moronic liberals lately.

What part of "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." don't you grasp? Obviously I'm not privy to your wealth of Constitutional Law expertise or razor sharp powers of deductive reasoning. You are just too damn cool for school, and I want to be you.

What part of "theory vs. practice" and "literal vs. interpretation" don't you understand? I realize you're trying too hard and it's frying the few brain cells you have left, but maybe you should step down from this one. Although you're definitely humorous with your "The Supreme Court will uphold because it's in the Constitution" logic.

Also, I understand you're too dumb to realize federal statutes supersede state courts, such as the Marriage Protection Amendment, DOMA, etc.

The only right the state has is to allow a civil union.

Yes, I'm struggling to stay upright and breathing because I'm on my last neuron. Thanks for the assist Demon, I might not have made it to noon without your help.

where does it say that? I believe the state has full control over that, but I could be wrong, Utah lost the right to marriage as they saw fit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Marriage_Amendment

Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-se...l_A mendments

Agent, I love your inability to properly post pictures.

lol ... still looking for 2% :

No time to read all of those great links. Since YOU brought up that 2% shit , maybe YOU should quote your article and supply a link ... genius ... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

.. and better non biased source..

BTW, how was the mopping ... :Oh crap

Intersting read, thanks for the link

Translation: I don't like your sources so I'm going to discount them, and then I'll accuse you of trying to discount mine!

THe mopping? I wouldn't know. I am however trying to figure out how much of my taxes will go to underprivileged individuals such as yourself. :)

To have the right to even go into divorce court is what is important.

Many divorce courts are stamped "straights only," which is no different than a bathroom being stamped "whites only."

One of the dumbest comparisons ever made. But what do you expect from a moronic liberal who compares slavery and/or oppression of Blacks with same sex civil unions not recognized as marriages.:1orglaugh


Edit: Just to dumb it down for you, you're comparing an era where a people weren't recognized as such, to a couple recognized as people AND a civil union, but not a married couple.

jesus Demon, get some new fucking material already. It was effective & a little funny at first, but now, every reply you make has the same basic theme: "One of the dumbest comparisons ever made. But what do you expect from a moronic liberal who ____ (fill in the blank)." :ugone2far

it's tired already dude.

So much for the majority vote then :)

What if the majority voted that gays are not legally considered "people"? That be okay too?

congrats! I wonder if this is going to be bad for business for this movie...



I think it just came out (see that!) earlier in the summer.

Holly, you go girl !!

Not as tiresome as "racist, bigot, religious fanatic, murderer", the key words liberals use to evoke emotion because they(you) are incapable of logical thought.

Ah yes, when the liberal is confronted with a logical thought, he MUST go to an extreme to prove his point.

Ok, fuck it. I'm going to just adopt your method.

That's the type of response I would expect from a moronic conservative who can't come up with a single original thought but instead regurgitates the same tired rhetoric over & over.

Oh, I apologize if I dented your delicate sensibilities.... should I choose a less extreme?

Here we go.... how about if the majority voted that straight people can marry, but can't ever get divorced. No matter what.

But they didn't, what they voted on was the discription of what a marriage was, it wasn't taking away any rights, it was preventing new ones

Prop 8 didn't take away their rights? Because I was sure gay marriage WAS legal here before Prop 8.

I guess the Libertarians will be happy with this ruling.

You've adopted this stance a long time ago, which is why you constantly embarrass yourself. If it's fox news, you don't look at the source. If it's conservative, you ignore it or bash it. The hypocrisy is amusing. I definitely enjoy arguing with intellectual inferiors though. Stick to making galleries. :1orglaugh

Okay then! :bowdown

Prop 8 was the second time it was voted on, both times voters said no to same sex marriage

Demon, you are my new personal Jesus. I'm going to conjure an image of you every time I pull my pud.

Interesting, because there were all kinds of gay folks getting married here a while back. Guess they did it all illegally.

That's ok, when I'm feeling down I can always look at your posts and realize someone is a lot worse off than myself in every aspect of life. :winkwink:

That's true. Sometimes I feel like a newborn tadpole when confronted with your superior intellect, razor sharp wit and iron fisted determination. Would it be okay if I got a tattoo honoring your worship, Princess?

When federal judges and our government ignore the MAJORITY of the people, eventually something is going to break. You guys really dont think you can get away with this shit without repercussions do you? Are you willing to DIE for your fag marriage? Consequences will never be the same.

Only the ignorant and naive actually believe the Supreme Court will uphold this decision.