GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The tubes are a joke!! [PICS] (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=982188)

Paul Markham 08-13-2010 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HB|Sergio (Post 17412167)
Evolution :) maybe soone will be something what will kill tubes :)

To win against Evolution you have to adapt. Do you see much of that with websites or do you see them doing the same old thing they did for years?

Just in HD now. :1orglaugh

DatingGameExpert 08-13-2010 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker (Post 17411366)
Adopt or die.

Fixed: STEAL OR DIE.

DatingGameExpert 08-13-2010 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlove (Post 17411377)
Just look at the amazon rankings for tube sites, find your content on each, and have a lawyer throw a complaint their way.

Amazon? You mean Alexa...:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1 orglaugh

DatingGameExpert 08-13-2010 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17412129)
Illustrate the the industry perfectly. Thinking members areas have to be filled with just videos and sets that can be stolen. Here's a suggestion to what else a members area can contain.

Live shows. Not a white label site of a webcam site. A real live show with the girls performing, solo, GG or BG. It has to be good sex, not the faking that most scenes now have. So no getting a girl to do 5 or more scenes in a day. They do or don't chat with members. They respond to what member want, within the girls limits.

Scenes need to be varied, don't just throw a girl on a bed or sofa and tell her to get on with it. That becomes boring. Members need to be anticipating on what the next girl will do. The approach is it's live, unscripted and happening now, under the part direction of members.

Small sites that can't afford to have their own exclusive shows can feed of a central site streaming it into their site. Even big sites could do this.

The cost of setting it up is affordable, if you have the space. Girls will do scenes priced according to where the sponsor bases the live show. What most webcam girls earn in a day would cover the cost of 3 scenes in 5-6 hours.

It's not an upsell to a webcam site to squeeze more money from a member, it's part of what he gets for his $30. Of course a tipping scheme could be built in or the option of the girl going for a private one to one. It could be at a lower price than conventional webcam sites. Because there are savings on the traffic costs. Again these are not ways to squeeze more from the customer. It's about giving extra value to customers.

By doing this it will weaken the profitability of Tubes. Very very few people ever bought porn on the Internet. The industry thrived on those few. By enticing back those who will spend money on porn, you weaken the "Free" competition. They need those buyers to keep profitable. Tubes exist on profit, part of which comes from webcam adverts. Offer something from inside the members areas to compete with those advertisers and you reduce the income of Tubes.

WHY THIS WON"T HAPPEN.

Most sponsors spend 50%-70% on traffic. Payouts, support, tools, promotion, etc.
And 10% or less on the members area.

Affiliates will continue to send traffic to who ever pays the most today and screw tomorrow. Sponsors will keep competing for traffic by spending more on traffic.

And that's why they won't compete with Tubes.

If anyone has a better idea then they're free to tell us. Those who don't can dismiss it out of hand. And watch ratios fall.

Sounds awfully nichey to me. So you are suggesting that this is the missing element? It's webcams 2.0, 90% of surfers won't give a flying fuck about this. They want to jerk off, not sit there typing shit with a bunch of other jerkers, telling girls what to do.

It's a cute idea and I'm sure some sites will do something like this but it's not going to save shit. It's over. People don't want to join sites anymore because the content is free now. Your industry let this happen, I don't understand really why but nothing will change unless there's a big lockdown...ya keep dreaming of that day.

ottopottomouse 08-13-2010 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 17411468)
There's a HUGE differance between giving away enough content to act as 'advertising' for your paysite and GIVING AWAY THE ENTIRE FUCKING WEBSITE FOR FREE.

Although it's a bit different to entire videos on tubes everybody laughs at AlphaSky for trying to restrict stuff.

martinsc 08-13-2010 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17411334)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Dirty Lord 08-13-2010 07:23 AM

funnie:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

cess 08-13-2010 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 17411318)
nobodies gonna do shit about it so who fucking cares

Yep, there's been a million (illegal) tube threads here and there will probably be many more. I believe Viacom lost vs google (youtube) which was the biggest case, so good luck to anyone trying a lawsuit now. Not that most people in the adult industry give a shit enough to try to stop it anyway.

Davy 08-13-2010 07:35 AM

The traffic graphs posted don't look like a joke to me!

xholly 08-13-2010 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17412129)
Illustrate the the industry perfectly. Thinking members areas have to be filled with just videos and sets that can be stolen. Here's a suggestion to what else a members area can contain.

Live shows. Not a white label site of a webcam site. A real live show with the girls performing, solo, GG or BG. It has to be good sex, not the faking that most scenes now have. So no getting a girl to do 5 or more scenes in a day. They do or don't chat with members. They respond to what member want, within the girls limits.

Scenes need to be varied, don't just throw a girl on a bed or sofa and tell her to get on with it. That becomes boring. Members need to be anticipating on what the next girl will do. The approach is it's live, unscripted and happening now, under the part direction of members.

Small sites that can't afford to have their own exclusive shows can feed of a central site streaming it into their site. Even big sites could do this.

The cost of setting it up is affordable, if you have the space. Girls will do scenes priced according to where the sponsor bases the live show. What most webcam girls earn in a day would cover the cost of 3 scenes in 5-6 hours.

It's not an upsell to a webcam site to squeeze more money from a member, it's part of what he gets for his $30. Of course a tipping scheme could be built in or the option of the girl going for a private one to one. It could be at a lower price than conventional webcam sites. Because there are savings on the traffic costs. Again these are not ways to squeeze more from the customer. It's about giving extra value to customers.

By doing this it will weaken the profitability of Tubes. Very very few people ever bought porn on the Internet. The industry thrived on those few. By enticing back those who will spend money on porn, you weaken the "Free" competition. They need those buyers to keep profitable. Tubes exist on profit, part of which comes from webcam adverts. Offer something from inside the members areas to compete with those advertisers and you reduce the income of Tubes.

WHY THIS WON"T HAPPEN.

Most sponsors spend 50%-70% on traffic. Payouts, support, tools, promotion, etc.
And 10% or less on the members area.

Affiliates will continue to send traffic to who ever pays the most today and screw tomorrow. Sponsors will keep competing for traffic by spending more on traffic.

And that's why they won't compete with Tubes.

If anyone has a better idea then they're free to tell us. Those who don't can dismiss it out of hand. And watch ratios fall.

Im not really interested in watching a webcam show, i dont really give a fuck if its live or not. I want to see good looking girls who are eager for cock get fucked and then smile and show off some sperm on their tongue. In fact i like to see this so much i'd even pay for it but fortunately theres good people on the internet who have decided to give this to me for free so I don't have to. :)

Barry-xlovecam 08-13-2010 07:51 AM

"Cut off their water" ? stop advertising for their traffic.
Make their piracy of content without profit.

Don't adapt.

If your neighborhood is taken over by crack dealers what do you propose to do? Become a crack dealer too?


Agent 488 08-13-2010 08:01 AM

adarpt or die.

ottopottomouse 08-13-2010 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 17412577)
If your neighborhood is taken over by crack dealers what do you propose to do? Become a crack dealer too?

You start to sell something better than crack. And/or go on a murder spree.

Quentin 08-13-2010 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 17411318)
nobodies gonna do shit about it so who fucking cares

I think I'm going to have to disagree with you there.

maxxtro 08-13-2010 08:30 AM

http://i38.tinypic.com/2556k9v.gif

Robbie 08-13-2010 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxxtro (Post 17412652)

Yep, that guy with the violin is ME with my tgps.

CaptainHowdy 08-13-2010 09:50 AM

Still waiting for the punchline...

Emil 08-13-2010 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 17412830)
Yep, that guy with the violin is ME with my tgps.

Then why the fuck are you just standing there? Go to another place and start playing on the violin.

andrej_NDC 08-13-2010 10:00 AM

Blame youtube, blame google.

Semi-Retired-Dave 08-13-2010 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 17412577)
"Cut off their water" ? stop advertising for their traffic.
Make their piracy of content without profit.

Don't adapt.

If your neighborhood is taken over by crack dealers what do you propose to do? Become a crack dealer too?


Great example. So True. FUCK ADAPTING and the Followers that use that Word. Damn I hate that word when it comes to Tube Sites.

sortie 08-13-2010 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Emil (Post 17412883)
Then why the fuck are you just standing there? Go to another place and start playing on the violin.

Because that's the only place he can play/panhandle without breaking the law. :winkwink:

That flasher will eventually go to jail, but justice is just way too slow.

:pimp

Robbie 08-13-2010 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sortie (Post 17412978)
Because that's the only place he can play/panhandle without breaking the law. :winkwink:

That flasher will eventually go to jail, but justice is just way too slow.

:pimp

lol
Yeah, that's pretty much the situation.

I did try playing the drums and the viola and tuba to "adapt"...but it seems that no matter what I played, the free pussy kicked my ass everytime. :1orglaugh

Ace_luffy 08-13-2010 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17411334)

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup nice one

_Richard_ 08-13-2010 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17411334)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh awesome

FeelMyTube 08-13-2010 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC (Post 17412944)
Blame youtube, blame google.

interesting point. tubes are nothing more than a new way to distribute content made possible by better technology (faster connections).

the fact that no one seems able to control piracy and content theft online is the real issue, be it in tubes, rapidshare, torrents, etc. tubes are just more user friendly (and for that reason get a disporponiate amount of the traffic and attention).

Dirty Dane 08-13-2010 10:58 AM

Full length movies won't sell shit, but to be honest, those old looking sites need to adapt. Adaption doesn't mean posting full movies, but they look like shit. Seriously. Something out of the 90's. Or even 80's, my Commodore can do better. And you can't put up some few ugly women in their 50's fucking in a classroom and promote them as "teen" niche. Those times are over, those bookmarkers must be dead by now.

The Porn Nerd 08-13-2010 11:31 AM

LIFE LESSON #26:

There are TWO types of porn "fans":

1. Those who just want to whack off, have a pop, get a quick orgasm and move on. It's like eating cookies to them: I'm hungry, what's in the pantry? Well, I really like Chips Ahoy but all there's only Oreos...well, Oreos are free and I don't feel like dragging my ass to the store so GULP. Ahhh that felt good! Now what did I have to do with the rest of my day?

2. Afficionados. The "discerning" consumer. Someone who loves porn but loves HIS kind of porn (whatever that may be). Fetish? Niche? Sure - but even guys who just like POV (so they can fantasize it's their dicks getting sucked/fucked) or big titted blondes or group sex or MILFs...THESE kind of porn fans WILL buy but only for something they consider "woth it".

SO: It's OUR jobs to stop concentrating on porn fan #1 because, honestly, he just wants to come and doesn't really care who/why/how/where etc. Therefore, we need to focus on porn fan #2: buy OUR shit because it fulfills what you want (and need?).

There's also an age factor: younger porn fans raised on free shit are disinclined to pay for something they've always gotten for free. So fuck the under-30's (they usually have little to no $ anyway). When you get to the over 40's - those with money, busy lives and responsibilities - they WILL PAY, for the convenience of not searching through free tubes for hours JUST to find that short-haired big-titted blonde they love to jerk it to.

So what do "older" porn fans WANT? Design your tours for THEM, focus your marketing skills on THEM, appeal to THEM and their needs. And guess what? Most people in this category do NOT want to visit a porn tour that looks like they just walked into a Red Light District in Amsterdam. Flashing GIFs, this element POPPING in their face, music screeching in their ears.....

Finally, if you're an under-40 adult webmaster then chances are you're struggling BIG TIME. NOT because you didn't get into the biz soon enough but because the way you view the world doesn't "match" your customer's expectations. You're marketing like a 28 year old and have no clue what the 44 year old porn BUYER wants, and what will motivate him to open his wallet.

So check yoself b4 you wreck yoself.

</RANT>

bushwacker 08-13-2010 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarryP (Post 17411196)
Paysite owners said TGP's were a joke in '97 -- same shit, different decade.


:eek7:eek7

sworld 08-13-2010 11:41 AM

Vsex.com is the answer to tube sites.

Hazlewood 08-13-2010 11:46 AM

jump on the train, then you wont care anymore. Otherwise, I feel your argument as it is warranted but life is short and there is money to be made

andrej_NDC 08-13-2010 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FeelMyTube (Post 17413171)
interesting point. tubes are nothing more than a new way to distribute content made possible by better technology (faster connections).

the fact that no one seems able to control piracy and content theft online is the real issue, be it in tubes, rapidshare, torrents, etc. tubes are just more user friendly (and for that reason get a disporponiate amount of the traffic and attention).

Man, read the sell&buy forum, waiting for your reply. Whats your icq?

Serial Pervert 08-13-2010 12:49 PM

good luck, man!

naughty1 08-13-2010 02:05 PM

Yes 16 pics versus a full movie is a big difference NOW but back in 95-2000 most people were still on Dialup and pictures were the in thing And back then whole sets from members areas were getting put up on tgps and no one said a damn thing then So in essence is kinda same thing thats happening now just in a different perspective. So those times versus these times i'd say are somewhat similar.

If you havent taken notice the spons programs that are surviving are the ones that have inner dealings with the tubes. Say what you want, but reality is spons tell us affiliates one thing to get the free traff but do totally opposite.

I know at least 10 big spons that are in the pockets of the big tubes and they are making MAD bank. In reality think about it from business end of things, Why wouldn't they deal with the tubes? they only have to deal with 1 or 2 people per tube on a regular basis, not 500 diff affiliates asking how to do this and that, and they make BIG MONEY period. Therefore They can pare down their support staff and increase their profit margin.

Do they post here on the board bitching Why of course they do because they want all the affiliates that do send em traffic to think they are 100% legit and totally against tubes,

purescotty 08-13-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane (Post 17413227)
Full length movies won't sell shit, but to be honest, those old looking sites need to adapt. Adaption doesn't mean posting full movies, but they look like shit. Seriously. Something out of the 90's. Or even 80's, my Commodore can do better. And you can't put up some few ugly women in their 50's fucking in a classroom and promote them as "teen" niche. Those times are over, those bookmarkers must be dead by now.

THIS.

Basically my exact opinion I have felt for some time before being a affiliate manager. So many sites just continue on as they have since day one, posting new content yes, but no other progressions. Better SEO, marketing, design, layout, quality traffic trading is what will matter. I don't see a tube site as a requirement to adapt and I personally don't even find them appealing, most are a bunch of low quality thumbs that all look the same. I MUCH rather prefer a TGP with some creativity to it that makes it different and appealing.

To this day, I think I actually viewed a tube once for my personal enjoyment, I stick to MGP/TGPs when I bother to surf in my personal time. Some of them have been around for 10 years. If I was going to spend time viewing a entire movie I would rather just buy the DVD or get a membership for the quality etc.

Do something different, market your site to be unique in some way. :2 cents:

Paul Markham 08-16-2010 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DatingGameExpert (Post 17412447)
Sounds awfully nichey to me. So you are suggesting that this is the missing element? It's webcams 2.0, 90% of surfers won't give a flying fuck about this. They want to jerk off, not sit there typing shit with a bunch of other jerkers, telling girls what to do.

It's a cute idea and I'm sure some sites will do something like this but it's not going to save shit. It's over. People don't want to join sites anymore because the content is free now. Your industry let this happen, I don't understand really why but nothing will change unless there's a big lockdown...ya keep dreaming of that day.

90% of surfers are of no concern to us. In fact 99+% of surfers are no concern to us. It's the tiny minority of member, those who buy, who are of concern to us that count. And it's these people we need to address our attentions to.

An industry that keeps selling what's free is doomed to failure. An industry that desires to survive will adapt and start selling what's not being given away for free. Live shows is an obvious example. Costly yes, impossible no. Would it take surfers back from Tubes in growing numbers enough to hurt Tubes sites finances? Maybe. Could we then target Dating sites and start giving away their content? Needs someone to work out how it can be done but again possible. Selling it half the price of normal prices, for instance what AFF charge, or directing people to free and more reliable Dating sites. Could again be another add on to help revive the industry.

A big lock down of content is impossible. Totally and utterly impossible. If in the very unlikely chance of the Internet industry doing this 75% it leaves 25% who won't. If 100% of the Internet industry did it new content would be ripped from DVDs. Or did you think porn was just on the Internet?

Robbie 08-16-2010 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naughty1 (Post 17413730)
Yes 16 pics versus a full movie is a big difference NOW but back in 95-2000 most people were still on Dialup and pictures were the in thing And back then whole sets from members areas were getting put up on tgps and no one said a damn thing then

Which tgps did that? We certainly never posted whole sets from members areas. Everyone we knew all bought content and made galleries. I can only speak from 1996 forward. But during that time period al4a.com was the number one site page ranked on sextracker, the only other guy even close to us was the hun who was number two. Nobody else was even close. We were the biggest and we didn't do that. So what tgp did that could have caused any damage during that time period?

RK 08-16-2010 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 17418055)
An industry that desires to survive will adapt and start selling what's not being given away for free. Live shows is an obvious example. Costly yes, impossible no.

The consensus seems to be that the vast majority of surfers prefer non-webcam content. They want to watch sex, not talk in a chat room with 50 guys and one girl. They want to access content whenever it is convenient for them, not when the girl they like is available once a day.

The technology to make content 99.9% theft proof is already easily and cheaply available, so that's not the problem. Now you just need make content which is worth paying for. You are the producer, I'm sure you can come up with such content without me needing to spell it out for you.

Paul Markham 08-16-2010 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RK (Post 17418135)
The consensus seems to be that the vast majority of surfers prefer non-webcam content. They want to watch sex, not talk in a chat room with 50 guys and one girl. They want to access content whenever it is convenient for them, not when the girl they like is available once a day.

Yes but with the vast majority of surfers not buying anything who should we target. Them or buyers? A lot of members will not want to chat with a girl, but will they want to watch her get off in real time. Knowing that she's there now and doing it for the audience. You must of never seen a live show with people clambering to get a glimpse. :)

And it does not need to be only solo girl, it can be solo, lesbian, boy girl or even groups. The more varied the better.

And who says it need to be once a day? It can be more often than that. It does not have to be one producer feeding it into a site or a big sponsor only doing one a day.

The only thing that holds us back is the cost. With so much spent to get people to the tour there's not enough left for the members area.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RK (Post 17418135)
The technology to make content 99.9% theft proof is already easily and cheaply available, so that's not the problem.

Illustrates how little you thought this through.

Let's dream that 100% of websites lock down content. What will the pirates do? They will take content from DVDs. Porn exists beyond the Internet. :winkwink:

Quote:

Originally Posted by RK (Post 17418135)
Now you just need make content which is worth paying for. You are the producer, I'm sure you can come up with such content without me needing to spell it out for you.

Of course I can come up with ways to make better content. The problem is getting sponsors to pay for it. You can't do much with the prices being paid for content today.

Paul Markham 08-16-2010 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 17412577)
"Cut off their water" ? stop advertising for their traffic.
Make their piracy of content without profit.


Also stop sending traffic to sites that advertise on Tubes, they too are as much the enemy as Tubes sites. If not more.

Matt 26z 08-16-2010 03:42 AM

What I find most stunning about the tubes is the incredible traffic they receive. We used to drool over The Hun's daily traffic figures, but many of these tubes put even a peak Hun to shame.

The top TGPs screwed up by clinging to the same process for too long, which in turn caused the smaller TGPs to do the same since submitters weren't going to create one version for submission to the "TGP mafia" and another for the more liberal TGP owners. In fact, I don't think the submission rules really even changed over a 10+ year period.

With all of this traffic that the largest tubes get, it now seems pretty clear that surfers disliked the TGP format all these years. You can of course get into the argument of longer, higher quality material, but I think the general presentation of that material played a huge role in surfers leaving the TGP for the tube.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123