I'm loving her tits! :stoned

At 16 I wouldn't have given a shit either. This stuff is hardly 'porn' by definition though, unless there are worse ones floating.

as far as i understood it doesn't necessarily matter that she is not nude or in any hardcore action, as long as she is underage and her images are used in a pornographic context. when her pics at 16 years of age are being sold next to pictures of cunts getting crammed with dick and other random sluts getting nuts busted on their face, i'm pretty sure her images are being used for in a pornographic context.

these programs have probably made millions off scraped images. they need to get hit hard and pay out heavily for damages, otherwise this is just a speed bump which they can pay out on and ignore. so long as the risks still outweigh the rewards,they will continue to do what they do.

not when you are operating out of bolivia. though some affiliates in the US/Canada/EU are getting a shock now ....

Hot babe, not very smart though. And she made those pics herself, that says a lot.

http://i40.tinypic.com/nmds0n.jpg

i remember a porn chick with this tattoo? the heart on the stomach?

Note: For 16 she had some fucking knockout tits. I wouldn't have guessed her to be under 20 myself. :1orglaugh

Good for her! At least her thoughts are coherent with the pics to begin with. What would be better? If she was absolutely outraged? Idiot.

strike back. all sites with legal content, yeah

Posting pix without 2257..............


</end>

wow she has a banging body.

:thumbsup

So do you :winkwink:

awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwhot

This girl was featured prominently in the design of a well known and highly touted site until just a few hours ago.

There are also many more such examples that are not well known as they haven't hit the lawsuit phase yet. There is one girl who was actually arrested and sentenced to counselling yet I understand she is used on the tours of nearly all of these sites.

Crazy.

She's suing Apple Inc. too?

This thread makes me wish I was an uber hot 16 year old. All a person would need to do is take some enticing yet non nude pics, and sprinkle them liberally across the net where they are likely to be scraped.

Then I'd just sit back, wait on my images to show up on some site, then sue the Bejesus out of them.

Luckily for the scrapers, 16 year old girls aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

post some nudes.

Agreed :Oh crap

Stolen content from stolen content.... thats what you get :(

Anyone looking to replace their unlicensed possibly underaged content with legal real American teen girls with documentation can license my Ex-GF collection. I have content in the same vein:

I have seen her "featured" on a few well known sites. Sucks to be them.

I don't remember girls that well built at 16.

Apple would have made money off any apps that were sold. That's why she's suing them--they benefited financially from the unlicensed use of her images.

There are another few doozy lawsuits looming from different girls.

Ironically we went after this same app several months ago as well for using our content. We only dmca'd them and apple, didn't pursue any legal action though.

Anyone care to highlight some other cases?