Somoene please explain this to me because I'm too fucking old to understand this.
 

Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor

EXCLUSIVE: Proud dad Reuben Sharpe has revealed how he gave birth to miracle baby Jamie with partner Jay in Britain’s most modern family - and even the couple's doctor was transgender

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...h-non-21177808

-----------

I've got absolutely no fucking clue who or what got pregnant... and who or what got it pregnant.

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incomin...ABY_018JPG.jpg

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incomin...42-weeksde.jpg

I think i'm more confused than they are.

a woman calling herself a man had a baby :2 cents:

OK... Now what's this non-binary stuff?

Is it some kind of programmable fertility sex toy?

Female sperm donor = dude is now lady
non-binary had baby = chick identifies as a them instead of her
The other is a chick that changed to dude

I think

this is why life is easier if you just like poo :2 cents:

OK... So a man that thinks he's a woman got a woman that thinks she's a man pregnant.
I'm still not grasping the concept but fuck it I don't need to. Now you know why my generation referred to them as Farries and Bull dickers.

I hate to say it but there were (are) reasons why every generation except this one has treated homos like garbage. Look at the bullshit they do soon as they get a chance

Thanks for clearing this up for me
There's a truthfully sad comment on the current state of the world.

No, that's not it. I don't have a better theory, but your's leaves out the female sperm donor.

I'm all for doing what you do, but this one smells of future regret.

Micro-nicheing ? ?

not exactly
non binary is the lifepartner of this transgender man (in case of transgender you use always the new gender at the end so you know he was originally a women)

the sperm came from a donor that is a trans gender women (so a man before).
the non binary had nothing to do with the process.

with modern science it would be possible that 2 man can have a baby together wich would be a real genetic child from both of them.

if 2 women want the same it is not possible for the reason that males have an x and an y chromosome and women have only Y.

ok
I think I got it.

This is two lesbian women, that are both living as gay men. This is why they needed a sperm donor. A Male-to-female tranny donated the sperm.

no - the one is non binary.
this is neither a man nor a women.
but can have a dick or a pussy or even both or none of it.

Ben Shapiro explained it:

Wikipedia explains "Non-Binary":


FUCK SAKES THAT IS SOME OF THE BEST BULLSHIT I HAVE EVER READ

It basically means that a non-binary person will literally fuck anything when they're horny.

So if a guy does 10 years in jail he's technically non-binary when he gets out for 6 months because he'll fuck anything. Honestly I can't imagine anyone wanting to admit to that... Nevermind embracing it as a lifestyle.

fuck off world :2 cents:

woman going to man via sex change does not provide working testicles and sperm any more than turning a man into a woman surgically provides ovaries. nor does making a man a woman cosmetically provide mitochondrial DNA, which is the DNA that provides power for life at a cellular level.

it's not confusing at all. sex change is ONLY cosmetic. in nature there are 2 genders. politically as many as you want. although some animals can change when need be, like some frogs or what ever. personally i have no desire to be an animal.

we have reached the 15th century again scientifically. forcing science to say there are as many genders as you like is no different the church persecuting Galileo. it's the very same thing as eugenics science, congratulations you've made it to being Nazis. I'm so proud of you :2 cents:

yup and next time you are sucking cock just tell everyone it's a pussy :thumbsup

This is the worst fucking 5th grade math problem I've ever read.

Best wishes for the future education of the baby ... :uhoh

Dude men cannot have babies.

Females do not have sperm.

You've gone full retard.

Stop this nonsense.

theoretically they can.
because man have an x and an y chromosome.
wich means they have female and male chromosome.
women do have only an y chromosome.

but this might be too high for you as so many other things.

it is not a lifestyle.
the gender is written in the genetic.
man have xy and women have only y.

but there are a few different forms of intersexuality.
i.e people with just one X chromosome or people with 2 X-chromosome
or just 1 y..
but even when they have a "normal" chromosome pair it does not mean that they
are male or female.

there are many cases where babies are born with xy chromosome but they
have a pussy instead of a dick. even xy males are existing that have an uterus.

there are also people with purely female genes but whose bodies produce testosterone instead of estrogen and vise versa.

by the way, the y-chromosome in men has been atrophying for several thousand years and it is assumed that in another few 100 thousand years there will be almost no more procreative men.

https://theconversation.com/the-y-ch...n-to-men-90125

Sounds and looks like a scary stuff. Fcking XXI century.

as long as they call me "attack helicopter" and use my pronoun:

bbbbbbbbrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtttttttttttttt *10 squats* bbbbrrrrrrrrt *20 jumping jacks* brrrrt!


then I am fine with it...

it is as old as mankind - we only start to understand the backgrounds now.

The doctor being transgender is the most alarming part. Someone that went to medical school for 5 years, then did a 3-5 year specialization - and they do not believe in the most basic human anatomy that is gender, which has been established since the dawn of man.

did you know that those that study psychology mostly do it because they want to know why they are that crazy ?

and no - what we knew about human anatomy 1000 years ago does not make it correct just because it is 1000 years old.

1000 years ago, people also thought that the world is flat.

we don't know everything yet but we know that we have considered a lot of wrong knowledge as status quo for far too long.

as far as I know biology, it was actually established millions years ago...
but there are of course some mental exceptions to it (in humans).
I only dont understand why make from them something that is so worth to be discussed, like they would be majority...and no, they are not.

are you for real?
you consider what these two persons did as something normal or "aberration"? mutated minority, not normal majority?

well no wonder why, maybe they all become pussies like these two guys....

In this case, it does.

Allow me to elaborate. Yes, we know more now about anatomy and medicine then 1000 years ago. A good movie that illustrates this is The Physician - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2101473/ - it was against religious doctrine to desecrate a body. However, even in those times no one could dispute that there were no more genders then male and female.

The fact that only two genders exist has been established for millions of years. In fact, lets go back. You have your parents, your grand parents, your great grand parents, etc. This goes back forever. Back to when we were neanderthals, back when were monkeys. Even back before that. You are here, because every single entity in your ancestral lineage was able to produce offspring, because every single one of them knew consciously or instinctively that they needed to reproduce with a member of the opposite gender. You can go backwards with this right up until we get to the beginning of mammals.

You are the first generation of a lineage that has been produced by exclusively by males and females since the fucking dawn of mammalian life on earth that believes there are more then two genders. Hundreds of millions of years of evolution that produced exclusively males and females of a million different species, and now, suddenly, in the last few years, it surfaces that there are 70something genders?

If someone wants to be transsexual I'm fine with that. I don't approve of it and I think it's gender dysphoria, but those are my views. I will probably not refer to them by whatever pronouns they decide they want to use, and I will simply "call 'em as I see 'em". If they make a convincing woman *when I first meet them*, i'll call them she, otherwise it's just a man with tits much like the two in the article are just women with beards. What I will not do, is spit in the face of evolution by pandering to made-up genders such as "non-binary".

A dude and a chick made a baby, with 2019 lunacy added to the mix.

I'm guessing that you're bisexual and you do drugs. Because that's where all this bullshit starts... drugs and homosexuality.


Women are double X.

Also genetic abnormalities only mean that they're abnormalities.

new math :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

we have a billion years to sort it out :2 cents:

yes on the psychology, we have no evidence people thought the world was flat before the 1300's. truisms aren't always true :2 cents:

correct, every person alive today has a biologically correct mother and biologically correct father. this will continue in the foreseeable future. sure being gay is great fun however there is no future for humanity in it. and at the same time being gay is natural to humanity. always has been and always will be. however for survival of the species heterosexuality is center weighted on the graph with minorities on each end of the graph.

I'm not sure why we have chosen to cosign gender dysphoria as opposed to treatment. these guys are rolling back science 500 years :(

the thing is all this gender bullshit is a 'quality' problems... people being starved and getting murdered for their social or hereditary circumstance don't much care about their dicks and what they should or should not do with it a dick :2 cents:

this is interesting for historical perspective. the inca's. personally I don't think homosexuality has ever been an issue until the last 100-150 years

Age and defining gender

The high infant mortality rates that plagued the Inca Empire caused all newborn infants to be given the term ‘wawa’ when they were born. Most families did not invest very much into their child until they reached the age of two or three years old. Once the child reached the age of three, a "coming of age" ceremony occurred, called the rutuchikuy. For the Incas, this ceremony indicated that the child had entered the stage of "ignorance". During this ceremony, the family would invite all relatives to their house for food and dance, and then each member of the family would receive a lock of hair from the child. After each family member had received a lock, the father would shave the child's head. This stage of life was categorized by a stage of "ignorance, inexperience, and lack of reason, a condition that the child would overcome with time."[40] For Incan society, in order to advance from the stage of ignorance to development the child must learn the roles associated with their gender.

The next important ritual was to celebrate the maturity of a child. Unlike the coming of age ceremony, the celebration of maturity signified the child's sexual potency. This celebration of puberty was called warachikuy for boys and qikuchikuy for girls. The warachikuy ceremony included dancing, fasting, tasks to display strength, and family ceremonies. The boy would also be given new clothes and taught how to act as an unmarried man. The qikuchikuy signified the onset of menstruation, upon which the girl would go into the forest alone and return only once the bleeding had ended. In the forest she would fast, and, once returned, the girl would be given a new name, adult clothing, and advice. This "folly" stage of life was the time young adults were allowed to have sex without being a parent.[40]

Between the ages of 20 and 30, people were considered young adults, "ripe for serious thought and labor."[40] Young adults were able to retain their youthful status by living at home and assisting in their home community. Young adults only reached full maturity and independence once they had married.

At the end of life, the terms for men and women denote loss of sexual vitality and humanity. Specifically, the "decrepitude" stage signifies the loss of mental well-being and further physical decline.

Marriage

In the Incan Empire, the age of marriage differed for men and women: men typically married at the age of 20, while women usually got married about four years earlier at the age of 16.[41] Men who were highly ranked in society could have multiple wives, but those lower in the ranks could only take a single wife.[42] Marriages were typically within classes and resembled a more business-like agreement. Once married, the women were expected to cook, collect food and watch over the children and livestock.[41] Girls and mothers would also work around the house to keep it orderly to please the public inspectors.[43] These duties remained the same even after wives became pregnant and with the added responsibility of praying and making offerings to Kanopa, who was the god of pregnancy.[41] It was typical for marriages to begin on a trial basis with both men and women having a say in the longevity of the marriage. If the man felt that it wouldn't work out or if the woman wanted to return to her parents’ home the marriage would end. Once the marriage was final, the only way the two could be divorced was if they did not have a child together.[41] Marriage within the Empire was crucial for survival. A family was considered disadvantaged if there was not a married couple at the center because everyday life centered around the balance of male and female tasks.[44]

Gender roles

In the eyes of the Inca, male and female roles were considered equal. The "indigenous cultures saw the two genders as complementary parts of a whole."[44] In other words, there was not a hierarchical structure in the domestic sphere for the Incas. Within the domestic sphere, women were known as the weavers. Women's everyday tasks included: spinning, watching the children, weaving cloth, cooking, brewing chichi, preparing fields for cultivation, planting seeds, bearing children, harvesting, weeding, hoeing, herding, and carrying water.[45] Men on the other hand, "weeded, plowed, participated in combat, helped in the harvest, carried firewood, built houses, herded llama and alpaca, and spun and wove when necessary".[45] On looking Spaniards did not understand the complementary nature of men and women roles within the Inca culture and believed women were treated like slaves.[46] However, Inca women did not view themselves as slaves, nor did they do their job for the man. The women completed their daily tasks for the improvement of her household and community, to ensure her family would survive.[45] Furthermore, women were allowed to own land and herds because inheritance was passed down from both the mother's and father's side of the family.[47] Kinship within the Inca society followed a parallel line of descent. In other words, women ascended from women and men ascended from men. Due to the parallel descent, women had access to land and other necessities through her mother, and communities flourished because of the environmental social ties among women.[45]