Ron Paul - The Movie ! - GoFuckYourself.com

mafia_man · 08-17-2011, 03:38 PM

I'm not even a Republican but he's better than Obama.

topsiteking · 08-17-2011, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mafia_man

I'm not even a Republican but he's better than Obama.

No shit.

chaze · 08-17-2011, 04:07 PM

He is the best politician period. Smart and honest, crazy to see it in this day.

sambucas · 08-17-2011, 11:24 PM

Dear Americans, please elect Ron Paul so we can live in peace.

seeandsee · 08-18-2011, 12:34 AM

Ron Paul for president, if he did it, i think somebody will try to take him down, if he start to clean america

buzzard · 08-18-2011, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sambucas

Dear Americans, please elect Ron Paul so we can live in peace.

Most simple and profound comment ever.

Absolutely great sambucas...

Props and cheers to you!

looky_lou · 08-18-2011, 01:34 AM

Will be nominated in the Short Story category unfortunately.

DWB · 08-18-2011, 03:05 AM

The bankers would kill him faster than they did Kennedy.

With that said, and not that it even matters, but I will vote for Ron Paul.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 08-18-2011, 03:38 AM

ADG

sperbonzo · 08-18-2011, 07:38 AM

Ron Paul's plan for health care reform in 2006

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html

Lowering the Cost of Health Care

by Ron Paul
by Ron Paul

DIGG THIS

As a medical doctor, I've seen first-hand how bureaucratic red tape interferes with the doctor-patient relationship and drives costs higher. The current system of third-party payers takes decision-making away from doctors, leaving patients feeling rushed and worsening the quality of care. Yet health insurance premiums and drug costs keep rising. Clearly a new approach is needed. Congress needs to craft innovative legislation that makes health care more affordable without raising taxes or increasing the deficit. It also needs to repeal bad laws that keep health care costs higher than necessary.

We should remember that HMOs did not arise because of free-market demand, but rather because of government mandates. The HMO Act of 1973 requires all but the smallest employers to offer their employees HMO coverage, and the tax code allows businesses ? but not individuals ? to deduct the cost of health insurance premiums. The result is the illogical coupling of employment and health insurance, which often leaves the unemployed without needed catastrophic coverage.

While many in Congress are happy to criticize HMOs today, the public never hears how the present system was imposed upon the American people by federal law. As usual, government intervention in the private market failed to deliver the promised benefits and caused unintended consequences, but Congress never blames itself for the problems created by bad laws. Instead, we are told more government ? in the form of ?universal coverage? ? is the answer. But government already is involved in roughly two-thirds of all health care spending, through Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs.

For decades, the U.S. healthcare system was the envy of the entire world. Not coincidentally, there was far less government involvement in medicine during this time. America had the finest doctors and hospitals, patients enjoyed high-quality, affordable medical care, and thousands of private charities provided health services for the poor. Doctors focused on treating patients, without the red tape and threat of lawsuits that plague the profession today. Most Americans paid cash for basic services, and had insurance only for major illnesses and accidents. This meant both doctors and patients had an incentive to keep costs down, as the patient was directly responsible for payment, rather than an HMO or government program.

The lesson is clear: when government and other third parties get involved, health care costs spiral. The answer is not a system of outright socialized medicine, but rather a system that encourages everyone ? doctors, hospitals, patients, and drug companies ? to keep costs down. As long as ?somebody else? is paying the bill, the bill will be too high.

The following are bills Congress should pass to reduce health care costs and leave more money in the pockets of families:

HR 3075 provides truly comprehensive health care reform by allowing families to claim a tax credit for the rising cost of health insurance premiums. With many families now spending close to $1000 or even more for their monthly premiums, they need real tax relief ? including a dollar-for-dollar credit for every cent they spend on health care premiums ? to make medical care more affordable.

HR 3076 is specifically designed to address the medical malpractice crisis that threatens to drive thousands of American doctors ? especially obstetricians ? out of business. The bill provides a dollar-for-dollar tax credit that permits consumers to purchase "negative outcomes" insurance prior to undergoing surgery or other serious medical treatments. Negative outcomes insurance is a novel approach that guarantees those harmed receive fair compensation, while reducing the burden of costly malpractice litigation on the health care system. Patients receive this insurance payout without having to endure lengthy lawsuits, and without having to give away a large portion of their award to a trial lawyer. This also drastically reduces the costs imposed on physicians and hospitals by malpractice litigation. Under HR 3076, individuals can purchase negative outcomes insurance at essentially no cost.

HR 3077 makes it more affordable for parents to provide health care for their children. It creates a $500 per child tax credit for medical expenses and prescription drugs that are not reimbursed by insurance. It also creates a $3,000 tax credit for dependent children with terminal illnesses, cancer, or disabilities. Parents who are struggling to pay for their children's medical care, especially when those children have serious health problems or special needs, need every extra dollar.

HR 3078 is commonsense, compassionate legislation for those suffering from cancer or other terminal illnesses. The sad reality is that many patients battling serious illnesses will never collect Social Security benefits ? yet they continue to pay into the Social Security system. When facing a medical crisis, those patients need every extra dollar to pay for medical care, travel, and family matters. HR 3078 waives the employee portion of Social Security payroll taxes (or self-employment taxes) for individuals with documented serious illnesses or cancer. It also suspends Social Security taxes for primary caregivers with a sick spouse or child. There is no justification or excuse for collecting Social Security taxes from sick individuals who literally are fighting for their lives.

August 23, 2006

.

stinkyfingers · 08-18-2011, 01:51 PM

Ethersync · 08-18-2011, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stinkyfingers

Another reason to like Ron Paul. Limbaugh hates him...

candyflip · 08-18-2011, 02:00 PM

The OPs nickname sucks. I always think he's someone else.

I know I'm not the only one.

IllTestYourGirls · 08-18-2011, 02:07 PM

The bankers dont want him, the MSM does not want him, Rush does not want him. How much more proof he is what we need? lol

stinkyfingers · 08-18-2011, 02:15 PM

mafia_man · 08-18-2011, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stinkyfingers

The media loves him?

I seen a Daily Show clip were he wasn't mentioned at all by the mainstream media channels.

porno jew · 08-18-2011, 02:49 PM

"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."

porno jew · 08-18-2011, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

The OPs nickname sucks. I always think he's someone else.

I know I'm not the only one.

reminds me of a certain depressed reborn christian.

stinkyfingers · 08-18-2011, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Ron Paul's plan for health care reform in 2006

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html

Lowering the Cost of Health Care

by Ron Paul
by Ron Paul

DIGG THIS

As a medical doctor, I've seen first-hand how bureaucratic red tape interferes with the doctor-patient relationship and drives costs higher. The current system of third-party payers takes decision-making away from doctors, leaving patients feeling rushed and worsening the quality of care. Yet health insurance premiums and drug costs keep rising. Clearly a new approach is needed. Congress needs to craft innovative legislation that makes health care more affordable without raising taxes or increasing the deficit. It also needs to repeal bad laws that keep health care costs higher than necessary.

We should remember that HMOs did not arise because of free-market demand, but rather because of government mandates. The HMO Act of 1973 requires all but the smallest employers to offer their employees HMO coverage, and the tax code allows businesses ? but not individuals ? to deduct the cost of health insurance premiums. The result is the illogical coupling of employment and health insurance, which often leaves the unemployed without needed catastrophic coverage.

While many in Congress are happy to criticize HMOs today, the public never hears how the present system was imposed upon the American people by federal law. As usual, government intervention in the private market failed to deliver the promised benefits and caused unintended consequences, but Congress never blames itself for the problems created by bad laws. Instead, we are told more government ? in the form of ?universal coverage? ? is the answer. But government already is involved in roughly two-thirds of all health care spending, through Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs.

For decades, the U.S. healthcare system was the envy of the entire world. Not coincidentally, there was far less government involvement in medicine during this time. America had the finest doctors and hospitals, patients enjoyed high-quality, affordable medical care, and thousands of private charities provided health services for the poor. Doctors focused on treating patients, without the red tape and threat of lawsuits that plague the profession today. Most Americans paid cash for basic services, and had insurance only for major illnesses and accidents. This meant both doctors and patients had an incentive to keep costs down, as the patient was directly responsible for payment, rather than an HMO or government program.

The lesson is clear: when government and other third parties get involved, health care costs spiral. The answer is not a system of outright socialized medicine, but rather a system that encourages everyone ? doctors, hospitals, patients, and drug companies ? to keep costs down. As long as ?somebody else? is paying the bill, the bill will be too high.

The following are bills Congress should pass to reduce health care costs and leave more money in the pockets of families:

HR 3075 provides truly comprehensive health care reform by allowing families to claim a tax credit for the rising cost of health insurance premiums. With many families now spending close to $1000 or even more for their monthly premiums, they need real tax relief ? including a dollar-for-dollar credit for every cent they spend on health care premiums ? to make medical care more affordable.

HR 3076 is specifically designed to address the medical malpractice crisis that threatens to drive thousands of American doctors ? especially obstetricians ? out of business. The bill provides a dollar-for-dollar tax credit that permits consumers to purchase "negative outcomes" insurance prior to undergoing surgery or other serious medical treatments. Negative outcomes insurance is a novel approach that guarantees those harmed receive fair compensation, while reducing the burden of costly malpractice litigation on the health care system. Patients receive this insurance payout without having to endure lengthy lawsuits, and without having to give away a large portion of their award to a trial lawyer. This also drastically reduces the costs imposed on physicians and hospitals by malpractice litigation. Under HR 3076, individuals can purchase negative outcomes insurance at essentially no cost.

HR 3077 makes it more affordable for parents to provide health care for their children. It creates a $500 per child tax credit for medical expenses and prescription drugs that are not reimbursed by insurance. It also creates a $3,000 tax credit for dependent children with terminal illnesses, cancer, or disabilities. Parents who are struggling to pay for their children's medical care, especially when those children have serious health problems or special needs, need every extra dollar.

HR 3078 is commonsense, compassionate legislation for those suffering from cancer or other terminal illnesses. The sad reality is that many patients battling serious illnesses will never collect Social Security benefits ? yet they continue to pay into the Social Security system. When facing a medical crisis, those patients need every extra dollar to pay for medical care, travel, and family matters. HR 3078 waives the employee portion of Social Security payroll taxes (or self-employment taxes) for individuals with documented serious illnesses or cancer. It also suspends Social Security taxes for primary caregivers with a sick spouse or child. There is no justification or excuse for collecting Social Security taxes from sick individuals who literally are fighting for their lives.

August 23, 2006

.

looks like the change everyone voted for

stinkyfingers · 08-19-2011, 10:34 AM

V_RocKs · 08-19-2011, 01:09 PM

He is a God among men...

Ethersync · 08-19-2011, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

He is a God among men...

And you are the new Fatfoo?

stinkyfingers · 08-19-2011, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."

"The truth requires no questions." - Gary Busey

08-17-2011, 02:33 PM	#1
stinkyfingers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 657	Ron Paul - The Movie ! __________________ how can i help you today ?

08-17-2011, 03:38 PM	#2
mafia_man Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq#: 639544261 Posts: 1,965	I'm not even a Republican but he's better than Obama. __________________ I'm out.

08-17-2011, 04:07 PM	#4
chaze Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 9,752	He is the best politician period. Smart and honest, crazy to see it in this day. Last edited by chaze; 08-17-2011 at 04:09 PM..

08-18-2011, 12:34 AM	#6
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	Ron Paul for president, if he did it, i think somebody will try to take him down, if he start to clean america __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

08-18-2011, 01:34 AM	#8
looky_lou Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,771	Will be nominated in the Short Story category unfortunately. __________________ PUSSY - PUSSY - PUSSY! Wet & Puffy - Wet & Pissy - We Like To Suck Puffy Cash

08-17-2011, 11:24 PM	#5
sambucas Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Aotearoa Posts: 371	Dear Americans, please elect Ron Paul so we can live in peace.

08-18-2011, 03:05 AM	#9
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	The bankers would kill him faster than they did Kennedy. With that said, and not that it even matters, but I will vote for Ron Paul.

08-18-2011, 03:38 AM	#10
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

08-18-2011, 07:38 AM	#11
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,748	Ron Paul's plan for health care reform in 2006 http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html Lowering the Cost of Health Care by Ron Paul by Ron Paul DIGG THIS As a medical doctor, I've seen first-hand how bureaucratic red tape interferes with the doctor-patient relationship and drives costs higher. The current system of third-party payers takes decision-making away from doctors, leaving patients feeling rushed and worsening the quality of care. Yet health insurance premiums and drug costs keep rising. Clearly a new approach is needed. Congress needs to craft innovative legislation that makes health care more affordable without raising taxes or increasing the deficit. It also needs to repeal bad laws that keep health care costs higher than necessary. We should remember that HMOs did not arise because of free-market demand, but rather because of government mandates. The HMO Act of 1973 requires all but the smallest employers to offer their employees HMO coverage, and the tax code allows businesses ? but not individuals ? to deduct the cost of health insurance premiums. The result is the illogical coupling of employment and health insurance, which often leaves the unemployed without needed catastrophic coverage. While many in Congress are happy to criticize HMOs today, the public never hears how the present system was imposed upon the American people by federal law. As usual, government intervention in the private market failed to deliver the promised benefits and caused unintended consequences, but Congress never blames itself for the problems created by bad laws. Instead, we are told more government ? in the form of ?universal coverage? ? is the answer. But government already is involved in roughly two-thirds of all health care spending, through Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs. For decades, the U.S. healthcare system was the envy of the entire world. Not coincidentally, there was far less government involvement in medicine during this time. America had the finest doctors and hospitals, patients enjoyed high-quality, affordable medical care, and thousands of private charities provided health services for the poor. Doctors focused on treating patients, without the red tape and threat of lawsuits that plague the profession today. Most Americans paid cash for basic services, and had insurance only for major illnesses and accidents. This meant both doctors and patients had an incentive to keep costs down, as the patient was directly responsible for payment, rather than an HMO or government program. The lesson is clear: when government and other third parties get involved, health care costs spiral. The answer is not a system of outright socialized medicine, but rather a system that encourages everyone ? doctors, hospitals, patients, and drug companies ? to keep costs down. As long as ?somebody else? is paying the bill, the bill will be too high. The following are bills Congress should pass to reduce health care costs and leave more money in the pockets of families: HR 3075 provides truly comprehensive health care reform by allowing families to claim a tax credit for the rising cost of health insurance premiums. With many families now spending close to $1000 or even more for their monthly premiums, they need real tax relief ? including a dollar-for-dollar credit for every cent they spend on health care premiums ? to make medical care more affordable. HR 3076 is specifically designed to address the medical malpractice crisis that threatens to drive thousands of American doctors ? especially obstetricians ? out of business. The bill provides a dollar-for-dollar tax credit that permits consumers to purchase "negative outcomes" insurance prior to undergoing surgery or other serious medical treatments. Negative outcomes insurance is a novel approach that guarantees those harmed receive fair compensation, while reducing the burden of costly malpractice litigation on the health care system. Patients receive this insurance payout without having to endure lengthy lawsuits, and without having to give away a large portion of their award to a trial lawyer. This also drastically reduces the costs imposed on physicians and hospitals by malpractice litigation. Under HR 3076, individuals can purchase negative outcomes insurance at essentially no cost. HR 3077 makes it more affordable for parents to provide health care for their children. It creates a $500 per child tax credit for medical expenses and prescription drugs that are not reimbursed by insurance. It also creates a $3,000 tax credit for dependent children with terminal illnesses, cancer, or disabilities. Parents who are struggling to pay for their children's medical care, especially when those children have serious health problems or special needs, need every extra dollar. HR 3078 is commonsense, compassionate legislation for those suffering from cancer or other terminal illnesses. The sad reality is that many patients battling serious illnesses will never collect Social Security benefits ? yet they continue to pay into the Social Security system. When facing a medical crisis, those patients need every extra dollar to pay for medical care, travel, and family matters. HR 3078 waives the employee portion of Social Security payroll taxes (or self-employment taxes) for individuals with documented serious illnesses or cancer. It also suspends Social Security taxes for primary caregivers with a sick spouse or child. There is no justification or excuse for collecting Social Security taxes from sick individuals who literally are fighting for their lives. August 23, 2006 . __________________ Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/ ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

08-18-2011, 01:51 PM	#12
stinkyfingers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 657	__________________ how can i help you today ?

08-18-2011, 02:00 PM	#14
candyflip Carpe Visio Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New York Posts: 43,062	The OPs nickname sucks. I always think he's someone else. I know I'm not the only one. __________________ Spend you some brain. Email Me

08-18-2011, 02:07 PM	#15
IllTestYourGirls Ah My Balls Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421 Posts: 14,311	The bankers dont want him, the MSM does not want him, Rush does not want him. How much more proof he is what we need? lol __________________

08-18-2011, 02:15 PM	#16
stinkyfingers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 657	__________________ how can i help you today ? Last edited by stinkyfingers; 08-18-2011 at 02:19 PM.. Reason: ...

08-18-2011, 02:49 PM	#18
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."

08-19-2011, 10:34 AM	#21
stinkyfingers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 657	__________________ how can i help you today ?

08-19-2011, 01:09 PM	#22
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,409	He is a God among men...