Manwin No trademark? - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

Radishdreams · 08-20-2011, 03:07 PM

A bit racist the way you put it but i did LMAO there for a second on a few parts

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

LMFAO @ that blog.

Look me, Glasshopper! Me talk about soul, cos all China person are very Zen.

I construct complex word perfect sentence month ago, when forget I China person:

"That is true sacrifice and once again it proves the existence of the soul within our fragile human bodies."

But go full retard, now more people watch blog:

"I ok rich but father is very rich so i rich through family" ... "I not need any more problems with blog"

Coz me think China person speak English like white person with stroke.

will76 · 08-20-2011, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan

just goin after whoever registers one currently. Protecting a mark does not mean you have to register every single domain that uses it.

not according to ICM

(just joking of course.)

Radishdreams · 08-20-2011, 07:06 PM

That is very funny. I am sure Nathan will find it funny too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

not according to ICM

(just joking of course.)

marlboroack · 08-20-2011, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee

Who are you?

Good question

Radishdreams · 08-21-2011, 10:53 AM

I'm new to the industry. Starting my own site here soon. For now that's all I can tell you.

NemesisEnforcer · 08-21-2011, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels

Hate to break this to you, but your "other routes" are a waste of time too. You have absolutely no chance to win this domain unless you bribe the panel with free porn for life.

Assuming the above info is correct, your trademark was not filed prior, and even if it was, you still cant show that the domain was registered in "bad faith" as the subject matter on the site is entirely different.

What makes me so sure?

Fifteen years of being a domainer with so many domains bought and sold over the years I could not possibly keep track. Easily owned 2,000, probably more like 3,000 domains.

If you are so eager to spend money on domains I will sell you a few of mine LOL but you have no chance at getting this domain if she wont sell it, sorry-

That being said the person is stupid not to take the 5K IMO

I have to agree with you on this one. The owner of manwin.co should win this one. Historically; (1) Nina Shoes with their trademark went after Nina Hartley for nina.com and lost. (2) Whitehouse Apple Juice with their trademark went after the boys at whitehouse.com and lost. (3) Fallen Angel with their trademark still can't get fallenangel.com. There are many more examples.

As long as the owner of manwin.co responds to the complaint to avoid a default judgment, the domain will stay where it is.

Radishdreams · 08-21-2011, 06:29 PM

Agreed!! Also what is up with this look. So if you look at the whois for manwin.com, its being protected by a Hong Kong privacy service. So if you look at Manwincn.com, which I'm sure manwin didn't try and threaten, its a company in Hong Kong that sells certain products. Could it be that manwin bought the manwin.com domain from them and just kept the privacy option from the previous company?
Also didn't manwin claim to be aggressively persistent about their trademark or something. Well its strange that their privacy service is in Hong Kong and there is another ckmpany called manwin limited which has been in business since 1984.

Who is with me when I say they can't do shit about the domain and are only blowing steam at some chick? How silly. I think I'm done with this thread. We obviously won't be seeing any udrp cases from this because clearly they would be retarded do one.

Sorry if i wasted anyones time.

Rad out!!!

08-21-2011, 10:53 AM	#105
Radishdreams Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 73	I'm new to the industry. Starting my own site here soon. For now that's all I can tell you.

08-21-2011, 06:29 PM	#107
Radishdreams Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 73	Agreed!! Also what is up with this look. So if you look at the whois for manwin.com, its being protected by a Hong Kong privacy service. So if you look at Manwincn.com, which I'm sure manwin didn't try and threaten, its a company in Hong Kong that sells certain products. Could it be that manwin bought the manwin.com domain from them and just kept the privacy option from the previous company? Also didn't manwin claim to be aggressively persistent about their trademark or something. Well its strange that their privacy service is in Hong Kong and there is another ckmpany called manwin limited which has been in business since 1984. Who is with me when I say they can't do shit about the domain and are only blowing steam at some chick? How silly. I think I'm done with this thread. We obviously won't be seeing any udrp cases from this because clearly they would be retarded do one. Sorry if i wasted anyones time. Rad out!!!