Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2012, 03:08 PM   #1
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Google to let webmasters DISAVOW LINKS to combat negative SEO... Good idea?

What do you guys think about Matt Cutt's latest statements that Google will allow webmasters to disavow links so it doesn't count against them? http://searchengineland.com/live-blo...dvanced-123513

Wouldn't this result in a WIN WIN situation where spam SEO links are reported http://www.seroundtable.com/google-b...nks-15190.html and webmasters don't get penalized?
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 03:31 PM   #2
- Jesus Christ -
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::||||||||||||:::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
Posts: 7,197
Wolf in sheep's clothing.
__________________

Amen
- Jesus Christ - is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 06:09 PM   #3
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - View Post
Wolf in sheep's clothing.
or merely crowdsourcing quality control....
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 06:19 PM   #4
- Jesus Christ -
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::||||||||||||:::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
Posts: 7,197
Compelling webmaster to sign up for your "tools" to remain competitive is more than just crowd sourcing. Google's been dancing at the top of a slippery slope for a while now.
__________________

Amen
- Jesus Christ - is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 07:56 PM   #5
19teenporn
Confirmed User
 
19teenporn's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: En la reverendisima concha de tu madre!
Posts: 3,034
This google shit is getting out of control.

They don't know what to do with their fucked up algorithm.
19teenporn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 08:34 PM   #6
Fap
Just Du It
 
Fap's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19teenporn View Post
This google shit is getting out of control.

They don't know what to do with their fucked up algorithm.
Blame the spammers for ruining it for everyone
Fap is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 08:51 PM   #7
TheSquealer
BANNED
 
TheSquealer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Your Head
Posts: 25,156
... I'll just sit here and wait for Smokethebear to again tell me that there are no negative penalties for inbound links and that you can't cause someones site to tank for its phrases with link spam.
__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard
TheSquealer is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 09:06 PM   #8
AllAboutCams
Femcams.com
 
AllAboutCams's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bjcam.com
Posts: 12,222
i wish they would leave it the same
AllAboutCams is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 09:37 PM   #9
Shedevils
Confirmed User
 
Shedevils's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 500
Ultra clusterfuck.
Shedevils is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 09:50 PM   #10
hony
Confirmed User
 
hony's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 314
not good. that means they CAN turn on negative penalties for incoming links; coz they can say "well you should disavow them if they aren't yours".

So basically instead of it being their job to tell what links are real, what are purchased, which are attempts to throw you under the bus, now it becomes your job to manage it.
__________________
sponsors who make me money
hony is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:09 PM   #11
lagcam
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,892
I am very far from an expert on this but it sounds on the face of it like a good thing to me, however I suppose there is a worry that you could be opening yourself up to problems on the links you specifically don't disavow?
lagcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:17 PM   #12
bean-aid
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the land of woke sleuths
Posts: 16,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer View Post
... I'll just sit here and wait for Smokethebear to again tell me that there are no negative penalties for inbound links and that you can't cause someones site to tank for its phrases with link spam.
you cannot penalize another site whatsoever... you can't even penalize your own site. Nothing is a penalty... it is all a mirage of smoke and mirrors to confuse you
bean-aid is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:20 PM   #13
OmahaJoe
Confirmed User
 
OmahaJoe's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
WTF if back links from a low ranking site don't hurt you why the hell would you report it?
Why would you kill a back link at all?
I could post to a site now from a low PR ranking blog today and if I blow that blogs PR or traffic up then every one wins.

This almost makes no sense. At the same time Matt has been wrong a few times. I take about 40% of what he says to heart. The rest of it is him throwing darts at a board.

Honestly content is king. Want good rank create good content.

(Sorry I did not mean to go off)
__________________
I dabble in this and a little in that.
OmahaJoe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:27 PM   #14
bean-aid
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the land of woke sleuths
Posts: 16,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaJoe View Post
WTF if back links from a low ranking site don't hurt you why the hell would you report it?
Why would you kill a back link at all?
I could post to a site now from a low PR ranking blog today and if I blow that blogs PR or traffic up then every one wins.

This almost makes no sense. At the same time Matt has been wrong a few times. I take about 40% of what he says to heart. The rest of it is him throwing darts at a board.

Honestly content is king. Want good rank create good content.

(Sorry I did not mean to go off)
Several ways to look at it. A site that is ranking for 15 good inbound links gets 1000 spam links... Penalized!

A site with 500 inbound links gets 1000 spam links... likely NOT penalized!

A site with 500 inbound links get fucking destroyed with 15000 totally shitty links... Penalized!

Content is key, but you can def. destroy a site with shitty inbound links. It is in their algo to try and prevent purchasing links but it has problems.
bean-aid is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:32 PM   #15
OmahaJoe
Confirmed User
 
OmahaJoe's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
beaner: I thought that is why google started to give spam sites a 0, That way if you spend money getting spank back links, they wont hurt you but they wont help either. That way your competitor cant go and buy you a 1000 spam back links to take you out of the running.
__________________
I dabble in this and a little in that.
OmahaJoe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:37 PM   #16
OmahaJoe
Confirmed User
 
OmahaJoe's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
I think I read too it was based of the rate of witch your links are built. If you get 1000 links over night then it all just drops off then you might get in trouble.

If you have a steady build and don't sky rocket over night and all the sites linking back to you are not on the same IP block or server and the content is relevant your good to go.

If there was a hard penalty for back links then you could use a back link bomb to destroy your competitor.

Unless this new tool is going to be used so they will give more weight to back links. This tool would allow you to undo what ever your competition may have done.
__________________
I dabble in this and a little in that.
OmahaJoe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:39 PM   #17
bean-aid
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the land of woke sleuths
Posts: 16,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaJoe View Post
beaner: I thought that is why google started to give spam sites a 0, That way if you spend money getting spank back links, they wont hurt you but they wont help either. That way your competitor cant go and buy you a 1000 spam back links to take you out of the running.
They may have started... but it is still happening.

1 thing I have noticed as recent as 2 weeks ago... if you change up the pattern of inlinks... meaning an influx of links... that will flag it if the site doesn't have a solid, steady flow of links in the past.
bean-aid is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 10:43 PM   #18
OmahaJoe
Confirmed User
 
OmahaJoe's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
Well Google does change it's mind about every three months or so. It just takes a big company with pull or $$$ to bitch.

I will stand by the fact the panda fucking sucked ass
__________________
I dabble in this and a little in that.
OmahaJoe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 11:09 PM   #19
Webmaster Advertising
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
What is to stop someone from buying 10,000 links and pointing them at a competitors website?
Webmaster Advertising is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 06:37 AM   #20
~Ray
visit hardlinks.org
 
~Ray's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas , Nv >>> [email protected] or icq 94994627 anytime
Posts: 18,362
I think Google Panda centered around low quality links meaning:

1: free hosted blogs

2: wordpress blog comments

possibly 3: forum profiles

xrumer style links


~Ray
~Ray is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 08:23 AM   #21
TheSquealer
BANNED
 
TheSquealer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Your Head
Posts: 25,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by beaner View Post
you cannot penalize another site whatsoever... you can't even penalize your own site. Nothing is a penalty... it is all a mirage of smoke and mirrors to confuse you
Proof you know nothing about SEO and blackhat SEO. You're just making this up and anyone that knows anything about link building (particularly to low authority pages) knows that's not the case and hasn't been for quite a few years.
__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard
TheSquealer is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 08:27 AM   #22
ottopottomouse
She is ugly, bad luck.
 
ottopottomouse's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,177
Just a way to get a list of which sites to make count negatively, either for human verification of their algorithm or developing a new one.
__________________
↑ see post ↑
13101
ottopottomouse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 09:29 PM   #23
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by hony View Post
not good. that means they CAN turn on negative penalties for incoming links; coz they can say "well you should disavow them if they aren't yours".

So basically instead of it being their job to tell what links are real, what are purchased, which are attempts to throw you under the bus, now it becomes your job to manage it.
Right. Also, what's preventing people from making links at ugc sections of competitors and "disavowing" those so their competitor can tank? This is a bigger problem for mainstream sites...
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 09:35 PM   #24
brentbacardi
Confirmed User
 
brentbacardi's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,425
And this is why more and more people are using Bing... I still use Google Search for now but I have begun using other services instead of the Google Suite.
__________________
Go Fuck Yourself!
brentbacardi is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 08:01 AM   #25
BaldBishop
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19teenporn View Post
This google shit is getting out of control.

They don't know what to do with their fucked up algorithm.
and now they want site owners to step in and do their work for them
__________________
BaldBishop is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 08:04 AM   #26
BaldBishop
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Ray View Post
I think Google Panda centered around low quality links
I would say it's a matter of footprints. Too many hiqh quality links will hurt you just as bad as too many low quality links.
BaldBishop is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 05:07 PM   #27
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldBishop View Post
and now they want site owners to step in and do their work for them
Here's the hat worn by Google execs/strategists

$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 06:21 PM   #28
hony
Confirmed User
 
hony's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldBishop View Post
and now they want site owners to step in and do their work for them
It's called "crowdsourcing"...

Seriously though, don't all successful sites basically work by getting people to do stuff for free. Where would flickr be without people upload pictures, where would facebook be without people generating content...
__________________
sponsors who make me money
hony is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 06:28 PM   #29
EukerVoorn
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Les Alpes, France
Posts: 1,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by $5 submissions View Post
What do you guys think about Matt Cutt's latest statements that Google will allow webmasters to disavow links so it doesn't count against them? http://searchengineland.com/live-blo...dvanced-123513

Wouldn't this result in a WIN WIN situation where spam SEO links are reported http://www.seroundtable.com/google-b...nks-15190.html and webmasters don't get penalized?
As long as the spam SEO links work for me I'm not going to worry about all this complicated shit. It's just like with everything else... if you lose your good rankings just start a piracy site and Google will toprank it
EukerVoorn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.