![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
Camera guys - Canon lens questions - VIDEO
Question guys.... We shot a small/micro budget feature movie using Canon t3i's and the 50mm 1.8 -- The nifty 50. (Non adult)
We really love the look of the lens and the bokeh it provides - and the low light quality overall. But what really kills me is the small focal plane and if a subject moves a bit---they go in to soft focus. Can anyone recommend another lens for us to try? It doesn't have to go to 1.8 - We have light... but we just need something that is cheap#1 and offers interesting #2 bokeh. Thanks in advance to anyone that has input!
__________________
--- Ethnic niche? Black-Asian-Latina ? Contact me and lets talk traffic. rockreed@ that thing they call the google mail When you E-mail Me, PLZZZZ make the Subject Title: >>>>>> GFY! So I do not lose you in Spam. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Carpe Visio
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 43,057
|
I've shot three shorts now and have used the Canon 18-35 2.8 L almost exclusively.
$1500 isn't cheap though. I have been lucky enough to have been able to borrow and rent. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,283
|
The 24-105 is a nice lens.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Haters & Trolls SUCK!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,275
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Not making A Comeback
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,218
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,080
|
you can also bump the iso up to give you more area in focus
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The People's Post
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 64,404
|
iso doesn't effect dof.
i was going to recommend going to a 35mm lens, on that t3i, that's = ~50mm, so you will get a deeper dof at the same aperture. but there are many variables, how far you are from the scene, how far the subject is from the background, your focal length and f-stop. so i would suggest doing a bit of the math on a dof calculator such as http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html and plugging in your specifics to see what your dof is, then make adjustments to any of the variables you can to create the perfect dof. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,080
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: los angeles
Posts: 825
|
stop down the lens genius.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The People's Post
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 64,404
|
yes, indirectly iso effects dof, change iso the equivalent of 1 full stop so you'd adjust aperture and/or shutter speed to balance. Sure, but even as good as the canon's are with high iso values (well, the ff, not sure about the cropped sensors) i'd make sure and check for noise eh.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
lurker
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
|
You can get an adapter and then look at a shit load of older lens.
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread...ge-Lens-Thread some have very nice quality |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,238
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Carpe Visio
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 43,057
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Somewhere On Bourbon Street
Posts: 524
|
Sigma 17-70mm 2.8-4 OS is what I use mostly on my Nikon D7000, but they make it also for you Canon users.
Best lens I ever bought for the bucks 349.00-399.00 on line from different sellers My take on a great all purpose lens The Kurbster
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |