EQUAL RIGHTS! Pedophile female teacher gets 22 years in prison!

[VikingMan]

The prosecutor asked the judge to treat this suck fucking female to treat her no differently than a man convicted of the same crime.

The judge called her a predator and gave her 22 years. She faces charges in another county as well. Hopefully she goes away for the rest of her life.

30-year-old Florida teacher sentenced to 22 years in prison for having sex with students | Q13 FOX News

[wehateporn]

let's hope they get the poor lads some counselling to help them cope

[tony286]

Pedophile likes pre puberty children,not 17 yr teenagers. its a waste of tax payer dollars. Takeaway her teaching license but 22 yrs in jail. If she murdered them she would of got less time.

[Look Chang]

I wish I could have had sex with such a sexy teacher when I was a horny 17 year old student

[VikingMan]

Originally Posted by tony286

Pedophile likes pre puberty children,not 17 yr teenagers. its a waste of tax payer dollars. Takeaway her teaching license but 22 yrs in jail. If she murdered them she would of got less time.

My point is some of us believe in equality. If this was a male teacher having sex with female students not a single soul would think the 22 year sentence was extreme.

[JFK]

Originally Posted by VikingMan

My point is some of us believe in equality. If this was a male teacher having sex with female students not a single soul would think the 22 year sentence was extreme.

Double standard yes, but 22 yrs is extreme in eighter case

[Google Expert]

seriously, 22 years for having sex with 17 year olds?

thats dumb. 17 y/o are not kids

[MaDalton]

this is retarded and it would be also retarded if the guy was 30 and the girl 17

[wehateporn]

They should give her the option of getting circumcised instead of doing the years

[pornguy]

Got to keep those prisons for profit full.

[seeandsee]

jesus she got 20plus for that, omg

[aka123]

Merica!!

22 years for having sex with 17-year olds. Around here it wouldn't normally even be illegal, but in the case of teacher it would be.

[MaDalton]

Originally Posted by aka123

Merica!!

22 years for having sex with 17-year olds. Around here it wouldn't normally even be illegal, but in the case of teacher it would be.

illegal in case of teacher/pupil yes, but at least the first time they would get maybe 1 year on probabtion

[DraX]

WTF

So not fair, I would be proud and very satisfied if a 30 year old teacher with decent looks would want to have coitus with me when I was 17.

Can someone show me a 17 year old who does not think about sex ?

[Tom_PM]

Regardless of how you feel about the length of the sentence, I hope it's not lost on everyone that the article has glaring errors in speech as most reports on this topic do.

This teacher did not "have sex with" a student. She MOLESTED an underage student. I agree that it's not pedophilia, but it is only possible for consenting ADULTS to engage in "sex" with each other. This constant blurring of the language done for the sake of titillation and on-screen real estate should not be ignored.

[aka123]

Originally Posted by Tom_PM

Regardless of how you feel about the length of the sentence, I hope it's not lost on everyone that the article has glaring errors in speech as most reports on this topic do.

This teacher did not "have sex with" a student. She MOLESTED an underage student. I agree that it's not pedophilia, but it is only possible for consenting ADULTS to engage in "sex" with each other. This constant blurring of the language done for the sake of titillation and on-screen real estate should not be ignored.

No, under-ages can have sex with each other and for example I can have sex with 16-year old, at least the starting point is that (in here). It is different thing if I am in some position I can take advantage of, and it may make it illegal even considering another adults. You know, if for example boss fucks employee. That may end badly juridically.

[Tom_PM]

No, no and no.

This is about semantics. It's about how important words are. Nothing to do with boss / employee or position of power over another. It's about using the language that properly fits the CRIME and avoiding blurring what sex is and what it isn't.

I'll just say words matter... they matter a LOT.

[brassmonkey]

that's a huge bid 2 decades and sum change dike or dye!

[editeur]

The problem here is where to draw the line. 17 is too old. What about 16? Maybe 15? Or 14? Etc etc etc... and whatever you pick there will be cases when the "victim" of a "pedophile" was a real victim and when the "victim" is a grown up dude/bitch who was literally asking for it.
It is the concept of a persons age as the deciding factor is deeply flawed. But other formal factors could be even worse. Like, if a kid has a menstruation or erection - then not a pedofile.

[aka123]

The problem in here are the sentences. It could be something like this.

17 "Soo, soo, bad teacher."
16 "He is too young, you get fined."
15 "He is way too young, you will get probation."
14 "He is wayyy too young, you will get jail (for few years)."

Or something like that. Now it is like ISIS chopping heads off. What is the fucking difference? The teacher will be 52 when she gets out of the prison without extra charges.

In my country that 17 wouldn't be anywhere described as pedophile, as the victim has to be under 14 or something like that for that.

She will probably lose her teaching license and stuff. It is just enough for fucking 17 years old if you ask me. Maybe some fines in top of that, but fucking jail (even one day), you gotta be kidding me.

[epitome]

Allen West and other right wing nuts are now convinced that since two loving adults of the same sex can now marry, the next argument will be that people should be able to marry kids. Yes, they really think that. Or maybe that's what they're hoping for because they're sick in the head.

According to them, she'll be exonerated and a hero soon!

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by MaDalton

this is retarded and it would be also retarded if the guy was 30 and the girl 17

What that man said.

The law was passed in a time before MTV, HBO, etc.

History.

While the age of consent is now set between 16 and 18 in all U.S. states, the age of consent has widely varied across the country in the past. In 1880, the age of consent was set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7. The ages of consent were raised across the U.S. during the late 19th century and the early 20th century. Until a few decades ago, many states used to have provisions requiring that the teenage girl must have been of previous "chaste character" in order for the sexual conduct to be considered criminal. In 1998, Mississippi became the last state to remove this provision from its code.

Time for the law makers to join the real world.

[Paul Markham]

It seems the boys, there were three of them and 37 times or occurrences, so were consenting.

This I found funny.

Placing one hand on her heart, she admitted that she did not think at the time how her three students at Central Aerospace Academy could be 'hurt' by their sexual relationships with her.

'I hate what you've gone though because of my actions,' she wept. 'If you hate me, I understand.'

Until this went public, these boys were winners. Now they're victims, of the outcry.

17 year old inmates in Florida

Kenneth Young

Florida policies needlessly derail young lives, fill prison cells

Seems 17 is the age of criminal responsibility.