26 U.S. Code § 7213. Unauthorized disclosure of information - GoFuckYourself.com

Grapesoda · 05-07-2019, 07:18 PM

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

kane · 05-07-2019, 07:20 PM

Laws matter now?

RedFred · 05-07-2019, 07:20 PM

You're more concerned with that than your President being a criminal? Fuck is wrong with you?

crockett · 05-07-2019, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

I have no doubt that Trump will attempt to sue the NYT.. he tries to sue everyone, hell that was Cohen's entire job..

I'm pretty sure however the NYT has pretty fucking smart lawyers and knows what is actually legal and what is not..

The key point that you are missing here is NYT did not publicly post Trump's tax returns. They wrote a investigative article based on information with-in those tax returns. One is legal, one is not...

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

Bladewire · 05-07-2019, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

But you were so PRO "WHISTLE BLOWER" when the russians released all our government info.

Now that Trump is the government your ass burns of unlubed ass fucking.

You ok bro?

Grapesoda · 05-07-2019, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

I have no doubt that Trump will attempt to sue the NYT.. he tries to sue everyone, hell that was Cohen's entire job..

I'm pretty sure however the NYT has pretty fucking smart lawyers and knows what is actually legal and what is not..

The key point that you are missing here is NYT did not publicly post Trump's tax returns. They wrote a investigative article based on information with-in those tax returns. One is legal, one is not...

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

817 dumb things.. YOU WOULD sue the times if they released your info, then we need a 2 year 30 million dollar investigation to see who colluded to release the docs, oh but wait, you only do that to trump, everyone else gets a walk

Rochard · 05-07-2019, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

Amazing. Our president's entire campaign staff committed treason by working with the Russians, but THIS is what is important to you.

It seems you do not understand how the law works. If anyone on GFY posts such information that would be covered from this law, they would most likely go to jail. However, if a newspaper posts something it would be covered under freedom of the press.

However, if you feel this way.... You would agree that Julian there should face jail time... right?

crockett · 05-07-2019, 07:51 PM

onwebcam · 05-07-2019, 07:53 PM

They most likely obtained them via court records.. More of "nothing to see here"

crockett · 05-08-2019, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

817 dumb things.. YOU WOULD sue the times if they released your info, then we need a 2 year 30 million dollar investigation to see who colluded to release the docs, oh but wait, you only do that to trump, everyone else gets a walk

Well at least I dont have to count the dumb things you say because every thing you say is dumb.

It's funny that you get so butthurt over things that negatively affect your "Dear Leader" but never blink an eye to illegal shit he does..

You care nothing about his war against our checks and balances, nothing about his daily lies, nothing about his disregard to the law to our Constitution..

You care about nothing but are 1st in line to defend your cult leader the moment anyone speaks badly..

Acepimp · 05-08-2019, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has Prosecuted More Whistleblowers than all previous administrations COMBINED

^^ Once again Crockett is the most uninformed person on this board.

Bladewire · 05-08-2019, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

They don't want Assange or wikileaks prosecuted and they got their data from espionage.

Notice how they are anti-government, until they are they are the government, now the release of private stolen data must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law!!! Why are Trump supporters so fucking stupid?

onwebcam · 05-08-2019, 10:12 AM

Nadler has basically admitted their entire motive is to obtain the pending grand jury information. It's now amended that information can't be included/unredacted so the entire contempt shit show is irrelevant.

pimpmaster9000 · 05-09-2019, 12:38 AM

1 US code 1: spy on everybody possible

05-07-2019, 07:18 PM	#1
Grapesoda So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Montana Posts: 46,238	26 U.S. Code § 7213. Unauthorized disclosure of information https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213 should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit (3) Other persons It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution. think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

05-07-2019, 07:51 PM	#8
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	__________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

05-07-2019, 07:53 PM	#9
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,653	They most likely obtained them via court records.. More of "nothing to see here" __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

05-08-2019, 10:12 AM	#13
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,653	Nadler has basically admitted their entire motive is to obtain the pending grand jury information. It's now amended that information can't be included/unredacted so the entire contempt shit show is irrelevant. __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

05-09-2019, 12:38 AM	#14
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	1 US code 1: spy on everybody possible __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

05-07-2019, 07:20 PM	#2
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	Laws matter now?

05-07-2019, 07:20 PM	#3
RedFred Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 9,782	You're more concerned with that than your President being a criminal? Fuck is wrong with you?