Ahh Red Hats & conservatives lose again.. - GoFuckYourself.com

crockett · 06-10-2019, 04:55 AM

https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...-wing-politics

No liberal media basis by Google against right wing retards.. You simply don't get high listings because you are retards..

Google & others are suppressing voices of Conservatives”, tweeted Donald Trump in 2018. “They are controlling what we can & cannot see.” The president’s charges of bias are often dubious. But many people worry about algorithms absorbing human prejudices. Robert Epstein, an academic, has compiled data that show Google suggesting more positive terms when users type “Hillary Clinton” than when they look up Mr Trump. pj Media, a conservative blog, claims that liberal sites get 96% of results for “Trump” on Google’s news page, a compilation of links to recent articles.

Google says that the 10,000 human evaluators who rate sources for its search engine assess “expertise” and “trustworthiness” but not ideology. Web-traffic figures support this defense. Sites with high scores from fact-checking groups, whose judgments probably resemble Google’s, draw larger shares of their visitors from search engines than sites with low scores do. Factually inaccurate sources also tend to have strong left- or right-wing slants.

onwebcam · 06-10-2019, 06:36 AM

You KNOW you're bat shit fucking INSANE when you believe Google

NoWhErE · 06-10-2019, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

You KNOW you're bat shit fucking INSANE when you believe Google

06-10-2019, 04:55 AM	#1
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	Ahh Red Hats & conservatives lose again.. https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...-wing-politics No liberal media basis by Google against right wing retards.. You simply don't get high listings because you are retards.. Google & others are suppressing voices of Conservatives”, tweeted Donald Trump in 2018. “They are controlling what we can & cannot see.” The president’s charges of bias are often dubious. But many people worry about algorithms absorbing human prejudices. Robert Epstein, an academic, has compiled data that show Google suggesting more positive terms when users type “Hillary Clinton” than when they look up Mr Trump. pj Media, a conservative blog, claims that liberal sites get 96% of results for “Trump” on Google’s news page, a compilation of links to recent articles. Google says that the 10,000 human evaluators who rate sources for its search engine assess “expertise” and “trustworthiness” but not ideology. Web-traffic figures support this defense. Sites with high scores from fact-checking groups, whose judgments probably resemble Google’s, draw larger shares of their visitors from search engines than sites with low scores do. Factually inaccurate sources also tend to have strong left- or right-wing slants. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

06-10-2019, 06:36 AM	#2
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,655	You KNOW you're bat shit fucking INSANE when you believe Google __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.