Here is your best chance to stay out of jail because of 2257. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

pxxx · 09-03-2004, 01:58 PM

Thanks for the find Lens.

jimmyf · 09-03-2004, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
Oh jeez.
Hammerhead alert.

jimmyf · 09-03-2004, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
It's not going to get any better..

There is no evidence that supports any party benifiting this industry.

What I see is pure speculation that in my opinion is not a realistic approach.

Clinton didn't help
Bush isn't helping
Kerry will not help

Don't get me wrong.. I wish it was as easy as voting for somebody.. but that simply isn't the case

very very true

Garou · 09-03-2004, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay

Get out and VOTE and if you plan on voting for Bush STAY HOME!

xxxjay · 09-03-2004, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
It's not going to get any better..

There is no evidence that supports any party benifiting this industry.

What I see is pure speculation that in my opinion is not a realistic approach.

Clinton didn't help
Bush isn't helping
Kerry will not help

Don't get me wrong.. I wish it was as easy as voting for somebody.. but that simply isn't the case

You are an IDIOT.

Sure no party will HELP the insustry, but I know at least ONE PARTY with a RELIGIOUS MORAL AGENDA and a zealot AG whose aim it is to take down our industry.

I wish I could just punch all you Bush supporters in the face one good time -- you deserve it.

jimmyf · 09-03-2004, 02:17 PM

you people think this little war that John Asshat has or is going 2 have going on with the porn Ind. is going away if Kerry gets elected???

Think again all of'em are a bunch of scum bags. So don't get you hopes up.

What are you all going 2 do if Kerry comes out, anti porn in one of his speach's.

Myself I like my odds with Bush, no ideal what Kerry might try, none at all, the man is all over the place on every other issue.

Samantha_Luvcox · 09-03-2004, 02:17 PM

We have added it to our front page.

titmowse · 09-03-2004, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Corona
Yes. Think Chief Justice Clarence Thomas.

or Antonin Scalia

piker · 09-03-2004, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by digi
It wonder what would happend if all major TGP's urged their surfers to register and vote to protect the free porn..

Yes, because in the eyes of most surfers FREE PORN is the only thing that matters.. Let's not worry about terrorist, economies, jobs, healthcare, social security.. etc

All that matters is FREE PORN...

riosluts · 09-03-2004, 02:23 PM

hey when is the election date exactly?

Lensman · 09-03-2004, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf
you people think this little war that John Asshat has or is going 2 have going on with the porn Ind. is going away if Kerry gets elected???

Think again all of'em are a bunch of scum bags. So don't get you hopes up.

What are you all going 2 do if Kerry comes out, anti porn in one of his speach's.

Myself I like my odds with Bush, no ideal what Kerry might try, none at all, the man is all over the place on every other issue.

I don't think Kerry is going to have an atty general that covers up the "Spirit of Justice" statue.

http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/AshcroftDrape/1.asp

Raven · 09-03-2004, 02:31 PM

Spreadin' the word.

MissMiranda · 09-03-2004, 02:42 PM

I have added it to my paysite and I also plan on adding it to various yahoo groups i have.

kenny · 09-03-2004, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
You are an IDIOT.

Sure no party will HELP the insustry, but I know at least ONE PARTY with a RELIGIOUS MORAL AGENDA and a zealot AG whose aim it is to take down our industry.

I wish I could just punch all you Bush supporters in the face one good time -- you deserve it.

What the fuck ever dude..

I am only pointing out that speculating a more liberal party will make it better for porn is weak.

There is zero evidence that the way any political party works will help porn.

It never has and I am assuming it never will

I am not supporting any political party based on this cause because there is no stance

xxxjay · 09-03-2004, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
What the fuck ever dude..

I am only pointing out that speculating a more liberal party will make it better for porn is weak.

There is zero evidence that the way any political party works will help porn.

It never has and I am assuming it never will

I am not supporting any political party based on this cause because there is no stance

I really want to beat you up. Beside the obvious porn thing...

Happy he lowered taxes? Give him 4 more years and he will lower your taxes a shitload because he will shut this industry down...you can't tax any % of zero.

Has he made the world safer?

No. In fact we are less safe. He has polarized the hatred of all who oppose us to an all time high. Al Queda is a complex system of underworld cells that had NO basis in Iraq. Look at all the time and resources that have been wasted in Iraq when we could have been dismantling the real threat ? Al Queda! Not to mention that because we have occupied Iraq tens of thousand of civilians over there have died in our air strikes, hundreds of Americans soldiers are dead, and 24 people have been executed because of our occupation. Yet Bin Laden and his organization continue to live on and all this crap in Iraq didn?t amount to shit ? they didn?t even find the WOMD that Bush claimed they had.

Iraq was all about settling a debt for daddy and oil.

The war in Iraq is the equivalent of having some guy punch you in the face at a bar, but instead of punching him back, you walk over to a bar across the street, smack around a bunch of guys over there, but that guy who punched you is still there.

Did he stop 9/11? No. Bill Clinton told Bush that Bin Laden was threat #1 and he was ignored.

Is the economy great? No.

Jobs? Nope.

Deficit? Through the roof.

Dependence on foreign oil? At an all time high.

What about our civil liberty? Getting stripped away by the second.

It?s obvious the threat he is to this industry.

But, hey, our taxes are A LITTLE BIT LOWER?

WOO-HA ? That lower taxes thing appeals the lowest common denominator and lowest intelligence. If you think we should sacrifice all of that for a measly tax cut?

YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKING MORON!

George Bush is dangerous, incompetent, stupid, and NEEDS TO BE REMOVED!

kenny · 09-03-2004, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
I really want to beat you up. Beside the obvious porn thing...

Happy he lowered taxes? Give him 4 more years and he will lower your taxes a shitload because he will shut this industry down...you can't tax any % of zero.

Has he made the world safer?

No. In fact we are less safe. He has polarized the hatred of all who oppose us to an all time high. Al Queda is a complex system of underworld cells that had NO basis in Iraq. Look at all the time and resources that have been wasted in Iraq when we could have been dismantling the real threat ? Al Queda! Not to mention that because we have occupied Iraq tens of thousand of civilians over there have died in our air strikes, hundreds of Americans soldiers are dead, and 24 people have been executed because of our occupation. Yet Bin Laden and his organization continue to live on and all this crap in Iraq didn?t amount to shit ? they didn?t even find the WOMD that Bush claimed they had.

Iraq was all about settling a debt for daddy and oil.

The war in Iraq is the equivalent of having some guy punch you in the face at a bar, but instead of punching him back, you walk over to a bar across the street, smack around a bunch of guys over there, but that guy who punched you is still there.

Did he stop 9/11? No. Bill Clinton told Bush that Bin Laden was threat #1 and he was ignored.

Is the economy great? No.

Jobs? Nope.

Deficit? Through the roof.

Dependence on foreign oil? At an all time high.

What about our civil liberty? Getting stripped away by the second.

It?s obvious the threat he is to this industry.

But, hey, our taxes are A LITTLE BIT LOWER?

WOO-HA ? That lower taxes thing appeals the lowest common denominator and lowest intelligence. If you think we should sacrifice all of that for a measly tax cut?

YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKING MORON!

George Bush is dangerous, incompetent, stupid, and NEEDS TO BE REMOVED!

Excuse me..

I simply made a statement that no political party is going to help online porn.

For some reason you want to post a bunch of negative things about Bush..

Who is the moron now? You fucking idiot.

kenny · 09-03-2004, 03:11 PM

Bush or Kerry vote for whoever you want..

I am only saying that the person who gets elected will have little impact on 2257 and issues with online porn in general.

One can speculate otherwise but in the end it's still mere speculation.

Thats all I have to say about this matter.

Morphius · 09-03-2004, 03:11 PM

Thank you

xxxjay · 09-03-2004, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
Bush or Kerry vote for whoever you want..

I am only saying that the person who gets elected will have little impact on 2257 and issues with online porn in general.

One can speculate otherwise but in the end it's still mere speculation.

Thats all I have to say about this matter.

Kenny - who do you think has a bigger hard-on to take this biz down -- an right wing zealot AG who spends 8k of taxpayer money to put a drape on the bare breast lady justice or the AG of an admitted liberal?

God, I would like to break your nose.

Tom_PMs · 09-03-2004, 03:37 PM

Indeed. The question has never been "which party will help our industry?". It's more along the lines of which do we know will hurt our industry?

To put it another way, would you rather have a constant negative quantity, or an unknown quantity with a history of essentially looking the other way?

I'll go for unknown because even a worst case scenario equals what we have now. And a non-worse case scenario equals something not as bad as we have now.

Those are great odds.

kenny · 09-03-2004, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
Kenny - who do you think has a bigger hard-on to take this biz down -- an right wing zealot AG who spends 8k of taxpayer money to put a drape on the bare breast lady justice or the AG of an admitted liberal?

God, I would like to break your nose.

I say it's irrelevant provided the track record of all political stances regarding online porn.

Thats where I stand believe that you will..

And please stop with the childish remarks of "punching" me and what not

I wouldn't mind if you said it to my face.. but please not on a message board

kenny · 09-03-2004, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom_PM
Indeed. The question has never been "which party will help our industry?". It's more along the lines of which do we know will hurt our industry?

To put it another way, would you rather have a constant negative quantity, or an unknown quantity with a history of essentially looking the other way?

I'll go for unknown because even a worst case scenario equals what we have now. And a non-worse case scenario equals something not as bad as we have now.

Those are great odds.

Thats a good perspective.. well better then most

Still the fact remands that there really isn't no political party thats going to do anything but cause harm to online porn.

Online porn is associated with to many bad things. To many people are agaisnt it when it comes to a political stance.. It's a safe bet to be anti-porn in politics.

It's really unfortunate as most online porn is legit buisness providing a honest service.

You can thank people like spammers and child porn peddlers for the general bad reputation of online porn

xxxjay · 09-03-2004, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny

I wouldn't mind if you said it to my face.. but please not on a message board

Hopefully I will see you at a show sometime - asshole.

crowkid · 09-03-2004, 04:02 PM

Voting for Bush, despite what the haters say, will have nothing to do with our business. In fact, many hate to admit it, but most of us who are well off, are even banking more since Bush has been in office? Name 1 thing he or his administration has done that has effected your business negatively? You can't can you? Didn't think so...

Stop trying to brainwash people in here, if you hate Bush, you hate Bush, just say it. Don't go around spitting lies just to scare people to vote democratic... Below is proof that Bush's own evil Supreme Court rejects any type of laws that would hurt us..

Proof

Tom_PMs · 09-03-2004, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
Thats a good perspective.. well better then most

Still the fact remands that there really isn't no political party thats going to do anything but cause harm to online porn.

Online porn is associated with to many bad things. To many people are agaisnt it when it comes to a political stance.. It's a safe bet to be anti-porn in politics.

It's really unfortunate as most online porn is legit buisness providing a honest service.

You can thank people like spammers and child porn peddlers for the general bad reputation of online porn

Yes, but see.. it really does come down to a known stance versus an unknown stance. We may not know who is best for us, but we know who has demonstrated they are bad for us.

It's like so many things.. It's like fishing. You can throw a lure for 10 hours and get nothing but bad results. Thats when you throw *anything* else because you sure know what doesnt work, lol.

There was a time when anything related to pot was an automatic knock-out blow. But now people dont much care. In fact, you'll probably get more votes if you got stoned once when you were a kid. Shows you're real.

Porn is like that too. So many more people go and rent movies, or buy online memberships than even a few years ago.. It's not exactly taboo. If anything, it's certainly moving more towards being "normal" than "abnormal". So I would not presume that everyone will carry on with the current ultra-strict morality that comes off this bunch..
Dressing the statue was the most unreal, amazing thing I've ever seen... I keep asking, whats next? All women must wear skirts down to the ankles? I mean honestly.. It's just backwards, not "conservative" it's "preservative" Preserving a time long long gone from reality.. it's so contrary to the way our society is moving.. it really shouldnt be allowed to continue..

Joe Citizen · 09-03-2004, 04:13 PM

Communists!

wyldblyss · 09-03-2004, 04:14 PM

Too bad I live in Canada and can't vote. I urge all webmasters to vote...every single one counts.

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Nothing against FSC or any organization that steps in to help, but your best chance is consulting your lawyers and doing what they tell you.

exactly

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
Actually...Your best chance is consulting an attorney who knows WTF they are talking about

well, that is a given . . . seems like several are out there just trying to drum up business without having a clear understanding, or a very twisted interpretation

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nas7782
thehun, worldsex, just to name a few major ones would make a significant impact on their American surfers.

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pradaboy
great incentive... let's just hope Bush won't get re-elected

I had a response, but since you don't live here I decided to let it slide

kenny · 09-03-2004, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom_PM
Yes, but see.. it really does come down to a known stance versus an unknown stance. We may not know who is best for us, but we know who has demonstrated they are bad for us.

It's like so many things.. It's like fishing. You can throw a lure for 10 hours and get nothing but bad results. Thats when you throw *anything* else because you sure know what doesnt work, lol.

There was a time when anything related to pot was an automatic knock-out blow. But now people dont much care. In fact, you'll probably get more votes if you got stoned once when you were a kid. Shows you're real.

Porn is like that too. So many more people go and rent movies, or buy online memberships than even a few years ago.. It's not exactly taboo. If anything, it's certainly moving more towards being "normal" than "abnormal". So I would not presume that everyone will carry on with the current ultra-strict morality that comes off this bunch..
Dressing the statue was the most unreal, amazing thing I've ever seen... I keep asking, whats next? All women must wear skirts down to the ankles? I mean honestly.. It's just backwards, not "conservative" it's "preservative" Preserving a time long long gone from reality.. it's so contrary to the way our society is moving.. it really shouldnt be allowed to continue..

I will give you this..

You might be able to slow down the process and I am using the word "might" because after all this is a unknown factor.

But ultimately no good will come from the goverment regarding online porn.

Porn in general has and will continue to become more acceptable.

The bad reputation of online porn is different because of the things associated with it.

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by joshuawk
presidents are elected by the electoral college no?

what the fuck is voting going to do besides giving the elite
statistics on how to further their massive population control.

its like filling out a fucking survey for a giant corporation so they
can make more money off you.

voting is bullshit.

I am at a loss for words

xxxjay · 09-03-2004, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crowkid
Voting for Bush, despite what the haters say, will have nothing to do with our business. In fact, many hate to admit it, but most of us who are well off, are even banking more since Bush has been in office? Name 1 thing he or his administration has done that has effected your business negatively? You can't can you? Didn't think so...

Stop trying to brainwash people in here, if you hate Bush, you hate Bush, just say it. Don't go around spitting lies just to scare people to vote democratic... Below is proof that Bush's own evil Supreme Court rejects any type of laws that would hurt us..

Proof

You are wrong. The supreme court has no say in 2257.

makefuckingmoney · 09-03-2004, 04:27 PM

so if we vote in November..they will leave online porn alone?

Kimmykim · 09-03-2004, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
There is no evidence that supports any party benifiting this industry.

What I see is pure speculation that in my opinion is not a realistic approach.

Clinton didn't help
Bush isn't helping
Kerry will not help

Apparently you are unfamiliar with the Meese Commission. Under Reagan, obscenity was prosecuted regularly, two of the people that I do alot of business with were prosecuted and one did 18 months in jail.

The Clinton administration chose not to prosecute obscenity.

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MissMina
I have never voted before

I keep seeing this . . . is it because you guys are kids that just turned 18 or something?

If not, why are you waiting until the last minute to get involved? It starts at the local level.

I doubt that 20% of you that "never voted before, but will now" will take the effort to get off the couch to go vote, then will whine when the results don't go as you think you wanted them to.

pounder · 09-03-2004, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Nothing against FSC or any organization that steps in to help, but your best chance is consulting your lawyers and doing what they tell you.

Nothing against you or any moron ( i.e. bitch with nothing to say )who pipes up , but your best chance of changing the future is not to sit idly by while you do what your lawyers tell you to do.

Are you a fucking sheep ? well neither am i. And i don't expect to be treated like one , so stand up for your rights instead of laying down like the political whore you are.

sexeducation · 09-03-2004, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
It's not going to get any better..

There is no evidence that supports any party benifiting this industry.

What I see is pure speculation that in my opinion is not a realistic approach.

Clinton didn't help
Bush isn't helping
Kerry will not help

Don't get me wrong.. I wish it was as easy as voting for somebody.. but that simply isn't the case

I agree you have to bring the cause mainstream - so it affects more "everyday people".

titmowse · 09-03-2004, 04:33 PM

no shit. register and vote you fuckers

and try to ignore the poster above me. he's a little off.

Kimmykim · 09-03-2004, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pounder
Nothing against you or any moron ( i.e. bitch with nothing to say )who pipes up , but your best chance of changing the future is not to sit idly by while you do what your lawyers tell you to do.

Are you a fucking sheep ? well neither am i. And i don't expect to be treated like one , so stand up for your rights instead of laying down like the political whore you are.

No, you're not a sheep, you're a dumbfuck with your head up your ass and the reading comprehension of a third grader, as evidenced by your inability to string together two sentences that are neither deragatory towards someone else or contributory to this discussion.

As far as whores go, that's something your wallet probably has plenty of experience with, since given your simple minded comments I can't imagine there's a woman out there with a GED, much less a diploma, that would find you even mildly interesting, and that would only be if your dick was at least 9" long.

Aly-Python · 09-03-2004, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
No, you're not a sheep, you're a dumbfuck with your head up your ass and the reading comprehension of a third grader, as evidenced by your inability to string together two sentences that are neither deragatory towards someone else or contributory to this discussion.

As far as whores go, that's something your wallet probably has plenty of experience with, since given your simple minded comments I can't imagine there's a woman out there with a GED, much less a diploma, that would find you even mildly interesting, and that would only be if your dick was at least 9" long.

OMG! That's the funniest shit I've read all week! Thanks for starting the weekend off on a FANTASTIC note, Kimmy!

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Republicans also put conservative judges in the supreme court...

I don't know how to break it to you, but every Supreme Court Justice has been appointed by Nixon, Reagan, or Bush, except Breyer and Ginsburg (Clinton-Dem) and Stevens (Ford - Rep)

So much for that idea, huh?

mookienow · 09-03-2004, 04:39 PM

Good looking out

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf
no ideal what Kerry might try, none at all, the man is all over the place on every other issue.

face it, the Democrats fucked up by nominating Kerry

baddog · 09-03-2004, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by piker
Yes, because in the eyes of most surfers FREE PORN is the only thing that matters.. Let's not worry about terrorist, economies, jobs, healthcare, social security.. etc

All that matters is FREE PORN...

stop being logical here . . .it won't work

xxxjay · 09-03-2004, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Apparently you are unfamiliar with the Meese Commission. Under Reagan, obscenity was prosecuted regularly, two of the people that I do alot of business with were prosecuted and one did 18 months in jail.

The Clinton administration chose not to prosecute obscenity.

Good point. They went after Frank Zappa.

Kimmykim · 09-03-2004, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
I don't know how to break it to you, but every Supreme Court Justice has been appointed by Nixon, Reagan, or Bush, except Breyer and Ginsburg (Clinton-Dem) and Stevens (Ford - Rep)

So much for that idea, huh?

Frankly, conservative judges on the Court aren't a bad thing. A conservative court has the tendency to support the law as its written, not try to interpret it into a new spin on the law.

Until someone gets popped and there's a case before some court, it's very much a wait and see game, especially when you take into account that these new regs will be signed into law in some sort of form prior to the election and the compliance date should fall ten days or so before the election. Leaving enough time for there to be a public "lynching" in the media of someone or other.

kenny · 09-03-2004, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Apparently you are unfamiliar with the Meese Commission. Under Reagan, obscenity was prosecuted regularly, two of the people that I do alot of business with were prosecuted and one did 18 months in jail.

The Clinton administration chose not to prosecute obscenity.

COPA happened during the Clinton Administration.

The Meese Commission didn't that provide that 1988 Obscenity Enforcement Act? That was the first version of 2257

The courts ruled that unconstitutional. I will have to read more about it.

The internet changed all that to my understaing. The laws were not equipped to combat internet based porn.

09-03-2004, 01:46 PM	#51
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	50, __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

09-03-2004, 02:17 PM	#57
jimmyf OU812 Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: California Posts: 12,651	you people think this little war that John Asshat has or is going 2 have going on with the porn Ind. is going away if Kerry gets elected??? Think again all of'em are a bunch of scum bags. So don't get you hopes up. What are you all going 2 do if Kerry comes out, anti porn in one of his speach's. Myself I like my odds with Bush, no ideal what Kerry might try, none at all, the man is all over the place on every other issue. __________________ Epic CashEpic Cash works for me Solar Cash Paysite Plugin Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting

09-03-2004, 02:17 PM	#58
Samantha_Luvcox Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: On a computer near you Posts: 396	We have added it to our front page. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

09-03-2004, 02:23 PM	#61
riosluts Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 5,250	hey when is the election date exactly? __________________

09-03-2004, 02:31 PM	#63
Raven Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 6,874	Spreadin' the word. __________________ Raven ~RETIRED~

09-03-2004, 01:58 PM	#52
pxxx First African GFY Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Posts: 12,114	Thanks for the find Lens.

09-03-2004, 02:42 PM	#64
MissMiranda Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Riverside,CA Posts: 583	I have added it to my paysite and I also plan on adding it to various yahoo groups i have. __________________

09-03-2004, 03:11 PM	#68
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	Bush or Kerry vote for whoever you want.. I am only saying that the person who gets elected will have little impact on 2257 and issues with online porn in general. One can speculate otherwise but in the end it's still mere speculation. Thats all I have to say about this matter. __________________ 7

09-03-2004, 03:11 PM	#69
Morphius Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,005	Thank you

09-03-2004, 03:37 PM	#71
Tom_PMs Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,049	Indeed. The question has never been "which party will help our industry?". It's more along the lines of which do we know will hurt our industry? To put it another way, would you rather have a constant negative quantity, or an unknown quantity with a history of essentially looking the other way? I'll go for unknown because even a worst case scenario equals what we have now. And a non-worse case scenario equals something not as bad as we have now. Those are great odds. __________________ You've read it, you can't unread it.

09-03-2004, 04:02 PM	#75
crowkid o.g. spammer Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 1,240	Voting for Bush, despite what the haters say, will have nothing to do with our business. In fact, many hate to admit it, but most of us who are well off, are even banking more since Bush has been in office? Name 1 thing he or his administration has done that has effected your business negatively? You can't can you? Didn't think so... Stop trying to brainwash people in here, if you hate Bush, you hate Bush, just say it. Don't go around spitting lies just to scare people to vote democratic... Below is proof that Bush's own evil Supreme Court rejects any type of laws that would hurt us.. Proof

09-03-2004, 04:13 PM	#77
Joe Citizen Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 4,552	Communists!

09-03-2004, 04:14 PM	#78
wyldblyss Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Buck Starts Here Posts: 5,779	Too bad I live in Canada and can't vote. I urge all webmasters to vote...every single one counts.

09-03-2004, 04:27 PM	#86
makefuckingmoney Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 3,277	so if we vote in November..they will leave online porn alone?

09-03-2004, 04:33 PM	#91
titmowse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: TEXAS Posts: 5,320	no shit. register and vote you fuckers and try to ignore the poster above me. he's a little off. __________________ I still love everybody Last edited by titmowse; 09-03-2004 at 04:36 PM..

09-03-2004, 04:39 PM	#95
mookienow Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sunny Sunny Seattle Posts: 987	Good looking out