Simple Math Eludes AIM - GoFuckYourself.com

mikesouth · 06-12-2009, 07:48 PM

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with ?patient X? as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren?t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

Helix · 06-12-2009, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with ?patient X? as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren?t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

Yes....you would think that a business that is built on the exchange of bodily fluids would be on top of this. Amazing stupidity to say the least.

Tempest · 06-12-2009, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with “patient X” as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren’t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

Good point.. Especially since she got it somewhere in that period and no one knows who that original carrier might be.

xxxdesign-net · 06-12-2009, 10:00 PM

2 + 2 = 5 no? Indeed the date of her last test were she tested negative should be the starting point for identifying who's going to get quarantined ...

xxxdesign-net · 06-12-2009, 11:18 PM

Btw it says here, http://www.xbiz.com/news/109218 , that the last negative test was on the 29th... and the last test was done on june 4th.. Did they change their story?

CyberHustler · 06-12-2009, 11:23 PM

NaughtyRob · 06-12-2009, 11:33 PM

WOW, very good point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with ?patient X? as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren?t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

xxxdesign-net · 06-12-2009, 11:57 PM

or do you mean that her last negative test was on may 29th and since tests are only effective 10-14(?) days after the infection, people she slept with after say may 15th should all be quarantined?

Tempest · 06-13-2009, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net

or do you mean that her last negative test was on may 29th and since tests are only effective 10-14(?) days after the infection, people she slept with after say may 15th should all be quarantined?

Tested negative April 29th... So I guess they need to go back to April 14th and work forward from there.. Lovely.. Just Lovely...

mikesouth · 06-13-2009, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest

Tested negative April 29th... So I guess they need to go back to April 14th and work forward from there.. Lovely.. Just Lovely...

at least April 14th

Aim is a bunch of idiots its sad that these morons are the best our industry can do

DWB · 06-13-2009, 04:32 AM

This is all assuming that her last negative test was not a false negative. I've read many times that the PCR-DNA test can often give false reports.

In theory, she may have been HIV+ for longer than everyone thinks and the test just never caught it.

StuartD · 06-13-2009, 04:44 AM

HIV... it's the new swine flu.

or is it the other way around?

xxxdesign-net · 06-13-2009, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest

Tested negative April 29th... So I guess they need to go back to April 14th and work forward from there.. Lovely.. Just Lovely...

Oh yeah, April 29th, my bad...

BFT3K · 06-13-2009, 09:16 AM

LA Times Story...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,3569962.story

aniloscash · 06-13-2009, 09:54 AM

seems like there should be some new standards set moving forward. A test when returning from a foreign country followed by no work until a second test can be performed. One thing is we are going to have to make some changes or there will certainly be regulation.

DWB · 06-13-2009, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aniloscash

seems like there should be some new standards set moving forward. A test when returning from a foreign country followed by no work until a second test can be performed.

Do you honestly think some of the dirt bags who travel abroad to shoot porn is going to report in that they have been abroad? No way.

Furthermore, what about if a performer just takes a personal vacation out of the country? Test them too? What about if they go on a date with someone not in the industry? Test?

The system is flawed. That's the problem. NOBODY will be 100% truthful with anything. For example, do you think a male porn stud who secretly loves cock and is bi-sexual, is gong to spill the beans on himself, tell everyone he takes it in the ass and then lose work over it? Not a chance. He will suck dick and get railed up the ass, maybe even by total strangers from a glory hole in some peep show, and not tell a soul about it, but he will show up to work the next day with a clean bill of health from AIM.

This is the risk everyone takes. Any test is better than none, and having AIM is better than not having AIM, but it's time for personal responsibility here and either use condoms or know that you may end up with HIV, Hep or any other STI, having no one to blame but yourself.

06-12-2009, 07:48 PM	#1
mikesouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: My High Horse Posts: 6,334	Simple Math Eludes AIM OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with ?patient X? as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods. Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009 patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test. This is NOT being done. Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren?t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago. __________________ Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

06-13-2009, 04:44 AM	#12
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	HIV... it's the new swine flu. or is it the other way around? __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-13-2009, 09:54 AM	#15
aniloscash Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,161	seems like there should be some new standards set moving forward. A test when returning from a foreign country followed by no work until a second test can be performed. One thing is we are going to have to make some changes or there will certainly be regulation. __________________ Got Milf Traffic Contact Me ICQ 473236446 j (at)anilos (dot)com http://www.aniloscash.com

06-12-2009, 10:00 PM	#4
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	2 + 2 = 5 no? Indeed the date of her last test were she tested negative should be the starting point for identifying who's going to get quarantined ...

06-12-2009, 11:18 PM	#5
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	Btw it says here, http://www.xbiz.com/news/109218 , that the last negative test was on the 29th... and the last test was done on june 4th.. Did they change their story?

06-12-2009, 11:23 PM	#6
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,857

06-12-2009, 11:57 PM	#8
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	or do you mean that her last negative test was on may 29th and since tests are only effective 10-14(?) days after the infection, people she slept with after say may 15th should all be quarantined?

06-13-2009, 04:32 AM	#11
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	This is all assuming that her last negative test was not a false negative. I've read many times that the PCR-DNA test can often give false reports. In theory, she may have been HIV+ for longer than everyone thinks and the test just never caught it.

06-13-2009, 09:16 AM	#14
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	LA Times Story... http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,3569962.story