Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2010, 04:40 PM   #1
Eric
Confirmed User
 
Eric's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Helm!
Posts: 8,818
Customer Blacklisting for Creating Chargebacks

Interesting read here:

http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2010/0...-to-blacklist/
__________________
No One
Eric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 04:47 PM   #2
Wizzo
2011 GFY Hall of Fame!
 
Wizzo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Back in Texas!
Posts: 15,224
We used to put something to that effect on our joinpages.
__________________
Looking for Opportunity!
Wizzo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 04:49 PM   #3
marketsmart
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
full of problems and if they are US based, expect a lawsuit...




.
marketsmart is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 05:09 PM   #4
VGeorgie
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 359
Don't understand why it would lead to lawsuits assuming the merchant has a positive reputation - that is, isn't known for deceptive practices themselves. CCBill does this routinely for their scrub. Check clearing companies have been doing it for years. Just once write a check that bounces, and if it's reported your check may be declined at many retailers who use the same verification service.
VGeorgie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 05:15 PM   #5
marketsmart
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by VGeorgie View Post
Don't understand why it would lead to lawsuits assuming the merchant has a positive reputation - that is, isn't known for deceptive practices themselves. CCBill does this routinely for their scrub. Check clearing companies have been doing it for years. Just once write a check that bounces, and if it's reported your check may be declined at many retailers who use the same verification service.
doing it internally is one thing. doing it externally is another..

what are the controls? what if someone had a valid c/b.. the issues with this are far reaching..



.
marketsmart is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 05:45 PM   #6
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by VGeorgie View Post
Don't understand why it would lead to lawsuits assuming the merchant has a positive reputation - that is, isn't known for deceptive practices themselves. CCBill does this routinely for their scrub. Check clearing companies have been doing it for years. Just once write a check that bounces, and if it's reported your check may be declined at many retailers who use the same verification service.
Do they charge an arbitrary fee to have the listing removed?
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 10:19 PM   #7
NemesisEnforcer
Confirmed User
 
NemesisEnforcer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vegas and Los Angeles
Posts: 2,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by marketsmart View Post
doing it internally is one thing. doing it externally is another..

what are the controls? what if someone had a valid c/b.. the issues with this are far reaching..

.
Doesn't the 3 credit bureaus do something like this externally.
__________________
The Only Time When Success Comes Before Work Is In A Dictionary.

Did you ever notice: When you put the 2 words 'The' and 'IRS' together it spells 'Theirs.'
NemesisEnforcer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 10:25 PM   #8
Intrinsic
Confirmed User
 
Intrinsic's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,589
Whats blacklisted? The credit card #? Seems easy to change that up without having to fucking pay $99...
Intrinsic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 10:29 PM   #9
marketsmart
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by NemesisEnforcer View Post
Doesn't the 3 credit bureaus do something like this externally.
they are regulated by the FCRA and a few other laws..

this service is not regulated and makes you pay to get off the list..

too many ways to get sued imho...





.
marketsmart is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 10:41 PM   #10
BIGTYMER
Junior Achiever
 
BIGTYMER's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Walled Garden
Posts: 17,066
I think its a great service!
BIGTYMER is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 10:50 PM   #11
DirtyJs
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 307
I could be incorrect, but I believe in netbilling if you ban a transaction and mark it as fraud, its netbilling wide. Like I said, I could be incorrect, but I heard this before.
DirtyJs is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 10:52 PM   #12
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
I have seen a program recently say a customer will be liable for $15,000 in damages if he files a false chargeback lol
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 10:55 PM   #13
BIGTYMER
Junior Achiever
 
BIGTYMER's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Walled Garden
Posts: 17,066
Lots of processors keep a blacklist and you're added to it if you do a chargeback or request a refund.
BIGTYMER is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 07:07 AM   #14
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGTYMER View Post
Lots of processors keep a blacklist and you're added to it if you do a chargeback or request a refund.
Yep, but this is a global blacklist maintained by a third party company whose business model is to charge the consumer a removal fee.
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 07:14 AM   #15
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
:2cents

This is already done to some degree.

I know for a fact CCB and Verotel will add that person's name, CC, and email to a blacklist if you charge back. Whether they share that list with others, I do not know. I have not heard on what Zombaio does yet. Although, I historically do not get a lot of charge backs on my membership sites.

I do not think I even average 1 a month over YEARS.
__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 07:37 AM   #16
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
I could see this being a huge privacy issue.

Or, you might as well provide a half crap service then use these guys. If someone CB's from you or anyone in the system, but they end up buying from you at any point - you can upsell the removal service and make money that way - and you might make your sale as well.

That's nasty...
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 10:46 AM   #17
VGeorgie
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by marketsmart View Post
doing it internally is one thing. doing it externally is another..
It's still internal. Member sites have signed up to use same verification service. You won't be blacklisted unless you try to join a member site. Check service companies work exactly the same way. And some actually do have a "clearing" charge which is paid/shared to the merchant that suffered the loss.

Assuming they base the scrub on the card # alone, if a card was stolen and charged back, then that CC # will not be used again. The same customer will be issued a new card and it will be accepted.

The only other way a customer would get on the list unfairly if they were forced to charge back following some kind of merchant misconduct, but I doubt these sites will be members of such a service. And if they are, any verification service will consider the number of chargebacks to a merchant to determine if their claims are reputable.

If you use CCBill or Epoch or any other third-party biller these anti-fraud measures are already in place, and I don't see them being sued by anybody over it.
VGeorgie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.