![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
New Webmasters ask "How-To" questions here. This is where other fucking Webmasters help. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: canada..............eh?
Posts: 850
|
![]() This link: http://www.SandraSynInc.com/
Loads in Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari. Will not show any images on my CPU in the latest IE or Google Chrome. ![]() Any Ideas? I was about to finish the image retouches and page layout, but if I cant get 2 div tags to show the BG images why bother! I am open to suggestions on this one!
__________________
need content? Email me for exclusive or semi-exclusive! sandraxxsyn @gmail.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NP-hard
Posts: 287
|
You have background images in your CSS - but no content whatsoever inside, so the DIV is not rendered. Put this inside the DIV:
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NP-hard
Posts: 287
|
...but from an SEO perspective, having NO indexable content on a page is not very good. Try the same with images and ALT tags, that's something the spiders can understand better.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NP-hard
Posts: 287
|
Sorry I proved myself wrong when I tried the thing. The problem is with the images: chrome doesn't load either image, paste the URL of them into the address bar and try it yourself. Most probably the jpeg encoding (which in your case is, according to irfanview, JPEG, CMYK) is wrong, that's why you have huge images (560kbytes for a BG image that is just 20 pixels wide is way too large in my opinion).
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: canada..............eh?
Posts: 850
|
totally aggreed on the image size, but I thought it useless to optimize if they were not visible?
I will try the alt tags and see what happens...... Thanks for the input thus far.
__________________
need content? Email me for exclusive or semi-exclusive! sandraxxsyn @gmail.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NP-hard
Posts: 287
|
try some other shit for saving the images... I see you use ps cs3 for graphics - save for web should do the trick
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: canada..............eh?
Posts: 850
|
And the answer for the gande prize is................. SilentSound!
Absolutely right, no content in the Div tag will cause Google Chrome and IExplorer to show nothing. Background images are not visible unless content exists inside the Div tag. Learn something new everyday! Appreciate the help, thanks again.
__________________
need content? Email me for exclusive or semi-exclusive! sandraxxsyn @gmail.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: canada..............eh?
Posts: 850
|
Saving for web causes image degradation in this case, so I just brought down the image quality for smaller size. Also in RBG now. Thanks for the advice though, sometimes the basics are overlooked when I get into a frustrated frame of mind!
__________________
need content? Email me for exclusive or semi-exclusive! sandraxxsyn @gmail.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NP-hard
Posts: 287
|
yeah you need quality down - but it's not an issue when you can have an image ~800 bytes instead of 500 kbytes with no noticeable quality loss... good luck dude, hit me up if ya have any problems
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
Or follow other image suggestions for seo purposes. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NP-hard
Posts: 287
|
yes, but then I tried it with the corrected images and it worked - but quirks suck bad....
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: canada..............eh?
Posts: 850
|
I did some research on this, because it was annoying the hell out of me even after I fixed it....
Some browsers require content within a tag to display it. If you toss a 1000px height on an empty table with 1 cell vert & horiz you get no display on Iexplorer or Chrome. When you place a dash "-" you get the table to show. Just some handy info to have right there! Thanks again for all the response!
__________________
need content? Email me for exclusive or semi-exclusive! sandraxxsyn @gmail.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |