Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2012, 01:47 PM   #151
JFK
FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
 
JFK's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: FUBARLAND
Posts: 67,374
One fitty frozen assets
__________________

FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com
JFK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 08:52 PM   #152
Suckerpunch
Confirmed User
 
Suckerpunch's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,156
And the latest... http://newswire.xbiz.com/view.php?id=150447
Suckerpunch is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 09:27 PM   #153
BIGTYMER
Junior Achiever
 
BIGTYMER's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Walled Garden
Posts: 17,066
Stick it to them CF!
BIGTYMER is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 11:28 PM   #154
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suckerpunch View Post
Quote:
Oron attorneys, in defense of Corbin Fisher's $34.8 million copyright infringement suit, today asked a federal judge to partially lift a temporary restraining order so that it can transfer $375,000 to a trust fund. The $375,000, which would come from its PayPal account, would be used for legal fees and business expenses to keep the file-trading site afloat.
Paypal need to be told where the money is coming from to fund the selling of porn.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 12:49 AM   #155
lucas131
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,475
but you must agree they have balls, still up and fighting not like all the other services that quietly closed doors and pissed their pants, looks more like they think they are doing legal thing
lucas131 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 11:06 AM   #156
Slappin Fish
Confirmed User
 
Slappin Fish's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,512
Oron Can Only Withdraw $100K Judge Rules...

http://www.xbiz.com/news/150475
Slappin Fish is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 11:39 AM   #157
DWB
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Encrypted. Access denied.
Posts: 31,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slappin Fish View Post
Oron Can Only Withdraw $100K Judge Rules...

http://www.xbiz.com/news/150475
Quote:
"Specifically, Oron?s counsel represented that a settlement demand of $500,000 was 'an unreasonable amount' to the defendants and 'more than the company itself was worth' in previous discussions,"
They were offered to settle for $500k. That's a big drop from 34 million.
DWB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 03:10 PM   #158
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slappin Fish View Post
Oron Can Only Withdraw $100K Judge Rules...

http://www.xbiz.com/news/150475
So let me get this straight...if any of us just so much as buys ANYTHING that PayPal suspects is "porn related" then they will close the account and never give you ANY Of your money.

But when Oron actually has their PayPal account FROZEN by a judge for piracy of porn....the account is still open?

And no...don't anybody tell me that it's because of the money. PayPal doesn't give a shit about that...they shut down all of adult years ago and kissed millions of dollars goodbye without hesitation.

That's the freakin' strange thing about the fact that they process for these pirate sites. EVERYBODY in the world...from 12 year olds to 90 year olds...know that is where the FREE PORN is.

No way in hell that not even one person at PayPal didn't realize that "yes" they are processing for porn when they process a file locker? And not only that...but they are processing for copyright infringrement?

Very strange. And since I don't believe in things "just happening", I can only assume that they are purposefully doing it. Perhaps in the same frame of mind that the govt. has had with allowing the porn industry to be gutted by piracy.

Intended to destroy our industry once and for all I guess.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com

Last edited by Robbie; 06-27-2012 at 03:12 PM..
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 03:51 PM   #159
Quentin
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
So let me get this straight...if any of us just so much as buys ANYTHING that PayPal suspects is "porn related" then they will close the account and never give you ANY Of your money.

But when Oron actually has their PayPal account FROZEN by a judge for piracy of porn....the account is still open?
The dodge from PayPal's perspective is that when people buy services from a cyberlocker through that cyberlocker's PayPal account, that consumer isn't buying content, or even buying access to content; he is merely buying the "cloud storage services" offered by the cyberlocker.

Don't get me wrong -- we all know that's a load of willfully blind bullshit. I'm just saying that "workaround," along with asserting the legal position that all of the illegal activity taking place on the cyberlockers is the sole responsibility of the individual users and not the cyberlocker operators themselves, is how PayPal rationalizes allowing cyberlockers to bill through them.

Yes, it's cynical as hell, and nowhere near in keeping with the spirit of the DMCA's safe harbor provisions.... but until or unless PayPal is successfully dragged into one of these fights as a defendant, or the law itself changes, I suspect PayPal will continue to maintain the same policies concerning cyberlockers.

The funny thing is, we operate a legitimate porn-specific file locker in PVLocker.com (all the content sold there is either ours or duly licensed from the rights-holder, users cannot share any content they upload, only store it and view it themselves through their own account, etc.) but I'm sure PayPal would not process for it, simply because it's porn-specific.

So, ironically, we can't sell our own content through our own cyberlocker by way of PayPal.... but a pirate can rip our videos, upload them to some sketchy, DMCA non-compliant cyberlocker, and sell access to it through PayPal all day long.

Go figure.
__________________
Q. Boyer
Quentin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 04:17 PM   #160
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,959
Yes Quentin, that's true...BUT, we've seen over and over where Paypal accounts have been shut down when programs paid their affiliates via Paypal.

That's much further off from buying porn than getting a membership to a file locker to download pirated materials.

And yet...that's what Paypal does. ANYTHING connected in any way to the legal and legitimate adult industry gets your account shut down. Even affiliate payments.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 04:28 PM   #161
Klen
 
Klen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Little Vienna
Posts: 32,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin View Post
The dodge from PayPal's perspective is that when people buy services from a cyberlocker through that cyberlocker's PayPal account, that consumer isn't buying content, or even buying access to content; he is merely buying the "cloud storage services" offered by the cyberlocker.

Don't get me wrong -- we all know that's a load of willfully blind bullshit. I'm just saying that "workaround," along with asserting the legal position that all of the illegal activity taking place on the cyberlockers is the sole responsibility of the individual users and not the cyberlocker operators themselves, is how PayPal rationalizes allowing cyberlockers to bill through them.

Yes, it's cynical as hell, and nowhere near in keeping with the spirit of the DMCA's safe harbor provisions.... but until or unless PayPal is successfully dragged into one of these fights as a defendant, or the law itself changes, I suspect PayPal will continue to maintain the same policies concerning cyberlockers.

The funny thing is, we operate a legitimate porn-specific file locker in PVLocker.com (all the content sold there is either ours or duly licensed from the rights-holder, users cannot share any content they upload, only store it and view it themselves through their own account, etc.) but I'm sure PayPal would not process for it, simply because it's porn-specific.

So, ironically, we can't sell our own content through our own cyberlocker by way of PayPal.... but a pirate can rip our videos, upload them to some sketchy, DMCA non-compliant cyberlocker, and sell access to it through PayPal all day long.

Go figure.
Lol that's not filelocker,its itunes/clips4sale clone.Filelocker is when you offer free downloads(without need for registration) plus selling premium speed.But it's pretty nice site,definitely better then clip4sale,good luck with it.
Klen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 03:03 AM   #162
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin View Post
but until or unless PayPal is successfully dragged into one of these fights as a defendant, or the law itself changes, I suspect PayPal will continue to maintain the same policies concerning cyberlockers.
Or get dragged into the court of public opinion.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 03:53 AM   #163
AdultKing
Raise Your Weapon
 
AdultKing's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Outback Australia
Posts: 15,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin View Post
The dodge from PayPal's perspective is that when people buy services from a cyberlocker through that cyberlocker's PayPal account, that consumer isn't buying content, or even buying access to content; he is merely buying the "cloud storage services" offered by the cyberlocker.
I can assure you that is not Paypal's position. Illegal file lockers days are numbered with Paypal.

While Paypal will still only investigate them on a case by case basis, there's a lot of cases under review.
AdultKing is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 07:10 AM   #164
Phoenix
BACON BACON BACON
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet
Posts: 35,457
i have sat and spoke with a lawyer who works at the firm who represents paypal worldwide.
his response when i told him what a pile of crap paypal was...was that he was not aware of what i told him. And they were prepared to defend paypal. In the end off the record he says, all that happens is he will make more money.

Paypal seems to be untouchable.
__________________
Skype Phoenixskype1
Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Phoenix is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 07:17 AM   #165
Tijuana_Tom
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 90210
Posts: 668
Man Robbie you need to cut down on the caffeine.

File Lockers is not against PayPals TOS.

Porn always has been.

PayPal has to cover their own Ass on every level not just to protect porn producers. This also easily becomes a massive legal matter with sites involved in illegal activities.

PayPal now has to go through their own internal process while following the rules.
Tijuana_Tom is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 07:19 AM   #166
Tijuana_Tom
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 90210
Posts: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
i have sat and spoke with a lawyer who works at the firm who represents paypal worldwide.
his response when i told him what a pile of crap paypal was...was that he was not aware of what i told him. And they were prepared to defend paypal. In the end off the record he says, all that happens is he will make more money.

Paypal seems to be untouchable.
I guess you don't talk to many lawyers. You will NEVER hear them talk bad about their client. It's an incredible skill.
Tijuana_Tom is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 07:35 AM   #167
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
i have sat and spoke with a lawyer who works at the firm who represents paypal worldwide.
his response when i told him what a pile of crap paypal was...was that he was not aware of what i told him. And they were prepared to defend paypal. In the end off the record he says, all that happens is he will make more money.

Paypal seems to be untouchable.
Maybe his firm will drop PayPal like a stone when the media tell everyone they represent PayPal.

This has nothing to do with legal, it's all about public opinion.

Still I agree with Tom. It's actually a wonder he spoke to you about a client.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 07:47 AM   #168
Jamie Gardner
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
And yet...that's what Paypal does. ANYTHING connected in any way to the legal and legitimate adult industry gets your account shut down. Even affiliate payments.
You can use PayPal to pay for x-rated DVDs on Adult DVD Empire, Bush DVD, Excalibur Films, etc..
Jamie Gardner is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 07:55 AM   #169
DWB
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Encrypted. Access denied.
Posts: 31,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
So let me get this straight...if any of us just so much as buys ANYTHING that PayPal suspects is "porn related" then they will close the account and never give you ANY Of your money.

But when Oron actually has their PayPal account FROZEN by a judge for piracy of porn....the account is still open?

And no...don't anybody tell me that it's because of the money. PayPal doesn't give a shit about that...they shut down all of adult years ago and kissed millions of dollars goodbye without hesitation.

That's the freakin' strange thing about the fact that they process for these pirate sites. EVERYBODY in the world...from 12 year olds to 90 year olds...know that is where the FREE PORN is.

No way in hell that not even one person at PayPal didn't realize that "yes" they are processing for porn when they process a file locker? And not only that...but they are processing for copyright infringrement?

Very strange. And since I don't believe in things "just happening", I can only assume that they are purposefully doing it. Perhaps in the same frame of mind that the govt. has had with allowing the porn industry to be gutted by piracy.

Intended to destroy our industry once and for all I guess.
I think it's intentional.

It doesn't make sense otherwise.
DWB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 08:00 AM   #170
DWB
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Encrypted. Access denied.
Posts: 31,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Gardner View Post
You can use PayPal to pay for x-rated DVDs on Adult DVD Empire, Bush DVD, Excalibur Films, etc..
That's great. If I sell the content on DVD, Paypal can be used. If someone steals that same content and loads it to a file locker for others to steal, Paypal can be used. If I sell the exact same content on a paysite, Paypal can not be used.
DWB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 08:29 AM   #171
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWB View Post
I think it's intentional.

It doesn't make sense otherwise.
Sorry my friend, but there is no anti-porn global conspiracy, with key players, being controlled at the highest levels of the government, or the banking industry working toward the total destruction of the porn business.

While it sounds like a plot straight out of the X-Files, it's just about as insane as FEMA being the "secret government". Which New Orleans showed was no where close to being accurate. For those who believes such fodder in the first place that is.

What you have going on here is the same as a hosting company, url shortener, registrar, 10 minute email, or alike. They are providing a service. That service is being abused.

I am not saying that these File Lockers repeatedly being discussed are not set up for the sole purpose to do whatever one is claiming in regards to piracy, content theft, copyright, and so forth. But from the outside looking in, they provide a sort of cloud hosting solution for people wanting to host their files.

That being said, I believe that you need to have a checks and balances in this equation. Which is probably the stance of the processor. They get complaints, approach the merchant who claims Sgt Schultz and will deal with abusers as they come up, but claim 90% of not that sort of abuse, etc.. Or they give them a three strikes out before closing their account, whatever the case is.

In short, unless you can prove active knowledge, such as affiliate programs or alike where people are paid to steal shit and upload it, you basically would have some degree of safe harbor if you can prove you are Sgt Schultz in regards to what is going on. However, in the case of ORON or some of these others, they have had active affiliate programs rewarding people for this behavior.

Sadly, the laws as they stand is a slippery slope. You have to prove knowledge of the infringement. You have to prove their whole business model is made up on this premise. You have to prove they are ignoring DMCA complaints, and not removing shit or telling you to fuck yourself.

There are many different issues involved here from just a legal stand point. Which does not even get into all of the Paypal complexities in regards to digital goods, and porn.

In the DWB example.... you setting up a porn website is a digital product specifically set up for the peddling of porn. A file locker (in theory) is not set up for the hosting, and distribution of porn. It is a sort of cloud hosting product, and that is it's supposed intent. Which, I am sure, is the position they are taking legally.

Your only defense here is to have the RYC's or alike start a DB collecting all of the DMCA and other complaints stemming from the theft, how quickly they respond to DMCA if at all, and then you can go to the processor with a mountain of evidence and show that they are not following U.S. copyright laws.

As most, not all, processing, Paypal, registrars, and alike are here in the states. You can hit them that way when the mountain of evidence shows that they are all about theft, versus providing a legitimate service. In summary, it's going to take a whole lot more legally that a few pornographers crying fowl.

__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 08:54 AM   #172
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by quentin View Post
[d]n't get me wrong -- we all know that's a load of willfully blind bullshit. I'm just saying that "workaround," along with asserting the legal position that all of the illegal activity taking place on the cyberlockers is the sole responsibility of the individual users and not the cyberlocker operators themselves, is how paypal rationalizes allowing cyberlockers to bill through them. ...
QFT 1+
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 08:56 AM   #173
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Paypal need to be told where the money is coming from to fund the selling of porn.
PayPal doesn't give a rat's ass about porn other than that they want no part of it.
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 09:01 AM   #174
Tijuana_Tom
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 90210
Posts: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWB View Post
I think it's intentional.

It doesn't make sense otherwise.
elaborate.
Tijuana_Tom is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 09:02 AM   #175
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies View Post
[T]hat being said, I believe that you need to have a checks and balances in this equation. Which is probably the stance of the processor. They get complaints, approach the merchant who claims Sgt Schultz and will deal with abusers as they come up, but claim 90% of not that sort of abuse, etc.. Or they give them a three strikes out before closing their account, whatever the case is. ...
Classic CYA Action


Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 09:07 AM   #176
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
Classic CYA Action


__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 12:27 PM   #177
Django
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing View Post
Illegal file lockers days are numbered with Paypal.
2000 (5 years) or more
Django is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 01:11 PM   #178
DWB
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Encrypted. Access denied.
Posts: 31,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies View Post
Sorry my friend, but there is no anti-porn global conspiracy, with key players, being controlled at the highest levels of the government, or the banking industry working toward the total destruction of the porn business.

While it sounds like a plot straight out of the X-Files, it's just about as insane as FEMA being the "secret government". Which New Orleans showed was no where close to being accurate. For those who believes such fodder in the first place that is.

What you have going on here is the same as a hosting company, url shortener, registrar, 10 minute email, or alike. They are providing a service. That service is being abused.

I am not saying that these File Lockers repeatedly being discussed are not set up for the sole purpose to do whatever one is claiming in regards to piracy, content theft, copyright, and so forth. But from the outside looking in, they provide a sort of cloud hosting solution for people wanting to host their files.

That being said, I believe that you need to have a checks and balances in this equation. Which is probably the stance of the processor. They get complaints, approach the merchant who claims Sgt Schultz and will deal with abusers as they come up, but claim 90% of not that sort of abuse, etc.. Or they give them a three strikes out before closing their account, whatever the case is.

In short, unless you can prove active knowledge, such as affiliate programs or alike where people are paid to steal shit and upload it, you basically would have some degree of safe harbor if you can prove you are Sgt Schultz in regards to what is going on. However, in the case of ORON or some of these others, they have had active affiliate programs rewarding people for this behavior.

Sadly, the laws as they stand is a slippery slope. You have to prove knowledge of the infringement. You have to prove their whole business model is made up on this premise. You have to prove they are ignoring DMCA complaints, and not removing shit or telling you to fuck yourself.

There are many different issues involved here from just a legal stand point. Which does not even get into all of the Paypal complexities in regards to digital goods, and porn.

In the DWB example.... you setting up a porn website is a digital product specifically set up for the peddling of porn. A file locker (in theory) is not set up for the hosting, and distribution of porn. It is a sort of cloud hosting product, and that is it's supposed intent. Which, I am sure, is the position they are taking legally.

Your only defense here is to have the RYC's or alike start a DB collecting all of the DMCA and other complaints stemming from the theft, how quickly they respond to DMCA if at all, and then you can go to the processor with a mountain of evidence and show that they are not following U.S. copyright laws.

As most, not all, processing, Paypal, registrars, and alike are here in the states. You can hit them that way when the mountain of evidence shows that they are all about theft, versus providing a legitimate service. In summary, it's going to take a whole lot more legally that a few pornographers crying fowl.

No global conspiracy needed. It only takes one person sitting at the top of Paypal to do exactly what they are doing now.

You can send 100s or 1000s of DMCAs to Paypal, pointing out not only material that has been stolen from you, but also that it is adult in nature and they are processing for it. I personally have sent 100s, so I know collectively they have received 10s of 1000s (or more), all telling them that file locker X has porn on it. What do they do? Nothing. Even after 10s of 1000s notices, they bury their head in the sand.

However, if you or myself takes one payment from a customer to give access to one of our pay sites, and they find out about it, our paypal account is closed without question. Period.

So the question is to be asked, if they will do that over one sale, why won't they do ANYTHING after being notified 1000s of times, and usually those notifications are about the same handful of sites.

The only reason they are finally doing something is because of the association of child porn that is now public and spreading rapidly. It has nothing to do with porn or piracy, as they have ignored them for years.



This is what you get when you tell them about someone selling porn, beats sex, or child porn:

Quote:
Thank you for contacting PayPal with your concern regarding sales that
potentially violate PayPal's Acceptable Use Policy. We will investigate
the matter and take appropriate action, if necessary.

Again, thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.

Sincerely,
Chris
PayPal, Brand Risk Management
This is what you get after you send a DMCA for porn content:

Quote:
Thank you for submitting the DMCA notice.

We hereby confirm that the URL/s you have reported have been forwarded to the merchant/s in charge for deletion and/or are no longer functioning.

This refers to your reports with the following subject/s:
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX

We thank you for your support and appreciate the information that you provided. If you have any questions, please contact the PayPal Brand Risk Management Department at [email protected].

Sincerely,
John
PayPal, Brand Risk Management
Not once did the site in question have their account frozen or terminated, even though I've sent endless amounts of DMCAs on just one site, as have many others, and even though those sites have had child porn on them. The links have actually remained up after paypal was notified about them.

The fact is, not one of us knows why they are doing it. It could be because they really are that dumb, or it could be that the CEO wants to see the demise of the porn industry. None of us know the answer to that, and either are possible. Or maybe the CEO is just a big Jerry Sandusky who gets his rocks from downloading kiddy porn from the lockers.
DWB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 01:38 PM   #179
Roald
SecretFriends.com
 
Roald's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: IMC Headquarters
Posts: 27,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin View Post
The dodge from PayPal's perspective is that when people buy services from a cyberlocker through that cyberlocker's PayPal account, that consumer isn't buying content, or even buying access to content; he is merely buying the "cloud storage services" offered by the cyberlocker.

Don't get me wrong -- we all know that's a load of willfully blind bullshit. I'm just saying that "workaround," along with asserting the legal position that all of the illegal activity taking place on the cyberlockers is the sole responsibility of the individual users and not the cyberlocker operators themselves, is how PayPal rationalizes allowing cyberlockers to bill through them.

Yes, it's cynical as hell, and nowhere near in keeping with the spirit of the DMCA's safe harbor provisions.... but until or unless PayPal is successfully dragged into one of these fights as a defendant, or the law itself changes, I suspect PayPal will continue to maintain the same policies concerning cyberlockers.

The funny thing is, we operate a legitimate porn-specific file locker in PVLocker.com (all the content sold there is either ours or duly licensed from the rights-holder, users cannot share any content they upload, only store it and view it themselves through their own account, etc.) but I'm sure PayPal would not process for it, simply because it's porn-specific.

So, ironically, we can't sell our own content through our own cyberlocker by way of PayPal.... but a pirate can rip our videos, upload them to some sketchy, DMCA non-compliant cyberlocker, and sell access to it through PayPal all day long.

Go figure.
Dont really think you can compare VPlocker with any of file lockers out there.
__________________


WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME



ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT


Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Roald is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 01:49 PM   #180
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWB View Post
You can send 100s or 1000s of DMCAs to Paypal, pointing out not only material that has been stolen from you, but also that it is adult in nature and they are processing for it. I personally have sent 100s, so I know collectively they have received 10s of 1000s (or more), all telling them that file locker X has porn on it. What do they do? Nothing. Even after 10s of 1000s notices, they bury their head in the sand.

However, if you or myself takes one payment from a customer to give access to one of our pay sites, and they find out about it, our paypal account is closed without question. Period.
I feel your pain fine sire. You know this. However, you missed my point.

In the one example, you are a pornographer, and peddling porn, or directly receiving from porn. Your whole purpose for your pay site is to peddle porn. You receiving a payment from a sponsor is for peddling porn. There is a hard connection there, or line of proof, in that regard to say that you.... the DWB is involved in porn.

A file locker on the other hand, hosting company, search engine, registrar, proxy host, url shortener, 10 minute email service provider, is NOT a porn company (in theory). They actually are a service provider who 'may' have some porn using their service in some capacity... which may need to be removed, sgt schultz, against AUP, etc..... but they (in theory) have many more non-porn, non-copyright violator, customers who are using their service for a legitimate, legal, purpose.

Legally.... that is the slippery slope, and my original point here.

You have to show that those file lockers knowingly promote copyright theft. They knowingly host porn. They are knowingly involved with Oron, or alike in some capacity. They intentionally disregard DMCA notices, and copyright claims. You must have some level of PROOF.

Otherwise, it is being looked at as a one off issue with a couple of abusers on a service that has a million legal, legit, paying users. When a processor looks at it like that, they see the abusers are a drop in the bucket, and there are a million others not abusing. You have to show them otherwise.

__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 02:08 PM   #181
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
PayPal doesn't give a rat's ass about porn other than that they want no part of it.
PayPal don't care if they process for stolen goods. The "illegal" angle isn't going to work.

These headlines will.

PAYPAL USED TO PAY FOR XXXXXXX


XXXXXX can be what ever will shock the most.

Our job now is to get this into the court of public opinion.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.