Any companies looking for 4k EXCLUSIVE SHOOTING - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Ferus · 11-06-2019, 02:57 AM

#50 times Paul should have kept his mouth shut

candyflip · 11-06-2019, 06:53 AM

Paul, it’s obvious you haven’t bothered to keep up with current technology with regards to cameras. High quality images can be had for very little money. You’ve shown us here that you don’t get 4K and why people are and should be shooting it. You’ve shown us that you don’t have the slightest clue what the current crop of cameras is capable of, nor do you have the slightest idea of what would be involved in processing any of the footage from these cameras. You don’t understand the capabilities of the codecs.

No one is arguing that lighting or composition isn’t important. But if you’re shooting that on HD cameras in a world clients and projects demand 4K and up, none of that matters. You’re not going to get hired. I have said nothing more than this and will continue to do so.

You’re brain Is just going to mush and you won’t ever get it. I will keep this going with the hope that the OP gets some eyes on his thread and can get some bites on his offer.

celandina · 11-06-2019, 08:57 AM

To see 4 K effect with 50" TV you need to sit about 4ft from the screen. Your cat or dog or a toddler may be that close. For 1080p about 7 feet away ( as most of us sit). Therefore for most, 4 K is a gimick to sell more TVs and cameras. In other words how many of us have 100+ inch TV to view 4K from the normal couch 7 feet away.

but hey who cares about old technology... Look at 8K, you need to be 2 feet away with 65 " screen..

Quote:

The optimal distances for a 65” screen are two feet for 8K and 4.3 feet for 4K. If you sit somewhere between these two distances, you will see some, but not all, of the added detail in the 8K image.

CaptainHowdy · 11-06-2019, 09:24 AM

candyflip · 11-06-2019, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina

To see 4 K effect with 50" TV you need to sit about 4ft from the screen. Your cat or dog or a toddler may be that close. For 1080p about 7 feet away ( as most of us sit). Therefore for most, 4 K is a gimick to sell more TVs and cameras. In other words how many of us have 100+ inch TV to view 4K from the normal couch 7 feet away.

but hey who cares about old technology... Look at 8K, you need to be 2 feet away with 65 " screen..

Sounds like you don’t get it, much like Paul doesn’t get it. People aren’t shooting 4K and higher to display in 4K and higher. They’re shooting these resolutions because of what you’re able to do with the footage in post.

Pretty sad to see folks who create and market content who lack the ability to understand the simple basics for content creation.

sadiedazzle · 11-06-2019, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

Sounds like you don’t get it, much like Paul doesn’t get it. People aren’t shooting 4K and higher to display in 4K and higher. They’re shooting these resolutions because of what you’re able to do with the footage in post.

Pretty sad to see folks who create and market content who lack the ability to understand the simple basics for content creation.

Paul has lost the plot. There was a time when he was current and his work was good. But now he is a ranting old man. This thread is the worst I have ever seen him. Here is some advice for Paul....

"get out of the new world if you can't lend a hand, for the times they are a changin"......Robert Zimmerman

The Porn Nerd · 11-06-2019, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

"get out of the new world if you can't lend a hand, for the times they are a changin"......Robert Zimmerman

But Paul is gonna say, "that Zimmerman guy ain't no Bob Dylan! Besides, the Times don't change; they've been the Times Of London for years."

Paul Markham · 11-07-2019, 01:47 AM

Why was I so stupid to suggest the subject matter, the way it's shot, lighting, audio, lens, camera, etc are more important. Thank you all you knowledgeable guys for showing me the errors of my ways.

Ditch what I said and just buy a cheap amateur 4K camera because that will suffice.

candyflip · 11-07-2019, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Why was I so stupid to suggest the subject matter, the way it's shot, lighting, audio, lens, camera, etc are more important. Thank you all you knowledgeable guys for showing me the errors of my ways.

Ditch what I said and just buy a cheap amateur 4K camera because that will suffice.

Again, no one said that those things aren’t important. Not one person. But if you’re gear isn’t current and up to the standards clients are demanding, none of those matter. It’s as simple as that. You just refuse to ever admit you are wrong or don’t have the slightest clue what you’re talking about. It’s obvious to all of us, except for you. It’s sad Paul.

Also...the cost of the camera means nothing at this point. My $1300 camera produces images that are indistinguishable from the images that come from the camera that cost us $30000. Guess which one has also made us the most money in the past year? The $1300 one we now own 3 of. The 6k model they released for $2500 is even better. That’s my current favorite camera. You should check them out. They’re far from “cheap cameras”. They will outperform anything you’ve ever got video on.

Paul Markham · 11-07-2019, 06:38 AM

Thank you candyflip for putting me right, I've always mistakenly thought the content of the product, the model, way it was shot, director, lighting, audio, pro lens and camera, etc Mattered before getting cheap camera that shoots 4K because the only thing customers want is 4K.

I see why you're reluctant to show samples making me feel small about my opinion.

candyflip · 11-07-2019, 07:43 AM

You can get a job at McDonald’s and check some of my work out. It’s used globally in training materials.

If you think I’m going to jeopardize a 7 figure contract with one of my company’s most recognizable clients, you’ve got another thing coming.

For the 100th time, because you senile brain has gone to shit...nothing is important if people aren’t hiring you because you aren’t delivering footage to them at the current minimum standards. 4K is the minimum, whether it looks good or looks like shit. That’s where we are at. That is why clients demand. For a host of reasons why, too. In 2019, if you’re not shooting 4K...you’re not getting hired.

Refuse to accept this, get left behind. Something you seem to know all about, right? Getting left behind?

celandina · 11-07-2019, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

Sounds like you don’t get it, much like Paul doesn’t get it. People aren’t shooting 4K and higher to display in 4K and higher. They’re shooting these resolutions because of what you’re able to do with the footage in post.

Pretty sad to see folks who create and market content who lack the ability to understand the simple basics for content creation.

It seems that you are sucking and blowing at the same time

The OP never talked about any post. Just shooting and DELIVERING !!! 4 K videos. So go figure ? On the other hand, you do NOT need to be an expert to understand that "higher the resolution, more possibilities to fix production errors or create better SGI effects". Now tell me what porn producer worries about cables in the images, photograpehr's flashes or other like issues. Now, when somebody can figure out how the romove the full " Bimbo look" in the post ( fish lips, botox cheeks and ass, ugly tattoos, deformed plastic boobs, brooms instead of eyebrows etc...), I will switch to 16 K immediately. Failing that, you are just full of hot air and being insulting to all ....

celandina · 11-07-2019, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

Again, no one said that those things aren’t important. Not one person. But if you’re gear isn’t current and up to the standards clients are demanding, none of those matter. It’s as simple as that. You just refuse to ever admit you are wrong or don’t have the slightest clue what you’re talking about. It’s obvious to all of us, except for you. It’s sad Paul.

Also...the cost of the camera means nothing at this point. My $1300 camera produces images that are indistinguishable from the images that come from the camera that cost us $30000. Guess which one has also made us the most money in the past year? The $1300 one we now own 3 of. The 6k model they released for $2500 is even better. That’s my current favorite camera. You should check them out. They’re far from “cheap cameras”. They will outperform anything you’ve ever got video on.

Oh my God, you better advise these producers who shot recently with really old cameras and 35 mm film ..grain an all. They must be a outdated as Paul...

celandina · 11-07-2019, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

But Paul is gonna say, "that Zimmerman guy ain't no Bob Dylan! Besides, the Times don't change; they've been the Times Of London for years."

We shoot with old Redcams capable of shooting 4 K yet we so far never used the 4 K. We shoot in 2K.

candyflip · 11-07-2019, 10:01 AM

Yet I'm the one who's small team has multiple 7 figure contracts with companies like Facebook, McDonald's and Merck...just to name a few. $4 million this year alone, all shot on "cheap" cameras as Paul puts it.

I don't believe for a second you've even touched a RED camera (which everyone is aware are just garbage off the shelf components in a pretty shell) based on your ridiculous comments above. Very few people are shooting higher resolutions to deliver. It doesn't seem that either you or Paul understands this. Unless you're a YouTuber, most are delivering still in HD. That doesn't make shooting in higher resolutions a waste of resources. Anyone who's had their hands a RED knows why you'd shoot at such large resolutions and they wouldn't spend the money and not put the camera to full use. They also wouldn't make stupid comparisons like you're attempting to do

sadiedazzle · 11-08-2019, 12:38 AM

I shoot in 4k and deliver in 2k. I also shoot in 6k and deliver in about 6 different sizes. In 2019, why is this even a discussion?

Here is some 6k

Paul Markham · 11-08-2019, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina

It seems that you are sucking and blowing at the same time

The OP never talked about any post. Just shooting and DELIVERING !!! 4 K videos. So go figure ? On the other hand, you do NOT need to be an expert to understand that "higher the resolution, more possibilities to fix production errors or create better SGI effects". Now tell me what porn producer worries about cables in the images, photograpehr's flashes or other like issues. Now, when somebody can figure out how the romove the full " Bimbo look" in the post ( fish lips, botox cheeks and ass, ugly tattoos, deformed plastic boobs, brooms instead of eyebrows etc...), I will switch to 16 K immediately. Failing that, you are just full of hot air and being insulting to all ....

The camera is less important than the overall quality of the content. That's not saying the camera doesn't matter, it's not saying don't buy a 4K camera. I am saying don't buy cheap amateur cameras with cheap amateur lenses which CF is saying. Maybe that's all he can afford.

Paul Markham · 11-08-2019, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

Yet I'm the one who's small team has multiple 7 figure contracts with companies like Facebook, McDonald's and Merck...just to name a few. $4 million this year alone, all shot on "cheap" cameras as Paul puts it.

I don't believe for a second you've even touched a RED camera (which everyone is aware are just garbage off the shelf components in a pretty shell) based on your ridiculous comments above. Very few people are shooting higher resolutions to deliver. It doesn't seem that either you or Paul understands this. Unless you're a YouTuber, most are delivering still in HD. That doesn't make shooting in higher resolutions a waste of resources. Anyone who's had their hands a RED knows why you'd shoot at such large resolutions and they wouldn't spend the money and not put the camera to full use. They also wouldn't make stupid comparisons like you're attempting to do

You have failed to show you've shot a porn video, no site, no samples, no customers showing what you delivered.

I never said "shooting in higher resolutions a waste of resources." I said it was secondary, which means it's not the most important thing. You disagree and think it is the most important. Let your customers decide.

If you shot for a corporate clients the last place you would be posting is on a porn board called Go Fuck Yourself, the slimmest chance of someone from that corporation reading this and knowing who posts it exposes your lies. Also corporate clients put the quality of work way above the resolution of the camera. Not saying it's not important, just not as important as you insist.

Paul Markham · 11-08-2019, 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

I shoot in 4k and deliver in 2k. I also shoot in 6k and deliver in about 6 different sizes. In 2019, why is this even a discussion?

Here is some 6k

Exactly. Why are people even discussing the importance of the product content over the camera quality is pointless. No surfer ever became a member to get a video in 4k. Your site proves what's important. Models, niche, direction, lighting, way it's shot, camera work, audio, etc.

The same as in mainstream movies, no one ever gave an award just because of the camera it was shot on. Candyflip is arguing the camera is the most important.

Back in the day I shot on Beta Cam, edited Beta to Beta then duplicated onto VHS. Doing what you're doing is sensible and simple. Is it as important and hard as getting the product right? NO.

MaDalton · 11-08-2019, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

The camera is less important than the overall quality of the content. That's not saying the camera doesn't matter, it's not saying don't buy a 4K camera. I am saying don't buy cheap amateur cameras with cheap amateur lenses which CF is saying. Maybe that's all he can afford.

i'm surely no fan of Candyflip but he's right when he says that the Blackmagic cameras blow everything out of the water you ever laid your hands on.

you seem to have enough time on your hands to troll here, maybe use it to educate yourself instead: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products

Konda · 11-08-2019, 05:23 AM

You know what's even more important than the camera or the lighting or the model these days? Mone, marketing and contacts. You can have the best content in the world, but without a big budget, the right marketing and the right contacts you won't get any sales.

celandina · 11-08-2019, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

Yet I'm the one who's small team has multiple 7 figure contracts with companies like Facebook, McDonald's and Merck...just to name a few. $4 million this year alone, all shot on "cheap" cameras as Paul puts it.

I don't believe for a second you've even touched a RED camera (which everyone is aware are just garbage off the shelf components in a pretty shell) based on your ridiculous comments above. Very few people are shooting higher resolutions to deliver. It doesn't seem that either you or Paul understands this. Unless you're a YouTuber, most are delivering still in HD. That doesn't make shooting in higher resolutions a waste of resources. Anyone who's had their hands a RED knows why you'd shoot at such large resolutions and they wouldn't spend the money and not put the camera to full use. They also wouldn't make stupid comparisons like you're attempting to do

You are correct, I have never touched our Red cams, or our lights, or never pushed our PeeWee dolly. I have also never held a boom or recorded sound.....I can go on what else I have never done.. I am a producer, I find money to shoot the shit ( adult and mainstream) and make sure it gets finished on time and budget. And after I pay the banks or investors I own the shit...and yes sometime I direct the shit...I am NOT " one man band" working for somebody like you, I work for myself. I have a crew when I shoot, about 25 people for the adult stuff and up to a 100 for the mainstream.

So proudly I state that the 4K info I have posted I got from my "post geeks" and NO, even with all that jazz I do not gross 4 million like you. You must be a genius and very good businessman or a great liar. I am pretty sure which one it is....

sadiedazzle · 11-08-2019, 02:39 PM

i'm surely no fan of Candyflip but he's right when he says that the Blackmagic cameras blow everything out of the water you ever laid your hands on.

I not quite sure about that. The Panasonic gh5 and the full frame S1??. Look pretty equal. Have you shot with both, Stefan?

badgirlfilms · 11-09-2019, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

i'm surely no fan of Candyflip but he's right when he says that the Blackmagic cameras blow everything out of the water you ever laid your hands on.

I not quite sure about that. The Panasonic gh5 and the full frame S1??. Look pretty equal. Have you shot with both, Stefan?

I HAVE BOTH Gh5 and a Black magic. Candyflip is correct..you need to shoot w/ the new minimums ..The client can choose how they would like to receive the footage. and I've seen the Black magic up against a $50k Alexa...hardly a difference.

The Porn Nerd · 11-09-2019, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konda

You know what's even more important than the camera or the lighting or the model these days? Mone, marketing and contacts. You can have the best content in the world, but without a big budget, the right marketing and the right contacts you won't get any sales.

But what about Google? Doesn't sucking Big G's dick solve everything???

sadiedazzle · 11-09-2019, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgirlfilms

I HAVE BOTH Gh5 and a Black magic. Candyflip is correct..you need to shoot w/ the new minimums ..The client can choose how they would like to receive the footage. and I've seen the Black magic up against a $50k Alexa...hardly a difference.

I have shot with the G4, G5, The Alexa Amira, The Red Dragon, though not the Black Magic. There is a huge difference on the big screen. Otherwise everyone would be shooting movies on 1300 dollar cameras and i phones.

badgirlfilms · 11-09-2019, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina

Oh my God, you better advise these producers who shot recently with really old cameras and 35 mm film ..grain an all. They must be a outdated as Paul...

Bottom 2 films were box office BOMBS...so what's your point

badgirlfilms · 11-09-2019, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

I have shot with the G4, G5, The Alexa Amira, The Red Dragon, though not the Black Magic. There is a huge difference on the big screen. Otherwise everyone would be shooting movies on 1300 dollar cameras and i phones.

Next time I decide to show a twerking ass on an IMAX screen, I'll bump up my camera equip.

And more films have been shot on iPhones and are showing on Netflix. Indie film makers are rocking..Like the director of Shazam and Light's Out...All his earlier stuff to get noticed was shot on the BMPCC 4k...All the DVD extras on Shazam He shot on his same BMPCC 4k

wtf is this thread about, I forgot

OneHungLo · 11-09-2019, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgirlfilms

Next time I decide to show a twerking ass on an IMAX screen, I'll bump up my camera equip.

Paul Markham · 11-10-2019, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

i'm surely no fan of Candyflip but he's right when he says that the Blackmagic cameras blow everything out of the water you ever laid your hands on.

you seem to have enough time on your hands to troll here, maybe use it to educate yourself instead: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products

I'm not disputing that the camera is an important part of filming anything. I'm saying other factors matter more than the camera. Not only are the other considerations more important they are also harder to master than spending $1500 on an amateur 4k camera. Maybe that's why CF thinks it's the most important.

Blackmagic looks good. But giving that to a bad cameraman, on a poor budget does not produce better quality than a good cameraman on good HD equipment. Especially for viewing on the Internet.

Paul Markham · 11-10-2019, 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konda

You know what's even more important than the camera or the lighting or the model these days? Mone, marketing and contacts. You can have the best content in the world, but without a big budget, the right marketing and the right contacts you won't get any sales.

Why do all these comparisons include one side having no marketing?

Can you get better results with a poor product and a big budget for marketing V a great product with a fair budget for marketing?

thommy · 11-10-2019, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Why do all these comparisons include one side having no marketing?

Can you get better results with a poor product and a big budget for marketing V a great product with a fair budget for marketing?

define marketing

there are many examples where poor products are sold through either a big marketing budget OR a good marketing idea and there are also examples where good products failed that had a big budget.

marketing is much much more than "selling" because sales are the results of a good marketing that starts already BEFORE a product is even produced.

maybe you should try to inform yourself what "marketing" really means before you use it as an argument in a discussion.

sadiedazzle · 11-10-2019, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgirlfilms

Next time I decide to show a twerking ass on an IMAX screen, I'll bump up my camera equip.

And more films have been shot on iPhones and are showing on Netflix. Indie film makers are rocking..Like the director of Shazam and Light's Out...All his earlier stuff to get noticed was shot on the BMPCC 4k...All the DVD extras on Shazam He shot on his same BMPCC 4k

wtf is this thread about, I forgot

Its simple. S.I.S.O. and there will always be "indie" successes like the Blair Witch Project.

thommy · 11-10-2019, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

Its simple. S.I.S.O. and there will always be "indie" successes like the Blair Witch Project.

good example

i think there was no movie I have ever seen that was less professional made than this one.
not sure if they could not do better or if they did not want to do better.

The Porn Nerd · 11-10-2019, 11:53 AM

A talented photographer can make an amazing image using an old Kodak camera from 1929. A hack can have the best equipment and produce shit.

End of discussion?

badgirlfilms · 11-10-2019, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

A talented photographer can make an amazing image using an old Kodak camera from 1929. A hack can have the best equipment and produce shit.

End of discussion?

That would be the end of the discussion...IF THAT WAS THE DISCUSSION...it is not, so the thread must continue off topic for another 5 pages.

sadiedazzle · 11-10-2019, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgirlfilms

That would be the end of the discussion...IF THAT WAS THE DISCUSSION...it is not, so the thread must continue off topic for another 5 pages.

Here is where your business thread got hi jacked by someone who is no longer in the business:

"What you shoot with is secondary. It's all down to how and what you shoot. The positive thing about tubes is few buy porn blind, they will look for the free videos on tubes before buying or not buying. So it has to be good."....Paul Markham

The Porn Nerd · 11-10-2019, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgirlfilms

That would be the end of the discussion...IF THAT WAS THE DISCUSSION...it is not, so the thread must continue off topic for another 5 pages.

Haha sorry man - I got hooked by that Paul Markham troll mojo. My bad.

MaDalton · 11-10-2019, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

I'm not disputing that the camera is an important part of filming anything. I'm saying other factors matter more than the camera. Not only are the other considerations more important they are also harder to master than spending $1500 on an amateur 4k camera. Maybe that's why CF thinks it's the most important.

Blackmagic looks good. But giving that to a bad cameraman, on a poor budget does not produce better quality than a good cameraman on good HD equipment. Especially for viewing on the Internet.

There is no good cameraman with HD equipment in 2019

Paul Markham · 11-11-2019, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

There is no good cameraman with HD equipment in 2019

What has that got to do with this discussion?

Paul Markham · 11-11-2019, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

Here is where your business thread got hi jacked by someone who is no longer in the business:

"What you shoot with is secondary. It's all down to how and what you shoot. The positive thing about tubes is few buy porn blind, they will look for the free videos on tubes before buying or not buying. So it has to be good."....Paul Markham

So tell me specifically where my statement is wrong?

Can the Internet convey 4K movies without having them reduced down to a smaller size?

Can it make a bad camera man into a good one?

Are things like lenses, lighting, audio, camera less important than buying a 4K camera?

Are directing, model selection, location, etc less important than the camera?

Anyone who can't afford $1500 for a camera shouldn't be in the business, but it doesn't define a good product that will sell in 2019. If it did everyone here would be a lot richer.

What people should do when canvassing for work is show how good there work is so people can see there skills. If you don't have a site where that's possible buying a 4K camera won't solve the problems.

MaDalton · 11-11-2019, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

But giving that to a bad cameraman, on a poor budget does not produce better quality than a good cameraman on good HD equipment. Especially for viewing on the Internet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

There is no good cameraman with HD equipment in 2019

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

What has that got to do with this discussion?

celandina · 11-11-2019, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badgirlfilms

Bottom 2 films were box office BOMBS...so what's your point

Sorry you have missed it

My point was, if you know what you are doing you can achieve great visual results shooting with OLD media (film) and with old cameras and lenses. FYI: That the movie bombed has no influence on the matter. I was NOT talking content but a visual quality.

thommy · 11-11-2019, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

So tell me specifically where my statement is wrong?

Can the Internet convey 4K movies without having them reduced down to a smaller size?

Can it make a bad camera man into a good one?

Are things like lenses, lighting, audio, camera less important than buying a 4K camera?

Are directing, model selection, location, etc less important than the camera?

Anyone who can't afford $1500 for a camera shouldn't be in the business, but it doesn't define a good product that will sell in 2019. If it did everyone here would be a lot richer.

What people should do when canvassing for work is show how good there work is so people can see there skills. If you don't have a site where that's possible buying a 4K camera won't solve the problems.

paul, are you aware that you really hijacking a thread that has NOTHING to do with your opinions?

the threat title is:

Any companies looking for 4k EXCLUSIVE SHOOTING

do you really believe that people that are working in internet are so dumb that they buy EXCLUSIVE content only for internet?

do you really believe that we all are like you and think internet will never move forward?

do you really believe that even a compressed low bandwith version from a 4k video will be better as to compress it from SD or HD ?

you have such a little clue about the day work from those who make the money at the end, that you should really stay out of such threads with your always yesterday opinions.

you have NEVER made money with users - you made money because there where always people that KNEW HOW TO MAKE money.
so you are really the last person that can be helpful.

sadiedazzle · 11-11-2019, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thommy

you have NEVER made money with users - you made money because there where always people that KNEW HOW TO MAKE money.
so you are really the last person that can be helpful.

Tilt....lets discuss something more exciting, new, fresh and different. Is content or traffic king. Paul?

Mickey_ · 11-11-2019, 03:59 PM

Takeaway: If you want exposure for your thread, contact Paul. Out with the sticky threads, in with PM's exclusive services.

Paul Markham · 11-12-2019, 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

You think the camera is more important than the person using it. I disagree and know you're wrong.

You think buying a 4K camera is something only skilled cameramen are allowed to do. I disagree and know you're wrong.

Klen · 11-12-2019, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

Tilt....lets discuss something more exciting, new, fresh and different. Is content or traffic king. Paul?

Dont... poke.... the devil

Paul Markham · 11-12-2019, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina

Sorry you have missed it

My point was, if you know what you are doing you can achieve great visual results shooting with OLD media (film) and with old cameras and lenses. FYI: That the movie bombed has no influence on the matter. I was NOT talking content but a visual quality.

I've boldened and enlarged your mistake. A lot of posts here are from people with no clue about shooting anything and argue with people who've shot content most of their life. That a camera is more important than the person using it, some one even suggests only good cameramen can buy them.

Paul Markham · 11-12-2019, 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sadiedazzle

Tilt....lets discuss something more exciting, new, fresh and different. Is content or traffic king. Paul?

Content, content, content.

Today the biggest sites with the most traffic are the ones with the best content, some are even willing to pay for it. Take the content off tubes and they're no longer the biggest sites with the most traffic.

No one has ever spent a lot of time promoting shit, because the people with enough traffic want the best conversions. Those come from kick ass tours with great content on.

Getting traffic is easy, $5 a 1,000 or less. OK it's shit traffic, but you can only buy shit content for shit money. If you have great content surfers are willing to pays for you can afford to buy traffic. How do you think Google makes it's money. Take the content off Google, it dies.

Getting good content is the hardest thing to do and why so many people have to generate traffic for free.

11-06-2019, 06:53 AM	#52
candyflip Carpe Visio Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New York Posts: 43,030	Paul, it’s obvious you haven’t bothered to keep up with current technology with regards to cameras. High quality images can be had for very little money. You’ve shown us here that you don’t get 4K and why people are and should be shooting it. You’ve shown us that you don’t have the slightest clue what the current crop of cameras is capable of, nor do you have the slightest idea of what would be involved in processing any of the footage from these cameras. You don’t understand the capabilities of the codecs. No one is arguing that lighting or composition isn’t important. But if you’re shooting that on HD cameras in a world clients and projects demand 4K and up, none of that matters. You’re not going to get hired. I have said nothing more than this and will continue to do so. You’re brain Is just going to mush and you won’t ever get it. I will keep this going with the hope that the OP gets some eyes on his thread and can get some bites on his offer. __________________ Spend you some brain. Email Me

11-06-2019, 09:24 AM	#54
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 91,632	__________________ Join the SWAG Affiliate Asian Live Cam Program, which offers non-saturated Asian models and exclusive material. After registration and placing the link on your website, you can receive 2 free backlinks to commemorate our collaboration.

11-07-2019, 01:47 AM	#58
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Why was I so stupid to suggest the subject matter, the way it's shot, lighting, audio, lens, camera, etc are more important. Thank you all you knowledgeable guys for showing me the errors of my ways. Ditch what I said and just buy a cheap amateur 4K camera because that will suffice. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

11-07-2019, 06:38 AM	#60
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Thank you candyflip for putting me right, I've always mistakenly thought the content of the product, the model, way it was shot, director, lighting, audio, pro lens and camera, etc Mattered before getting cheap camera that shoots 4K because the only thing customers want is 4K. I see why you're reluctant to show samples making me feel small about my opinion. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

11-07-2019, 10:01 AM	#65
candyflip Carpe Visio Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New York Posts: 43,030	Yet I'm the one who's small team has multiple 7 figure contracts with companies like Facebook, McDonald's and Merck...just to name a few. $4 million this year alone, all shot on "cheap" cameras as Paul puts it. I don't believe for a second you've even touched a RED camera (which everyone is aware are just garbage off the shelf components in a pretty shell) based on your ridiculous comments above. Very few people are shooting higher resolutions to deliver. It doesn't seem that either you or Paul understands this. Unless you're a YouTuber, most are delivering still in HD. That doesn't make shooting in higher resolutions a waste of resources. Anyone who's had their hands a RED knows why you'd shoot at such large resolutions and they wouldn't spend the money and not put the camera to full use. They also wouldn't make stupid comparisons like you're attempting to do __________________ Spend you some brain. Email Me

11-06-2019, 02:57 AM	#51
Ferus Bye - Left to do stuff Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 4,109	#50 times Paul should have kept his mouth shut

11-07-2019, 07:43 AM	#61
candyflip Carpe Visio Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New York Posts: 43,030	You can get a job at McDonald’s and check some of my work out. It’s used globally in training materials. If you think I’m going to jeopardize a 7 figure contract with one of my company’s most recognizable clients, you’ve got another thing coming. For the 100th time, because you senile brain has gone to shit...nothing is important if people aren’t hiring you because you aren’t delivering footage to them at the current minimum standards. 4K is the minimum, whether it looks good or looks like shit. That’s where we are at. That is why clients demand. For a host of reasons why, too. In 2019, if you’re not shooting 4K...you’re not getting hired. Refuse to accept this, get left behind. Something you seem to know all about, right? Getting left behind?

11-08-2019, 12:38 AM	#66
sadiedazzle Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 972	I shoot in 4k and deliver in 2k. I also shoot in 6k and deliver in about 6 different sizes. In 2019, why is this even a discussion? Here is some 6k

11-08-2019, 05:23 AM	#71
Konda ... Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 2,280	You know what's even more important than the camera or the lighting or the model these days? Mone, marketing and contacts. You can have the best content in the world, but without a big budget, the right marketing and the right contacts you won't get any sales.

11-08-2019, 02:39 PM	#73
sadiedazzle Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 972	i'm surely no fan of Candyflip but he's right when he says that the Blackmagic cameras blow everything out of the water you ever laid your hands on. I not quite sure about that. The Panasonic gh5 and the full frame S1??. Look pretty equal. Have you shot with both, Stefan?

11-10-2019, 11:53 AM	#85
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,249	A talented photographer can make an amazing image using an old Kodak camera from 1929. A hack can have the best equipment and produce shit. End of discussion? __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold (Coming Soon) Over 90 paysites to promote! ICQ: 579915163 Skype: peabodymedia

11-11-2019, 03:59 PM	#96
Mickey_ Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Worldwide Posts: 4,238	Takeaway: If you want exposure for your thread, contact Paul. Out with the sticky threads, in with PM's exclusive services. __________________ LifeSelector Affiliates - Make money today promoting the online porn of tomorrow. mb [at] lifeselector.com