Why have the 9/11 Pentagon Vids of the plane crash never been released? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

SmokeyTheBear · 08-25-2007, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

Once again if this is a reason to base a conspiracy on then i think you are nuts.

once again i have yet to see anyone base a conspiracy on this.. but i think you misunderstand the meaning of conspiracy.. a consipracy is an act between 2 or more people to commit an illegal act. 9/11 was a conpiracy , some people just disagree on who the conspiracy involved. If what you meant to say was " lack of the video does not prove high ranking usa government officials were involved in 9/11 and anyone who thinks it does is an idiot" then i agree with you and i dont think anyone wouldnt..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

Why they dont show the video? Because they dont have to.

thats awfully thoughtfull of them for the hundreds of families that lost their lives and would like some closure. and the public that has alot of questions considering the people invloved " the pilot who crashed into the pentagon once worked at the pentagon specifically on how to avoid planes crashing into it

" so regardless of what you feel or i feel , lots of people have questions , and i think they deserve and answer because thats what a democracy is about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

Its pretty standard procedure if a gov related attack is videotaped that the tapes dont become public.

i haven't heard about 1 single one. When tapes of things are known to exist they always become public.. if we didnt know tapes exists we dont know they didnt exist thus we wouldnt know its standard procedure

if it was "standard procedure" why would they release the crappy grainy footage. wouldnt that be "non-standard procedure" , then years later they announce they will finally release a better copy , and they released the same crappy footage with like 2 extra frames..

so with years to think about it they again ignore "standard procedure" and release a second tape hmm. but they cant release the camera that has crystal clear footage and ANYONE with an internet connection could have viewed it if they were watching that day...

GITZINGER · 08-25-2007, 04:09 PM

conspiracy cake.

Phoenix · 08-25-2007, 04:12 PM

as usual franck is all hate and venom

Fletch XXX · 08-25-2007, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GITZINGER

conspiracy cake.

mmm cake

Phoenix · 08-25-2007, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

mmm cake

wow you have a lot of gay pics handy today

Porno Dan · 08-25-2007, 07:20 PM

This is insane I was at my office in Arlington when the plant hit the pentagon, I was on the 12th floor and our floor shook. One of the girls at my company's Mom died when the plane hit near her office. Anyone who thinks there was some government conspiracy was obviously not anywhere near DC.

Phoenix · 08-25-2007, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porno Dan

This is insane I was at my office in Arlington when the plant hit the pentagon, I was on the 12th floor and our floor shook. One of the girls at my company's Mom died when the plane hit near her office. Anyone who thinks there was some government conspiracy was obviously not anywhere near DC.

did you see the plane?

if not...it could have been anything

Minte · 08-25-2007, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

did you see the plane?

if not...it could have been anything

This was not produced by three kids in a dorm room.

http://www.history.com/search.do?act... Conspiracies

Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.

Rating: TVPG

Running Time: 120 minutes

SmokeyTheBear · 08-25-2007, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte

This was not produced by three kids in a dorm room.

http://www.history.com/search.do?act... Conspiracies

Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.

Rating: TVPG

Running Time: 120 minutes

and yet they cant explain why the most obvious evidence ( the videos ) cant be shown.. ( the topic of this thread )

running time 1 second..

teg0 · 08-25-2007, 08:00 PM

Hoooray Everyone Is An Expert

SmokeyTheBear · 08-25-2007, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teg0

Hoooray Everyone Is An Expert

hooray you didn't read the thread..

he simply asked why they haven't released the video.. do you need an expert to explain to you why the tapes haven't been released ?

jonesonyou · 08-25-2007, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

why would the federal government NOT confiscate videos of an attack on the nations military headquarters? you would have to be pretty ignorant to not understand the basic security issues the come into play if such videos existed.

why would they or why should they release them? i dont think any government is in the habit of releasing videos of successful attacks on their most high value military targets to the general public. i would hope that would be common sense to most people... but apparently its not.

why does that prove any sort of conspiracy? all it would prove is that there are highly sensitive videos that aren't being released for security reasons.

i am not going to reply in this thread. i am just a little stunned sometimes at the stupidity of this industry and the people in it.

why not devote this energy towards doing something that actually matters like stopping governments from slowly destroying you and the industry you are in, in making more money, making sure credit card processors don't finally pull the plug on you like AMEX did, stopping people from ripping off and distributing your content via torrents/p2p networks, stopping people from hijacking your traffic and sales with spyware and so on.

there can't possibly be an industry on this planet with a greater collective stupidity than this one. i bet if you took 100 random pornographers and put them up against 100 random, inbred, uneducated kentucky hillbillies on a game show, the hillbillies would beat the shit out of the pornographers in any contest that requires thought, analysis and basic problem solving.

Yes about not releasing the tape. From both points. Being Terrorists foreign or domestic.

SmokeyTheBear · 08-25-2007, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

Did you read my posts at all? Once again its the fucking Pentagon! They dont release tapes just to please people like you.

actually they did , twice.. so straight up your wrong. they do and have

Ripshit · 08-25-2007, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz

so if no plane hit the pentagon then all those supposed "dead" people who have families.

those "families" would all be on in the conspiracy theory, my my, thats alot of extra people isnt it, who now all have to lie and say their family members died for the rest of their lives

couple of hundred family members of those who died now all have to "lie"

if it really was a conspiracy theory, then bush administration deserves the prize of the universe for the most sophisticated plan ever in the history of time.

lets not forget all the people on the scene at the pentagon, fire fighters, police, military officials etc etc.

or....

logical explanation:
bunch of pissed of terrorists flew a plane into it.

Your Generation is Blind!
Do you remember VIETNAM!?

BusterBunny · 08-25-2007, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LilBro

they just had this week all about the conspiracy theories....they had scientists, specialists etc.... was very interesting. they proved all these theories wrong....i think it was history channel, will be on all month i am sure...

its on right now but i think its almost over

Ripshit · 08-25-2007, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit

Your Generation is Blind!
Do you remember VIETNAM!?

Try a couple of hundred fucking Thousand!!!!!! Can you imagine???

SmokeyTheBear · 08-25-2007, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

why would the federal government NOT confiscate videos of an attack on the nations military headquarters? you would have to be pretty ignorant to not understand the basic security issues the come into play if such videos existed.

you mean like the videos they already released that completely contradicts your theory.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

why would they or why should they release them?

because this is a democracy still ( kinda ) , and the majority of people would like to see it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i dont think any government is in the habit of releasing videos of successful attacks on their most high value military targets to the general public. i would hope that would be common sense to most people... but apparently its not.

once again you obviously dont follow the news.. they already did release tapes to the public of the exact scenario you just pointed out , not once but twice.

so to answer your question , yes

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

why does that prove any sort of conspiracy? all it would prove is that there are highly sensitive videos that aren't being released for security reasons.

and what security reason would that be ? any joe blow could look at several public cameras pointing directly at the pentagon. that wasn't a security problem so why would a tape of one of the most questionable terrorist acts of all time suddenly be a security risk. anyone can also just drive right by and get the same view

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i am not going to reply in this thread. i am just a little stunned sometimes at the stupidity of this industry and the people in it.

everyone says the same thing when they cant answer simple questions..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

why not devote this energy towards doing something that actually matters

everyone who died doesn't matter ? what about the war we started over this ? what about the thousands of american soldiers dying in iraq ? they don't matter ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

there can't possibly be an industry on this planet with a greater collective stupidity than this one. i bet if you took 100 random pornographers and put them up against 100 random, inbred, uneducated kentucky hillbillies on a game show, the hillbillies would beat the shit out of the pornographers in any contest that requires thought, analysis and basic problem solving.

what an ignorant statement. less people on gfy believe 9/11 was a conspiracy than the average american. so according to you that already puts us ahead of most americans..

Phoenix · 08-25-2007, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte

This was not produced by three kids in a dorm room.

http://www.history.com/search.do?act... Conspiracies

Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.

Rating: TVPG

Running Time: 120 minutes

you are right..it is an expertly done program...how nice of them to offer every single piece of thought you might need to convince yourself once and for all that this was not an inside job.

neatly packaged and all....beware the interweb...they be telling lies in there

pocketkangaroo · 08-25-2007, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

and yet they cant explain why the most obvious evidence ( the videos ) cant be shown.. ( the topic of this thread )

running time 1 second..

And you can't provide an explanation for what happened to the real plane that took off from the airport that day (since it didn't fly into the Pentagon). Seriously, find those people and your conspiracy theory has legs.

Ripshit · 08-25-2007, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

And you can't provide an explanation for what happened to the real plane that took off from the airport that day (since it didn't fly into the Pentagon). Seriously, find those people and your conspiracy theory has legs.

Yes you are CORRECT!And bo one ever knew if those Japanese planes actually made it bach to Japan the mornig of Preal!!!

It really makes you wonder when you really look deep into things and dont just brush off this with a "Fuck that shit hahaha" attitude!

Ann-Angelcom · 08-25-2007, 10:37 PM

I don't understand why when people post things in reply to a totally legit question, they don't stop and think about the answers they give for just one second.

Everyone's reply seems to be "oh because they simply do not show attacks like to the public".

WHAT ABOUT THE 900 VIDEOS OF THE PLANES FLYING INTO WTC!!!!!!!! WHY AREN'T THOSE CONFISCATED!??

It doesn't take a genius to see how the story just doesn't add up. Forget the physics, science, math, english, whatever your subject is that you feel you need to study to understand this. It's common sense. You see 900 shots of WTC and 0 of Pentagon. They tell you the footage shot of Pentagon attack is classified and you can't see it. AND YOU BELIEVE IT???

Common sense guys....common sense.

ronaldo · 08-25-2007, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

you are right..it is an expertly done program...how nice of them to offer every single piece of thought you might need to convince yourself once and for all that this was not an inside job.

neatly packaged and all....beware the interweb...they be telling lies in there

Did you see it and genuinely came to that conclusion, or because it contradicts what you believe, it's automatically horseshit and there's no reason to even bother watching?

I haven't seen it but really want to whether it supports what I believe or not. Just like I watched Loose Change. It made me look for answers...which I was able to find to my satisfaction.

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 01:00 AM

Smokey , the only video released of the pentagon crash was released as evidence in the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui.... which is why it eventually became available to the public.

if you just can't imagine why ANY nations government would not want to release videos to the general public showing a successful attack from every angle, on its biggest and most important military target, then there is simply no reasoning with you.

i think its interesting that conspiracy theorists insist that their side is "fact" and any other answer, rebuttal, eyewitness account, expert testimony etc is just BS by brainwashed idiots. you have to be pretty fucking arrogant and disturbed to think like that.

there is a show right now on The History Channel that disputes 9/11 conspiracy theories point for point... but then of course, as always... they must be part of the conspiracy. who needs simple facts when you had your mind made up BEFORE the attack that the government was out to get out.

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 01:07 AM

"government was out to get out." = "government was out to get YOU."

s9ann0 · 08-26-2007, 01:35 AM

they could not find a betamax player to view them on

SmokeyTheBear · 08-26-2007, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

Smokey , the only video released of the pentagon crash was released as evidence in the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui.... which is why it eventually became available to the public.

wrong .. the video was released to the press before the trial and after the trial on two seperate occasions and either way thus solidifies my point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

if you just can't imagine why ANY nations government would not want to release videos to the general public showing a successful attack from every angle, on its biggest and most important military target, then there is simply no reasoning with you.

nice try , you tried to make some lame argument that a government would never let a video of an attack be shown , then i called you on the actual attack were talking about and the fact THE GOV RELEASED the video , now your backtracking..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i think its interesting that conspiracy theorists insist that their side is "fact" and any other answer, rebuttal, eyewitness account, expert testimony etc is just BS by brainwashed idiots. you have to be pretty fucking arrogant and disturbed to think like that.

i think its funny you make up "experts" out of thin air.. and call any question " conpiracy theorists"

the question is simple SEE THREAD TITLE and you have yet to give an answer nor have i seen an answer as to why they only released the crudest crappiest video they could when we KNOW there were several better cameras with full shots of the crash

your only argument yet is " security reasons" yet you cant seem to name 1 single reason why they would not show it for "security reasons"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

there is a show right now on The History Channel that disputes 9/11 conspiracy theories point for point...

then of course you should be able to answer the simple question posed in this thread title and end the thread right ... ?

were all waiting

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

but then of course, as always... they must be part of the conspiracy. who needs simple facts when you had your mind made up BEFORE the attack that the government was out to get out.

nice how you end it with a complete bullshit line you made up in your head. i havent said anything of the sort .. who needs simple facts when you had your mind made up that aliens controlled all baseballs and talked to you through a special communication device hidden in your cheerios ?

i personally dont believe any high ranking gov official knew 9/11 was going to take place on 9/11 , and guess what I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHY THEY HAVE NOT SHOWN THE VIDEO
and you have yet to give a satisfactory answer nor have i seen one that answers this.. so by all means let us know oh wise one

pocketkangaroo · 08-26-2007, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit

Yes you are CORRECT!And bo one ever knew if those Japanese planes actually made it bach to Japan the mornig of Preal!!!

It really makes you wonder when you really look deep into things and dont just brush off this with a "Fuck that shit hahaha" attitude!

I was more or less asking a question. Since you and the false flag guys seem to know the answer to everything that happened on 9/11, what happened to the real plane? It was filled with a bunch of people who thought they were going somewhere. Can you tell me what happened to that plane and those people on board?

Quagmire · 08-26-2007, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

I was more or less asking a question. Since you and the false flag guys seem to know the answer to everything that happened on 9/11, what happened to the real plane? It was filled with a bunch of people who thought they were going somewhere. Can you tell me what happened to that plane and those people on board?

You're painting with a pretty broad brush there. Having more questions and not accepting some of the answers being given doesn't make someone a tinfoil hat wearing wacko. Its the theories *some* of the theorists come up with that are wacko

For example, I can recall from the morning of 9/11 that they were interviewing eye witnesses who said they saw Flight 93 get shot down over Somerset PA. The morning of, as in within hours of the attacks taking place. Not interviews well after the fact. People were describing how it was shot out of the sky.

Which is a better way to remember the victims? As heroes because they crashed the plane in to the ground to save other innocent lives, or as the collateral damage of a country's security measures trying to protect itself from having another building hit?

Minte · 08-26-2007, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

you are right..it is an expertly done program...how nice of them to offer every single piece of thought you might need to convince yourself once and for all that this was not an inside job.

neatly packaged and all....beware the interweb...they be telling lies in there

It's not a matter of *thought*. It's a matter of facts,witnesses and solid evidence.
If we have a thread about Noah's Ark or the bigbang theory,then we need *thought*.

You mention neatly packaged. The creators of Loose Change are on their 3rd edit that they will be releasing on DVD.
This question probably justifies it's own thread.

How much $$$ are the Loose Change boys making on this?

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

wrong .. the video was released to the press before the trial and after the trial on two seperate occasions and either way thus solidifies my point.

nice try , you tried to make some lame argument that a government would never let a video of an attack be shown , then i called you on the actual attack were talking about and the fact THE GOV RELEASED the video , now your backtracking..

i think its funny you make up "experts" out of thin air.. and call any question " conpiracy theorists"

the question is simple SEE THREAD TITLE and you have yet to give an answer nor have i seen an answer as to why they only released the crudest crappiest video they could when we KNOW there were several better cameras with full shots of the crash

your only argument yet is " security reasons" yet you cant seem to name 1 single reason why they would not show it for "security reasons"

then of course you should be able to answer the simple question posed in this thread title and end the thread right ... ?

were all waiting

nice how you end it with a complete bullshit line you made up in your head. i havent said anything of the sort .. who needs simple facts when you had your mind made up that aliens controlled all baseballs and talked to you through a special communication device hidden in your cheerios ?

i personally dont believe any high ranking gov official knew 9/11 was going to take place on 9/11 , and guess what I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHY THEY HAVE NOT SHOWN THE VIDEO
and you have yet to give a satisfactory answer nor have i seen one that answers this.. so by all means let us know oh wise one

ooooooohhhh.... so its just about "the question" - the one i "refuse to answer" although i thought i gave a pretty good answer as to why they wouldn't be released... but that wasn't good enough? i didn't "answer the question"?

sorry..

well.. how's this?

DEAR FUCKING MORONS

all you have to do is look up why they weren't released. its part of the official record, its a question thats been asked time and time again. it isn't hard.... and shouldn't be hard... even for a bunch of fucking idiots that want others to believe they make money online. of course you fucking idiots make it hard because you are looking for an answer that isn't there and doesn't exist and you are not interested in the actual answer because it proves you're a complete asshole thats out of touch with reality.

why weren't the videos released?

they were all siezed by the FBI and in the custody of the Justice Dept as evidence should any further criminal charges be filed in relation to the attack ... just as the first two that were released as part of criminal procedings.

do you have to agree with that? no.
you have have to believe 100% everything you are told? no.
is that the official answer of the government? yes.

HAS YOUR QUESTION BEEN ANSWERED? yes.

i swear to fucking christ... you guys pretend you want an answer to a question and all of you fucking morons are too stupid to look it up.

and most of you fucking idiots flock around a few kids in a dorm room and other crackpots that make a living by giving you answers you want... rather than listening to actual experts that tell you how it is/was.

its exactly you type of people that end up in dangerous cults.

I wish all of you much luck in your future mass suicide.

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 09:02 AM

I wish some of you luck in the future. I'm sure its not easy being in the TOP99.9999% of the population that "gets it". I know you will find happiness as all people similar to you tend to do in a compound somewhere following the ramblings and rantings of your charismatic, pooly educated and convicted felon "guru" who will be often accused of being a pedophile, a psychotic lunatic, tax dodger and characterized as being extremely dangerous by those outsiders who just want to "bring you down" and who "don't understand" his divine authority.

you will always be comforted with the satisfaction of being right no matter what the facts are. your faith in what you want to believe will be unwaivering. you will always be satisfied that no one "gets it" outside of your group, right up until its final moments.

remember... always give the kool aid to your kids first, make sure they have totally stopped breathing before you drink the kool aid. but you're all so clever, i'm sure you wouldn't skip that important detail.

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 09:07 AM

one more remembrance for kindred souls for you guys. i'm sure you felt their pain as you watched a fellow group of lunatics,... OOPS! i mean enlighted ones, following a child rapist ... OOPS! i mean Christ on earth, do the right thing.

geeknik · 08-26-2007, 09:08 AM

I don't give a shit. That's why.

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 09:10 AM

NEVER FORGET YOUR COMRADES!

http://www.cnn.com/US/9703/27/suicide/index.html

Mass suicide involved sedatives, vodka and careful planning

Coroner: 'It seemed to be a group decision'
March 27, 1997
Web posted at: 7:55 p.m. EST

DEL MAR, California (CNN) -- The 39 cult members found dead in a hilltop mansion apparently died in a carefully orchestrated suicide that involved sedatives, vodka and plastic bags possibly used to suffocate, officials said Thursday.

The victims apparently believed they were going to meet a UFO hiding behind the Hale-Bopp comet.

Ripshit · 08-26-2007, 10:17 AM

I think this thread is going way off base with Waco,Heavens gate,and conspiracy theorists here!
The bottom line is where are these tapes and why havent they been released?
Pleasurepays has stated his opinion of why they were never released time in and time out ,and I think the resoning behind this is very weak!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

why would the federal government NOT confiscate videos of an attack on the nations military headquarters? you would have to be pretty ignorant to not understand the basic security issues the come into play if such videos existed.

why would they or why should they release them? i dont think any government is in the habit of releasing videos of successful attacks on their most high value military targets to the general public. i would hope that would be common sense to most people... but apparently its not.

why does that prove any sort of conspiracy? all it would prove is that there are highly sensitive videos that aren't being released for security reasons.

Security reasons?
Im just not seeing your point on this at all what kind of major security breach are we talking about here?
Anyone can go to Washington and take pics or videos of the Pentagon at anytime they so choose!
You can also Google map the place and see satalite images of the whole place!
Christ you could get a blue print if you wanted of the whole place at the library 35 years ago if you wanted with enough info to know whatever kind of info you wanted on this place!
Have you ever heard of the watergate break in?
Im just not buying the Security Bullshit at all and think that if the government released these tapes for public view it would certanly clear alot of things up in all directions!
Im not saying it did or didnt happen here at all but look at this and it may shed some light on the subject for you!
First I would like to point out I am not a big fan of these guys but what I do find strange is that the size of the hole was only 30feet across and a plane crashing into any building with a wing span of 140feet across would leave a much bigger hole!
Look at the other (exact) plane crashes on the trade center buildings,and you tell me if the holes were only 30 feet across in a perfect circle!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=T_Fm3Zc7D8I

Ripshit · 08-26-2007, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit

the size of the hole was only 30feet across and a plane crashing into any building with a wing span of 140feet across would leave a much bigger hole!
Look at the other (exact) plane crashes on the trade center buildings,and you tell me if the holes were only 30 feet across in a perfect circle!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=T_Fm3Zc7D8I

Sorry my bad the hole was only 16 feet wide and if you look at the pics the windows on either side are perfectly intact!
Geeee thats strange

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 10:25 AM

you find every explanation "weak" thats why you are a conspiracy theorist.

you demand answers, ignore any relevant facts, cling to points that support what you have already decided to believe and argue and debate to affirm your own beliefs under the guise of "just asking"

jesus christ. at this point you guys are bringing up arguments taht have been debated into the ground for years as if the discussion is new and there have not been any explanations or there are none.

what does teh size of the hole in the pentagon have to do with anything? with your "question" - the size of the hole that was broadcast by every major news agency before it collapsed? nothing. you had to move on to a new argument, pretending they are connected to the "question" rather than deal with relevant facts and the explanation and answer to your question.

just because you find it weak doesn't mean something isn't true. its not up to the planet to prove something to YOU. if you are in doubt, its up to you to prove your case. not just ask questions, make weak/lame arguments and keep regurgitating teh same old lame theories and explanations that have been fully disputed and explained countless times as if the subject just came up yesterday.

the fact is YOU WANT to believe in a government conspiracy... everything else is just fluff that you use in a looose and sloppy manner to support the ideas you want to believe in. you are no different than any other weirdo cult member. no more rational and no more sane.

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit

Sorry my bad the hole was only 16 feet wide and if you look at the pics the windows on either side are perfectly intact!
Geeee thats strange

so now you choose to willfully ignore the fact that the pentagon is a heavily reinforced military building with blast resistant windows?

i can certainly understand why you would have to.

Ripshit · 08-26-2007, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

so now you choose to willfully ignore the fact that the pentagon is a heavily reinforced military building with blast resistant windows?

i can certainly understand why you would have to.

Blast resistant windows hmm ok what kind of exact pressure would a plane of that size going over 500 mph produce?

Jesus christ those are some strong fucking windows what are they made of and who makes them?

Lets look into this if you can produce evidence on the window maker and what they are made of etc I would be more apt to believe this again very weak and now your running in circles here.

Dirty F · 08-26-2007, 10:41 AM

Smokey, how can you be so obsessed about the Pentagon not wanting to release videos of a plane attacking the #1 military building in America (which is pretty obvious why and mentioned several times already) but a plane dissapearing if it was a missile, including its passengers is no problem for you. You dont even want to think about it. Minor detail. Also why use a missile if a plane was heading towards the Pentagon to crash it also is something you dont want to think about.

And why? Because it doesnt fit your lunatic conspiracy shit. Thats it. Thats all. If it was the other way around you would be crying about it like a madman. If it was a page from your conspiracy book then this wouldnt be a minor detail but it would proof once and for all that everything is a conspiracy.

Conspiracy idiots are such sad people.

Dirty F · 08-26-2007, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit

Blast resistant windows hmm ok what kind of exact pressure would a plane of that size going over 500 mph produce?

Jesus christ those are some strong fucking windows what are they made of and who makes them?

Lets look into this if you can produce evidence on the window maker and what they are made of etc I would be more apt to believe this again very weak and now your running in circles here.

God you are retarded. Look up your shit first because you think you can make everything up with your pea sized mind you stuppid faggot.

Dirty F · 08-26-2007, 10:45 AM

And please show us a pic of a 16 feet hole ripshit. You stupid fucking moron.

GrouchyAdmin · 08-26-2007, 10:47 AM

This thread is more embarrassing than that tart who failed basic geography. At least she looked good while being completely retarded.

Phoenix · 08-26-2007, 10:51 AM

they killed all the passengers...maybe even put them on one of the planes that got blown up that day..you know the one they disintegrated in the air

is that what everyone was not wanting to say?

Ripshit · 08-26-2007, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

God you are retarded. Look up your shit first because you think you can make everything up with your pea sized mind you stuppid faggot.

Let us pause.

Beyond the cited imagery, why would any rational person believe it could be a missile? - Because Donald Rumsfeld let it slip out during an interview with Parade Magazine, on October 12th, 2001; catching himself in one of his famous Freudian slips. Remember his Freudian view of draftees?

Rumsfeld: "Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center."
Now look that up why would he call it a missle?

Pleasurepays · 08-26-2007, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit

Blast resistant windows hmm ok what kind of exact pressure would a plane of that size going over 500 mph produce?

Jesus christ those are some strong fucking windows what are they made of and who makes them?

Lets look into this if you can produce evidence on the window maker and what they are made of etc I would be more apt to believe this again very weak and now your running in circles here.

typical conspiracy theorist.

i stated a fact.

heavily re-inforced building. blast resistant windows.

you summarily dismiss that and demand that i continue to prove things... when you really have nothing to say on the issue and can't disprove it with facts and mathematics.

i'm not running in circles. like every other conspiracy clown, you have to start bringing in other arguments because your first argument got shot down. not to mention the simple fact that if you really wanted to know the answer to the question, you could have just looked it up. its a matter of official record... not some lunatics opinion.

your question was "why weren't the videos released"

the answer to the question is "those videos are in the custody of the dept of justice pending any future prosecutions for the crime, as they are evidence"

thats the answer. doesn't get any more simple than that.

another reasonable answer is taht its pretty fucking obvious to anyone that isn't retarded that a government is not going to release videos to anyone that documents a successful attack on its military nerve center. not being able to at least understand that whether you agree with it or not just proves that you have absolutely no grasp on reality.

Ripshit · 08-26-2007, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

And please show us a pic of a 16 feet hole ripshit. You stupid fucking moron.

Ripshit · 08-26-2007, 11:02 AM

Several websites have claimed that photos show a debris free lawn in front of the Pentagon, and therefore this proves major anomalies in the attack. However, those sites generally show either photos taken long after the fire has been extinguished or photos that show signs of having been digitally altered.

Dirty F · 08-26-2007, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit

Cool, now show us the 16 feet hole dickshit.

Phoenix · 08-26-2007, 11:03 AM

Ripshit..dont forget about the light poles

the plane would have smashed up lots of light poles on its way in..yet they were just lying on t heir side..none of them were bent or broken u p or anything..just lying on the ground

08-25-2007, 04:09 PM	#52
GITZINGER Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: up your sisters ass Posts: 929	conspiracy cake. __________________ Your momma was a ho!!!

08-25-2007, 04:12 PM	#53
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	as usual franck is all hate and venom __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

08-25-2007, 07:20 PM	#56
Porno Dan Court Jester Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Budapest Posts: 6,342	This is insane I was at my office in Arlington when the plant hit the pentagon, I was on the 12th floor and our floor shook. One of the girls at my company's Mom died when the plane hit near her office. Anyone who thinks there was some government conspiracy was obviously not anywhere near DC. __________________ Reality TV Star, AVN Hall of Fame, Five-Time XBIZ Winner 2021 XBIZ Europe Winner Best Director Site Promote the sites where members get paid to get laid by their favorite porn stars

08-25-2007, 08:00 PM	#60
teg0 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Gringo in Puerto Rico Posts: 4,197	Hoooray Everyone Is An Expert __________________ OV Tube - Tube Script Software

08-25-2007, 10:37 PM	#71
Ann-Angelcom Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: new york Posts: 500	I don't understand why when people post things in reply to a totally legit question, they don't stop and think about the answers they give for just one second. Everyone's reply seems to be "oh because they simply do not show attacks like to the public". WHAT ABOUT THE 900 VIDEOS OF THE PLANES FLYING INTO WTC!!!!!!!! WHY AREN'T THOSE CONFISCATED!?? It doesn't take a genius to see how the story just doesn't add up. Forget the physics, science, math, english, whatever your subject is that you feel you need to study to understand this. It's common sense. You see 900 shots of WTC and 0 of Pentagon. They tell you the footage shot of Pentagon attack is classified and you can't see it. AND YOU BELIEVE IT??? Common sense guys....common sense. __________________ Digitalangeldollars.com 10% on all referrals!! NOW PAYING 75% OF ALL SALES!!!

08-26-2007, 01:00 AM	#73
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	Smokey , the only video released of the pentagon crash was released as evidence in the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui.... which is why it eventually became available to the public. if you just can't imagine why ANY nations government would not want to release videos to the general public showing a successful attack from every angle, on its biggest and most important military target, then there is simply no reasoning with you. i think its interesting that conspiracy theorists insist that their side is "fact" and any other answer, rebuttal, eyewitness account, expert testimony etc is just BS by brainwashed idiots. you have to be pretty fucking arrogant and disturbed to think like that. there is a show right now on The History Channel that disputes 9/11 conspiracy theories point for point... but then of course, as always... they must be part of the conspiracy. who needs simple facts when you had your mind made up BEFORE the attack that the government was out to get out.

08-26-2007, 01:07 AM	#74
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	"government was out to get out." = "government was out to get YOU."

08-26-2007, 01:35 AM	#75
s9ann0 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Boston Posts: 4,873	they could not find a betamax player to view them on

08-26-2007, 09:02 AM	#81
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	I wish some of you luck in the future. I'm sure its not easy being in the TOP99.9999% of the population that "gets it". I know you will find happiness as all people similar to you tend to do in a compound somewhere following the ramblings and rantings of your charismatic, pooly educated and convicted felon "guru" who will be often accused of being a pedophile, a psychotic lunatic, tax dodger and characterized as being extremely dangerous by those outsiders who just want to "bring you down" and who "don't understand" his divine authority. you will always be comforted with the satisfaction of being right no matter what the facts are. your faith in what you want to believe will be unwaivering. you will always be satisfied that no one "gets it" outside of your group, right up until its final moments. remember... always give the kool aid to your kids first, make sure they have totally stopped breathing before you drink the kool aid. but you're all so clever, i'm sure you wouldn't skip that important detail.

08-26-2007, 09:07 AM	#82
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	one more remembrance for kindred souls for you guys. i'm sure you felt their pain as you watched a fellow group of lunatics,... OOPS! i mean enlighted ones, following a child rapist ... OOPS! i mean Christ on earth, do the right thing.

08-26-2007, 09:08 AM	#83
geeknik l337 h4x0r!#% Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: OKC, OK, USA Posts: 8,364	I don't give a shit. That's why. __________________ hacker 4 hire.

08-26-2007, 09:10 AM	#84
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	NEVER FORGET YOUR COMRADES! http://www.cnn.com/US/9703/27/suicide/index.html Mass suicide involved sedatives, vodka and careful planning Coroner: 'It seemed to be a group decision' March 27, 1997 Web posted at: 7:55 p.m. EST DEL MAR, California (CNN) -- The 39 cult members found dead in a hilltop mansion apparently died in a carefully orchestrated suicide that involved sedatives, vodka and plastic bags possibly used to suffocate, officials said Thursday. The victims apparently believed they were going to meet a UFO hiding behind the Hale-Bopp comet.

08-26-2007, 10:25 AM	#87
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	you find every explanation "weak" thats why you are a conspiracy theorist. you demand answers, ignore any relevant facts, cling to points that support what you have already decided to believe and argue and debate to affirm your own beliefs under the guise of "just asking" jesus christ. at this point you guys are bringing up arguments taht have been debated into the ground for years as if the discussion is new and there have not been any explanations or there are none. what does teh size of the hole in the pentagon have to do with anything? with your "question" - the size of the hole that was broadcast by every major news agency before it collapsed? nothing. you had to move on to a new argument, pretending they are connected to the "question" rather than deal with relevant facts and the explanation and answer to your question. just because you find it weak doesn't mean something isn't true. its not up to the planet to prove something to YOU. if you are in doubt, its up to you to prove your case. not just ask questions, make weak/lame arguments and keep regurgitating teh same old lame theories and explanations that have been fully disputed and explained countless times as if the subject just came up yesterday. the fact is YOU WANT to believe in a government conspiracy... everything else is just fluff that you use in a looose and sloppy manner to support the ideas you want to believe in. you are no different than any other weirdo cult member. no more rational and no more sane.

08-26-2007, 10:41 AM	#90
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Smokey, how can you be so obsessed about the Pentagon not wanting to release videos of a plane attacking the #1 military building in America (which is pretty obvious why and mentioned several times already) but a plane dissapearing if it was a missile, including its passengers is no problem for you. You dont even want to think about it. Minor detail. Also why use a missile if a plane was heading towards the Pentagon to crash it also is something you dont want to think about. And why? Because it doesnt fit your lunatic conspiracy shit. Thats it. Thats all. If it was the other way around you would be crying about it like a madman. If it was a page from your conspiracy book then this wouldnt be a minor detail but it would proof once and for all that everything is a conspiracy. Conspiracy idiots are such sad people.

08-26-2007, 10:45 AM	#92
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	And please show us a pic of a 16 feet hole ripshit. You stupid fucking moron.

08-26-2007, 10:47 AM	#93
GrouchyAdmin Now choke yourself! Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 12,085	This thread is more embarrassing than that tart who failed basic geography. At least she looked good while being completely retarded. __________________ AIM: GrouchyGfy

08-26-2007, 10:51 AM	#94
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	they killed all the passengers...maybe even put them on one of the planes that got blown up that day..you know the one they disintegrated in the air is that what everyone was not wanting to say? __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

08-26-2007, 11:02 AM	#98
Ripshit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 951	Several websites have claimed that photos show a debris free lawn in front of the Pentagon, and therefore this proves major anomalies in the attack. However, those sites generally show either photos taken long after the fire has been extinguished or photos that show signs of having been digitally altered.

08-26-2007, 11:03 AM	#100
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	Ripshit..dont forget about the light poles the plane would have smashed up lots of light poles on its way in..yet they were just lying on t heir side..none of them were bent or broken u p or anything..just lying on the ground __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io