mpa3 or nats? elevated x? pros and cons? - GoFuckYourself.com

Phoenix · 07-21-2009, 07:15 PM

others?

lets hear it...im mostly looking for support issues

you know like when something goes wrong...who has your back?

if they make say 60 "test" accounts to your sites, and then those accounts get leaked on the password sites...do they help you cancel them all?

or leave it to you..and just ignore you?

would it take one of them 6 months to finally figure out what is wrong and set you up properly?

i need to know these things thanks

HorseShit · 07-21-2009, 07:38 PM

you've been here this long and are now just asking these questions?

Phoenix · 07-21-2009, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin

you've been here this long and are now just asking these questions?

when you learn to read between the lines..it will save us all from reading your well thought out comments

it is obvious one of those companies has been fucking me in the ass

HorseShit · 07-21-2009, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

it is obvious one of those companies has been fucking me in the ass

are you that frog in your sig?

geedub · 07-21-2009, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin

are you that frog in your sig?

you've got to be the current most worthless piece of shit on this board.

HorseShit · 07-21-2009, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geedub

you've got to be the current most worthless piece of shit on this board.

Thurbs · 07-21-2009, 07:56 PM

I could answer all of these questions for you

MPA vs NATS : NATS ( Bigger user base, more upgrades, more potential for B2B and imo B2C )

Elevated X : Be prepared to learn things, and lots of them, better then the other CMS products out there. I will give this to EVX, unlike other idiot companies, they take in code changes and code requests seriously. We had issues outside of their support, and asked if we could get some time with snippets of SRC to build a solution that they could roll in, and that was huge. Most companies are scared of this, but its foolish, b/c if you shun your customer long enough, he'll find something else.

As for NATS, the learning curve is pretty easy, advanced stuff is pretty steep. the more you play, the more you know. They are serious about their support, but they aren't babysitters. Often times I think people want them to admin the program, when they refuse to learn, and that just clogs up the queue.

Nothing is 100% un-hackable, un-leakable. Any time you have to interact with something, there is always room for exploits. I'd not suggest anyone judge software on that criteria unless you're willing to take into account how fast they reply.

We sent NATS for example a found exploit on Approval Pages, they fixed it for all clients within 3 hours and sent out an update ticket to all to run the file fix.

Phoenix · 07-21-2009, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thurbs

I could answer all of these questions for you

MPA vs NATS : NATS ( Bigger user base, more upgrades, more potential for B2B and imo B2C )

Elevated X : Be prepared to learn things, and lots of them, better then the other CMS products out there. I will give this to EVX, unlike other idiot companies, they take in code changes and code requests seriously. We had issues outside of their support, and asked if we could get some time with snippets of SRC to build a solution that they could roll in, and that was huge. Most companies are scared of this, but its foolish, b/c if you shun your customer long enough, he'll find something else.

As for NATS, the learning curve is pretty easy, advanced stuff is pretty steep. the more you play, the more you know. They are serious about their support, but they aren't babysitters. Often times I think people want them to admin the program, when they refuse to learn, and that just clogs up the queue.

Nothing is 100% un-hackable, un-leakable. Any time you have to interact with something, there is always room for exploits. I'd not suggest anyone judge software on that criteria unless you're willing to take into account how fast they reply.

We sent NATS for example a found exploit on Approval Pages, they fixed it for all clients within 3 hours and sent out an update ticket to all to run the file fix.

I'd not suggest anyone judge software on that criteria unless you're willing to take into account how fast they reply.

as usual man..on the ball...how about a reply in a timely matter...to let you know you are moving forward on the issue

munki · 07-21-2009, 08:28 PM

I'm all about Nats and Elevated, 2 great pieces of software, with strong teams to back.

07-21-2009, 07:15 PM	#1
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	mpa3 or nats? elevated x? pros and cons? others? lets hear it...im mostly looking for support issues you know like when something goes wrong...who has your back? if they make say 60 "test" accounts to your sites, and then those accounts get leaked on the password sites...do they help you cancel them all? or leave it to you..and just ignore you? would it take one of them 6 months to finally figure out what is wrong and set you up properly? i need to know these things thanks __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

07-21-2009, 08:28 PM	#9
munki Do Fun Shit. Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: OC Posts: 13,393	I'm all about Nats and Elevated, 2 great pieces of software, with strong teams to back. __________________ “I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.” -Oscar Wilde

07-21-2009, 07:38 PM	#2
HorseShit Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 17,513	you've been here this long and are now just asking these questions?

07-21-2009, 07:56 PM	#7
Thurbs The Thrilla in Manila Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Thurbs' Lagoon, Christmas Island Posts: 4,785	I could answer all of these questions for you MPA vs NATS : NATS ( Bigger user base, more upgrades, more potential for B2B and imo B2C ) Elevated X : Be prepared to learn things, and lots of them, better then the other CMS products out there. I will give this to EVX, unlike other idiot companies, they take in code changes and code requests seriously. We had issues outside of their support, and asked if we could get some time with snippets of SRC to build a solution that they could roll in, and that was huge. Most companies are scared of this, but its foolish, b/c if you shun your customer long enough, he'll find something else. As for NATS, the learning curve is pretty easy, advanced stuff is pretty steep. the more you play, the more you know. They are serious about their support, but they aren't babysitters. Often times I think people want them to admin the program, when they refuse to learn, and that just clogs up the queue. Nothing is 100% un-hackable, un-leakable. Any time you have to interact with something, there is always room for exploits. I'd not suggest anyone judge software on that criteria unless you're willing to take into account how fast they reply. We sent NATS for example a found exploit on Approval Pages, they fixed it for all clients within 3 hours and sent out an update ticket to all to run the file fix.