A Personal Plee From Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

cam_girls · 11-19-2011, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErectMedia

All they would have to do is throw affiliate links to shit they use in the footer.

Domain Registration Provided By: GoDaddy.com

Web Hosting/Servers Provided By:

etc...

not really advertising if you're only promoting shit you actually use and are happy with. I do this on a few sites and make referrals and with their page views a few footer text links wouldn't kill anyone and would probably do quite well. Waiting on my 10% consulting fee.

no but that was! http://affiliate.godaddy.com/redirect/49A1A2758..

PAY PER EDIT! $1 / WORD

You change a paragraph, pay $100.

someone changes it back - another $100

RAKE IT IN!

porno jew · 11-19-2011, 09:41 PM

CyberHustler · 11-19-2011, 09:44 PM

stocktrader23 · 11-19-2011, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErectMedia

All they would have to do is throw affiliate links to shit they use in the footer.

Domain Registration Provided By: GoDaddy.com

Web Hosting/Servers Provided By:

etc...

not really advertising if you're only promoting shit you actually use and are happy with. I do this on a few sites and make referrals and with their page views a few footer text links wouldn't kill anyone and would probably do quite well. Waiting on my 10% consulting fee.

I think you're the first person to think of this. I bet they'd make 50 million per year with GoDaddy referrals!

redwhiteandblue · 11-20-2011, 05:20 AM

I'll give them money in return for a link...

ErectMedia · 11-20-2011, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cam_girls

no but that was! http://affiliate.godaddy.com/redirect/49A1A2758..

PAY PER EDIT! $1 / WORD

You change a paragraph, pay $100.

someone changes it back - another $100

RAKE IT IN!

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23

I think you're the first person to think of this. I bet they'd make 50 million per year with GoDaddy referrals!

I know I make a bit from my sites and with their page views not sure about 50 million but I think it would be substantial.

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue

I'll give them money in return for a link...

ditto

czarina · 11-20-2011, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint

I think he should turn it into a tube

he would get better google rankings.

Jel · 11-20-2011, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler

I hate wikipedia's edit-nazis. I go in and try to correct something that is obviously wrong, I even cite my credible references and sources... them fuckers change it back and ban me instantly. All the time. I go in and add "and she was a proud lesbian" on a famous straight actress's wiki page and it stays there for a long time.

I built a site for a local community service, the previous site, linked to by wikipedia is no longer online, so I edited the link to the new one.

Deleted, and old one put back up as the link by the editor.

Go back, add the live site, with a note that the old link goes 404

New link deleted, old link still up, IP banned.

Fuckwads.

Anyway, they should stop being so pretentious, put up ads instead of asking for donations, and at least give:

users something they might be interested in to click on
advertisers a chance to give wikipedia users something they may find useful

End result is the same as asking for donations, but with millions of people gaining an extra benefit(s).

cam_girls · 11-20-2011, 09:08 AM

Can a (not tiny) site pay it's hosting bill with a link to the webhost in the footer, in general? It's not a video site.

It's a publicity stunt to put a face to Wiki. Who on Earth needs that many mug shots plastered all over the freakin internet?

jimmycooper · 11-20-2011, 09:39 AM

After reading this thread, I've decided that I will not be accepting donations.

Barry-xlovecam · 11-20-2011, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Thank you for your support. Read about why other donors ...

Wikipedia is generally more accurate than FauxNewsSpeak and my cable company pays a $1? a month for that crap ...

VikingMan · 11-20-2011, 10:39 AM

It takes a special kind of sheep to donate money to help the wolves. Gotta love the constant groveling by Mr Wales as he knows well the psychological profiles of his targets.

porno jew · 11-20-2011, 10:51 AM

the world is a better place with wikipedia then without. only immature faggots hate it because it's not perfect or see conspiracy under every bed.

J. Falcon · 11-24-2011, 11:19 AM

Quote:

From Wikipedia programmer Brandon Harris
I feel like I?m living the first line of my obituary.

I don?t think there will be anything else that I do in my life as important as what I do now for Wikipedia. We?re not just building an encyclopedia, we?re working to make people free. When we have access to free knowledge, we are better people. We understand the world is bigger than us, and we become infected with tolerance and understanding.

Wikipedia is the 5th most visited website in the world. I work at the small non-profit that keeps it on the web. We don?t run ads because doing so would sacrifice our independence. The site is not and should never be a propaganda tool.

Our work is possible because of donations from our readers. Will you help protect Wikipedia by donating $5, ?10, ¥1000 or whatever you can afford?

I work at the Wikimedia Foundation because everything in my soul tells me it?s the right thing to do. I?ve worked at huge tech companies, doing some job to build some crappy thing that?s designed to steal money from some kid who doesn?t know it. I would come home from work crushed.

You might not know this, but the Wikimedia Foundation operates with a very small staff. Most other top-ten sites have tens of thousands of people and massive budgets. But they produce a fraction of what we pull off with sticks and wire.

When you give to Wikipedia, you?re supporting free knowledge around the world. You?re not only leaving a legacy for your children and for their children, you?re elevating people around the world who have access to this treasure. You?re assuring that one day everyone else will too.

Thank you,

Brandon Harris
Programmer, Wikimedia Foundation

Pay up motherfuckers!

J. Falcon · 11-24-2011, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

It is easy and free to look things up on Wikipedia, so people tend to use it. I know that, for anything I am very informed about, I can tell that Wikipedia is egregiously inaccurate. Their crowd-sourcing system eliminates the accountability which might make it more accurate. No knowledge source is perfect, but that one is particularly bad. Certainly, for anything about currently living people and present day brands, I think the site is an abomination. If people want to pay for quality research, there are better options. For a free one, it sometimes seems more worthwhile than, ya know, nothing.

Van you give some examples of inaccuracy?

cam_girls · 11-24-2011, 11:45 AM

It says PROLOG is a 5GL when it's a 4GL

Quote:

Prolog, OPS5, and Mercury are examples of fifth-generation languages.[citation needed]

i.e. a PROLOG Interpreter is generally written in a 3GL like C, so it's 3+1 GL. (Generation Language)

1GL MACHINE CODE ....F8 01
2GL ASSEMBLY CODE ..LDA 01
3GL DECLARATIVE ... WHILE (x<10) *state how to do
4GL RELATIONAL .... SELECT moon FROM planets *state what to do

each Generation the compiler or interpreter is written in a computer language of the preceding generation.

e.g. you need C (3GL) to write a PROLOG interpreter (4GL)

this is not even mentioned in Wiki they claim language levels are based on code size and levels of abstraction.

TrashyContent · 11-24-2011, 12:03 PM

Manwin should buy it and make it into a tube !

porno jew · 11-24-2011, 12:33 PM

they've run studies where wikipedia is as accurate as, or better than resources like encyclopedias. anyone saying wikipedia is a poor source is generally ignorant. and guess what, if you see an error you can edit it.

Hentaikid · 11-24-2011, 02:08 PM

I lost the link but the donation statistics are online, and they're doing pretty well this year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by *******

It takes a special kind of sheep to donate money to help the wolves.

What are you even talking about?

helterskelter808 · 11-24-2011, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Sanger and Wales were identified as co-founders [of Wikipedia] at least as early as September 2001 by The New York Times. [....] In August [2002], Wales identified himself as "co-founder" of Wikipedia.

In late 2005, Wales edited his own biographical entry on the English Wikipedia [and] removed references to Sanger as the co-founder of Wikipedia. Sanger commented that "having seen edits like this, it does seem that Jimmy is attempting to rewrite history."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales

jrdeware · 11-24-2011, 02:41 PM

I don't see the point of refusing ads, especially if their layout is not too annoying...And you can't compare wikipedia to a park unless we have an internet government that can taxes globally web users adn then fund wikipedia, there's no other way than going capitalist here.

wehateporn · 11-24-2011, 04:12 PM

IMHO there are many far more worthy causes than Wikipedia

Jimmy should have kept his adult site running to fund Wikipedia

11-20-2011, 05:20 AM	#55
redwhiteandblue Bollocks Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Bollocks Posts: 2,792	I'll give them money in return for a link... __________________ Interserver unmanaged AMD Ryzen servers from $73.00

11-20-2011, 09:39 AM	#60
jimmycooper Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2010 Location: Manhattan Posts: 4,016	After reading this thread, I've decided that I will not be accepting donations. __________________

11-24-2011, 12:03 PM	#67
TrashyContent Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Location: England Posts: 2,155	Hmmm... Manwin should buy it and make it into a tube ! __________________ Trashy Content - High Res Images - HD Video SlutBank.com Home of THOT PORN [email protected] - - Skype - bangbangsteve Great Content Deals Available @ TRASHY CONTENT

11-24-2011, 04:12 PM	#72
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	IMHO there are many far more worthy causes than Wikipedia Jimmy should have kept his adult site running to fund Wikipedia __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing Last edited by wehateporn; 11-24-2011 at 04:19 PM..

11-19-2011, 09:41 PM	#52
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166

11-19-2011, 09:44 PM	#53
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,511

11-20-2011, 09:08 AM	#59
cam_girls So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 2,968	Can a (not tiny) site pay it's hosting bill with a link to the webhost in the footer, in general? It's not a video site. It's a publicity stunt to put a face to Wiki. Who on Earth needs that many mug shots plastered all over the freakin internet?

11-20-2011, 10:39 AM	#62
VikingMan Exploiting human weakness Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: next to a salmon stream Posts: 6,497	It takes a special kind of sheep to donate money to help the wolves. Gotta love the constant groveling by Mr Wales as he knows well the psychological profiles of his targets.

11-20-2011, 10:51 AM	#63
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	the world is a better place with wikipedia then without. only immature faggots hate it because it's not perfect or see conspiracy under every bed.

11-24-2011, 12:33 PM	#68
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	they've run studies where wikipedia is as accurate as, or better than resources like encyclopedias. anyone saying wikipedia is a poor source is generally ignorant. and guess what, if you see an error you can edit it.

11-24-2011, 02:41 PM	#71
jrdeware Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 2	I don't see the point of refusing ads, especially if their layout is not too annoying...And you can't compare wikipedia to a park unless we have an internet government that can taxes globally web users adn then fund wikipedia, there's no other way than going capitalist here.