Which Affiliate Program Software do you prefer? - GoFuckYourself.com

myjah · 12-05-2011, 06:11 AM

When you are deciding to promote a program, what affiliate software do you prefer or trust the most? For example, do you avoid programs that use CCBill or do you shy away from NATS? Is MPA your preference? Discuss....

sponsorpimp · 12-05-2011, 06:19 AM

I don't really care that much as long as the sponsor has a good reputation and pays on time

Fletch XXX · 12-05-2011, 06:20 AM

i was gonna say i like that program software that pays on time, other than that its cool... whatever. LOL

Mutt · 12-05-2011, 06:28 AM

rather promote CCBILL programs, no minimum payouts which for webmasters who promote a lot of programs/sites matters since you might do a couple of sales on a NATS/MPA site and then not do another sale or two for months to reach minimum payout, which means you wait for months to get paid. also a ton of non-CCBILL programs have just closed their doors and said fuck you to affiliates who are owned money. I'm going to trust CCBILL a lot more than somebody I have no clue about who they are and what their situation is who is running a program on NATS/MPA. Of course if a site is really converting and making you money you take the risk and promote it.

some people think CCBILL ratios are much higher/worse than NATS/MPA - i don't see that but know many people who absolutely believe it.

not many CCBILL programs do pay-per-signup which hurts since many webmasters will only be interested in PPS.

roganoli · 12-05-2011, 07:07 AM

ccbill and their amazing rebills!

Nicky · 12-05-2011, 07:22 AM

I prefer nats programs.

myjah · 12-05-2011, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

rather promote CCBILL programs, no minimum payouts which for webmasters who promote a lot of programs/sites matters since you might do a couple of sales on a NATS/MPA site and then not do another sale or two for months to reach minimum payout, which means you wait for months to get paid. also a ton of non-CCBILL programs have just closed their doors and said fuck you to affiliates who are owned money. I'm going to trust CCBILL a lot more than somebody I have no clue about who they are and what their situation is who is running a program on NATS/MPA. Of course if a site is really converting and making you money you take the risk and promote it.

some people think CCBILL ratios are much higher/worse than NATS/MPA - i don't see that but know many people who absolutely believe it.

not many CCBILL programs do pay-per-signup which hurts since many webmasters will only be interested in PPS.

Are there certain aspects of CCBill reporting that you would improve upon?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky

I prefer nats programs.

Is there something specific about NATS you prefer? Detailed stats? User Interface? Etc?

C4W · 12-05-2011, 09:31 AM

Nats is nice for its backend. Great stats options.

you-big-dummy · 12-05-2011, 09:32 AM

Nats program! `

Roald · 12-05-2011, 09:39 AM

Just for the software NATS.

Best interface. I hate the whole ccbill system.

stocktrader23 · 12-05-2011, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

rather promote CCBILL programs, no minimum payouts which for webmasters who promote a lot of programs/sites matters since you might do a couple of sales on a NATS/MPA site and then not do another sale or two for months to reach minimum payout, which means you wait for months to get paid. also a ton of non-CCBILL programs have just closed their doors and said fuck you to affiliates who are owned money. I'm going to trust CCBILL a lot more than somebody I have no clue about who they are and what their situation is who is running a program on NATS/MPA. Of course if a site is really converting and making you money you take the risk and promote it.

some people think CCBILL ratios are much higher/worse than NATS/MPA - i don't see that but know many people who absolutely believe it.

not many CCBILL programs do pay-per-signup which hurts since many webmasters will only be interested in PPS.

I've had bad luck with CCBill going back 6 or 7 years ago. Also, my own card was declined there when I tested it. Epoch bills for StreamMate and I know for a fact that approve damn near any credit card on earth with no problems so I would think true ratios, all things equal, would be better with them.

As for CCBill programs not doing PPS, hard to pay the big bucks when you can't shave.

rogueteens · 12-05-2011, 10:29 AM

i prefer ccbill, i dont want to end up with loads of Nats programmes that'll never reach payout

femdomdestiny · 12-05-2011, 10:48 AM

yes, happened to me for years. Not only nats, but all those programs with their own payment methods...fuck them, always some virtual money there, non stop checking of sales to see is minimum reached, then waiting for their pay period...shit.real pain in the ass.
I am going with ccbill because all sales are going to one account.

epitome · 12-05-2011, 10:51 AM

These days any smart program would use NATS to run both a CCBill program and a traditional one. Those that don't trust payouts will use the CCBill side while others will use the traditional side.

over38 · 12-05-2011, 12:14 PM

Yep, offer NATS and CCbill either seperate or intergrated

Phoenix · 12-05-2011, 12:16 PM

my own custom.

signupdamnit · 12-05-2011, 12:34 PM

It's not the software it's the owners of the company and the people who speak for them. I run a search here (unless I already know) and read some of the posts from the owners and their reps (Attitudes often trickle down) to see how they view affiliates and the industry as well as their general character. I often find myself going with my gut about a company. I've been in the industry since before 2000 and even now I've only ever been stiffed on a payment one time and that was when I first started. So I must be doing something right.

Overall I like a 100% ccbill program best because there are less things to worry about not to mention the minimum payment and payment delay issues being eliminated. But I know for a fact even ccbill sponsors can and do cheat affiliates. Based on stats alone I like nats 4.1+. It's miles ahead of anything else I've seen and there have been some major improvements in recent versions.

icymelon · 12-05-2011, 01:08 PM

I'm fine with nats. but I always shy away from ccbill

Obliterating · 12-05-2011, 02:16 PM

check sig

trevesty · 12-06-2011, 01:33 PM

NATS.

Sam - Mr. Skin · 12-06-2011, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald

Just for the software NATS.

Best interface. I hate the whole ccbill system.

Sam - Mr. Skin · 12-06-2011, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roganoli

ccbill and their amazing rebills!

What does ccbill have to do with retention? I could see them having some sort of impact on initial joins based on different scrubbing methods etc, but how are they impacting rebills in any major way? If you promote a crappy site that uses ccbill are your rebills going to be good...no.

12-05-2011, 06:11 AM	#1
myjah Back in the harbor Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 11,482	Which Affiliate Program Software do you prefer? When you are deciding to promote a program, what affiliate software do you prefer or trust the most? For example, do you avoid programs that use CCBill or do you shy away from NATS? Is MPA your preference? Discuss.... __________________ VP of Marketing AVN Media Network Skype: AVNJill [email protected]

12-05-2011, 06:19 AM	#2
sponsorpimp Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,567	I don't really care that much as long as the sponsor has a good reputation and pays on time __________________

12-05-2011, 06:20 AM	#3
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	i was gonna say i like that program software that pays on time, other than that its cool... whatever. LOL __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

12-05-2011, 06:28 AM	#4
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	rather promote CCBILL programs, no minimum payouts which for webmasters who promote a lot of programs/sites matters since you might do a couple of sales on a NATS/MPA site and then not do another sale or two for months to reach minimum payout, which means you wait for months to get paid. also a ton of non-CCBILL programs have just closed their doors and said fuck you to affiliates who are owned money. I'm going to trust CCBILL a lot more than somebody I have no clue about who they are and what their situation is who is running a program on NATS/MPA. Of course if a site is really converting and making you money you take the risk and promote it. some people think CCBILL ratios are much higher/worse than NATS/MPA - i don't see that but know many people who absolutely believe it. not many CCBILL programs do pay-per-signup which hurts since many webmasters will only be interested in PPS. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

12-05-2011, 07:22 AM	#6
Nicky Judge Jury and Executioner Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 30,069	I prefer nats programs. __________________ gfynicky @ gmail.com

12-05-2011, 07:07 AM	#5
roganoli Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 757	ccbill and their amazing rebills!

12-05-2011, 09:31 AM	#8
C4W Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 699	Nats is nice for its backend. Great stats options. __________________ Boost your site with these quality deals. Buy Quality Links Deal 1 - Buy Quality Links Deal 2 - Buy Quality Links Deal 3

12-05-2011, 09:32 AM	#9
you-big-dummy So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Dallas, Texas Posts: 320	Nats program! `

12-05-2011, 09:39 AM	#10
Roald SecretFriends.com Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: IMC Headquarters Posts: 27,882	Just for the software NATS. Best interface. I hate the whole ccbill system. __________________ WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME ClubSweethearts \| ManUpFilms \| SinfulXXX \| HOT * AdultPrime * HOT Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com \| telegram: roaldr

12-05-2011, 10:29 AM	#12
rogueteens So fucking bland Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: England Posts: 8,005	i prefer ccbill, i dont want to end up with loads of Nats programmes that'll never reach payout __________________ Free traffic and backlinks from one of the fastest growing adult pinsites on the net - SAUCY PICTURES! Easily my best performing webcam sponsor - CLICK HERE!!

12-05-2011, 10:48 AM	#13
femdomdestiny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 5,173	yes, happened to me for years. Not only nats, but all those programs with their own payment methods...fuck them, always some virtual money there, non stop checking of sales to see is minimum reached, then waiting for their pay period...shit.real pain in the ass. I am going with ccbill because all sales are going to one account. __________________ Femdom Destiny -------------------------------------------- ICQ: 463-630-426 email: webmaster(at)femdomdestiny.com

12-05-2011, 10:51 AM	#14
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	These days any smart program would use NATS to run both a CCBill program and a traditional one. Those that don't trust payouts will use the CCBill side while others will use the traditional side.

12-05-2011, 12:14 PM	#15
over38 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: USA Posts: 460	Yep, offer NATS and CCbill either seperate or intergrated __________________ Mainstream Blazing Fast SSD WordPress Hosting As Low As $4.97/month! USA Based Support !

12-05-2011, 12:16 PM	#16
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	my own custom. __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

12-05-2011, 12:34 PM	#17
signupdamnit Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 6,697	It's not the software it's the owners of the company and the people who speak for them. I run a search here (unless I already know) and read some of the posts from the owners and their reps (Attitudes often trickle down) to see how they view affiliates and the industry as well as their general character. I often find myself going with my gut about a company. I've been in the industry since before 2000 and even now I've only ever been stiffed on a payment one time and that was when I first started. So I must be doing something right. Overall I like a 100% ccbill program best because there are less things to worry about not to mention the minimum payment and payment delay issues being eliminated. But I know for a fact even ccbill sponsors can and do cheat affiliates. Based on stats alone I like nats 4.1+. It's miles ahead of anything else I've seen and there have been some major improvements in recent versions.

12-05-2011, 01:08 PM	#18
icymelon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 3,220	I'm fine with nats. but I always shy away from ccbill __________________ Network Of Adult Blogs With Hardlink Rentals Available

12-05-2011, 02:16 PM	#19
Obliterating Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: wut Posts: 131	check sig __________________ Buy & Sell Ads on The Most Sexy Advertising Network on the Planet available ad spots \| sign up now Join now Check our tube for ideas and then press JOIN NOW for 2:10 convertion ratio

12-06-2011, 01:33 PM	#20
trevesty Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Midwest Posts: 3,804	NATS.