Congrats to North Korea - GoFuckYourself.com

Rochard · 02-06-2016, 08:55 PM

Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

SBJ · 02-06-2016, 09:00 PM

congrats to the winners

muthisdev · 02-07-2016, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

Difference being: North Korea's missles can't make it to the moon.
More like 50s tech.

Sarn · 02-07-2016, 05:22 AM

now they have a full-fledged nuclear weapons delivery vehicles.
and of nuclear weapons

KCNA

directfiesta · 02-07-2016, 06:03 AM

was a '' satellite '' ....

Grapesoda · 02-07-2016, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

we managed to fuck japan with vacuum tubes, nk can probably fuck us with transistors

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s.

Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology.

To be fair, many of so-called developed countries had no such a technology even now. Also even the USA have lost the Apollo techs long time ago (when it's creator Wernher Von Braun has died). When exactly the US astronaut has been sent to the orbit by the US-made rocket and got back alive?

yuu.design · 02-07-2016, 06:24 AM

hahhaha, mean guy :P

Sarn · 02-07-2016, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

was a '' satellite '' ....

are you sure?

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

was a '' satellite '' ....

What's the difference? A a nuclear warhead is also a satellite. This video shows launch of a commercial satellite by a military mobile ICBM launch system:

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 07:21 AM

Barry-xlovecam · 02-07-2016, 07:40 AM

We can wait until they try to nuke Japan I guess ...

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

We can wait until they try to nuke Japan I guess ...

The question is: what for? What profit NK will gain of nuking Japan?

Black All Through · 02-07-2016, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muthisdev

Difference being: North Korea's missles can't make it to the moon.
More like 50s tech.

Sarn · 02-07-2016, 08:18 AM

adultchatpay · 02-07-2016, 08:39 AM

There goes the missle that could feed millions of North Koreans.

Rochard · 02-07-2016, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

To be fair, many of so-called developed countries had no such a technology even now. Also even the USA have lost the Apollo techs long time ago (when it's creator Wernher Von Braun has died). When exactly the US astronaut has been sent to the orbit by the US-made rocket and got back alive?

Seems we are planning on going back to the moon in the next few years...

NASA to Unveil Plans to Send 4 Astronauts to Moon in 2018
NASA's Orion Crew Module Arrives in Florida to Prep for 2018 Flight

Rob · 02-07-2016, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

We can wait until they try to nuke Japan I guess ...

They would Nuke South Korea before they went after Japan.

Sarn · 02-07-2016, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Seems we are planning on going back to the moon in the next few years...

NASA to Unveil Plans to Send 4 Astronauts to Moon in 2018
NASA's Orion Crew Module Arrives in Florida to Prep for 2018 Flight

how's this device with the people landed on the moon and fly away back

if on the erth after all the tests you can return only once a rocket, other attempts have failed, and it was without people

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Seems we are planning on going back to the moon in the next few years...

NASA to Unveil Plans to Send 4 Astronauts to Moon in 2018
NASA's Orion Crew Module Arrives in Florida to Prep for 2018 Flight

I've seen many similar announces within last few years from the USA, Russia and even China, but I don't think it will happen in 2018, 2025 or 2030. First of all, the States have no rocket technologies for a new Moon mission. Forget about the Apollo project, because the technology was completely lost. Even the latest Mars mission (Curiosity) would be possible because of this: RD-180.

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn

how's this device with the people landed on the moon and fly away back

I know good English, bad English, terrible English and Sarn English. Type in Russian please, so at least about 1/3 of GFY members (including me of course) will be able to read your posts. A 1/3 is better than nobody.

Sarn · 02-07-2016, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I know good English, bad English, terrible English and Sarn English. Type in Russian please, so at least about 1/3 of GFY members (including me of course) will be able to read your posts. A 1/3 is better than nobody.

device = the lunar module, it works on the same principle as the missiles develops in spacex.
landing from Apollo station and return back
Apollo Lunar Module - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PS:educational so bad

PSS:
-burrito
-FFff..FUck

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn

device = the lunar module, it works on the same principle as the missiles develops in spacex.
landing from Apollo station and return back
Apollo Lunar Module - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So? What's wrong with the lunar module? Dude, it has nothing to do with SpaceX rockets or any others. Go back to school and learn physics already. There is no atmosphere on the Moon, so the lunar module don't need to have a streamlined body, it won't be affected by a windage, it doesn't need to be pressurized and so on. Also the Moon gravitation is only 16% of the Earth's one, so an average human can easily do 6 meter high jumps there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn

PS:educational so bad

Yep, your education sux so bad. I bet your teacher of physics was even worse than the English one.

Barry-xlovecam · 02-07-2016, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob

They would Nuke South Korea before they went after Japan.

Too close, they might be downwind in the weather changes.

SAMANTAmax · 02-07-2016, 11:21 AM

They are 5steps ahead of every nation

dyna mo · 02-07-2016, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I've seen many similar announces within last few years from the USA, Russia and even China, but I don't think it will happen in 2018, 2025 or 2030. First of all, the States have no rocket technologies for a new Moon mission. Forget about the Apollo project, because the technology was completely lost. Even the latest Mars mission (Curiosity) would be possible because of this: RD-180.

Nitwit, NASA just finished final tests of the rs-25 made in the USA rocket engines for mars. Or the fucking moon, whichever one we fucking want to go to while rosskiez try and figure out how to buy gasoline.

Sarn · 02-07-2016, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

So? What's wrong with the lunar module? Dude, it has nothing to do with SpaceX rockets or any others. Go back to school and learn physics already. There is no atmosphere on the Moon, so the lunar module don't need to have a streamlined body, it won't be affected by a windage, it doesn't need to be pressurized and so on. Also the Moon gravitation is only 16% of the Earth's one, so an average human can easily do 6 meter high jumps there.
Yep, your education sux so bad. I bet your teacher of physics was even worse than the English one.

everyone understands that this is not the same. lunar module not SpaceX rockets.
everyone understands that the parameters are different from the earth and the moon.
but the development of such a module for another planet with unknown parameters(atmosphere, gravitation etc...) on the distance which 384 400 km - is much more difficult than in the calculation of which is being developed here on earth.
for earth the task much easier, if you have these settlements. and they must to be if you really be fly to the moon.

SekobA · 02-07-2016, 12:52 PM

I remember they won the world cup soccer

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn

but the development of such a module for another planet with unknown parameters(atmosphere, gravitation etc...) on the distance which 384 400 km - is much more difficult than in the calculation of which is being developed here on earth.
for earth the task much easier, if you have these settlements. and they must to be if you really be fly to the moon.

Jeez. Moon is not a planet. The Moon manures are very easy (a Newtonian physics was taught to every Soviet 7th grader) and they are not even comparable with the Earth ones. I've made my first scientific lunar landing simulator when I was 12 year old. In fact, it was pretty simple suing standard formulas.

baddog · 02-07-2016, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muthisdev

Difference being: North Korea's missles can't make it to the moon.
More like 50s tech.

The difference really being, they're not trying to go to the moon. All they need to do is make it to LA.

Rochard · 02-07-2016, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

First of all, the States have no rocket technologies for a new Moon mission. =

The United States is the only country who has ever landed a man on the moon. What makes you think we do not have the technology to do it again?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Forget about the Apollo project, because the technology was completely lost.

We lost that technology? Did we not write things down? I'm pretty sure we most likely still have the parts laying around some where.

MaDalton · 02-07-2016, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

The difference really being, they're not trying to go to the moon. All they need to do is make it to LA.

considering LA traffic you have plenty of time for counter measures

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

The United States is the only country who has ever landed a man on the moon.

No, that was done by German Nazis, bot by you. The USA were involved as founders and cannon fodder (for example, the evil Soviets had used dogs for the similar purpose).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

What makes you think we do not have the technology to do it again?

A simple fact: the States are not able to build it again after Von Braun's death. If you think they can, please post the proof.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

We lost that technology? Did we not write things down? I'm pretty sure we most likely still have the parts laying around some where.

Man, that's not as simple as you think. Nobody can just read a book to repeat the German Moon program (actually I have a doubt that "book" does still exist). The technology was completely lost together with a death of its creator. That's why you have to buy Russian space engines for your super-puper high-tech rockets in 21th century. Why don't you use the Apollo tech? I'll tell it to you: it was completely lost.

Sednub997 · 02-07-2016, 02:35 PM

They lended on the sun

xXXtesy10 · 02-07-2016, 03:07 PM

Sarn · 02-07-2016, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Jeez. Moon is not a planet. The Moon manures are very easy (a Newtonian physics was taught to every Soviet 7th grader) and they are not even comparable with the Earth ones. I've made my first scientific lunar landing simulator when I was 12 year old. In fact, it was pretty simple suing standard formulas.

planet-satellite, satellite - it Moon! all know this

in Soviet schools not taught to think - only to teach written postulates of the Communist leaders.

that's what those guys with a notebook wrote - that this delirium taught in Soviet schools.
your simulator - shit has no relation to reality.
I repeat once again for idiots - landing on the moon is much harder and more expensive.

Rochard · 02-07-2016, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

A simple fact: the States are not able to build it again after Von Braun's death. If you think they can, please post the proof.

You mean, other than the space shuttle?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Man, that's not as simple as you think. Nobody can just read a book to repeat the German Moon program (actually I have a doubt that "book" does still exist). The technology was completely lost together with a death of its creator. That's why you have to buy Russian space engines for your super-puper high-tech rockets in 21th century. Why don't you use the Apollo tech? I'll tell it to you: it was completely lost.

There was no "German moon program". I know all about Von Braun's and what a handful of Germans did, but this was only a portion of the technology. I just finished reading "Apollo" by Bly Cox and Charles Murray, and also "Failure is not an option" by Gene Kranz - This was an American effort by thousands if not tens of thousands of American engineers...

I know you thin Russia is so great... For me... If Russia was to put boots on the moon tonight I was stay up all night watching it on TV because I would be so excited. I don't care who does it - The US, China Russia, - I just want mankind to move forward and I would be excited no matter who did it.

just a punk · 02-07-2016, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

You mean, other than the space shuttle?

Space shuttles? The USA made 6 space shuttles. Two of them (1/3) have exploded and killed off all their crews. It doesn't sound good enough even for a 3rd-world technology, isn't it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

There was no "German moon program". I know all about Von Braun's and what a handful of Germans did, but this was only a portion of the technology. I just finished reading "Apollo" by Bly Cox and Charles Murray, and also "Failure is not an option" by Gene Kranz - This was an American effort by thousands if not tens of thousands of American engineers...

There was a German Moon program. Von Braun and his Nazi guys did it. Now he's dead and there is no Moon for the States anymore. Your modern super-puper rockets explode in 50% of cases. Admit it already.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I know you thin Russia is so great...

I didn't say that. I've just mentioned a well-known fact: the USA have no reliable rocket technologies and they have to use the Russian ones.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

For me... If Russia was to put boots on the moon tonight I was stay up all night watching it on TV because I would be so excited. I don't care who does it

A first creature in space was a dog. Not some American guy, and not a Russian one. It was a dog. Does it mean that dogs won the space race? The same can be applied to Americans. Von Braun and his Nazi crew just used Americans to see if they will survive on the Moon or not. It's just like Soviets were using dogs in their experiments. Dogs were always first and humans were second.

LovinNothin · 02-08-2016, 06:16 AM

Doesn't matter how slow they are progressing, the fact is, they are progressing and it's just a matter of time before they do something really stupid.

Sarn · 02-08-2016, 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LovinNothin

Doesn't matter how slow they are progressing, the fact is, they are progressing and it's just a matter of time before they do something really stupid.

I do not believe that it is their research and development.
it is very hard work.

malcolme polo · 02-08-2016, 09:01 AM

Going to watch The Interview again

Horatio Caine · 02-08-2016, 11:48 AM

JFK · 02-08-2016, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultchatpay

There goes the missle that could feed millions of North Koreans.

The "Dear Leader" is well fed, that's all that matters

Piper Blush · 02-08-2016, 01:11 PM

Great for them, they now have one satellite alone in space! It won't be long for that this satellite to 'accidentally' stop functioning.

02-06-2016, 08:55 PM	#1
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,340	Congrats to North Korea Seems North Korea claims it launched a long range missile today. The pictures were very cute, reminded me of the Apollo missions in the 1960s. Congrats to North Korea for having 1960s technology. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

02-06-2016, 09:00 PM	#2
SBJ So Fucking Fabulous Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Indiana Posts: 11,374	congrats to the winners __________________ Chaturbate - Make tons of money from Cams! *Name Silo - Domains under $9 and free ID protect*

02-07-2016, 06:24 AM	#8
yuu.design Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Argentina Posts: 25,924	hahhaha, mean guy :P __________________ Beautiful And Usable Web Design Creations For The Adult Industry Since 2003 I'm Yuu, Designer and Content Producer Paysites - Affiliate Programs - Dating & Cam Sites - Mainstream Projects - Tube Sites - Banners - Wordpress Themes - NATs integration - Landing Pages Check my Portfolio and Content Production Offers

02-07-2016, 07:21 AM	#11
just a punk So fuckin' bored Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 32,382	__________________ Obey the Cowgod

02-07-2016, 11:21 AM	#25
SAMANTAmax TieMeUp Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Home Posts: 7,043	They are 5steps ahead of every nation __________________ 1million $ in a Month

02-07-2016, 05:22 AM	#4
Sarn Say for stagnation Yes!!1 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 11,139	now they have a full-fledged nuclear weapons delivery vehicles. and of nuclear weapons KCNA

02-07-2016, 06:03 AM	#5
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Punta Cana, DR Posts: 29,587	was a '' satellite '' ....

02-07-2016, 07:40 AM	#12
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	We can wait until they try to nuke Japan I guess ...

02-07-2016, 08:18 AM	#15
Sarn Say for stagnation Yes!!1 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 11,139

02-07-2016, 08:39 AM	#16
adultchatpay Let's Make Money Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 8,784	There goes the missle that could feed millions of North Koreans.

02-07-2016, 12:52 PM	#28
SekobA Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 567721649 Posts: 12,157	I remember they won the world cup soccer __________________ Best Affiliate Program Available Start Promoting 25% REV-SHARE

02-07-2016, 02:35 PM	#34
Sednub997 Naked in my bathroom Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Europe Posts: 6,129	They lended on the sun __________________ X10 FANS PLAFORM - 3 IN 1 LIVE CAMS/FANS/MEMBERSHIP CMS CONTENT MANAGEMENT, MONETIZATION AND PUBLISHING PLATFORM 17 YEARS WITH 1000'S OF CLIENTS SCALABLE - ENTERPRISE-READY - MULTI-LANG

02-07-2016, 03:07 PM	#35
xXXtesy10 Fakecoin Investor Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: New Delhi, IN Posts: 7,127	__________________ WARNING: Stay Away From Marlboroack aka aka Brandon Ackerman https://gfy.com/21169705-post8.html Donny Long is Felon, Stalker, Scammer & Coward http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/...lon-int-761244

02-08-2016, 06:16 AM	#39
LovinNothin So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2015 Posts: 565	Doesn't matter how slow they are progressing, the fact is, they are progressing and it's just a matter of time before they do something really stupid.

02-08-2016, 09:01 AM	#41
malcolme polo Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 33	Going to watch The Interview again

02-08-2016, 11:48 AM	#42
Horatio Caine full-time aspiring rapper Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Compton, CA Posts: 5,746

02-08-2016, 01:11 PM	#44
Piper Blush Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: Montreal, Qc Posts: 49	Great for them, they now have one satellite alone in space! It won't be long for that this satellite to 'accidentally' stop functioning.